Artemis 2 Success, ESO Fallout & The Intriguing World of X-Ray Binaries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
Space News TodayApril 09, 202600:33:4030.83 MB

Artemis 2 Success, ESO Fallout & The Intriguing World of X-Ray Binaries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...

Sponsor Link:

This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you with th support of NordVPN . When online, stay safe, stay private and browse with confidence. To get our great deal visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts (https://nordvpn.com/spacenuts) or use the code SPACENUTS at checkout. And remember, there's a 30 Day Money Back Guarantee .


Artemis 2 Launch, Australian Astronomy Setbacks, and the Mystery of X-Ray Binaries

In this thrilling episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson dive into the latest advancements in space exploration and the challenges faced by the Australian astronomy community. The successful launch of Artemis 2 marks a significant milestone for humanity's return to the Moon, while a recent government decision leaves Australian astronomers concerned about their future access to critical telescopes. The episode also explores the intriguing discovery of an X-ray binary that defies conventional understanding, revealing new mysteries in the cosmos.

Episode Highlights:

- Artemis 2 Launch: Andrew and Fred share their excitement over the successful launch of Artemis 2, discussing the mission's significance and the historic achievements of the crew as they become the first humans to travel further than Apollo 13.

- Australian Astronomy Challenges: The hosts delve into the Australian government's decision to discontinue its partnership with the European Southern Observatory, examining the potential impact on local astronomers and the future of optical astronomy in Australia.

- X-Ray Binary Discovery: A fascinating conversation unfolds around the discovery of two peculiar X-ray binaries that challenge existing theories, leading to discussions about the nature of these celestial objects and what they reveal about stellar evolution.

- Future of Astronomy: Andrew and Fred reflect on the implications of these developments for the broader astronomy community, contemplating the balance between funding, scientific advancement, and international collaboration.


For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/32650573?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Hello again. Thanks for joining us on

00:00:02 --> 00:00:06 this yet another edition of Space Nuts,

00:00:06 --> 00:00:07 where we talk astronomy and space

00:00:08 --> 00:00:10 science. My name is Andrew Dunley, your

00:00:10 --> 00:00:12 host. Great to have your company. Coming

00:00:12 --> 00:00:15 up on a fresh episode, Arteimus 2 making

00:00:15 --> 00:00:17 headlines for all the right reasons.

00:00:17 --> 00:00:19 What a sigh of relief that was. Did you

00:00:19 --> 00:00:22 watch the launch? I sure did. Uh, but

00:00:22 --> 00:00:24 some bad news for the Australia ESO

00:00:24 --> 00:00:27 deal, which has got astronomers upset.

00:00:27 --> 00:00:28 One in particular I can think of. what's

00:00:28 --> 00:00:31 his name again? And the discovery of an

00:00:31 --> 00:00:33 X-ray binary. That's all coming up in

00:00:33 --> 00:00:36 this edition of Space Nuts.

00:00:36 --> 00:00:41 >> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9

00:00:41 --> 00:00:42 Ignition sequence start.

00:00:42 --> 00:00:43 >> Space Nuts.

00:00:43 --> 00:00:46 >> 5 4 3 2

00:00:46 --> 00:00:48 >> 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1

00:00:48 --> 00:00:49 >> Space Nuts.

00:00:49 --> 00:00:52 >> Astronauts report. It feels good.

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 >> Just wondering what an X-ray binary is.

00:00:54 --> 00:00:55 It sounds like something you could get

00:00:55 --> 00:00:58 arrested for. And joining us to talk

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 about all of that is Professor Fred

00:01:00 --> 00:01:01 Watson, astronomer at large. Hello,

00:01:02 --> 00:01:02 Fred.

00:01:02 --> 00:01:06 >> Hello, Andrew. And uh I I pick you up on

00:01:06 --> 00:01:07 that because I nearly got arrested once

00:01:07 --> 00:01:10 for doing astronomy with a an old brass

00:01:10 --> 00:01:13 telescope in the front garden, which the

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15 neighbors thought was a bazooka. Uh and

00:01:15 --> 00:01:17 so I had a visit from a very large

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 policeman. I think I was uh 16 or 17 at

00:01:20 --> 00:01:21 the time

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24 >> cuz these these days you'd get accused

00:01:24 --> 00:01:27 of of being a peeping tom or something,

00:01:27 --> 00:01:29 >> but back back then they thought it was a

00:01:29 --> 00:01:30 weapon.

00:01:30 --> 00:01:34 >> The reason why they do have weaponike,

00:01:34 --> 00:01:35 >> you know, looks them, don't they?

00:01:35 --> 00:01:37 >> Yeah, they look like a gun. That's

00:01:37 --> 00:01:39 right. The reason why I didn't um I

00:01:39 --> 00:01:41 didn't get uh any complaints about being

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44 a peeping tom was that our front garden

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46 overlooked the cemetery uh and there

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49 wasn't anybody around to complain.

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 >> That's Yeah. Okay. Lots of things come

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 to mind, but I'll I'll just I won't go

00:01:54 --> 00:01:55 there. Won't go there.

00:01:55 --> 00:01:59 >> No. But yes, like Yeah. When when was

00:01:59 --> 00:02:01 that?

00:02:01 --> 00:02:03 >> The early 1960s. Yeah. Uh-huh.

00:02:03 --> 00:02:05 >> Long after the Second World War, which

00:02:05 --> 00:02:07 is where why bazookas were on people's

00:02:07 --> 00:02:08 minds.

00:02:08 --> 00:02:10 >> Yeah. Yeah. Everyone was still super

00:02:10 --> 00:02:12 sensitive, I guess.

00:02:12 --> 00:02:13 >> Fred, it's been an exciting week. I know

00:02:14 --> 00:02:15 this is podcast, so some people will

00:02:15 --> 00:02:18 hear this well after the fact. But, uh,

00:02:18 --> 00:02:21 the other day, Artemis 2 lifted off very

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23 successfully, which was very, very

00:02:23 --> 00:02:27 exciting. And I watched it live on NASA

00:02:27 --> 00:02:29 live, which a lot of people did. There

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 were tens of thousands of people logged

00:02:31 --> 00:02:34 on and the system held up and I just

00:02:34 --> 00:02:36 watched the whole thing. I had it on my

00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 computer. I sat there and I just I

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41 watched the whole hour build up to the

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43 to the launch and and watched it all

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46 unfold. And it went something like this.

00:02:46 --> 00:02:57 10 9 8 7 RS25 engines. 8 4 3 2 1 booster

00:02:57 --> 00:03:00 ignition and liftoff.

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 The crew of Artemis 2 now bound for the

00:03:03 --> 00:03:05 moon. Humanity's next great voyage

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07 begins.

