Anna and Avery cover BepiColombo's arrival at Mercury beginning today, as the ESA/JAXA mission jettisons the transfer module that has carried it for nearly eight years and nine planetary flybys. Plus: NASA awards Blue Origin a $700 million contract to build a dedicated Mars communications orbiter, Hubble confirms a brand-new ten-sided cloud pattern at Saturn's south pole — first spotted by amateur astronomers, one of them in outback New South Wales — and China's Galactic Energy flies its reusable Pallas-1 rocket for the first time.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail (https://www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail)
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)
This episode includes AI-generated content.
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/35086238?utm_source=youtube
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Hey everyone, welcome back to Astronomy
00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 Daily. It's Thursday, September 3rd,
00:00:05 --> 00:00:09 2026. I'm Anna and this is series 5,
00:00:09 --> 00:00:11 episode 184.
00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 >> And I'm Avery. Anna, we've got a
00:00:14 --> 00:00:16 spacecraft doing something irreversible
00:00:16 --> 00:00:17 today.
00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 >> We do. As we're recording, Beepy
00:00:20 --> 00:00:22 Columbbo, the European and Japanese
00:00:22 --> 00:00:25 mission to Mercury, is throwing away the
00:00:25 --> 00:00:26 module that got it there.
00:00:26 --> 00:00:29 >> Throwing away sounds harsh. It's
00:00:29 --> 00:00:32 accurate though. Eight years, nine
00:00:32 --> 00:00:34 planetary flybys, one very serious
00:00:34 --> 00:00:37 engine problem, and today the transfer
00:00:37 --> 00:00:39 module gets cut loose, and the two
00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 science orbiters are on their own. It's
00:00:41 --> 00:00:43 the start of the arrival phase.
00:00:43 --> 00:00:47 >> That's our lead. Then NASA has just
00:00:47 --> 00:00:50 handed Blue Origin $700 million to build
00:00:50 --> 00:00:53 the internet connection for Mars,
00:00:53 --> 00:00:54 >> which is a much bigger deal than it
00:00:54 --> 00:00:55 sounds.
00:00:55 --> 00:00:59 >> It really is. Then Saturn has grown a
00:00:59 --> 00:01:01 new shape at its south pole and nobody
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04 expected it. And an Australian in Broken
00:01:04 --> 00:01:07 Hill is part of how we found out.
00:01:07 --> 00:01:10 >> Love that story. And then a second
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12 Chinese private company has flown a
00:01:12 --> 00:01:14 reusable rocket 3 weeks after the first
00:01:14 --> 00:01:15 one.
00:01:15 --> 00:01:17 >> Plus, we'll get you sorted for the sky
00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 tonight. Both hemispheres as always.
00:01:20 --> 00:01:22 >> Let's get into it.
00:01:22 --> 00:01:24 >> Okay. Set the scene for me. What is
00:01:24 --> 00:01:27 physically happening today? So Bey
00:01:27 --> 00:01:29 Columbo has flown to Mercury as a stack.
00:01:30 --> 00:01:32 Three pieces bolted together. At the
00:01:32 --> 00:01:34 bottom, you've got the Mercury transfer
00:01:34 --> 00:01:36 module. That's the ion engine bus, the
00:01:36 --> 00:01:38 thing with the enormous solar wings
00:01:38 --> 00:01:40 that's been doing the driving. On top of
00:01:40 --> 00:01:43 that sits the European orbiter, the
00:01:43 --> 00:01:45 Mercury Planetary Orbiter. And on top of
00:01:45 --> 00:01:48 that sits the Japanese one, MO, the
00:01:48 --> 00:01:50 Mercury Magneettospheric Orbiter.
00:01:50 --> 00:01:53 >> Three spacecraft in a tower.
00:01:53 --> 00:01:56 >> A tower. And today at around 8 in the
00:01:56 --> 00:01:59 morning US Eastern time, which is about
00:01:59 --> 00:02:01 10 o'clock tonight for us in Sydney, the
00:02:01 --> 00:02:04 transfer module separates.
00:02:04 --> 00:02:07 It live. They start the broadcast a bit
00:02:07 --> 00:02:10 before, pause it, and come back about an
00:02:10 --> 00:02:11 hour later to confirm they've got a
00:02:11 --> 00:02:13 signal from what is now for the first
00:02:13 --> 00:02:16 time an independent spacecraft.
00:02:16 --> 00:02:18 >> And there's no putting it back together.
00:02:18 --> 00:02:22 >> None. That's why today matters. Up to
00:02:22 --> 00:02:23 this point, if something went wrong, you
00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 still had the propulsion module. From
00:02:26 --> 00:02:28 today, the ion engines are gone.
00:02:28 --> 00:02:29 Everything after this runs on the
00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 orbiter's own chemical thrusters.
00:02:32 --> 00:02:36 >> Take me back. This launched in 2018,
00:02:36 --> 00:02:40 >> October 20th, 2018, on an Aron 5 out of
00:02:40 --> 00:02:43 Kuru. So, we are 3 weeks shy of 8 years.
00:02:43 --> 00:02:45 >> 8 years to reach the closest planet to
00:02:46 --> 00:02:48 the sun, which sounds backwards.
