Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
This episode includes AI-generated content.
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Anna: On Friday, a camera the size of a small car
00:00:02 --> 00:00:04 finished cooling to minus
00:00:04 --> 00:00:06 143 degrees Celsius,
00:00:07 --> 00:00:09 a million and a half kilometres from here.
00:00:10 --> 00:00:13 Over the weekend, NASA turned it on and
00:00:13 --> 00:00:14 then it looked at a star.
00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 Avery: The picture is blurry, deliberately,
00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 gloriously blurry. And it is the most
00:00:20 --> 00:00:23 important image the Nancy Grace Roman Space
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24 Telescope will ever take.
00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 Anna: Welcome to Astronomy AstroDailyPod. I'm Anna.
00:00:28 --> 00:00:31 Avery: And I'm avery. It's Wednesday 16th
00:00:31 --> 00:00:34 September 2026. Coming to you from
00:00:34 --> 00:00:34 Sydney.
00:00:35 --> 00:00:38 Anna: Coming up, Roman opens its eye and
00:00:38 --> 00:00:41 finds it has twice as long to look as anyone
00:00:41 --> 00:00:41 planned.
00:00:41 --> 00:00:44 Avery: Caltech says the solar system has an
00:00:44 --> 00:00:47 expiry date and it is very much earlier
00:00:47 --> 00:00:48 than the textbooks say.
00:00:48 --> 00:00:51 Anna: The United States says out loud. And for the
00:00:51 --> 00:00:54 first time that it has weapons in orbit,
00:00:54 --> 00:00:55 Rubin finds a
00:00:55 --> 00:00:58 Avery: globular cluster that was hiding behind a
00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 hundred thousand light years of dust and bad
00:01:00 --> 00:01:01 luck.
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04 Anna: Starship finally has a date and a Venus
00:01:04 --> 00:01:07 that is about to be as bright as it gets.
00:01:07 --> 00:01:08 Avery: Let's get into it.
00:01:09 --> 00:01:10 Anna: Let's start with a telescope we have been
00:01:10 --> 00:01:13 following all the way from the launch pad. On
00:01:13 --> 00:01:16 30 August, we watched the Nancy Grace
00:01:16 --> 00:01:18 Roman Space Telescope leave Kennedy on a
00:01:18 --> 00:01:21 Falcon Heavy. On 1st September, its
00:01:21 --> 00:01:23 Coronagraph Instrument got its first taste of
00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 electrical power. And this week, the main
00:01:26 --> 00:01:29 event, Roman's primary instrument, is awake
00:01:29 --> 00:01:30 and it has seen starlight.
00:01:31 --> 00:01:33 Avery: This is the wide field instrument.
00:01:34 --> 00:01:36 Anna: It is, and it's worth being precise about
00:01:36 --> 00:01:39 what it actually is because the specification
00:01:39 --> 00:01:42 is doing something unusual. It's a 300
00:01:42 --> 00:01:44 megapixel infrared camera built around 18
00:01:44 --> 00:01:47 separate detectors. Its field of view is at
00:01:47 --> 00:01:49 least a hundred times larger than Hubble's
00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 infrared field. The practical way to say that
00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 is in a single exposure.
00:01:54 --> 00:01:57 Roman captures a patch of sky bigger than the
00:01:57 --> 00:01:59 full moon at a sharpness comparable to
00:01:59 --> 00:02:02 Hubble's. Hubble takes exquisite postage
00:02:02 --> 00:02:05 stamps. Roman takes exquisite murals.
00:02:06 --> 00:02:08 Avery: And the activation happened over about four
00:02:08 --> 00:02:08 days.
00:02:09 --> 00:02:12 Anna: It did, and NASA has walked through it step
00:02:12 --> 00:02:14 by step, which I appreciate. On Friday the
00:02:14 --> 00:02:17 11th, the instrument finished cooling to its
00:02:17 --> 00:02:19 operating temperature. Minus
00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 225 Fahrenheit, minus
00:02:21 --> 00:02:24 143 Celsius. Infrared
00:02:24 --> 00:02:27 detectors have to be cold because if they
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29 aren't, the camera sees its own heat instead
00:02:29 --> 00:02:32 of the sky. Then across the 11th and
00:02:32 --> 00:02:35 12th, the team brought up all 18 infrared
00:02:35 --> 00:02:38 detectors and the calibration system. On
00:02:38 --> 00:02:40 the 12th, the element wheel, the carousel
00:02:40 --> 00:02:43 that swings filters and optical elements into
00:02:43 --> 00:02:45 the light path, turned in microgravity for
00:02:45 --> 00:02:46 the first time.
00:02:46 --> 00:02:49 On the 13th, they confirmed the Focus
00:02:49 --> 00:02:51 mechanism moves the way it's supposed to.
00:02:51 --> 00:02:53 Avery: Any one of which could have gone
00:02:53 --> 00:02:55 Anna: wrong, any one of which could have ended the
00:02:55 --> 00:02:58 mission. Frankly, a stuck filter wheel
00:02:58 --> 00:03:00 on an instrument a million and a half
00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 kilometres away is not a thing. You send
00:03:03 --> 00:03:06 somebody up to jiggle and then they pointed
00:03:06 --> 00:03:08 it at stars and took the picture I mentioned
00:03:08 --> 00:03:11 at the top, which is out of focus and
00:03:11 --> 00:03:12 which is exactly right.
00:03:13 --> 00:03:16 Avery: Explain that. Because our new
00:03:16 --> 00:03:19 billion dollar telescope took a blurry photo
00:03:19 --> 00:03:22 is a headline waiting to be misread?
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25 Anna: It is. So let's head it off. You do
00:03:25 --> 00:03:27 not focus an instrument before you know the
00:03:27 --> 00:03:30 detectors work. The order of operations is
00:03:31 --> 00:03:34 prove the detectors respond, prove they
00:03:34 --> 00:03:36 respond uniformly, establish a baseline
00:03:36 --> 00:03:39 and only then start the long fussy business
00:03:39 --> 00:03:42 of focusing a telescope that has been shaken
00:03:42 --> 00:03:44 by a rocket and then allowed to settle in
00:03:44 --> 00:03:47 vacuum. Those defocused stars
00:03:47 --> 00:03:50 smeared across thousands of pixels are a
00:03:50 --> 00:03:53 diagnostic. They tell you the optical path
00:03:53 --> 00:03:56 is clear, every detector is live, and
00:03:56 --> 00:03:58 the light is arriving where the model said it
00:03:58 --> 00:04:01 would. Josh Schlieder, the wide field
00:04:01 --> 00:04:03 instrument scientist at Goddard, put it
00:04:03 --> 00:04:06 plainly. After years of effort building and
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08 testing the instrument on the ground, they
00:04:08 --> 00:04:10 now have confirmation that it is operational
00:04:10 --> 00:04:11 in space.