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09 >> How cool is that? How cool. And and

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 those engines, the the sound of those

00:03:11 --> 00:03:13 engines, even over the over the internet

00:03:13 --> 00:03:16 on a on a shony microphone cuz NASA

00:03:16 --> 00:03:19 can't really afford good stuff. Um, no,

00:03:19 --> 00:03:21 that it sounded You want to hear that

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23 again? That that that that just the

00:03:23 --> 00:03:29 sound of the engines. Okay. All right.

00:03:29 --> 00:03:31 >> No, that was just me blowing into the

00:03:31 --> 00:03:34 microphone, but um yeah, fantastic

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37 stuff. Uh it was so exciting to watch. I

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39 um I really got a big kick out of it and

00:03:39 --> 00:03:40 uh you could hear the crowd cheering at

00:03:40 --> 00:03:43 one stage. It was so loud that the

00:03:43 --> 00:03:45 microphones picked up the crowd and um

00:03:45 --> 00:03:47 yeah it was an amazing moment and of

00:03:47 --> 00:03:51 course as we speak today they have

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53 reached the moon and done their lap.

00:03:53 --> 00:03:56 They went onto the dark side and uh all

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 that loss talk was being spoken of with

00:03:59 --> 00:04:00 loss of signal. I mean, they were

00:04:00 --> 00:04:04 blocked out by a big rock and um and

00:04:04 --> 00:04:06 they achieved so much. I think uh yeah,

00:04:06 --> 00:04:08 it's been a pretty exciting week, hasn't

00:04:08 --> 00:04:09 it, Fred?

00:04:09 --> 00:04:12 >> You can say that again. And that um that

00:04:12 --> 00:04:14 live broadcast that you're talking

00:04:14 --> 00:04:18 about, um I've still got it on in

00:04:18 --> 00:04:19 this afternoon.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:22 >> Yeah, we're we're getting updates uh uh

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 all the time. And you know, this is kind

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26 of NASA at his best, isn't it really?

00:04:26 --> 00:04:29 It's just uh such a fantastic

00:04:29 --> 00:04:32 achievement for us to see this mission

00:04:32 --> 00:04:36 uh going so profoundly well. Um uh you

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 said the uh the trans traverse behind

00:04:40 --> 00:04:42 the moon has taken place. Uh now um

00:04:42 --> 00:04:44 there was a 40-minute loss of signal

00:04:44 --> 00:04:46 which you'd expect for exactly the

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48 reason that you mentioned. Uh the moon

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50 is a big rock and gets in the way of

00:04:50 --> 00:04:53 sign of radio signals. But also what the

00:04:53 --> 00:04:56 astronauts on board Arteimus saw was an

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59 eclipse of the sun. So the moon's disc

00:04:59 --> 00:05:02 actually covered the sun. Now from our

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04 vantage point on Earth, the sun and the

00:05:04 --> 00:05:06 moon look to be the same size. It's one

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08 of the most curious cosmic coincidences

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 that we've got our satellite and the and

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 our star which have the same angular

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 size half a degree in the sky. But of

00:05:16 --> 00:05:18 course from the vantage point of the u

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21 of the Arteimus astronauts uh who are

00:05:21 --> 00:05:24 roughly 6 kilometers from the moon's

00:05:24 --> 00:05:26 surface at the moment uh the moon is is

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29 a lot bigger and so yes they did see an

00:05:29 --> 00:05:33 eclipse uh and as the moon covered the

00:05:33 --> 00:05:35 disc of the sun they would see first of

00:05:35 --> 00:05:37 all the inner atmosphere of the sun what

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39 we call the chromosphere which often has

00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 pink uh glowing clouds of hydrogen on it

00:05:42 --> 00:05:44 but more especially they would have seen

00:05:44 --> 00:05:46 the corona the sun's outer atmosphere,

00:05:46 --> 00:05:49 which is what uh captivates eclipse

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51 goers whenever they go and see a total

00:05:51 --> 00:05:53 eclipse of the sun. And I can't resist

00:05:53 --> 00:05:57 there a plug for 22nd of July, 2028 when

00:05:57 --> 00:06:00 a total eclipse of the sun uh will see

00:06:00 --> 00:06:02 the moon shadow passing over both where

00:06:02 --> 00:06:04 you're sitting at the moment in do and

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 where I'm sitting at the moment in

00:06:06 --> 00:06:07 Sydney. That's going to be a huge event.

00:06:08 --> 00:06:10 Perhaps not quite as momentous as seeing

00:06:10 --> 00:06:12 it from a spacecraft on the far side of

00:06:12 --> 00:06:15 the moon, but still pretty good. uh and

00:06:15 --> 00:06:17 uh you know the the astronauts are

00:06:17 --> 00:06:20 indeed now on their way home. They in a

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 sense they've been on their way home

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24 ever since they left Earth orbit because

00:06:24 --> 00:06:28 the trajectory that um that the rocket

00:06:28 --> 00:06:30 was inserted into the the Trans Luna

00:06:30 --> 00:06:33 insertion move uh which took place above

00:06:33 --> 00:06:36 the Earth's surface that that really

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39 placed them on on a path that inevitably

00:06:39 --> 00:06:41 would take them in a figure of eight uh

00:06:41 --> 00:06:43 loop around the moon and bring them back

00:06:43 --> 00:06:47 to Earth. Uh now there are midcourse

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49 connection sorry corrections. I think

00:06:49 --> 00:06:53 there is one planned for later today uh

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 uh after which I think the um the

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 astronauts are going to be given some

00:06:58 --> 00:07:00 time to themselves because they've been

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02 pretty hard at work in the last 24 hours

00:07:02 --> 00:07:04 with the with the lunar far side flyby.

00:07:04 --> 00:07:07 >> Absolutely. Uh they've achieved so much

00:07:07 --> 00:07:10 today. Um the four astronauts Reed

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 Weisman, Victor Glover, Christina Ko or

00:07:13 --> 00:07:15 Kosh depending on how you want to

00:07:15 --> 00:07:17 pronounce it, Jeremy Hansen uh have

00:07:17 --> 00:07:21 become the um the first humans to go

00:07:21 --> 00:07:24 beyond where Apollo 13 set the record

00:07:24 --> 00:07:26 for the first furthest distance for

00:07:26 --> 00:07:30 humans from Earth. So they are now world

00:07:30 --> 00:07:31 record holders. Is it a world record

00:07:32 --> 00:07:33 when you're not on the world?

00:07:33 --> 00:07:35 >> I don't

00:07:35 --> 00:07:39 It's a solar system record. Yes, the um

00:07:39 --> 00:07:42 yes indeed the distance 47

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44 kilometers from Earth

00:07:44 --> 00:07:47 >> uh which uh and I think it was about

00:07:47 --> 00:07:50 400 that the Apollo 13 astronauts

00:07:50 --> 00:07:53 flew out. So it's a significant increase

00:07:53 --> 00:07:55 from that more than 6 km.