00:02:48 --> 00:02:50 >> It sounds backwards. And it's the single
00:02:50 --> 00:02:52 most counterintuitive thing about
00:02:52 --> 00:02:54 Mercury. If you point a rocket at
00:02:54 --> 00:02:56 Mercury and just let go, you don't
00:02:56 --> 00:02:59 gently arrive, you fall. The sun's
00:02:59 --> 00:03:01 gravity well is enormous, and you pick
00:03:01 --> 00:03:03 up speed the whole way down. The hard
00:03:03 --> 00:03:05 part isn't getting there. The hard part
00:03:05 --> 00:03:08 is arriving slowly enough that Mercury's
00:03:08 --> 00:03:10 very weak gravity can actually catch
00:03:10 --> 00:03:10 you.
00:03:10 --> 00:03:12 >> So, the whole mission is a breaking
00:03:12 --> 00:03:13 problem.
00:03:13 --> 00:03:16 >> The whole mission is a breaking problem.
00:03:16 --> 00:03:18 that be Columbbo has used one flyby of
00:03:18 --> 00:03:22 Earth, two of Venus, and six of Mercury
00:03:22 --> 00:03:25 itself, the last of those in January
00:03:25 --> 00:03:26 2025,
00:03:26 --> 00:03:29 plus years of continuous, very gentle
00:03:29 --> 00:03:32 thrusting from those ion engines. All of
00:03:32 --> 00:03:35 it to shed speed rather than gain it.
00:03:35 --> 00:03:38 >> Nine flybys. That's more than most
00:03:38 --> 00:03:41 missions do in a lifetime. And there's a
00:03:41 --> 00:03:43 lovely bit of history in that because
00:03:43 --> 00:03:45 the mission is named after the man who
00:03:46 --> 00:03:49 invented that technique. Jeppe Colombo
00:03:49 --> 00:03:51 bey to everyone who knew him was an
00:03:52 --> 00:03:54 Italian mathematician who worked out in
00:03:54 --> 00:03:57 1974 that if you shaped Mariner 10's
00:03:57 --> 00:03:59 trajectory correctly, you could get
00:03:59 --> 00:04:01 repeat visits to Mercury instead of just
00:04:01 --> 00:04:04 one. He also figured out why Mercury
00:04:04 --> 00:04:06 rotates three times for every two
00:04:06 --> 00:04:08 orbits. So, the mission carries the name
00:04:08 --> 00:04:10 of the person who made this kind of
00:04:10 --> 00:04:12 flight possible at all.
00:04:12 --> 00:04:15 >> Now, you said one very serious engine
00:04:16 --> 00:04:17 problem.
00:04:17 --> 00:04:20 >> Yes. April 2024. The team found
00:04:20 --> 00:04:22 unexpected electric currents flowing
00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 between the transfer module solar arrays
00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 and one of its power distribution units.
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29 The practical effect was that there
00:04:29 --> 00:04:30 wasn't enough power reaching the
00:04:30 --> 00:04:32 electric thrusters, so they couldn't run
00:04:32 --> 00:04:34 at full thrust.
00:04:34 --> 00:04:36 >> How much did they lose? They clawed back
00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 most of it. Engineers got the thrusters
00:04:39 --> 00:04:42 to about 90% of original performance,
00:04:42 --> 00:04:44 but 90% wasn't enough for the trajectory
00:04:44 --> 00:04:47 they were flying. Santa Martinez, the
00:04:47 --> 00:04:49 mission manager, put it plainly at the
00:04:49 --> 00:04:52 time. After months of investigation,
00:04:52 --> 00:04:54 they concluded the thrusters would stay
00:04:54 --> 00:04:56 below the minimum thrust needed for the
00:04:56 --> 00:04:57 orbit insertion they'd planned for
00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 December 2025.
00:05:00 --> 00:05:02 >> So, they redesigned the arrival.
00:05:02 --> 00:05:05 >> They redesigned the arrival. new
00:05:05 --> 00:05:07 trajectory, a revised set of flybys, and
00:05:07 --> 00:05:10 the arrival slipped by 11 months from
00:05:10 --> 00:05:13 December 2025 to November this year,
00:05:13 --> 00:05:15 which is why we're talking about it now
00:05:15 --> 00:05:17 rather than last Christmas.
00:05:17 --> 00:05:20 >> 11 months is a long slip. Was anything
00:05:20 --> 00:05:21 gained?
00:05:21 --> 00:05:24 >> A bit, actually. Johannes Benov, the
00:05:24 --> 00:05:26 project scientist, made the point that
00:05:26 --> 00:05:28 the extra time flew the instruments
00:05:28 --> 00:05:30 through parts of Mercury's environment
00:05:30 --> 00:05:32 they'd never otherwise have sampled.
00:05:32 --> 00:05:35 It's not compensation for the delay, but
00:05:35 --> 00:05:37 it isn't nothing either.
00:05:37 --> 00:05:40 >> All right, so today the module goes,
00:05:40 --> 00:05:42 what's the calendar from here?
00:05:42 --> 00:05:45 >> It's a slow staged arrival. November
00:05:45 --> 00:05:48 21st is gravity capture. That's when
00:05:48 --> 00:05:50 Mercury actually takes hold of both
00:05:50 --> 00:05:52 orbiters. Then in the second week of
00:05:52 --> 00:05:55 December, around the 9th and 10th, MO is
00:05:55 --> 00:05:57 released into its own very stretched
00:05:57 --> 00:06:00 orbit. About a week after that, the
00:06:00 --> 00:06:02 European Orbiter starts working its way
00:06:02 --> 00:06:04 down. It reaches its final science orbit
00:06:04 --> 00:06:07 on March 10th next year, and routine
00:06:07 --> 00:06:09 science operations formally begin on
00:06:09 --> 00:06:12 April 6th, 2027.