00:04:11 --> 00:04:14 Sharp science images are expected by early
00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 2027 and the coronagraph
00:04:17 --> 00:04:20 progressing. The team at Caltech and IPAC
00:04:20 --> 00:04:22 have completed initial communications,
00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 testing software, thermal systems,
00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 mechanisms, cameras, avionics, all, all
00:04:27 --> 00:04:30 responding. It's now sitting through 30 day
00:04:30 --> 00:04:32 decontamination cycles at room temperature
00:04:32 --> 00:04:35 about 22 degrees to bake off any
00:04:35 --> 00:04:37 contaminants before it gets cold and precise.
00:04:38 --> 00:04:40 That's the instrument we talked about on the
00:04:40 --> 00:04:42 6th, the technology demonstrator. That's
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44 meant to prove we can block a star's light
00:04:44 --> 00:04:47 well enough to photograph a planet beside it.
00:04:47 --> 00:04:50 Avery: Okay, but the thing that actually made me sit
00:04:50 --> 00:04:53 up this week wasn't the first light. It was
00:04:53 --> 00:04:53 the fuel.
00:04:54 --> 00:04:56 Anna: It's the better storey. And it landed the day
00:04:56 --> 00:04:59 before. On Monday the 14th, NASA
00:04:59 --> 00:05:01 published the numbers from Roman's first mid
00:05:01 --> 00:05:04 course correction. The burn that fine tunes
00:05:04 --> 00:05:06 the trajectory out to the second Lagrange
00:05:06 --> 00:05:09 point. That burn was better than 99%
00:05:09 --> 00:05:12 accurate. It used under 10% of what had
00:05:12 --> 00:05:15 been allocated to it. About 18 kilogrammes
00:05:15 --> 00:05:17 of propellant out of a, uh, 200 kilogramme
00:05:17 --> 00:05:18 budget.
00:05:19 --> 00:05:21 Avery: And accuracy converts directly into fuel.
00:05:22 --> 00:05:24 Anna: Directly. Every kilogramme you don't spend
00:05:24 --> 00:05:27 correcting an error is a kilogramme you can
00:05:27 --> 00:05:30 spend later holding station and pointing. On
00:05:30 --> 00:05:32 top of that, the spacecraft came in lighter
00:05:32 --> 00:05:35 than the maximum it was allowed to be. So it
00:05:35 --> 00:05:36 launched with margin. It was never supposed
00:05:36 --> 00:05:39 to have. Add the accurate first burn,
00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 add the launch margin, add what they expect
00:05:42 --> 00:05:44 from the second burn and the insertion into
00:05:44 --> 00:05:47 orbit around L2. And Jamie Dunn at
00:05:47 --> 00:05:49 Goddard says the quiet part out loud.
00:05:50 --> 00:05:53 Roman has fuel for at least 22 years of
00:05:53 --> 00:05:56 potential science operations against a
00:05:56 --> 00:05:58 design life of 10 five years primary,
00:05:58 --> 00:06:01 five years extended. So this is roughly
00:06:01 --> 00:06:03 double. And here is where I want to be
00:06:03 --> 00:06:06 careful because NASA telescope's life
00:06:06 --> 00:06:08 doubled is going to be everywhere this week
00:06:08 --> 00:06:10 and it needs a caveat attached.
00:06:10 --> 00:06:13 22 years is a fuel figure, it is not a
00:06:13 --> 00:06:16 funding figure and it is not a hardware
00:06:16 --> 00:06:18 figure. Detectors degrade, budgets get
00:06:18 --> 00:06:21 written annually. Fuel is one of several
00:06:21 --> 00:06:23 things that can end a space telescope and
00:06:23 --> 00:06:25 Roman has just removed it from the top of the
00:06:25 --> 00:06:28 list. That's genuinely excellent news.
00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 It is not a promise of 22 years of science.
00:06:32 --> 00:06:34 Avery: Understood. So why does the fuel matter
00:06:35 --> 00:06:37 so much for this particular telescope?
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39 Anna: Because of what Roman was built to measure
00:06:40 --> 00:06:42 and because of what we led with on Monday.
00:06:42 --> 00:06:45 Remember Monday's lead the Australian
00:06:45 --> 00:06:47 led supernova compilation out of the
00:06:47 --> 00:06:50 University of Queensland with ANU and
00:06:50 --> 00:06:53 Swinburne2884
00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 type Ia supernovae Pantheon
00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 and the full dark energy survey five year
00:06:58 --> 00:07:01 sample rebuilt in one framework and a
00:07:01 --> 00:07:04 2.5 to 3.1-sigma preference for
00:07:04 --> 00:07:06 dark energy that changes over time rather
00:07:06 --> 00:07:07 than staying constant.
00:07:08 --> 00:07:11 Avery: Which was tantalising and not conclusive.
00:07:11 --> 00:07:14 Anna: Exactly that. And the reason it wasn't
00:07:14 --> 00:07:17 conclusive is the reason Roman exists. You
00:07:17 --> 00:07:19 are trying to detect a slow drift in a number
00:07:19 --> 00:07:22 and your enemies are sample size and
00:07:22 --> 00:07:24 systematics. Dust host
00:07:24 --> 00:07:27 galaxy properties, the slow accumulation
00:07:27 --> 00:07:29 of small calibration differences between
00:07:29 --> 00:07:32 surveys. Roman attacks all three
00:07:32 --> 00:07:35 Its high latitude Time domain survey about
00:07:35 --> 00:07:37 six months of observing Hunt's Type Ia
00:07:37 --> 00:07:39 supernovae specifically to measure how the
00:07:39 --> 00:07:42 expansion rate has changed. Its high
00:07:42 --> 00:07:45 latitude Wide area survey about 17 months
00:07:45 --> 00:07:48 covers more than 5 square degrees to
00:07:48 --> 00:07:50 probe the origin of cosmic acceleration
00:07:50 --> 00:07:53 through weak gravitational lensing and galaxy
00:07:53 --> 00:07:56 clustering. A completely independent handle
00:07:56 --> 00:07:57 on the same question.
00:07:57 --> 00:08:00 Avery: Two different methods, one telescope, one
00:08:00 --> 00:08:01 calibration.