00:07:55 --> 00:07:57 >> So the most isolated humans in history

00:07:57 --> 00:07:59 in real terms.

00:07:59 --> 00:08:01 >> Yes, in a that's right in a sense. Um

00:08:01 --> 00:08:03 and they probably felt like that when

00:08:03 --> 00:08:04 they were out of communication for that

00:08:04 --> 00:08:06 40 minutes when they were in the moon

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08 shadow from radio signals from Earth.

00:08:08 --> 00:08:12 >> M yeah and uh one while I was listening

00:08:12 --> 00:08:15 to the live broadcast uh this afternoon

00:08:15 --> 00:08:19 our time uh I heard them talking about

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21 seeing uh meteorite flashes on the

00:08:21 --> 00:08:24 surface of the moon. They they spotted

00:08:24 --> 00:08:28 uh three four impacts while they were um

00:08:28 --> 00:08:29 rounding the moon which I I find

00:08:29 --> 00:08:31 astounding and it was really exciting

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33 for everybody especially the science

00:08:33 --> 00:08:35 team that were talking to them at that

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37 moment.

00:08:37 --> 00:08:39 >> Now that I didn't hear so that's great.

00:08:39 --> 00:08:39 That's great.

00:08:39 --> 00:08:42 >> Yeah. Quite incredible. Yeah. So, you

00:08:42 --> 00:08:43 know, things are happening that you just

00:08:43 --> 00:08:46 you wouldn't. And and apparently where

00:08:46 --> 00:08:49 the where these impacts happened, people

00:08:49 --> 00:08:50 on Earth who were observing the moon at

00:08:50 --> 00:08:53 the time may well have seen them, too.

00:08:53 --> 00:08:56 >> So, um I don't know if it's just a

00:08:56 --> 00:08:58 coincidence. We just happen to have a

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00 spaceship right there at the time or

00:09:00 --> 00:09:01 this happens a lot.

00:09:01 --> 00:09:03 >> I think it's happening a lot. I think

00:09:03 --> 00:09:06 that's the bottom line. It's um um you

00:09:06 --> 00:09:08 know these things have been observed

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10 actually since the 1950s when they were

00:09:10 --> 00:09:12 called transient lunar events which we

00:09:12 --> 00:09:14 now know are as you said meteorite

00:09:14 --> 00:09:19 impacts. Um I also noted that uh two

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22 relatively fresh and unnamed craters

00:09:22 --> 00:09:25 have been uh given a name by the uh

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 astronauts. One is is integrity which is

00:09:28 --> 00:09:30 the name of the spacecraft and the other

00:09:30 --> 00:09:32 is Carol which is the name of Reed

00:09:32 --> 00:09:34 Wiseman's late wife who died a few years

00:09:34 --> 00:09:35 ago.

00:09:35 --> 00:09:39 >> Yeah. Lovely lovely stuff. Yeah.

00:09:39 --> 00:09:42 >> Yeah. And more more to be written I

00:09:42 --> 00:09:45 suppose as this mission unfolds. Um and

00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 and so far so good. um and a whole new

00:09:48 --> 00:09:50 generation um feeling the same

00:09:50 --> 00:09:53 excitement we did back in the 60s and

00:09:53 --> 00:09:56 70s when the Apollo missions did exactly

00:09:56 --> 00:09:58 the same thing. This this flyby is

00:09:58 --> 00:10:01 probably a replication of what Apollo 8

00:10:01 --> 00:10:02 I think

00:10:02 --> 00:10:04 >> very much. Yeah, very similar to Apollo

00:10:04 --> 00:10:07 8. December 1968 I remember it well.

00:10:07 --> 00:10:09 >> Christmas was

00:10:09 --> 00:10:11 >> it was Yeah, that's right. Christmas Eve

00:10:11 --> 00:10:12 I think it might have been but it

00:10:12 --> 00:10:15 depends on your time zone. It's sort of

00:10:15 --> 00:10:17 um occurred to me a couple of times. I'm

00:10:17 --> 00:10:22 kind of rambling a bit now, but um in a

00:10:22 --> 00:10:25 perhaps a quai Trumpian manner. Uh but

00:10:25 --> 00:10:27 um I think it's really interesting to me

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30 because my career in astronomy, my

00:10:30 --> 00:10:32 working career in astronomy is kind of

00:10:32 --> 00:10:36 bookended by lunar missions. Um because

00:10:36 --> 00:10:37 it was early in my career that we were

00:10:38 --> 00:10:39 watching all the Apollo flights and I

00:10:40 --> 00:10:41 don't think anyone even with the best

00:10:41 --> 00:10:43 will in the world would deny that I'm

00:10:43 --> 00:10:46 now late in my career and we've got the

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48 Optimus excitement coming as well. It's

00:10:48 --> 00:10:50 just great stuff. It is fabulous stuff

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52 and you can read all about it or even

00:10:52 --> 00:10:55 watch it live as it happens which we

00:10:55 --> 00:10:57 really couldn't do back in the 60s and

00:10:57 --> 00:10:59 70s. Not like this. We had to rely on

00:10:59 --> 00:11:01 television but now you can just log on

00:11:01 --> 00:11:04 to NASA live and watch it all happen in

00:11:04 --> 00:11:07 real time. s. Fantastic stuff. Yeah. Uh,

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09 so more more to talk about down the

00:11:09 --> 00:11:10 track, I'm sure, but uh, if you've been

00:11:10 --> 00:11:12 following it, well, you probably know

00:11:12 --> 00:11:14 more than we do. This is Space Nuts with

00:11:14 --> 00:11:18 Andrew Dunley and Professor Fred Watson.

00:11:18 --> 00:11:21 Let's take a short break from Space Nuts

00:11:21 --> 00:11:24 to tell you about our sponsor, NordVPN.

00:11:24 --> 00:11:26 Now, I've talked about virtual private

00:11:26 --> 00:11:28 networks before and how they can protect

00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 you online, and no one does it better

00:11:31 --> 00:11:34 than Nord. Now, I've been using Nord for

00:11:34 --> 00:11:37 over two years, and I have no

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 complaints. Uh I'm also using uh some of

00:11:40 --> 00:11:41 their other tools, including the

00:11:41 --> 00:11:45 brilliant password manager. Uh NordVPN

00:11:45 --> 00:11:47 is great for streaming and won't slow

00:11:47 --> 00:11:49 you down. In fact, it does the opposite

00:11:49 --> 00:11:52 with no interruptions, no limits on

00:11:52 --> 00:11:55 bandwidth, and no limits on speed. right

00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 now. Uh, using the exclusive Space Nuts

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 offer, you can receive four extra months

00:12:01 --> 00:12:05 for free on a NordVPN.com

00:12:05 --> 00:12:09 plan. NordVPN encrypts your internet

00:12:09 --> 00:12:11 connection, hides your IP address, and

00:12:11 --> 00:12:14 offers access to over 7 servers

00:12:14 --> 00:12:17 around the world. Plus, with features

00:12:17 --> 00:12:21 like threat protection pro, MeshNet,

00:12:21 --> 00:12:24 ultra fast speeds via Nord links, your

00:12:24 --> 00:12:27 digital life stays private and

00:12:27 --> 00:12:30 efficient. So, don't miss out. Visit

00:12:30 --> 00:12:33 nordvpn.com/spacenuts

00:12:33 --> 00:12:36 and enter the code spacenuts to claim

00:12:36 --> 00:12:38 this deal. Remember, there's a 30-day

00:12:38 --> 00:12:41 money back guarantee, so it's riskfree

00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 to try. Stay safe, stay private, and

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46 browse with confidence. That's

00:12:46 --> 00:12:51 nordvpn.com/spacenuts.