00:06:12 --> 00:06:14 >> So, today is the beginning of a 7-month
00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 arrival.
00:06:16 --> 00:06:17 >> That's exactly the right way to think
00:06:17 --> 00:06:20 about it. Nobody's landing. Nobody's
00:06:20 --> 00:06:23 breaking hard. It's a long, careful
00:06:23 --> 00:06:24 settling in.
00:06:24 --> 00:06:26 >> And the two orbiters end up in quite
00:06:26 --> 00:06:29 different places. deliberately. So, the
00:06:29 --> 00:06:32 European orbiter goes low and tight,
00:06:32 --> 00:06:35 roughly 480 kilometers at its closest,
00:06:35 --> 00:06:38 1500 at its furthest. That's the mapping
00:06:38 --> 00:06:41 orbit, minology, elemental composition,
00:06:41 --> 00:06:44 the surface at a range of wavelengths.
00:06:44 --> 00:06:46 MO goes much higher and much more
00:06:46 --> 00:06:49 elliptical out to something like 11
00:06:49 --> 00:06:51 km because it's chasing the magnetic
00:06:51 --> 00:06:53 field and the particles and you need to
00:06:53 --> 00:06:55 fly through a big volume of space to
00:06:55 --> 00:06:57 sample that properly.
00:06:57 --> 00:06:59 Which brings me to the thing I actually
00:06:59 --> 00:07:02 want to know. What are the questions?
00:07:02 --> 00:07:04 >> Three big ones and they're all genuinely
00:07:04 --> 00:07:07 strange. The first is the magnetic
00:07:07 --> 00:07:09 field. Mercury is small. It should have
00:07:09 --> 00:07:11 cooled and frozen solid billions of
00:07:11 --> 00:07:13 years ago. And yet it has a global
00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 magnetic field. Of the rocky planets,
00:07:16 --> 00:07:19 only Earth and Mercury do. So something
00:07:19 --> 00:07:20 inside it is still liquid and still
00:07:20 --> 00:07:22 moving. And we don't have a settled
00:07:22 --> 00:07:25 explanation for that. And Mercury's core
00:07:25 --> 00:07:27 is huge, isn't it?
00:07:27 --> 00:07:29 >> Enormous relative to the planet. The
00:07:29 --> 00:07:32 iron core takes up something like 85% of
00:07:32 --> 00:07:35 the radius. Mercury is essentially a
00:07:35 --> 00:07:37 metal ball with a thin coat of rock on
00:07:37 --> 00:07:40 it, and nobody is entirely sure why.
00:07:40 --> 00:07:41 >> Second question,
00:07:42 --> 00:07:44 >> ice. There is water ice sitting in
00:07:44 --> 00:07:45 permanently shadowed craters at
00:07:46 --> 00:07:48 Mercury's poles. On the planet closest
00:07:48 --> 00:07:51 to the sun, where the dayside gets to
00:07:51 --> 00:07:54 well over 400° C, the floors of some
00:07:54 --> 00:07:56 polar craters never see sunlight, so
00:07:56 --> 00:07:59 they stay cold enough to hold ice. But
00:07:59 --> 00:08:01 where it came from and how much there is
00:08:01 --> 00:08:03 is open.
00:08:03 --> 00:08:04 >> And the third,
00:08:04 --> 00:08:07 >> the hollows. These are my favorite.
00:08:07 --> 00:08:09 Messenger, the last mission to orbit
00:08:09 --> 00:08:11 Mercury, found these bright, shallow,
00:08:11 --> 00:08:13 irregular pits scattered across the
00:08:13 --> 00:08:16 surface. No impact structure, no
00:08:16 --> 00:08:18 volcanic vent, just ground that appears
00:08:18 --> 00:08:21 to be disappearing. The best guess is
00:08:21 --> 00:08:23 some volatile material in the rock is
00:08:23 --> 00:08:25 sublimating straight to gas and leaving
00:08:25 --> 00:08:28 the hollow behind. And they look fresh.
00:08:28 --> 00:08:30 There's a real possibility Mercury's
00:08:30 --> 00:08:33 surface is actively changing right now,
00:08:33 --> 00:08:34 which is not something you expect from a
00:08:34 --> 00:08:36 dead little world.
00:08:36 --> 00:08:38 >> How many times have we actually been to
00:08:38 --> 00:08:40 Mercury before this?
00:08:40 --> 00:08:43 >> Barely. Two missions ever. Mariner 10
00:08:44 --> 00:08:47 did three flybys in 1974 and 75.
00:08:47 --> 00:08:51 Messenger orbited from 2011 to 2015.
00:08:51 --> 00:08:53 That's it. It is the least explored
00:08:53 --> 00:08:55 planet in the inner solar system by a
00:08:55 --> 00:08:57 very wide margin.
00:08:57 --> 00:09:00 >> And is there an Australian thread here?
00:09:00 --> 00:09:01 There usually is.