00:08:01 --> 00:08:04 Anna: Which is the whole point. Monday's paper was
00:08:04 --> 00:08:07 heroic precisely because it had to stitch
00:08:07 --> 00:08:08 together three decades of different
00:08:08 --> 00:08:09 instruments.
00:08:09 --> 00:08:12 Roman gets to skip that problem and now it
00:08:12 --> 00:08:14 gets to do it for 22 years instead of 10.
00:08:15 --> 00:08:17 Which is not just more supernovae. It's a
00:08:17 --> 00:08:20 longer lever arm in time. And in this
00:08:20 --> 00:08:22 measurement the lever arm is everything.
00:08:22 --> 00:08:24 Avery: There's the exoplanet half too.
00:08:25 --> 00:08:27 Anna: There is, and it's extraordinary. The
00:08:27 --> 00:08:30 Galactic bulge time domain survey 15 months
00:08:30 --> 00:08:33 or so, 6 observing seasons imaging the
00:08:33 --> 00:08:36 crowded heart of the Galaxy every 12 minutes,
00:08:36 --> 00:08:39 12.1 minutes, to be exact. That
00:08:39 --> 00:08:41 Cadence is designed to catch gravitational
00:08:41 --> 00:08:44 microlensing events, and it's expected to
00:08:44 --> 00:08:46 find more than a thousand planets on wide
00:08:46 --> 00:08:49 orbits, the cold, distant worlds that transit
00:08:49 --> 00:08:52 surveys are almost blind to, plus something
00:08:52 --> 00:08:54 like a hundred thousand transiting planets as
00:08:54 --> 00:08:55 a bonus.
00:08:55 --> 00:08:58 Avery: And for southern listeners, there's a thread
00:08:58 --> 00:08:59 running through all of this.
00:08:59 --> 00:09:02 Anna: There is, and it's the one I keep coming back
00:09:02 --> 00:09:02 to.
00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 The Dark Energy survey data in Monday's paper
00:09:05 --> 00:09:08 came off the Blanco 4 metre telescope at
00:09:08 --> 00:09:11 Cerro Tololo in Chile. The
00:09:11 --> 00:09:13 compilation was led out of Brisbane. The
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15 accelerating universe result that started
00:09:15 --> 00:09:18 this whole argument was work Brian Schmidt
00:09:18 --> 00:09:20 did at Matt Stromlo outside Canberra.
00:09:21 --> 00:09:23 The question about dark energy got sharpened
00:09:23 --> 00:09:26 in the Southern sky over 30 years by
00:09:26 --> 00:09:29 people working in our half of the world. And
00:09:29 --> 00:09:31 this week the instrument built to settle it
00:09:31 --> 00:09:34 opened its eye, took a deliberately blurry
00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 picture of a star and found out it has twice
00:09:36 --> 00:09:38 as long to look as anyone had planned.
00:09:39 --> 00:09:40 Avery: Not a bad week.
00:09:41 --> 00:09:42 Anna: Not a bad week at all.
00:09:42 --> 00:09:45 Avery: Right, let's talk about how the solar system
00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 ends, because three people at Caltech have
00:09:48 --> 00:09:50 just moved the date forward by about a
00:09:50 --> 00:09:51 billion fold.
00:09:52 --> 00:09:53 Anna: That is an aggressive revision.
00:09:54 --> 00:09:56 Avery: It really is. The paper is by
00:09:56 --> 00:09:59 Constantine Batygin, Jim Fuller and
00:09:59 --> 00:10:01 Fred Watson Adams. It went up on the archive
00:10:01 --> 00:10:04 on Friday the 11th, and it's been accepted by
00:10:04 --> 00:10:07 the Astrophysical Journal Letters. So it's
00:10:07 --> 00:10:10 five days old and peer reviewed, but not yet
00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 in the Journal. I'll flag that as we go.
00:10:13 --> 00:10:15 The title is Terminal Instability of the
00:10:15 --> 00:10:18 Solar System Triggered by Stochastic Solar
00:10:18 --> 00:10:18 Mass Loss.
00:10:19 --> 00:10:20 Anna: Give me the old number first.
00:10:21 --> 00:10:23 Avery: 10 to the 18 years. A billion
00:10:24 --> 00:10:27 billion years. That's the standard estimate
00:10:27 --> 00:10:29 for how long the giant planets Jupiter,
00:10:29 --> 00:10:32 Saturn, Uranus, Neptune hold
00:10:32 --> 00:10:34 their current orbital architecture together.
00:10:35 --> 00:10:37 And it already accounts for the sun losing
00:10:37 --> 00:10:40 mass as it dies, and for the occasional
00:10:40 --> 00:10:43 passing star. It is an absurdly long
00:10:43 --> 00:10:46 time. The universe is 14 billion
00:10:46 --> 00:10:46 years old.
00:10:47 --> 00:10:48 Anna: So what breaks it?
00:10:48 --> 00:10:51 Avery: An assumption nobody was really examining.
00:10:51 --> 00:10:54 That the sun sheds its mass smoothly.
00:10:54 --> 00:10:57 That as it becomes a red giant and then a
00:10:57 --> 00:11:00 white dwarf, it releases material steadily
00:11:00 --> 00:11:03 and symmetrically, like a tyre with a slow
00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 puncture, and the planet's orbits widen
00:11:05 --> 00:11:06 gently in response.
00:11:07 --> 00:11:09 Anna: And that isn't what happens.
00:11:09 --> 00:11:12 Avery: Apparently not. And the evidence comes from
00:11:12 --> 00:11:15 white dwarfs themselves. Measure how
00:11:15 --> 00:11:17 fast white dwarfs are moving and they show
00:11:17 --> 00:11:20 recoil. A kick. A kick means
00:11:20 --> 00:11:23 the mass didn't leave evenly. It left
00:11:23 --> 00:11:25 in discrete, independently directed
00:11:25 --> 00:11:28 ejections. Parcels, not a stream,
00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 each one shoving the star a different way,
00:11:31 --> 00:11:31 and the
00:11:31 --> 00:11:34 Anna: planets are attached to the star's gravity,
00:11:34 --> 00:11:35 so they feel every shove.
00:11:36 --> 00:11:39 Avery: That's the mechanism. The star jitters and
00:11:39 --> 00:11:41 the planet's orbits take a random walk in
00:11:41 --> 00:11:44 response, each ejection nudging them a little
00:11:44 --> 00:11:47 in no particular direction, with the size of
00:11:47 --> 00:11:50 the nudges set by how lumpy the mass loss
00:11:50 --> 00:11:53 is. Do that for long enough and
00:11:53 --> 00:11:55 orbits that were carefully spaced drift into
00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 each other's business. And once giant
00:11:58 --> 00:12:00 planets start perturbing each other in
00:12:00 --> 00:12:03 earnest, the outcome is scattering planets
00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 thrown onto wild orbits or thrown out
00:12:06 --> 00:12:06 altogether.