00:12:51 --> 00:12:53 >> The crew of Artemis 2 now bound for the

00:12:53 --> 00:12:56 moon. Humanity's next great voyage

00:12:56 --> 00:12:57 begins.

00:12:57 --> 00:13:00 >> Space nuts. Now Fred, we go from

00:13:00 --> 00:13:04 excitement to something um quite uh

00:13:04 --> 00:13:06 upsetting for Australian astronomers,

00:13:06 --> 00:13:09 including yourself, and that is an

00:13:09 --> 00:13:10 announcement by the Australian

00:13:10 --> 00:13:14 government to um discontinue

00:13:14 --> 00:13:18 uh the the deal with um the European

00:13:18 --> 00:13:20 Southern Observatory. It's uh all over

00:13:20 --> 00:13:22 Red Rover by the sound of it.

00:13:22 --> 00:13:28 >> Uh yes. Yes, we still hope for um

00:13:28 --> 00:13:31 something to come out of all this, but

00:13:31 --> 00:13:33 the backstory here is that Australian

00:13:33 --> 00:13:37 astronomers uh since 2017 have had

00:13:37 --> 00:13:40 access to the best telescopes in the

00:13:40 --> 00:13:42 southern hemisphere without question,

00:13:42 --> 00:13:43 the best optical telescopes anyway,

00:13:43 --> 00:13:45 visible light telescopes, which are

00:13:45 --> 00:13:47 operated by the European Southern

00:13:47 --> 00:13:48 Observatory, whose headquarters are in

00:13:48 --> 00:13:51 Munich uh and whose telescopes are in

00:13:51 --> 00:13:55 northern Chile. uh and um those

00:13:56 --> 00:13:57 principally the the biggest uh

00:13:57 --> 00:14:01 telescopes are the four 8.2 2 meter

00:14:01 --> 00:14:03 components of what's called the VT the

00:14:03 --> 00:14:07 very large telescope uh which have been

00:14:07 --> 00:14:09 you know so which um Australian

00:14:09 --> 00:14:10 astronomers have have had access to

00:14:10 --> 00:14:14 since 2017 uh and has been a highly

00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 productive arrangement not just for the

00:14:16 --> 00:14:18 astronomers but also because our

00:14:18 --> 00:14:20 instrument builders here in Australia

00:14:20 --> 00:14:21 the people who build the fancy

00:14:21 --> 00:14:23 instruments that go on the back of

00:14:23 --> 00:14:28 telescopes um are um they are have have

00:14:28 --> 00:14:29 excelled themselves with what they've

00:14:30 --> 00:14:33 achieved uh because of the you know the

00:14:33 --> 00:14:35 opportunities to build a kit for these

00:14:35 --> 00:14:39 giant telescopes. So and plus all the

00:14:39 --> 00:14:41 spin-offs in terms of education and STEM

00:14:41 --> 00:14:43 and outreach and all the rest of it

00:14:43 --> 00:14:46 which we've tried to capitalize on. Um

00:14:46 --> 00:14:49 but that partnership was always going to

00:14:50 --> 00:14:54 be a 10-year deal. So 2017 to 2027, it

00:14:54 --> 00:14:56 comes to an end in December next year.

00:14:56 --> 00:15:00 >> And uh we in the astronomy community uh

00:15:00 --> 00:15:01 I started worrying about this actually

00:15:02 --> 00:15:04 in 2018. Uh what was going to happen

00:15:04 --> 00:15:08 next uh and to to make a case for the

00:15:08 --> 00:15:10 next step which would have to be

00:15:10 --> 00:15:12 according to the rules of the European

00:15:12 --> 00:15:14 Southern Observatory would have to be

00:15:14 --> 00:15:17 full membership. Um and that is the

00:15:17 --> 00:15:22 stumbling block because whilst um whilst

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 10 years of strategic partnership were

00:15:25 --> 00:15:28 valued at 129 million Australian

00:15:28 --> 00:15:32 dollars, 10 years of full membership is

00:15:32 --> 00:15:36 $400 million uh nearly half a billion

00:15:36 --> 00:15:38 and that is something that governments

00:15:38 --> 00:15:41 don't like big numbers like that. uh and

00:15:41 --> 00:15:43 especially in times of financial

00:15:43 --> 00:15:46 stringent which we understand. Um

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 however we do think that the government

00:15:49 --> 00:15:50 could have looked rather more

00:15:50 --> 00:15:52 constructively at other possible

00:15:52 --> 00:15:55 opportunities uh before making this

00:15:55 --> 00:15:58 announcement. Uh and there may be still

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00 scope for that. Um we've you know we've

00:16:00 --> 00:16:03 discussed things like uh Australian

00:16:03 --> 00:16:05 astronomers making inind contributions

00:16:05 --> 00:16:08 to ESO European Southern Observatory by

00:16:08 --> 00:16:11 for example building uh instruments in

00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 including the possibility of a new

00:16:13 --> 00:16:15 telescope here in Australia that could

00:16:16 --> 00:16:21 be uh actually um installed in the site

00:16:21 --> 00:16:24 near the site where the VT very large

00:16:24 --> 00:16:26 telescope uh unit instruments are

00:16:26 --> 00:16:28 situated at place called Sarah for

00:16:28 --> 00:16:30 paranal. Perhaps the most glawing thing

00:16:30 --> 00:16:33 about this though, Andrew, is that we

00:16:33 --> 00:16:35 have uh

00:16:35 --> 00:16:39 our membership, if we were to become

00:16:39 --> 00:16:41 members of ESO, would give us access to

00:16:41 --> 00:16:45 what is going to be the most stupendous

00:16:45 --> 00:16:47 telescope in the world when it comes on

00:16:47 --> 00:16:49 stream early in 2029. That is the

00:16:49 --> 00:16:52 European Southern Observatory's ELT or

00:16:52 --> 00:16:55 extremely large telescope. Sorry, one

00:16:55 --> 00:16:57 >> that's the one that that's as good a

00:16:57 --> 00:16:59 title because that's what it's going to

00:16:59 --> 00:17:03 be. Uh 39 meter diameter mirror. The the

00:17:03 --> 00:17:06 mirror diameter is 10 times that of the

00:17:06 --> 00:17:07 biggest telescope in Australia, the

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 Anglo Australian telescope that I used