00:09:01 --> 00:09:04 >> There is, and it's a nice one. ISA
00:09:04 --> 00:09:06 tracks its deep space missions through a
00:09:06 --> 00:09:08 network that includes New Norsia in
00:09:08 --> 00:09:11 Western Australia, north of Perth. and
00:09:11 --> 00:09:13 issa opened a brand new deep space
00:09:13 --> 00:09:15 antenna at that site in October last
00:09:15 --> 00:09:17 year, working with CSRO.
00:09:18 --> 00:09:19 Southern Hemisphere ground stations
00:09:19 --> 00:09:21 aren't a courtesy on missions like this.
00:09:21 --> 00:09:23 They're how you keep a spacecraft in
00:09:23 --> 00:09:25 contact as the Earth turns.
00:09:25 --> 00:09:27 >> So, what should people actually watch
00:09:27 --> 00:09:28 for today?
00:09:28 --> 00:09:32 >> Signal acquisition. That's the moment.
00:09:32 --> 00:09:34 Separation itself is a mechanical event
00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 you can't really see. The thing that
00:09:36 --> 00:09:38 tells you it worked is the ground
00:09:38 --> 00:09:40 station hearing a healthy carrier from a
00:09:40 --> 00:09:43 spacecraft that an hour earlier didn't
00:09:43 --> 00:09:46 exist as an independent object. If that
00:09:46 --> 00:09:49 comes through clean, Bey Columbo is
00:09:49 --> 00:09:51 genuinely on approach.
00:09:51 --> 00:09:54 >> Right. Second story. And this one is
00:09:54 --> 00:09:57 about plumbing, but the good kind. NASA
00:09:58 --> 00:10:00 announced on Tuesday, September 1st,
00:10:00 --> 00:10:03 that it has awarded Blue Origin a firm
00:10:03 --> 00:10:06 fixedpric contract worth about 700
00:10:06 --> 00:10:08 million to build the Mars
00:10:08 --> 00:10:10 Telecommunications Network,
00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 >> which is not a science mission.
00:10:12 --> 00:10:15 >> Deliberately not. This is a dedicated
00:10:15 --> 00:10:18 communications orbiter. Its entire job
00:10:18 --> 00:10:21 is relaying science data, imagery,
00:10:21 --> 00:10:23 navigation information, and mission
00:10:23 --> 00:10:26 commands for anything operating on or
00:10:26 --> 00:10:29 around Mars. No instruments of its own
00:10:29 --> 00:10:32 competing for power and pointing time.
00:10:32 --> 00:10:34 >> And that's the change, isn't it? Because
00:10:34 --> 00:10:36 right now, that job is done by science
00:10:36 --> 00:10:38 orbiters moonlighting.
00:10:38 --> 00:10:40 >> Exactly right. Every picture you have
00:10:40 --> 00:10:43 ever seen from Curiosity or Perseverance
00:10:43 --> 00:10:46 came home through Mars Odyssey or the
00:10:46 --> 00:10:49 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Odyssey
00:10:49 --> 00:10:54 launched in 2001. MRO launched in 2005.
00:10:54 --> 00:10:56 Odyssey is 25 years old and it's
00:10:56 --> 00:10:58 carrying the data return for a whole
00:10:58 --> 00:11:00 planet as a side hustle.
00:11:00 --> 00:11:02 >> And people have been sounding the alarm
00:11:02 --> 00:11:04 about that for years.
00:11:04 --> 00:11:07 >> For years. The worry has always been the
00:11:07 --> 00:11:10 same. If one of those two fails, surface
00:11:10 --> 00:11:13 missions don't go quiet exactly, but
00:11:13 --> 00:11:15 their data rates fall off a cliff. You'd
00:11:16 --> 00:11:18 be choosing which images come home.
00:11:18 --> 00:11:20 >> So, what's Blue Origin actually
00:11:20 --> 00:11:21 building?
00:11:21 --> 00:11:24 >> It's based on their Blue Ring platform,
00:11:24 --> 00:11:26 a hybrid spacecraft that uses both
00:11:26 --> 00:11:28 solar, electric, and chemical
00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 propulsion. It launches on New Glenn.
00:11:31 --> 00:11:35 Delivery deadline is December 31st, 2028
00:11:35 --> 00:11:38 and NASA expects it operational at Mars
00:11:38 --> 00:11:39 by 2030.
00:11:39 --> 00:11:42 >> And the contract is design, develop,
00:11:42 --> 00:11:45 launch, and operate. All four.
00:11:45 --> 00:11:48 >> All four. That's the interesting bit.
00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 Structurally, NASA isn't buying a
00:11:50 --> 00:11:53 spacecraft. It's buying a service. The
00:11:53 --> 00:11:55 same way it now buys communications
00:11:55 --> 00:11:57 around the Earth and the Moon. It sits
00:11:58 --> 00:11:59 under the space communications and
00:12:00 --> 00:12:02 navigation program and it follows a
00:12:02 --> 00:12:05 request for proposals NASA put out back
00:12:05 --> 00:12:06 in May.
00:12:06 --> 00:12:07 >> Who else was in the running?
00:12:07 --> 00:12:10 >> Rocket Lab was the other finalist. So,
00:12:10 --> 00:12:13 this was a real competition, not a sole
00:12:13 --> 00:12:14 source award.
00:12:14 --> 00:12:16 >> And Blue Origin does have Mars form now,
00:12:16 --> 00:12:19 which they didn't have two years ago.