00:12:07 --> 00:12:08 Anna: What do the simulations give?
00:12:08 --> 00:12:11 Avery: About 40% of the modelled systems are
00:12:11 --> 00:12:13 disrupted or violently scattered because
00:12:14 --> 00:12:16 before the sun even finishes becoming a white
00:12:16 --> 00:12:19 dwarf, and roughly 90%
00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 come apart within about 3 billion years.
00:12:22 --> 00:12:25 After that, the headline number the
00:12:25 --> 00:12:27 dynamical lifetime of the outer solar system
00:12:27 --> 00:12:30 drops from 10 to the 18 years to
00:12:30 --> 00:12:33 somewhere around 1 billion years past white
00:12:33 --> 00:12:34 dwarf formation.
00:12:35 --> 00:12:38 Anna: I want to be clear, for anyone reaching for
00:12:38 --> 00:12:41 the panic button, please, none
00:12:41 --> 00:12:43 Avery: of this is near term anything. The
00:12:43 --> 00:12:46 sun has about 5 billion years of normal
00:12:46 --> 00:12:49 life left and Earth's surface becomes
00:12:49 --> 00:12:51 uninhabitable long before the interesting
00:12:51 --> 00:12:54 part of this paper begins. What it
00:12:54 --> 00:12:57 changes isn't a forecast, it's a
00:12:57 --> 00:12:58 prediction. We can go and cheque.
00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 Meaning, if this is right,
00:13:02 --> 00:13:05 planetary systems around old white dwarfs
00:13:05 --> 00:13:08 should be rarer, more scattered and more
00:13:08 --> 00:13:10 chaotic than the smooth mass loss picture
00:13:10 --> 00:13:13 predicts. We already find white
00:13:13 --> 00:13:16 dwarfs polluted with the debris of shredded
00:13:16 --> 00:13:18 rocky bodies, which tells us something
00:13:18 --> 00:13:21 violent happens out there. This gives
00:13:21 --> 00:13:23 that violence a mechanism and a rate.
00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 And the caveat, the honest one, is
00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 it's a simulation result. And the answer
00:13:30 --> 00:13:33 depends entirely on how granular the mass
00:13:33 --> 00:13:35 loss really is. Big
00:13:36 --> 00:13:38 infrequent parcels give you a very different
00:13:38 --> 00:13:41 system for from small frequent ones.
00:13:41 --> 00:13:44 That granularity is now the number to go and
00:13:44 --> 00:13:47 measure. Which is a nice place for a paper
00:13:47 --> 00:13:50 to end, not with a claim, but with an
00:13:50 --> 00:13:50 assignment.
00:13:51 --> 00:13:54 Anna: Now, a storey that isn't astronomy, but which
00:13:54 --> 00:13:56 sits directly over the sky, we all use.
00:13:57 --> 00:13:59 On Monday, at the opening of the Air and
00:13:59 --> 00:14:02 Space Forces Association's Air, Space and
00:14:02 --> 00:14:04 Cyber Conference at National Harbour in
00:14:04 --> 00:14:06 Maryland, the Secretary of the Air Force,
00:14:06 --> 00:14:09 Troy Meink, said that the United
00:14:09 --> 00:14:12 States now has, in his words, on
00:14:12 --> 00:14:15 orbit space control weapons capable of
00:14:15 --> 00:14:17 defending the joint force against hostile
00:14:17 --> 00:14:19 adversary actions.
00:14:19 --> 00:14:21 Avery: That's the first time that's been said out
00:14:21 --> 00:14:22 loud.
00:14:22 --> 00:14:24 Anna: It is the first public acknowledgment by the
00:14:24 --> 00:14:27 United States military that it has offensive
00:14:27 --> 00:14:30 capability in orbit. And I want to be
00:14:30 --> 00:14:32 precise about what was and wasn't said,
00:14:33 --> 00:14:35 because the gap matters. What was said?
00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 The capability exists, it is on orbit
00:14:39 --> 00:14:41 and it is framed as defensive of the Joint
00:14:41 --> 00:14:44 Force. What was not said, what the
00:14:44 --> 00:14:47 systems are, how many there are, where they
00:14:47 --> 00:14:49 are, when they got there, or what they can
00:14:49 --> 00:14:50 actually do.
00:14:51 --> 00:14:53 Avery: Did anyone define the term?
00:14:53 --> 00:14:55 Anna: A Space Force spokesperson did, and the
00:14:55 --> 00:14:58 definition is broad. Space control, they
00:14:58 --> 00:15:01 said, encapsulates the mission areas required
00:15:01 --> 00:15:03 to contest and control the space domain,
00:15:03 --> 00:15:06 employing kinetic and non kinetic means to
00:15:06 --> 00:15:08 affect adversary capabilities through
00:15:08 --> 00:15:11 disruption, degradation and if
00:15:11 --> 00:15:13 necessary, destruction. So that covers
00:15:13 --> 00:15:16 everything from M jamming a signal to
00:15:16 --> 00:15:18 physically destroying a satellite. And the
00:15:18 --> 00:15:20 statement doesn't tell us where on that
00:15:20 --> 00:15:22 spectrum these systems sit.
00:15:22 --> 00:15:23 Avery: Why say it now?
00:15:23 --> 00:15:26 Anna: That question got answered the following day.
00:15:26 --> 00:15:29 General Douglas Schies, the Chief of Space
00:15:29 --> 00:15:32 Operations, said on Tuesday, I think it
00:15:32 --> 00:15:34 was time that within the Department of War we
00:15:34 --> 00:15:37 talked about it and it's time to talk about
00:15:37 --> 00:15:39 that. We have the capabilities to make sure
00:15:39 --> 00:15:42 that we can do what the Joint Force needs. He
00:15:42 --> 00:15:44 attributed the decision to advances by China
00:15:44 --> 00:15:47 and Russia in anti satellite capability
00:15:47 --> 00:15:49 and said the United States needed to be able
00:15:49 --> 00:15:52 to respond from a position of strength.
00:15:52 --> 00:15:54 Avery: How is that being read?
00:15:54 --> 00:15:57 Anna: Two ways, and I think both are worth hearing.
00:15:57 --> 00:15:59 The deterrence reading is that capability.