00:17:09 --> 00:17:11 to be astronomer in charge of. It's 10

00:17:11 --> 00:17:13 times bigger, which gives you a 100

00:17:13 --> 00:17:15 times the the sensitivity in terms of

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 light gathering power and plus many

00:17:17 --> 00:17:19 other benefits. That will come on stream

00:17:19 --> 00:17:22 2029. Um it is sure to generate Nobel

00:17:22 --> 00:17:25 prizes. uh Australian astronomers will

00:17:25 --> 00:17:26 be barred from that and the great pity

00:17:26 --> 00:17:29 of that is uh that Australian

00:17:29 --> 00:17:32 astronomers have access uh to the square

00:17:32 --> 00:17:34 kilometer array which will come online

00:17:34 --> 00:17:37 at about the same time. Uh and to have

00:17:37 --> 00:17:39 those two things together under the you

00:17:40 --> 00:17:42 know the opaces of Australian astronomy

00:17:42 --> 00:17:44 would have given them a head start over

00:17:44 --> 00:17:46 the whole world in terms of discoveries.

00:17:46 --> 00:17:48 uh because the two things absolutely

00:17:48 --> 00:17:52 dovetail together the SKA and the uh ESO

00:17:52 --> 00:17:55 ELT that is not now going to happen and

00:17:55 --> 00:17:57 we feel that's a wasted opportunity and

00:17:57 --> 00:18:00 I might just add one more thing if I may

00:18:00 --> 00:18:03 because this is um this is a you know uh

00:18:03 --> 00:18:05 it is something very close to my heart

00:18:05 --> 00:18:07 I've worked very hard on this for the

00:18:07 --> 00:18:10 last almost decade um there is a there

00:18:10 --> 00:18:14 was a report that came out uh last month

00:18:14 --> 00:18:17 written by one of the country's senior

00:18:17 --> 00:18:18 economists

00:18:18 --> 00:18:21 uh a man named Professor Richard Holden

00:18:21 --> 00:18:23 and uh he's at the University of New

00:18:23 --> 00:18:25 South Wales here in Australia. He has

00:18:26 --> 00:18:28 done an analysis of the economic

00:18:28 --> 00:18:32 benefits of astronomy. Not just about,

00:18:32 --> 00:18:34 you know, the deals that you can do

00:18:34 --> 00:18:36 where you get money to build instruments

00:18:36 --> 00:18:37 and things of that sort. It's about the

00:18:37 --> 00:18:40 value of ideas, the the spin-offs that

00:18:40 --> 00:18:44 we have. All of those things um are

00:18:44 --> 00:18:46 taken into account in a report he wrote

00:18:46 --> 00:18:50 and he makes the point uh in conclusion

00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 in that report that Australian astronomy

00:18:52 --> 00:18:57 adds about $330 million per year to the

00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 country's economy. Uh which makes $40

00:19:00 --> 00:19:03 million a year for the ESO deal seem

00:19:03 --> 00:19:05 really quite proportionate. uh there

00:19:05 --> 00:19:07 would be a huge return on that $40

00:19:07 --> 00:19:09 million uh in terms of other benefits

00:19:09 --> 00:19:11 and that's what the government's missing

00:19:11 --> 00:19:12 out on. Yeah.

00:19:12 --> 00:19:13 >> Yeah. I think when we talked about this

00:19:13 --> 00:19:17 a few episodes ago u because we knew

00:19:17 --> 00:19:19 which was coming up

00:19:19 --> 00:19:21 >> um

00:19:21 --> 00:19:23 I I said something flippant like you

00:19:23 --> 00:19:24 know the left hand probably won't know

00:19:24 --> 00:19:27 what what the right hand's doing. So the

00:19:27 --> 00:19:29 the cost benefit versus cost, you know,

00:19:30 --> 00:19:32 the the benefit versus cost analysis may

00:19:32 --> 00:19:35 not get on the right desk and the

00:19:35 --> 00:19:37 decision could go against you. And I I

00:19:37 --> 00:19:40 was being a a smarty pants, but kind of

00:19:40 --> 00:19:41 looks like that's what's happened.

00:19:41 --> 00:19:45 >> Yeah. I don't actually I think it's uh

00:19:45 --> 00:19:47 different from that because um we made

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50 sure that the people who are making the

00:19:50 --> 00:19:52 decisions um and it's not Jordi by the

00:19:52 --> 00:19:54 way, but he makes his own decisions. I

00:19:54 --> 00:19:56 don't know whether you heard that.

00:19:56 --> 00:19:56 >> I did.

00:19:56 --> 00:19:58 >> The people Yeah. the people who were

00:19:58 --> 00:20:01 making the decisions um had access to

00:20:01 --> 00:20:03 that report. We made that very clear as

00:20:03 --> 00:20:06 soon as it came out. Um now um I'm

00:20:06 --> 00:20:09 suspect that the minister and his

00:20:09 --> 00:20:10 science advisers would also have had

00:20:10 --> 00:20:13 access to it. Uh so what they've done is

00:20:13 --> 00:20:14 they've turned their backs on that and

00:20:14 --> 00:20:17 they've turned their backs on on

00:20:17 --> 00:20:20 something that is very exciting in

00:20:20 --> 00:20:22 relation to our exploration of the

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 universe at the very time when everybody

00:20:24 --> 00:20:26 else is looking skyward because of

00:20:26 --> 00:20:30 Arteimus. We we had this news on the day

00:20:30 --> 00:20:33 of the Arteimus 2 launch. Uh couldn't

00:20:33 --> 00:20:35 have been a bigger contrast between the

00:20:35 --> 00:20:37 two stories. And and where does this

00:20:37 --> 00:20:40 leave the likes of um the Australian

00:20:40 --> 00:20:42 Space Agency for example? I mean the

00:20:42 --> 00:20:45 government's established that or a

00:20:45 --> 00:20:46 former government did and they've been

00:20:46 --> 00:20:48 pouring money into it. Now now they've

00:20:48 --> 00:20:50 sort of shot the door in your face in

00:20:50 --> 00:20:54 regard to um

00:20:54 --> 00:20:57 the Europe the the um the work

00:20:57 --> 00:20:58 observatory.

00:20:58 --> 00:21:02 >> Yes, exactly. ESO um you know where does

00:21:02 --> 00:21:04 this put everything? Are we kind of

00:21:04 --> 00:21:06 going back to the dark ages?

00:21:06 --> 00:21:09 >> Um, no, no pun intended.

