Black Hole Born in Silence | Crew-12 Launches | Inside-Out Planets
Space News TodayFebruary 13, 202600:17:3516.11 MB

Black Hole Born in Silence | Crew-12 Launches | Inside-Out Planets

Today on Astronomy Daily: Astronomers have witnessed something extraordinary in the Andromeda Galaxy — a massive star that simply vanished, collapsing into a brand-new black hole without the usual supernova fireworks. We cover the SpaceX Crew-12 launch to the ISS, Europe's powerful Ariane 64 flying for the first time with Amazon satellites aboard, another booster anomaly for ULA's Vulcan rocket, a bizarre inside-out planetary system that defies formation models, and NASA's plan to rescue the Swift observatory from orbital decay. Timestamped Chapters 00:00 — Welcome to Astronomy Daily 01:30 — SpaceX Crew-12 launches to the ISS 04:00 — Star vanishes in Andromeda — a black hole is born 08:30 — Europe's Ariane 64 flies for the first time 10:30 — Vulcan rocket suffers repeat booster anomaly 13:00 — The bizarre inside-out planetary system of LHS 1903 15:30 — NASA's Swift observatory fights for survival 17:30 — Sign-off and how to stay connected Key Links • NASA Crew-12 Blog: nasa.gov/blogs/commercialcrew • Vanishing Star Study (Science): doi.org/10.1126/science.adt4853 • Inside-Out Planet Study (Science): doi.org/10.1126/science.adl2348 • NASA Swift Observatory: nasa.gov/swift • Show Website: astronomydaily.io • Social Media: @AstroDailyPod on all platforms


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .


Sponsor Details:

Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!


Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)


This episode includes AI-generated content.

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/31657241?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Good morning, good evening, and good

00:00:02 --> 00:00:04 whenever you're listening. Welcome to

00:00:04 --> 00:00:07 Astronomy Daily, your front row seat to

00:00:07 --> 00:00:09 the cosmos. I'm Anna.

00:00:09 --> 00:00:11 >> And I'm Avery. It's Friday, the 13th,

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 February, 2026. And if you're

00:00:14 --> 00:00:16 superstitious, well, the universe

00:00:16 --> 00:00:18 doesn't care about your calendar. It's

00:00:18 --> 00:00:20 been too busy making black holes,

00:00:20 --> 00:00:22 breaking rockets, and building planetary

00:00:22 --> 00:00:25 systems that make absolutely no sense.

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 >> That's right. We've got an absolutely

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30 packed show for you today. Astronomers

00:00:30 --> 00:00:33 may have just watched a star quietly

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35 collapse into a brand new black hole in

00:00:36 --> 00:00:38 our neighboring Andromeda galaxy. No

00:00:38 --> 00:00:41 supernova required. SpaceX's Crew 12 is

00:00:41 --> 00:00:43 launching to the International Space

00:00:43 --> 00:00:45 Station as we speak. Europe's most

00:00:45 --> 00:00:48 powerful rocket just flew for the very

00:00:48 --> 00:00:49 first time. And that's just for

00:00:50 --> 00:00:50 starters.

00:00:50 --> 00:00:52 >> We've also got a Vulcan rocket that

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 apparently didn't learn its lesson the

00:00:54 --> 00:00:57 first time around. a planetary system

00:00:57 --> 00:00:59 that's been turned completely inside out

00:00:59 --> 00:01:01 and NASA's Swift Observatory going into

00:01:01 --> 00:01:05 survival mode to avoid a fiery re-entry.

00:01:05 --> 00:01:06 Let's get into it.

00:01:06 --> 00:01:08 >> We're kicking things off with what is

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10 quite literally happening right now.

00:01:10 --> 00:01:13 NASA and SpaceX have given the final go

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15 for Crew 12 mission to the International

00:01:15 --> 00:01:17 Space Station. Liftoff was scheduled for

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 5:15 a.m. Eastern time this morning from

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22 Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape

00:01:22 --> 00:01:25 Canaveral. The crew is an international

00:01:25 --> 00:01:27 squad. We've got NASA astronauts Jessica

00:01:27 --> 00:01:30 Mir and Jack Hathaway, European Space

00:01:30 --> 00:01:32 Agency astronauts Sophie Edino from

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 France, and Rosscosmos cosminaut Andre

00:01:35 --> 00:01:37 Fedv from Russia. They're riding aboard

00:01:38 --> 00:01:40 a SpaceX Dragon capsule on a Falcon 9

00:01:40 --> 00:01:43 rocket. And this launch was supposed to

00:01:43 --> 00:01:45 happen yesterday on the 12th, but

00:01:45 --> 00:01:47 mission teams waved off due to weather

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49 conditions along the flight path. They

00:01:49 --> 00:01:51 completed a final weather briefing last

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53 night and gave the all clear to proceed

00:01:53 --> 00:01:54 into the countdown.