00:16:00 --> 00:16:03 Nobody knows about deters. Nobody. That if
00:16:03 --> 00:16:05 the point of a weapon is to make an adversary
00:16:05 --> 00:16:08 decide not to act, the adversary has to
00:16:08 --> 00:16:11 know it exists on that reading. Saying it
00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 out loud is the whole function. The arms
00:16:13 --> 00:16:15 control reading is that public acknowledgment
00:16:15 --> 00:16:18 by the largest space power lowers the
00:16:18 --> 00:16:20 threshold for everyone else, invites
00:16:20 --> 00:16:23 reciprocal declarations and makes the orbital
00:16:23 --> 00:16:26 environment more contested rather than less,
00:16:26 --> 00:16:28 with debris as the physical consequence that
00:16:28 --> 00:16:30 outlives any particular dispute.
00:16:31 --> 00:16:33 Avery: And debris is where this touches us.
00:16:33 --> 00:16:36 Anna: That's the part I'd hold onto. We covered US
00:16:36 --> 00:16:39 Space Command's Apollo manoeuvres exercise
00:16:39 --> 00:16:41 last week. The first live fly orbital
00:16:41 --> 00:16:43 manoeuvre drill with allies including
00:16:43 --> 00:16:46 Australia, under Operation Olympic Defender.
00:16:46 --> 00:16:48 Australia has its own Defence Space Command
00:16:48 --> 00:16:51 and we're part of that framework. But
00:16:51 --> 00:16:53 whatever anybody's strategic view, kinetic
00:16:53 --> 00:16:56 action in low Earth orbit produces debris,
00:16:56 --> 00:16:59 and debris doesn't respect flags. Every
00:16:59 --> 00:17:02 fragment is a hazard to every satellite and
00:17:02 --> 00:17:05 in the long run, to the sky above every
00:17:05 --> 00:17:07 observatory on the ground. We'll keep
00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 reporting this one factually as it develops.
00:17:10 --> 00:17:12 The conference is still running as we record.
00:17:13 --> 00:17:15 Avery: Lets finish the news with something that made
00:17:15 --> 00:17:18 me grin. The Vera Rubin Observatory
00:17:18 --> 00:17:20 has found a globular cluster in our own
00:17:20 --> 00:17:23 galaxy that nobody had ever catalogued.
00:17:23 --> 00:17:26 Anna: In our own galaxy in 2026,
00:17:27 --> 00:17:27 in
00:17:27 --> 00:17:30 Avery: our own galaxy in 2026.
00:17:30 --> 00:17:33 The paper went up on Monday. Lead author
00:17:33 --> 00:17:35 Ashay Pai with William Cerny,
00:17:35 --> 00:17:38 Andrew Pace, Alex Drlica, Wagner and
00:17:38 --> 00:17:40 colleagues across Chicago, Yale,
00:17:41 --> 00:17:43 Dartmouth, Washington and Colorado.
00:17:43 --> 00:17:46 They've named it Rubin GC1. And they
00:17:46 --> 00:17:49 found it in Rubin's early data preview too.
00:17:49 --> 00:17:52 Not even the survey proper. The preview.
00:17:52 --> 00:17:53 Anna: Where was it hiding?
00:17:54 --> 00:17:57 Avery: In the worst possible direction, towards the
00:17:57 --> 00:17:59 galactic bulge. You're looking through the
00:17:59 --> 00:18:02 thickest dust in the galaxy at a field so
00:18:02 --> 00:18:04 crowded with foreground stars that a faint
00:18:04 --> 00:18:07 clump is statistically invisible. Trying to
00:18:07 --> 00:18:09 pick out something that isn't bright to begin
00:18:09 --> 00:18:09 with.
00:18:10 --> 00:18:12 Anna: So it's in the bulge?
00:18:12 --> 00:18:15 Avery: No. And this is the lovely bit. It's
00:18:15 --> 00:18:18 behind it. Rubin GC1 is
00:18:18 --> 00:18:21 about 31 kiloparsecs away. Call it
00:18:21 --> 00:18:24 a hundred thousand light years. That puts it
00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 out in the Milky Way's halo, seen through the
00:18:26 --> 00:18:29 bulge. A, uh, halo object sitting in the most
00:18:29 --> 00:18:31 confusing line of sight we have.
00:18:31 --> 00:18:32 Anna: What is it physically?
00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 Avery: Small and old, half light radius around
00:18:36 --> 00:18:38 5 parsecs. A compact little ball,
00:18:39 --> 00:18:42 absolute magnitude about minus 2.4,
00:18:42 --> 00:18:45 which is faint for a globular. The authors
00:18:45 --> 00:18:47 place it in the faint tail of the globular
00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 cluster. Luminosity function age
00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 about 9.2 billion years.
00:18:52 --> 00:18:54 Moderately metal poor.
00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 Anna: And where did it come from?
00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 Avery: This is my favourite part. They took Gaia's
00:19:00 --> 00:19:03 third day to release proper motions, measured
00:19:03 --> 00:19:05 how the cluster is actually moving through
00:19:05 --> 00:19:08 space and ran the phase space modelling
00:19:08 --> 00:19:10 backwards. The answer that comes out is that
00:19:10 --> 00:19:13 Rubin GC1 was very probably
00:19:13 --> 00:19:15 stripped from the Sagittarius dwarf
00:19:15 --> 00:19:17 spheroidal galaxy, one of the small
00:19:17 --> 00:19:20 galaxies the Milky Way is currently eating.
00:19:21 --> 00:19:23 So it isn't ours originally.
00:19:23 --> 00:19:25 Anna: It's spoils that needs
00:19:25 --> 00:19:26 spectroscopy to confirm.
00:19:26 --> 00:19:29 Avery: Presumably it does, and the
00:19:29 --> 00:19:32 authors say so. That's the next beat,
00:19:32 --> 00:19:34 along with the fact that this is early
00:19:34 --> 00:19:36 preview data, not the full survey.
00:19:36 --> 00:19:39 But step back, because there's a pattern
00:19:39 --> 00:19:41 here. We have now hit four times in a month.
00:19:42 --> 00:19:44 M M74 turned out to be more than twice
00:19:44 --> 00:19:47 its catalogue size. Magnetars
00:19:47 --> 00:19:50 turned out to be half of all neutron stars,
00:19:50 --> 00:19:53 rather than 1%. Mercury turned
00:19:53 --> 00:19:55 out to have shrunk up to 30% more than we
00:19:55 --> 00:19:58 thought. And now a globular cluster a
00:19:58 --> 00:20:00 hundred thousand light years away turns out
00:20:00 --> 00:20:02 to have been sitting in our catalogue's blind
00:20:02 --> 00:20:04 spot the whole time.