00:21:09 --> 00:21:10 >> No, no pun intended. No, we are going

00:21:10 --> 00:21:13 back probably several decades for

00:21:13 --> 00:21:15 Australian optical astronomy. But

00:21:15 --> 00:21:19 >> um the space agency has been likewise

00:21:19 --> 00:21:22 um chastised, if I can put it that way.

00:21:22 --> 00:21:26 They had large budget taken off them by

00:21:26 --> 00:21:28 the present government about three two

00:21:28 --> 00:21:31 three years ago. Uh, and I actually

00:21:31 --> 00:21:33 wonder if some of this is political

00:21:33 --> 00:21:36 because the space agency was was uh

00:21:36 --> 00:21:39 initiated by a previous government. Uh,

00:21:39 --> 00:21:42 and the ESO strategic partnership was

00:21:42 --> 00:21:44 initiated by a previous government of

00:21:44 --> 00:21:47 opposite flavor to what we have now.

00:21:47 --> 00:21:49 >> Um, so there might be a political side

00:21:49 --> 00:21:51 to it. I'm sure the minister would deny

00:21:51 --> 00:21:54 that. It takes all of

00:21:54 --> 00:21:57 >> course he would. that um I've seen

00:21:57 --> 00:21:59 politics in action and I I I can tell

00:21:59 --> 00:22:01 you quite clearly we I'll give you an

00:22:01 --> 00:22:03 example. We we were going to get a big

00:22:03 --> 00:22:05 sports hub in do

00:22:05 --> 00:22:08 and uh it was announced by our local

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11 member who was also the leader of um his

00:22:11 --> 00:22:14 party at the time and when they lost the

00:22:14 --> 00:22:18 next election the new premier of the

00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 opponent party took the money away and

00:22:21 --> 00:22:23 said no you can't have it.

00:22:23 --> 00:22:26 >> Yeah. and that that was purely political

00:22:26 --> 00:22:28 to you just basically to slap an

00:22:28 --> 00:22:31 opposition leader in the face and yes

00:22:31 --> 00:22:33 they would deny it but it's absolutely

00:22:33 --> 00:22:35 that's just the way the game is played

00:22:35 --> 00:22:37 all over the world. Um this is really

00:22:37 --> 00:22:40 sad really really sad that it's it's

00:22:40 --> 00:22:43 come to this any any hope Fred of some

00:22:43 --> 00:22:45 turnaround some chance of

00:22:45 --> 00:22:47 >> there's always there's always hope um I

00:22:47 --> 00:22:48 I

00:22:48 --> 00:22:51 >> maybe not after what I just said but you

00:22:51 --> 00:22:51 know

00:22:51 --> 00:22:51 >> it's okay

00:22:52 --> 00:22:54 >> I'm not an astronomer. No, no, no,

00:22:54 --> 00:22:56 nobody nobody listens to this. It's

00:22:56 --> 00:22:58 okay.

00:22:58 --> 00:23:02 Um, look, I I am hopeful. We have some

00:23:02 --> 00:23:06 discussions coming up that I hope might

00:23:06 --> 00:23:09 emerge from which might emerge some

00:23:09 --> 00:23:10 perhaps what you might call more

00:23:10 --> 00:23:14 affordable options uh which might still

00:23:14 --> 00:23:16 involve ESO. The problem is ESO has its

00:23:16 --> 00:23:17 own rules

00:23:17 --> 00:23:21 >> and ESO is I think it's 17 uh member

00:23:21 --> 00:23:24 countries and if you do a special deal

00:23:24 --> 00:23:26 for Australia they're all going to say

00:23:26 --> 00:23:27 well why don't we get a special deal

00:23:28 --> 00:23:30 like that as well. Um and that's

00:23:30 --> 00:23:33 understandable. So ISO has to tread very

00:23:33 --> 00:23:34 carefully in this kind of thing.

00:23:34 --> 00:23:36 >> Yeah, that makes sense. All right. Well,

00:23:36 --> 00:23:38 hopefully common sense will prevail

00:23:38 --> 00:23:42 sometime in the next uh two years and

00:23:42 --> 00:23:44 somebody changes their mind and sees the

00:23:44 --> 00:23:47 the benefits rather than just looking at

00:23:47 --> 00:23:48 the dollar signs.

00:23:48 --> 00:23:50 >> Looking at the dollars. That's right.

00:23:50 --> 00:23:53 >> Okay. This is Space Nuts. Andrew Dunley

00:23:53 --> 00:23:57 with Professor Fred Watson.

00:23:57 --> 00:23:59 >> Hey, that's one of the better sims.

00:23:59 --> 00:24:00 Believe me,

00:24:00 --> 00:24:02 >> we've had a couple of cardiac arrests

00:24:02 --> 00:24:03 down here too, peeps.

00:24:03 --> 00:24:05 >> There weren't any time for that up here.

00:24:05 --> 00:24:08 Space nuts.

00:24:08 --> 00:24:11 >> All right. Uh, our final story takes us

00:24:11 --> 00:24:13 um quite a way away from the planet, a

00:24:14 --> 00:24:15 little bit further than Artemus 2 has

00:24:16 --> 00:24:17 traveled, in fact. Uh, the discovery of

00:24:17 --> 00:24:22 an X-ray binary, Fred. Now, I'm not sure

00:24:22 --> 00:24:26 what this is. Um, but yes, I I know

00:24:26 --> 00:24:29 there's all sorts of um, you know, radio

00:24:29 --> 00:24:31 wave type signals flying around the

00:24:31 --> 00:24:35 universe. X-rays, gamma rays, um, AC/DC,

00:24:35 --> 00:24:39 you name it. Um, but it's all out there.

00:24:39 --> 00:24:42 Uh, what is an X-ray binary?

00:24:42 --> 00:24:44 >> Um, that's a great question because this

00:24:44 --> 00:24:47 is this is a story about an X-ray binary

00:24:47 --> 00:24:50 that isn't a binary.

00:24:50 --> 00:24:52 >> So, just to complicate things further.

00:24:52 --> 00:24:54 So what's an X-ray binary? Uh if you've

00:24:54 --> 00:24:58 got a star which has got a star a bit

00:24:58 --> 00:25:00 like the sun actually these are normal

00:25:00 --> 00:25:03 stars like the sun uh gets to the end of

00:25:03 --> 00:25:07 its life uh and after usually something

00:25:07 --> 00:25:09 in the region of 10 billion years. Um

00:25:10 --> 00:25:12 what it what happens is it it puffs off

00:25:12 --> 00:25:14 its outer layers because the nuclear

00:25:14 --> 00:25:16 reactions change in its interior and

00:25:16 --> 00:25:19 eventually its core collapses to become

00:25:19 --> 00:25:21 something we call a white dwarf star.

00:25:21 --> 00:25:22 We've talked about them before. They're

00:25:22 --> 00:25:24 about the size of the Earth with about

00:25:24 --> 00:25:27 the mass of a star. Uh and they've

00:25:27 --> 00:25:29 basically exhausted their fuel. They're

00:25:29 --> 00:25:31 still shining because they're very hot.