00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 >> That's the part I'd flag. New Glenn's
00:12:22 --> 00:12:24 second flight in November last year
00:12:24 --> 00:12:27 carried NASA's twin escapade probes to
00:12:27 --> 00:12:30 Mars and landed its booster for the
00:12:30 --> 00:12:32 first time on the same mission. So, the
00:12:32 --> 00:12:34 pitch here isn't theoretical.
00:12:34 --> 00:12:37 >> And the longer game is crude missions.
00:12:37 --> 00:12:39 >> That's stated fairly openly in the
00:12:39 --> 00:12:41 announcement. If you're serious about
00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 people at Mars in the late 2030s or
00:12:44 --> 00:12:47 2040s, you cannot run that on two
00:12:47 --> 00:12:49 orbiters built in the Clinton and Bush
00:12:49 --> 00:12:51 administrations. You need infrastructure
00:12:52 --> 00:12:54 that's designed to be infrastructure.
00:12:54 --> 00:12:57 >> It's the least glamorous $700 million
00:12:57 --> 00:13:00 NASA will spend this decade and probably
00:13:00 --> 00:13:02 one of the more important.
00:13:02 --> 00:13:05 >> Nobody's ever made a poster of a relay
00:13:05 --> 00:13:07 satellite, but nothing else works
00:13:07 --> 00:13:08 without it.
00:13:08 --> 00:13:11 >> Now, this one is just lovely. Saturn's
00:13:11 --> 00:13:13 south pole has a 10-sided shape around
00:13:13 --> 00:13:16 it, and it wasn't there before.
00:13:16 --> 00:13:21 >> 10-sided. A decagon. A decagon published
00:13:21 --> 00:13:23 in science advances yesterday, September
00:13:23 --> 00:13:26 2nd, led by Augustine Sanchez Lagga at
00:13:26 --> 00:13:28 the University of the Bas country in
00:13:28 --> 00:13:31 Spain with Amy Simon at NASA Goddard and
00:13:31 --> 00:13:33 Michael Wong at UC Berkeley among the
00:13:33 --> 00:13:34 co-authors.
00:13:34 --> 00:13:36 >> And we already knew Saturn does this at
00:13:36 --> 00:13:38 the other pole.
00:13:38 --> 00:13:40 >> That's the famous one, the northern
00:13:40 --> 00:13:43 hexagon, six-sided, been known since
00:13:43 --> 00:13:46 Voyager in the 1980s, and it is rock
00:13:46 --> 00:13:49 solid. Amy Simon's line is that it has
00:13:49 --> 00:13:51 been there every single time anyone has
00:13:51 --> 00:13:54 looked for more than 40 years.
00:13:54 --> 00:13:56 >> So why has nobody seen a southern one
00:13:56 --> 00:13:57 before?
00:13:57 --> 00:13:59 >> Because we couldn't look. Saturn is
00:14:00 --> 00:14:02 tilted like Earth and it takes about 30
00:14:02 --> 00:14:05 years to go around the sun. Between
00:14:05 --> 00:14:08 roughly 2012 and 2023, the South Pole
00:14:08 --> 00:14:11 was simply turned away from us. It has
00:14:11 --> 00:14:13 only recently come back into view.
00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 >> And who spotted it? This is the part I
00:14:16 --> 00:14:19 love. Amateur astronomers. The first
00:14:19 --> 00:14:21 hint turned up in groundbased images in
00:14:21 --> 00:14:25 2024. A subtle undulating band around
00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 the pole in pictures submitted to
00:14:27 --> 00:14:29 something called the planetary virtual
00:14:29 --> 00:14:31 observatory laboratory which is a
00:14:31 --> 00:14:33 database professionals use to mine
00:14:33 --> 00:14:36 amateur planetary imagery. Two observers
00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 are credited. Jean Paul O and Trevor
00:14:39 --> 00:14:41 Barry. Trevor Barry as in
00:14:41 --> 00:14:45 >> as in Broken Hill, New South Wales, far
00:14:45 --> 00:14:47 western outback, New South Wales. He's a
00:14:47 --> 00:14:49 former miner who built his own
00:14:49 --> 00:14:51 observatory. He's been imaging Saturn
00:14:51 --> 00:14:53 for the better part of two decades. He's
00:14:53 --> 00:14:56 won an Astronomical Society of Australia
00:14:56 --> 00:14:58 award for it, and he has a long history
00:14:58 --> 00:15:00 of contributing to exactly this kind of
00:15:00 --> 00:15:02 professional work.
00:15:02 --> 00:15:04 >> So, a bloke in Broken Hill helps find a
00:15:04 --> 00:15:06 new feature on Saturn.
00:15:06 --> 00:15:08 >> And then Hubble goes and confirms it.
00:15:08 --> 00:15:10 Once they knew what to look for, the
00:15:10 --> 00:15:12 team went into Hubble's Opal program,
00:15:12 --> 00:15:14 that's the longrunning survey that
00:15:14 --> 00:15:16 photographs the outer planets every
00:15:16 --> 00:15:18 year, and found the decagon sitting
00:15:18 --> 00:15:21 there in data going back to 2023 with
00:15:21 --> 00:15:23 observations running through late August
00:15:23 --> 00:15:24 last year.
00:15:24 --> 00:15:27 >> How big is it in Earth terms?