00:20:04 --> 00:20:07 Anna: Catalogues are detection limits, not
00:20:07 --> 00:20:08 censuses.
00:20:08 --> 00:20:11 Avery: That's the line and it keeps being true.
00:20:12 --> 00:20:14 This cluster wasn't missing because it's far
00:20:14 --> 00:20:17 away. Plenty of catalogued globulars are.
00:20:17 --> 00:20:20 Further, it was missing because it's faint
00:20:20 --> 00:20:22 and behind dust and, and in a crowded
00:20:22 --> 00:20:25 direction. Three handicaps stacked on
00:20:25 --> 00:20:28 each other. Ruben removed enough of the first
00:20:28 --> 00:20:29 to overcome the other two.
00:20:30 --> 00:20:32 Anna: And Ruben is on Cerro Pachon in
00:20:32 --> 00:20:35 Avery: Chile in our half of the sky.
00:20:35 --> 00:20:37 And two names on that author list are, uh,
00:20:38 --> 00:20:40 old friends of this programme. Nora Shipp
00:20:40 --> 00:20:43 was on the Stellar Streams paper we led with
00:20:43 --> 00:20:46 on the 7th. Alex Drelika Wagner
00:20:46 --> 00:20:48 is a dark energy survey scientist. Which
00:20:48 --> 00:20:50 ties straight back to Monday.
00:20:51 --> 00:20:53 Same small community, same southern
00:20:53 --> 00:20:55 telescopes. Three different questions.
00:20:56 --> 00:20:59 Anna: We've ended three recent leads with wait for
00:20:59 --> 00:20:59 Rubin.
00:21:00 --> 00:21:03 Avery: Stellar Streams, the Trans Neptunian Objects
00:21:03 --> 00:21:05 and Monday's dark energy result.
00:21:06 --> 00:21:08 This is the first instalment on that promise
00:21:08 --> 00:21:10 and it came out of a data preview.
00:21:11 --> 00:21:13 Rubin hasn't really started yet.
00:21:14 --> 00:21:16 Anna: Next up, a quick hit. And it's an update to
00:21:16 --> 00:21:18 something we left unresolved Yesterday.
00:21:19 --> 00:21:21 Starship Flight 14 has a firm date.
00:21:22 --> 00:21:24 Finally, finally.
00:21:24 --> 00:21:26 Yesterday we had to carry two dates and a
00:21:26 --> 00:21:28 caveat. An FAA advisory showing the
00:21:28 --> 00:21:31 18th reporting pointing to the 22nd
00:21:31 --> 00:21:33 and no formal word from SpaceX.
00:21:34 --> 00:21:36 SpaceX has now published and the FAA has
00:21:36 --> 00:21:39 cleared it. Tuesday the 22nd of September.
00:21:40 --> 00:21:43 Uh, a 75 minute window opening at 8:15 in the
00:21:43 --> 00:21:46 morning Eastern. That's 12:15 UTC
00:21:46 --> 00:21:48 and 10 past 10 in the evening Sydney time on
00:21:48 --> 00:21:49 the 22nd.
00:21:49 --> 00:21:51 Avery: And um, this is the orbital one.
00:21:52 --> 00:21:55 Anna: This is the orbital one six orbits at about
00:21:55 --> 00:21:58 275 kilometres then
00:21:58 --> 00:22:00 splash down in the Pacific west of Chile
00:22:01 --> 00:22:03 roughly 10 hours after launch. So this flight
00:22:03 --> 00:22:06 ends in our half of the world. The payload is
00:22:06 --> 00:22:09 26 Starlink V3 satellites, the
00:22:09 --> 00:22:11 first flight of the next generation
00:22:11 --> 00:22:13 satellites designed specifically for
00:22:13 --> 00:22:13 starship.
00:22:14 --> 00:22:16 And three of them carry cameras to photograph
00:22:16 --> 00:22:18 the ship's heat shield during re entry.
00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 Booster Gulf splashdown about seven
00:22:21 --> 00:22:24 minutes after liftoff. And confirming what we
00:22:24 --> 00:22:27 corrected on air back on the 12th. No tower
00:22:27 --> 00:22:29 catches on this flight for either stage.
00:22:30 --> 00:22:32 SpaceX's framing is that going to orbit is
00:22:32 --> 00:22:34 what unlocks the next phase.
00:22:35 --> 00:22:37 Their line is that by going to orbit, the
00:22:37 --> 00:22:39 work of making starship fully and rapidly
00:22:39 --> 00:22:40 reusable can begin.
00:22:41 --> 00:22:44 Avery: And that brings us to the sky. And this is
00:22:44 --> 00:22:45 a good week in it.
00:22:45 --> 00:22:47 Anna: Start with tonight, because tonight is lovely
00:22:47 --> 00:22:50 and it's free. Go out at dusk and find the
00:22:50 --> 00:22:53 moon, a waxing crescent about a quarter lit,
00:22:53 --> 00:22:56 five days old. Sitting right beside it is
00:22:56 --> 00:22:58 Antares, the red heart of Scorpius.
00:22:59 --> 00:23:02 How close from Sydney? Two and a half
00:23:02 --> 00:23:04 degrees apart at nautical dusk and both of
00:23:04 --> 00:23:07 them about 60 degrees up. A pairing you can
00:23:07 --> 00:23:09 cover with two fingers at arm's length.
00:23:09 --> 00:23:12 Sitting high overhead From Los Angeles,
00:23:12 --> 00:23:14 five and a half degrees apart and 18 degrees
00:23:14 --> 00:23:17 up. From New York, nearly seven degrees
00:23:17 --> 00:23:19 apart and 12 degrees up.
00:23:19 --> 00:23:22 Avery: Same sky, wildly different view.
00:23:23 --> 00:23:25 Anna: Same sky, same night. And it's the
00:23:25 --> 00:23:27 ecliptic tilt we talked about yesterday.
00:23:28 --> 00:23:30 Around the September equinox, the ecliptic
00:23:30 --> 00:23:32 stands up almost vertically from the western
00:23:32 --> 00:23:34 horizon at dusk in the southern hemisphere
00:23:34 --> 00:23:37 and lies down almost flat in the northern.
00:23:38 --> 00:23:40 Everything on that line, the Moon,
00:23:40 --> 00:23:43 Venus. Mercury rides high and
00:23:43 --> 00:23:46 lingers in the south and hugs the horizon in
00:23:46 --> 00:23:49 the north. In March, it reverses and
00:23:49 --> 00:23:50 the north gets the good version.
00:23:51 --> 00:23:52 Avery: Which brings us to Venus.