00:25:32 --> 00:25:36 Uh so, um that's an a white dwarf star.

00:25:36 --> 00:25:40 Now, often that will happen in what's

00:25:40 --> 00:25:42 called a binary system. Two stars

00:25:42 --> 00:25:44 orbiting around their common center of

00:25:44 --> 00:25:49 gravity. And a binary is actually almost

00:25:49 --> 00:25:52 the most common form of stars in the

00:25:52 --> 00:25:55 galaxy. Many many stars that we observe,

00:25:55 --> 00:25:57 almost 50% are actually part of a binary

00:25:58 --> 00:26:00 pair. They're part of a duo. So, if

00:26:00 --> 00:26:02 you've got a star that's collapsed into

00:26:02 --> 00:26:05 a white dwarf star, um, which has

00:26:05 --> 00:26:07 intense gravity, not quite as intense as

00:26:07 --> 00:26:09 a black hole, but pretty intense, and

00:26:09 --> 00:26:11 it's being orbited by another star that

00:26:11 --> 00:26:13 hasn't got to that stage in its

00:26:13 --> 00:26:15 evolution, then what you get is the

00:26:15 --> 00:26:18 white dwarf is sucking matter off the

00:26:18 --> 00:26:21 other star and spiraling it inwards. The

00:26:21 --> 00:26:23 white dwarf's eating it up. Uh, and

00:26:23 --> 00:26:25 eventually if the white dwarf has enough

00:26:25 --> 00:26:27 of that stuff, it becomes unstable and

00:26:27 --> 00:26:28 turns into what we call a type 1A

00:26:28 --> 00:26:33 supernova, an exploding star. Um but

00:26:33 --> 00:26:35 during that process while your your

00:26:35 --> 00:26:38 white dwarf and your normal star are in

00:26:38 --> 00:26:40 this dance around each other with stuff

00:26:40 --> 00:26:42 being pulled off the normal star that

00:26:42 --> 00:26:44 stuff will be accelerated by the gravity

00:26:44 --> 00:26:47 of the white dwarf and it will emit

00:26:47 --> 00:26:50 x-rays because it is being so uh so

00:26:50 --> 00:26:54 highly excited uh by the energy that's

00:26:54 --> 00:26:56 basically being imparted to it as it

00:26:56 --> 00:26:57 gets pulled in. It's a bit like the

00:26:57 --> 00:26:59 accretion disc of a black hole. It's a

00:27:00 --> 00:27:02 kind of calm down version of that.

00:27:02 --> 00:27:05 >> Um, so that all makes sense.

00:27:05 --> 00:27:07 >> I'm glad it does. That's that's where

00:27:07 --> 00:27:09 the X-ray bit comes from. So an X-ray

00:27:09 --> 00:27:12 binary is two stars. One's a normal star

00:27:12 --> 00:27:14 having its surface sucked away by a

00:27:14 --> 00:27:17 white dwarf and that sucking away of

00:27:17 --> 00:27:19 material causes the X-rays. So that's

00:27:19 --> 00:27:21 how you discover it. So what has

00:27:21 --> 00:27:23 happened? But this isn't what's

00:27:23 --> 00:27:24 happening now, is it? With this

00:27:24 --> 00:27:27 discovery. No, no, but that's the that's

00:27:28 --> 00:27:30 the backstory if I can put it that way.

00:27:30 --> 00:27:34 >> Um what has happened now is um there are

00:27:34 --> 00:27:37 two of them actually two stars that have

00:27:37 --> 00:27:40 been uh discovered

00:27:40 --> 00:27:43 >> which show all the signs of being an

00:27:44 --> 00:27:46 X-ray binary in terms of the X-rays that

00:27:46 --> 00:27:49 they emit. But there's no other star

00:27:49 --> 00:27:52 there. There's there's no, you know,

00:27:52 --> 00:27:53 there's there's there's only the white

00:27:54 --> 00:27:56 dwarf. there's there's nothing else.

00:27:56 --> 00:27:56 >> Okay.

00:27:56 --> 00:27:59 >> Um and that means it's an X-ray binary

00:27:59 --> 00:28:02 that isn't a binary. Uh and two of these

00:28:02 --> 00:28:06 things have been discovered um by a

00:28:06 --> 00:28:08 group of scientists who actually look

00:28:08 --> 00:28:10 for these things. Uh they've got

00:28:10 --> 00:28:12 interesting names, perhaps a bit more

00:28:12 --> 00:28:14 imaginative than the usual astronomical

00:28:14 --> 00:28:17 names. One is called Gandalf. Uh and the

00:28:17 --> 00:28:20 and the other is called Moonsized. uh

00:28:20 --> 00:28:22 they were discovered at different times

00:28:22 --> 00:28:25 but they're basically um you know they

00:28:25 --> 00:28:28 are um part of the same survey. So

00:28:28 --> 00:28:31 they've got this signature of X-rays but

00:28:31 --> 00:28:37 um no companion object that is basically

00:28:37 --> 00:28:39 telling you that it's a normal B X-ray

00:28:39 --> 00:28:40 binary.

00:28:40 --> 00:28:42 >> So

00:28:42 --> 00:28:43 does that mean there's something else

00:28:43 --> 00:28:46 there that it's feeding off or

00:28:46 --> 00:28:50 >> That's correct. It looks as though that

00:28:50 --> 00:28:55 what what they have is a a half ring of

00:28:55 --> 00:28:59 material actually circulating around the

00:28:59 --> 00:29:01 white dwarf.

00:29:01 --> 00:29:06 >> So, and that this is the debris from

00:29:06 --> 00:29:08 basically a star being swallowed up,

00:29:08 --> 00:29:10 another star being swallowed up by the

00:29:10 --> 00:29:13 by the white dwarf. Uh it's very very

00:29:13 --> 00:29:15 odd and very unusual and quite hard to

00:29:15 --> 00:29:18 get your head around. This uh this this

00:29:18 --> 00:29:22 moving ring um which uh as the white

00:29:22 --> 00:29:24 dwarf itself spins and generates a

00:29:24 --> 00:29:26 magnetic field is not actually aligned

00:29:26 --> 00:29:28 with where we think the magnetic field

00:29:28 --> 00:29:34 is. Um so it's it's um it's a puzzle.

00:29:34 --> 00:29:37 I'm going to quote one of the authors of

00:29:37 --> 00:29:41 one of these papers who says to to note

00:29:41 --> 00:29:43 white dwarfs of similar age and

00:29:44 --> 00:29:46 evolutionary stage are typically

00:29:46 --> 00:29:48 non-magnetic

00:29:48 --> 00:29:50 while highly magnetic white dwarf

00:29:50 --> 00:29:53 remnants are already an exception.