00:15:27 --> 00:15:29 >> I'm going to be careful here because
00:15:29 --> 00:15:31 some of the coverage yesterday quoted a
00:15:31 --> 00:15:34 width that's larger than Saturn itself,
00:15:34 --> 00:15:36 which obviously can't be right. The
00:15:36 --> 00:15:38 official releases don't put a hard
00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 number on it. What we can say
00:15:40 --> 00:15:42 confidently is that it's the same class
00:15:42 --> 00:15:45 of feature as the hexagon. A planet
00:15:45 --> 00:15:48 scale wave locked inside a polar jetream
00:15:48 --> 00:15:51 tens of thousands of kilome across. I'd
00:15:51 --> 00:15:53 rather wait for the paper's own figures
00:15:53 --> 00:15:55 than repeat one that doesn't survive a
00:15:55 --> 00:15:56 sanity check.
00:15:56 --> 00:16:00 >> Fair. And why 10 sides rather than six?
00:16:00 --> 00:16:02 >> The mechanism is thought to be the same
00:16:02 --> 00:16:05 in both cases. a meandering wave trapped
00:16:05 --> 00:16:08 inside a fast polar jet. The number of
00:16:08 --> 00:16:10 sides falls out of how fast and how wide
00:16:10 --> 00:16:13 that jet is. Different jet, different
00:16:13 --> 00:16:13 number.
00:16:14 --> 00:16:16 >> And the really interesting difference is
00:16:16 --> 00:16:17 the age.
00:16:17 --> 00:16:19 >> That's the headline for scientists. The
00:16:19 --> 00:16:22 hexagon is old and stable. This thing
00:16:22 --> 00:16:24 looks new. And Simon's assessment is
00:16:24 --> 00:16:26 that it appears to be strengthening,
00:16:26 --> 00:16:28 which means for the first time we get to
00:16:28 --> 00:16:30 watch one of these form rather than
00:16:30 --> 00:16:32 inheriting a finished one. The plan is
00:16:32 --> 00:16:35 to keep tracking it with Hubble and JWST
00:16:35 --> 00:16:37 as sunlight builds toward the southern
00:16:37 --> 00:16:40 summer over the next few years and see
00:16:40 --> 00:16:42 whether it settles or falls apart.
00:16:42 --> 00:16:45 >> A planet size geometry experiment
00:16:45 --> 00:16:46 running in real time.
00:16:46 --> 00:16:48 >> And we're on the right side of the
00:16:48 --> 00:16:50 planet to appreciate it, which we'll
00:16:50 --> 00:16:52 come back to in a few minutes.
00:16:52 --> 00:16:54 >> Last news story, and it's another one
00:16:54 --> 00:16:56 for the Chinese commercial launch
00:16:56 --> 00:16:59 column. Galactic Energy flew its Palace
00:16:59 --> 00:17:02 One rocket for the first time. That was
00:17:02 --> 00:17:05 late on August 31st, US Eastern time.
00:17:05 --> 00:17:08 So, morning of September 1st in China
00:17:08 --> 00:17:10 out of the Ju Kuan launch center
00:17:10 --> 00:17:12 >> and it worked.
00:17:12 --> 00:17:15 >> Clean debut. The company says it reached
00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 its planned orbit about 30 minutes after
00:17:17 --> 00:17:20 liftoff. First flight of a brand new
00:17:20 --> 00:17:22 vehicle straight to orbit, which is not
00:17:22 --> 00:17:23 a given.
00:17:23 --> 00:17:27 >> Give me the numbers. 52 m tall, so a bit
00:17:27 --> 00:17:31 over 170 ft. About 7 tons to low Earth
00:17:32 --> 00:17:35 orbit. And crucially, the first stage is
00:17:35 --> 00:17:37 built to be reusable. Hypersonic grid
00:17:37 --> 00:17:40 fins, deployable landing legs rated for
00:17:40 --> 00:17:44 up to 25 flights. If that specification
00:17:44 --> 00:17:46 sounds familiar, it's because it's
00:17:46 --> 00:17:48 essentially the Falcon 9 playbook.
00:17:48 --> 00:17:50 >> Did they try to land it?
00:17:50 --> 00:17:54 >> No. Hardware was fitted, but no recovery
00:17:54 --> 00:17:56 attempt on a maiden flight. They're
00:17:56 --> 00:17:59 targeting the second half of 2027 for
00:17:59 --> 00:18:00 the first landing try.
00:18:00 --> 00:18:02 >> Now, the reason this matters isn't
00:18:02 --> 00:18:04 really the rocket on its own.
00:18:04 --> 00:18:07 >> No, it's the pattern. Look at the last 8
00:18:07 --> 00:18:10 weeks in China. July 10th, a long march
00:18:10 --> 00:18:13 10B, that's the state program, launches
00:18:14 --> 00:18:16 and catches its first stage in a net
00:18:16 --> 00:18:18 strung across a ship at sea, making
00:18:18 --> 00:18:21 China only the second country ever to
00:18:21 --> 00:18:24 recover an orbital class booster. Mid
00:18:24 --> 00:18:28 August, Land Space lands Juke 3 on legs,
00:18:28 --> 00:18:31 the first Chinese private company to do
00:18:31 --> 00:18:33 it, though, as we covered at the time,
00:18:33 --> 00:18:35 it caught fire and toppled over after
00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 touchdown. And now, three weeks later, a
00:18:39 --> 00:18:42 second private company debuts a vehicle
00:18:42 --> 00:18:45 with recovery hardware already on it.