00:23:52 --> 00:23:55 Anna: And, um, Friday, Friday the 18th,
00:23:55 --> 00:23:58 Venus reaches greatest brilliancy, about
00:23:58 --> 00:24:01 magnitude -4.8, the brightest it
00:24:01 --> 00:24:04 gets in this evening apparition. And the
00:24:04 --> 00:24:05 reason is worth understanding because it's
00:24:05 --> 00:24:08 counterintuitive. Venus is not brightest when
00:24:08 --> 00:24:09 it's fullest.
00:24:10 --> 00:24:10 Avery: Go on.
00:24:11 --> 00:24:13 Anna: Right now, Venus is a Crescent, only about
00:24:13 --> 00:24:16 26% lit, but it's swinging in towards
00:24:16 --> 00:24:19 us. So its disc has swollen to about 39
00:24:19 --> 00:24:22 arcseconds across. Enormous as
00:24:22 --> 00:24:25 planets go. Brightness depends on the total
00:24:25 --> 00:24:27 illuminated area, which is the lit fraction
00:24:27 --> 00:24:30 multiplied by the size of the disc. As Venus
00:24:30 --> 00:24:33 approaches, the crescent thins, but the disc
00:24:33 --> 00:24:36 grows. And the product of those two peaks,
00:24:36 --> 00:24:39 right about now, a thin crescent that's very
00:24:39 --> 00:24:41 big beats a full disc that's very small.
00:24:42 --> 00:24:45 Avery: And at, uh, 39 arcseconds, you can actually
00:24:45 --> 00:24:46 see the crescent.
00:24:46 --> 00:24:49 Anna: You, you can steady a pair of binoculars
00:24:49 --> 00:24:51 against a fence post or a wall, and Venus
00:24:51 --> 00:24:54 resolves into a crescent rather than a dot.
00:24:54 --> 00:24:56 That's a genuinely startling thing to show
00:24:56 --> 00:24:59 somebody who has never looked where and when
00:25:00 --> 00:25:02 west after sunset. And the two hemispheres
00:25:02 --> 00:25:05 get very different deals. From Sydney, Venus
00:25:05 --> 00:25:08 stands nearly 40 degree high at sunset and
00:25:08 --> 00:25:10 sets about three and a quarter hours after
00:25:10 --> 00:25:13 the sun. You cannot miss it. From Los
00:25:13 --> 00:25:15 Angeles, it sets about an hour and 20 minutes
00:25:15 --> 00:25:17 after the sun. From New York, about an hour
00:25:17 --> 00:25:19 and five. So for, uh, our North American
00:25:19 --> 00:25:22 listeners, and you are our largest audience,
00:25:22 --> 00:25:25 the honest advice is look low in the west
00:25:25 --> 00:25:28 20 to 45 minutes after sunset with a clear
00:25:28 --> 00:25:31 horizon, it's bright enough to punch through
00:25:31 --> 00:25:33 twilight. You just need to be looking at the
00:25:33 --> 00:25:35 right time without a building in the way.
00:25:36 --> 00:25:38 Avery: There's a southern only bonus this week, too.
00:25:39 --> 00:25:41 Anna: Mercury magnitude
00:25:41 --> 00:25:44 -0.4, which is bright, but only
00:25:44 --> 00:25:46 16 degrees from the sun, which is awful.
00:25:47 --> 00:25:49 From Sydney, the steep ecliptic rescues it
00:25:49 --> 00:25:52 15 degrees up at sunset, setting more than an
00:25:52 --> 00:25:55 hour after the Sun. From London, it's three
00:25:55 --> 00:25:58 degrees up and effectively unobservable same
00:25:58 --> 00:26:01 planet, same brightness. A real target in
00:26:01 --> 00:26:02 the south and a non event in the north.
00:26:03 --> 00:26:04 Avery: Saturn.
00:26:04 --> 00:26:07 Anna: Saturn is everybody's. It rises about an hour
00:26:07 --> 00:26:10 and a quarter after sunset from Sydney and
00:26:10 --> 00:26:12 under an hour after sunset from New York, Los
00:26:12 --> 00:26:15 Angeles and London. So from anywhere it's
00:26:15 --> 00:26:17 well placed by full dark and stays up all
00:26:17 --> 00:26:20 night. Magnitude around 0.3
00:26:20 --> 00:26:23 disc just under 20 arc seconds. Rings about
00:26:23 --> 00:26:26 7 degrees open heading for opposition on the
00:26:26 --> 00:26:27 4th of October.
00:26:27 --> 00:26:29 If you have a telescope, this is
00:26:29 --> 00:26:32 Avery: the month moon phase for the weekend.
00:26:32 --> 00:26:34 Anna: First quarter on Friday the 18th at
00:26:34 --> 00:26:37 2043 UTC, which is
00:26:37 --> 00:26:40 Saturday morning 27 in Sydney.
00:26:40 --> 00:26:43 And that timing is not an accident because
00:26:43 --> 00:26:45 Saturday the 19th is international observe
00:26:45 --> 00:26:47 the Moon, uh, night. NASA is running public
00:26:47 --> 00:26:50 events and observatories and astronomy clubs
00:26:50 --> 00:26:51 around the world will be too.
00:26:52 --> 00:26:54 Avery: Why first quarter specifically?
00:26:54 --> 00:26:57 Anna: Because a full moon is the worst moon.
00:26:57 --> 00:26:59 At full the sunlight comes straight down and
00:26:59 --> 00:27:02 everything looks flat and washed out. At
00:27:02 --> 00:27:05 first quarter, the terminator, the line
00:27:05 --> 00:27:08 between lit and unlit runs down the middle of
00:27:08 --> 00:27:10 the disc and along that line the sun is low
00:27:10 --> 00:27:13 and every crater rim and mountain throws a
00:27:13 --> 00:27:15 long black shadow. The Moon looks three
00:27:15 --> 00:27:16 dimensional.
00:27:17 --> 00:27:19 That's what you want to show somebody. And
00:27:19 --> 00:27:21 that's why the date moves each year to land
00:27:21 --> 00:27:22 near first quarter.
00:27:23 --> 00:27:25 Avery: And the pre dawn sky belongs to the north.
00:27:25 --> 00:27:28 Anna: This week it does. And that's a fair trade
00:27:28 --> 00:27:30 for Venus. Mars and Jupiter are both in the
00:27:30 --> 00:27:33 east before sunrise. From Los Angeles
00:27:33 --> 00:27:36 and New York, Mars is 45 to 47
00:27:36 --> 00:27:39 degrees up at nautical dawn with
00:27:39 --> 00:27:41 Jupiter about 24 degrees below it.