00:29:53 --> 00:29:57 Gandalf is now only one one of only two

00:29:57 --> 00:29:59 known merger remnants to feature

00:30:00 --> 00:30:02 asymmetric magnetization.

00:30:02 --> 00:30:04 That's all gobbledygook for saying this

00:30:04 --> 00:30:06 is a very very peculiar pair of objects

00:30:06 --> 00:30:08 that we uh that we see and they're in

00:30:08 --> 00:30:10 different parts of the universe. They're

00:30:10 --> 00:30:11 not related to each other. They are

00:30:11 --> 00:30:15 different parts. So this is a really

00:30:15 --> 00:30:18 interesting um episode because it looks

00:30:18 --> 00:30:20 as though a completely new class of

00:30:20 --> 00:30:22 stars has been discovered here.

00:30:22 --> 00:30:24 Something that really is not the norm.

00:30:24 --> 00:30:25 Stuff that we know about and are

00:30:25 --> 00:30:27 familiar and and love. It's just not

00:30:27 --> 00:30:31 part of that. It's something quite new.

00:30:31 --> 00:30:34 as you're explaining it, my thought just

00:30:34 --> 00:30:37 went to could this just be the end of

00:30:37 --> 00:30:40 the partnership? Like it's the the stars

00:30:40 --> 00:30:42 pretty well just, you know, there's

00:30:42 --> 00:30:43 hardly anything left. You're still

00:30:43 --> 00:30:46 getting that X-ray deal going on,

00:30:46 --> 00:30:49 >> but you know, um there's there's

00:30:49 --> 00:30:51 >> hardly any material left and see you

00:30:51 --> 00:30:53 later alligator

00:30:53 --> 00:30:55 >> and and what's what's there is spread

00:30:55 --> 00:30:57 into half a ring, which seems to be the

00:30:57 --> 00:30:59 case. Yeah, I think that's I think that

00:30:59 --> 00:31:01 is probably the the bottom line of this.

00:31:01 --> 00:31:03 Um, which is is boring.

00:31:03 --> 00:31:04 >> You figured something out. Perhaps

00:31:04 --> 00:31:05 >> you figured something out. Yep. Yep.

00:31:06 --> 00:31:08 >> Where's my Nobel Prize?

00:31:08 --> 00:31:09 >> Actually, it's I think I've got it here

00:31:09 --> 00:31:12 in this drawer. So, I put it away last

00:31:12 --> 00:31:15 week.

00:31:15 --> 00:31:18 Uh, yes, it's um, look, it's great uh

00:31:18 --> 00:31:20 that that we've got entirely new

00:31:20 --> 00:31:22 category of highly magnetized white

00:31:22 --> 00:31:24 dwarf, which is something that's not

00:31:24 --> 00:31:26 been seen before.

00:31:26 --> 00:31:28 Yes, indeed. Very exciting. Uh if you'd

00:31:28 --> 00:31:30 like to read about that, you can see it

00:31:30 --> 00:31:33 on uh one of the best websites around

00:31:33 --> 00:31:35 when it comes to uh science and

00:31:36 --> 00:31:39 astronomy. And that's f.org, not fi.

00:31:39 --> 00:31:41 It's phys.org.

00:31:41 --> 00:31:43 fizz.org.

00:31:43 --> 00:31:45 Great story. Uh we had a bit of a

00:31:45 --> 00:31:47 sandwich there. Good news, bad news,

00:31:47 --> 00:31:48 good news, I think.

00:31:48 --> 00:31:52 >> Yes. Yeah, that's right. We We do our

00:31:52 --> 00:31:53 best. We aim to please, don't we? I

00:31:53 --> 00:31:55 mean, we're we're only adequate, but we

00:31:55 --> 00:31:57 do aim to please at some level.

00:31:57 --> 00:31:59 >> We do. Yes. Although, you know, depends

00:31:59 --> 00:32:00 which part of it you were listening to

00:32:00 --> 00:32:02 as to what is pleasing and what wasn't.

00:32:02 --> 00:32:05 I think it was self-evident.

00:32:05 --> 00:32:06 >> Yes, indeed.

00:32:06 --> 00:32:08 >> We are all done, Fred. Thank you very

00:32:08 --> 00:32:09 much.

00:32:09 --> 00:32:11 >> Great pleasure, Andrew. Always good to

00:32:11 --> 00:32:14 air my grievances as well as talk about

00:32:14 --> 00:32:17 the latest in science news. We'll see

00:32:17 --> 00:32:18 you next time.

00:32:18 --> 00:32:19 >> Yes, we will catch you on the next

00:32:19 --> 00:32:21 episode, a Q&A episode coming your way

00:32:21 --> 00:32:23 very, very soon. And uh while you're

00:32:23 --> 00:32:26 online uh have a listen or have a look

00:32:26 --> 00:32:28 around on our website because uh we

00:32:28 --> 00:32:30 would uh we'd love you to do that. You

00:32:30 --> 00:32:32 can u sign up to the astronomy daily

00:32:32 --> 00:32:35 news feed. Uh you can become a supporter

00:32:35 --> 00:32:37 which is totally optional but there's a

00:32:37 --> 00:32:38 little button there. You can send us

00:32:38 --> 00:32:40 messages or questions through the ask me

00:32:40 --> 00:32:42 anything button at the top. It's called

00:32:42 --> 00:32:47 AMA. And please leave reviews uh at your

00:32:47 --> 00:32:50 um favorite podcasting platform. Um,

00:32:50 --> 00:32:52 they help us a lot and we really would

00:32:52 --> 00:32:56 appreciate it. Um, I I think we mostly

00:32:56 --> 00:32:57 get reasonably good ones, you know, two

00:32:58 --> 00:33:00 and a half, three stars. Woohoo. No,

00:33:00 --> 00:33:02 we've had a few bigger than that. Uh,

00:33:02 --> 00:33:05 and thanks to Hugh in the studio. Uh,

00:33:05 --> 00:33:06 we've just come out of a long weekend

00:33:06 --> 00:33:08 here in Australia and Hugh's been away

00:33:08 --> 00:33:10 and um he was running late because he

00:33:10 --> 00:33:13 was at a convention of white dwarfs. And

00:33:13 --> 00:33:15 from me, Andrew Dunley, thanks for your

00:33:15 --> 00:33:17 company. We'll see you on the next

00:33:17 --> 00:33:19 episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye.

00:33:19 --> 00:33:20 >> Space nuts.

00:33:20 --> 00:33:22 >> You've been listening to the Space Nuts

00:33:22 --> 00:33:24 podcast

00:33:24 --> 00:33:27 >> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

00:33:27 --> 00:33:30 iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast

00:33:30 --> 00:33:32 player. You can also stream on demand at

00:33:32 --> 00:33:35 byes.com. This has been another quality

00:33:35 --> 00:33:40 podcast production from byes.com.