00:18:45 --> 00:18:46 >> Three different programs, three
00:18:46 --> 00:18:49 different approaches in under two
00:18:49 --> 00:18:49 months.
00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 >> And there's a clear commercial driver.
00:18:52 --> 00:18:54 China is building out very large
00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 satellite constellations, Gul Wong,
00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 Chiian Fan, and you cannot deploy tens
00:19:00 --> 00:19:02 of thousands of satellites on expendable
00:19:02 --> 00:19:06 rockets at any sensible price. Galactic
00:19:06 --> 00:19:08 Energy is quite openly positioning
00:19:08 --> 00:19:12 Palace 1 as a constellation workhorse.
00:19:12 --> 00:19:13 >> And this isn't a startup with no track
00:19:13 --> 00:19:14 record.
00:19:14 --> 00:19:18 >> Not at all. They already fly series 1, a
00:19:18 --> 00:19:21 small satellite launcher with more than
00:19:21 --> 00:19:24 20 flights behind it. So Palace 1 is a
00:19:24 --> 00:19:27 step up, not a first attempt.
00:19:27 --> 00:19:30 >> The thing I'd watch is 2027.
00:19:30 --> 00:19:32 Landing is the hard part, and everyone's
00:19:32 --> 00:19:34 landing attempt is still ahead of them,
00:19:34 --> 00:19:37 right? Let's get you outside. And we
00:19:37 --> 00:19:38 have to start with Saturn tonight for
00:19:38 --> 00:19:40 obvious reasons.
00:19:40 --> 00:19:42 >> After that segment, it would be rude not
00:19:42 --> 00:19:43 to.
00:19:43 --> 00:19:45 >> Saturn is rising around sunset now and
00:19:45 --> 00:19:47 it's up for most of the night over in
00:19:47 --> 00:19:50 Aquarius, sitting at about magnitude
00:19:50 --> 00:19:52 plus 0.4.
00:19:52 --> 00:19:54 It's building toward opposition on
00:19:54 --> 00:19:56 October 4th. So, it gets a little better
00:19:56 --> 00:19:58 every night for the next month.
00:19:58 --> 00:20:00 >> And the rings are doing something
00:20:00 --> 00:20:03 unusual. They're tilted only about 8°
00:20:03 --> 00:20:05 from edge on, close to the narrowest
00:20:05 --> 00:20:08 they've been in a dozen years, which
00:20:08 --> 00:20:09 some people find disappointing, and I
00:20:09 --> 00:20:12 think is the opposite. When the rings
00:20:12 --> 00:20:14 are nearly closed, the moons line up in
00:20:14 --> 00:20:17 a much tighter row, and the globe of the
00:20:17 --> 00:20:20 planet is easier to see detail on. It's
00:20:20 --> 00:20:21 a different Saturn.
00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 >> Southern Hemisphere advantage tonight.
00:20:24 --> 00:20:27 >> A real one from Sydney. Saturn climbs
00:20:27 --> 00:20:29 high overhead, so you're looking through
00:20:29 --> 00:20:31 much less atmosphere than northern
00:20:31 --> 00:20:33 observers who get it lower in the
00:20:33 --> 00:20:35 southern sky. If you've got a telescope
00:20:35 --> 00:20:37 and you've been meaning to use it, this
00:20:37 --> 00:20:40 is the month. And to be clear, the
00:20:40 --> 00:20:42 decagon we just talked about is far
00:20:42 --> 00:20:44 beyond a backyard scope. That's a Hubble
00:20:44 --> 00:20:47 class detection. What you can see is the
00:20:47 --> 00:20:49 ring tilt and the moons.
00:20:49 --> 00:20:51 >> For North American listeners
00:20:51 --> 00:20:53 specifically, the big one is tonight's
00:20:53 --> 00:20:54 moon.
00:20:54 --> 00:20:57 Yes, the moon passes very close to the
00:20:57 --> 00:20:59 Pletes tonight and it's an actual
00:20:59 --> 00:21:01 occultation from North America, from
00:21:01 --> 00:21:04 East Asia, and from Arctic latitudes.
00:21:04 --> 00:21:06 The cluster stars wink out behind the
00:21:06 --> 00:21:09 lunar limb. If that's you, that's your
00:21:09 --> 00:21:12 event, and binoculars are plenty. And
00:21:12 --> 00:21:12 from here,
00:21:12 --> 00:21:15 >> from Australia, New Zealand, the moon
00:21:15 --> 00:21:18 and the pletes rise together in the
00:21:18 --> 00:21:21 small hours as a close, pretty pairing,
00:21:21 --> 00:21:23 but no occultation.
00:21:23 --> 00:21:25 Worth setting an alarm for if you're up
00:21:25 --> 00:21:26 anyway.
00:21:26 --> 00:21:28 >> Moon phase
00:21:28 --> 00:21:30 >> waning gibus and it hits last quarter
00:21:30 --> 00:21:33 tomorrow, September 4th. Practically
00:21:33 --> 00:21:36 that means it rises late. So the early
00:21:36 --> 00:21:38 evening is dark, which is good news for
00:21:38 --> 00:21:39 the next one.