00:27:42 --> 00:27:44 A comfortable civilised pairing.
00:27:45 --> 00:27:47 From Sydney, Mars is 20 degrees up and
00:27:47 --> 00:27:50 Jupiter is a struggle at 8. Jupiter
00:27:50 --> 00:27:52 is the bright one at minus 1.7.
00:27:53 --> 00:27:56 Mars the modest orange dot at plus
00:27:56 --> 00:27:58 1.2. And they're closing
00:27:59 --> 00:28:02 24 degrees apart this morning, about 12
00:28:02 --> 00:28:05 by mid October and just 2 degrees apart by
00:28:05 --> 00:28:07 the middle of November. Put that in your
00:28:07 --> 00:28:09 calendar now, zodiacal light
00:28:10 --> 00:28:12 standing item. And the Moon is out of the way
00:28:12 --> 00:28:15 again after the 26th. For from the southern
00:28:15 --> 00:28:17 hemisphere it's a faint cone in the west
00:28:17 --> 00:28:19 after full dark.
00:28:19 --> 00:28:22 The false dusk from the northern hemisphere
00:28:22 --> 00:28:24 it's the same cone in the east before dawn,
00:28:24 --> 00:28:27 the false dawn, same dust, same
00:28:27 --> 00:28:30 tilt. Opposite ends of the night running
00:28:30 --> 00:28:33 through to early November. You need a dark
00:28:33 --> 00:28:34 sight and patience.
00:28:34 --> 00:28:37 Avery: And um, the equinox next Wednesday.
00:28:37 --> 00:28:39 Anna: And this is the clarification we made
00:28:39 --> 00:28:41 yesterday, and I wanna keep making the
00:28:41 --> 00:28:44 September equinox is a single instant five
00:28:44 --> 00:28:47 minutes past midnight UTC on the 23rd,
00:28:47 --> 00:28:49 which means it falls on the evening of the
00:28:49 --> 00:28:52 22nd across the Americas and mid morning
00:28:52 --> 00:28:54 on the 23rd in Australia.
00:28:54 --> 00:28:57 An equinox is a moment, not a day,
00:28:57 --> 00:29:00 and which calendar date it lands on depends
00:29:00 --> 00:29:01 entirely on where you're standing
00:29:02 --> 00:29:05 Avery: and the safety line, which we never cut.
00:29:05 --> 00:29:08 Anna: Never. But with Venus this bright, some of
00:29:08 --> 00:29:09 you will want to try to find it in broad
00:29:09 --> 00:29:12 daylight. And you can. It's genuinely doable,
00:29:13 --> 00:29:16 but you must do it safely. Do not sweep the
00:29:16 --> 00:29:18 daytime sky with binoculars or a telescope.
00:29:18 --> 00:29:21 Hunting for Venus One accidental pass
00:29:21 --> 00:29:24 across the sun at that magnification and the
00:29:24 --> 00:29:26 damage to your eye is instant and permanent.
00:29:26 --> 00:29:29 Use a building or a wall to physically block
00:29:29 --> 00:29:31 the sun from your field of view before you
00:29:31 --> 00:29:33 start and know where Venus is before you
00:29:33 --> 00:29:36 look. And if you have any eclipse glasses
00:29:36 --> 00:29:38 left over from August, those are for looking
00:29:38 --> 00:29:39 at the sun only.
00:29:39 --> 00:29:41 They must carry the
00:29:41 --> 00:29:43 ISO12312
00:29:44 --> 00:29:47 certification and they must be undamaged.
00:29:47 --> 00:29:49 Never look at the sun through any optics
00:29:49 --> 00:29:52 without proper solar filtration fitted at the
00:29:52 --> 00:29:54 front. Your eyes do not grow back.
00:29:55 --> 00:29:57 Avery: That's Astronomy daily for Wednesday
00:29:57 --> 00:29:58 16th September.
00:29:59 --> 00:30:02 Anna: Roman's wide field instrument is alive. It it
00:30:02 --> 00:30:04 has seen its first starlight and it has fuel
00:30:04 --> 00:30:07 for 22 years instead of 10, which
00:30:07 --> 00:30:09 matters most for the dark energy question an
00:30:09 --> 00:30:11 Australian LED team sharpened on Monday.
00:30:12 --> 00:30:15 Avery: Caltech has cut the solar system's dynamical
00:30:15 --> 00:30:17 lifetime from a billion billion years to
00:30:17 --> 00:30:20 about a billion by pointing out that dying
00:30:20 --> 00:30:22 stars don't lose mass.
00:30:22 --> 00:30:24 Anna: Politely, the United States has said out
00:30:24 --> 00:30:27 loud for the first time that it has weapons
00:30:27 --> 00:30:28 in orbit.
00:30:28 --> 00:30:31 Avery: Rubin has found a globular cluster a hundred
00:30:31 --> 00:30:33 thousand light years away that was hiding
00:30:33 --> 00:30:36 behind dust crowding and its own
00:30:36 --> 00:30:38 faintness. From a data preview
00:30:39 --> 00:30:40 Starship flies on
00:30:40 --> 00:30:42 Anna: the 22nd and Venus is at its brightest
00:30:42 --> 00:30:43 on Friday.
00:30:44 --> 00:30:47 Avery: Show notes, sources and links for every
00:30:47 --> 00:30:50 storey are at astronomydaily IO
00:30:50 --> 00:30:53 and there's a contact form there. We read
00:30:53 --> 00:30:55 everything that comes through it, and
00:30:55 --> 00:30:57 listener questions have driven segments on
00:30:57 --> 00:30:59 this programme more than once.
00:30:59 --> 00:31:02 Anna: You'll find us as astrodaily pod on Social
00:31:02 --> 00:31:04 and Astronomy AstroDailyPod wherever you get
00:31:04 --> 00:31:07 your podcasts. If the show is useful to you,
00:31:07 --> 00:31:09 the single most helpful thing you can do is
00:31:09 --> 00:31:11 tell one other person about it.
00:31:11 --> 00:31:12 Avery: I'm Avery.
00:31:13 --> 00:31:15 Anna: And I'm Anna. Astronomy AstroDailyPod is a
00:31:15 --> 00:31:18 production of the bytes.com podcast network
00:31:18 --> 00:31:21 clear Skies and if you're anywhere near the
00:31:21 --> 00:31:23 west after sunset this week or go and look at
00:31:23 --> 00:31:24 Venus
00:31:27 --> 00:31:27 Avery: mhm.