00:21:39 --> 00:21:43 >> Venus. Venus is the unmissable one. Low
00:21:43 --> 00:21:46 in the west to west southwest, roughly
00:21:46 --> 00:21:48 14 degrees up an hour after sunset from
00:21:48 --> 00:21:51 Sydney. Sunset here is about 5:35 in the
00:21:51 --> 00:21:53 afternoon at the moment. It's just
00:21:53 --> 00:21:55 pulled away from Spya after their
00:21:55 --> 00:21:57 conjunction on Monday night, and it's
00:21:57 --> 00:21:59 building toward greatest brilliancy on
00:21:59 --> 00:22:02 September 18th. There's a beautiful thin
00:22:02 --> 00:22:04 crescent moon alongside it on the 14th.
00:22:04 --> 00:22:07 So, mark that one. Pre-dawn,
00:22:07 --> 00:22:09 >> Jupiter is back and it's worth the early
00:22:09 --> 00:22:12 start, rising east northeast around 10
00:22:12 --> 00:22:15 to 4 in the morning. Mars is also there,
00:22:16 --> 00:22:18 low and slowly fading. And tonight, it
00:22:18 --> 00:22:20 makes a triangle with Beetlejuice and
00:22:20 --> 00:22:22 Elnath if you want a target to find.
00:22:22 --> 00:22:24 >> And there's a Jupiter event coming for
00:22:24 --> 00:22:26 North America.
00:22:26 --> 00:22:28 >> There is. On September 8th, the moon
00:22:28 --> 00:22:31 occults Jupiter, visible from Canada,
00:22:31 --> 00:22:33 the United States, Mexico, Greenland,
00:22:34 --> 00:22:36 the Caribbean, and Eastern Russia. The
00:22:36 --> 00:22:37 catch is that for most of that
00:22:37 --> 00:22:39 footprint, it happens in daylight with
00:22:40 --> 00:22:42 the sun above the horizon.
00:22:42 --> 00:22:43 >> Which brings us to the standing
00:22:43 --> 00:22:44 reminder.
00:22:44 --> 00:22:46 >> It does, and it applies to that
00:22:46 --> 00:22:48 occultation directly. If you are
00:22:48 --> 00:22:51 observing anywhere near the sun, take it
00:22:51 --> 00:22:53 seriously. Any filter you use for direct
00:22:54 --> 00:22:56 solar viewing must be certified to the
00:22:56 --> 00:22:59 ISO12312-2
00:22:59 --> 00:23:02 standard, not sunglasses, not smoked
00:23:02 --> 00:23:05 glass, not a stack of exposed film.
00:23:05 --> 00:23:08 ISO12312-2.
00:23:08 --> 00:23:10 And check the certification is genuine.
00:23:10 --> 00:23:12 Sweeping a telescope or binoculars
00:23:12 --> 00:23:13 around a daylight sky looking for
00:23:13 --> 00:23:16 Jupiter is exactly the situation where
00:23:16 --> 00:23:17 people get hurt.
00:23:17 --> 00:23:20 >> Anything else on the calendar? three to
00:23:20 --> 00:23:22 pencil in international observe the moon
00:23:22 --> 00:23:25 night on the 19th the equinox on the
00:23:25 --> 00:23:27 22nd spring for us autumn for our
00:23:28 --> 00:23:30 northern listeners and the harvest moon
00:23:30 --> 00:23:32 rising near Saturn on the 26th which
00:23:32 --> 00:23:34 after tonight's conversation feels like
00:23:34 --> 00:23:36 a nice bookend
00:23:36 --> 00:23:40 >> and that's episode 184
00:23:40 --> 00:23:42 has cut loose the module that carried it
00:23:42 --> 00:23:45 for eight years and is officially on
00:23:45 --> 00:23:46 approach to Mercury
00:23:46 --> 00:23:49 >> Blue Origin is building Mars a proper
00:23:49 --> 00:23:51 phone line. Saturn has grown a 10-sided
00:23:51 --> 00:23:54 crown at its south pole with a hand from
00:23:54 --> 00:23:56 an amateur astronomer in Outback New
00:23:56 --> 00:23:58 South Wales. And a second Chinese
00:23:58 --> 00:24:00 private company has put a reusable
00:24:00 --> 00:24:01 rocket into orbit.
00:24:01 --> 00:24:04 >> Full show notes, links to every primary
00:24:04 --> 00:24:07 source and the whole back catalog are at
00:24:07 --> 00:24:09 astronomyaily.io.
00:24:09 --> 00:24:12 >> You can find us on X, Instagram, and Tik
00:24:12 --> 00:24:14 Tok at astroaily pod. And if you've got
00:24:14 --> 00:24:17 a question or a correction, we genuinely
00:24:17 --> 00:24:19 want it. There's a contact form on the
00:24:19 --> 00:24:20 website. You'll find us at
00:24:20 --> 00:24:22 astronomydaily.io.
00:24:22 --> 00:24:25 >> If today's episode was useful, the
00:24:25 --> 00:24:27 single most helpful thing you can do is
00:24:27 --> 00:24:30 send it to one person who'd enjoy it.
00:24:30 --> 00:24:32 >> We'll be back tomorrow. Until then,
00:24:32 --> 00:24:34 clear skies.
00:24:34 --> 00:24:38 >> Clear skies. Astronomy Day.
00:24:38 --> 00:24:42 Stories we told.