00:01:54 --> 00:01:56 >> If everything went according to plan

00:01:56 --> 00:01:58 this morning, the crew should arrive at

00:01:58 --> 00:02:00 the station tomorrow afternoon on

00:02:00 --> 00:02:02 Valentine's Day at around 3:15 p.m.

00:02:02 --> 00:02:05 Eastern. Romantic, right? Nothing says I

00:02:05 --> 00:02:07 love you like docking with a space

00:02:07 --> 00:02:10 station at 28 kmh.

00:02:10 --> 00:02:12 >> Once they're aboard, they'll bring the

00:02:12 --> 00:02:13 station back up to its full complement

00:02:14 --> 00:02:16 of seven crew members. The ISS has been

00:02:16 --> 00:02:18 operating with a reduced crew, so this

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20 is a welcome reinforcement. They've got

00:02:20 --> 00:02:22 a packed science agenda waiting for them

00:02:22 --> 00:02:23 up there.

00:02:23 --> 00:02:25 >> Fun stat on this one. The Falcon 9

00:02:25 --> 00:02:28 booster being used, B1081,

00:02:28 --> 00:02:32 is flying for its 22nd time. 22 flights

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34 on a single rocket booster. And this is

00:02:34 --> 00:02:38 the 19th Falcon 9 mission of 2026 alone,

00:02:38 --> 00:02:40 and we're only in midFebruary. SpaceX's

00:02:40 --> 00:02:43 launch cadence is just relentless. We'll

00:02:43 --> 00:02:45 keep you updated on Crew 12's progress

00:02:45 --> 00:02:47 as they make their way to the station.

00:02:47 --> 00:02:49 You can catch the full coverage on NASA

00:02:49 --> 00:02:52 Plus, Amazon Prime, and NASA's YouTube

00:02:52 --> 00:02:53 channel.

00:02:53 --> 00:02:55 >> All right, Anna, this next story is the

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57 kind of thing that gives astrophysicists

00:02:57 --> 00:02:59 goosebumps. Astronomers believe they've

00:02:59 --> 00:03:02 witnessed something extraordinary. A

00:03:02 --> 00:03:04 massive star in the Andromeda galaxy

00:03:04 --> 00:03:06 that didn't go out by a bang, but just

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 quietly vanished. And what it left

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 behind appears to be a brand new black

00:03:11 --> 00:03:14 hole. This is genuinely remarkable. The

00:03:14 --> 00:03:18 star cataloged as M31204DS1

00:03:18 --> 00:03:22 was a yellow super giant about 13 times

00:03:22 --> 00:03:24 the mass of our own sun, sitting roughly

00:03:24 --> 00:03:27 2.5 million lighty years away in our

00:03:27 --> 00:03:29 neighboring Andromeda galaxy. Before it

00:03:30 --> 00:03:31 disappeared, it was one of the brightest

00:03:31 --> 00:03:34 stars in Andromeda, shining about

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37 100 times brighter than our own sun.

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39 >> So, here's what happened. A team led by

00:03:39 --> 00:03:42 Columbia University astrophysicist Kesha

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44 Leiday was sifting through archival data

00:03:44 --> 00:03:47 from NASA's Neoise mission, an infrared

00:03:47 --> 00:03:49 space telescope that mapped the sky from

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52 2009 to 2024. They were building a map

00:03:52 --> 00:03:54 of how millions of stars change in

00:03:54 --> 00:03:56 brightness over time. And buried in that

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 data, they found something stunning.

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 >> Starting around 2014, this star began to

00:04:02 --> 00:04:05 brighten in infrared light. Then it

00:04:05 --> 00:04:07 started fading dramatically in visible

00:04:07 --> 00:04:10 light. And by 2022, it had vanished

00:04:10 --> 00:04:13 entirely from Neoise's view. Even with

00:04:13 --> 00:04:15 the most sensitive telescopes available

00:04:15 --> 00:04:18 today, there's nothing there. As Depos

00:04:18 --> 00:04:21 put it, imagine if Betal Juice just

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24 suddenly disappeared. That's essentially

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26 what happened here, just in the galaxy

00:04:26 --> 00:04:27 next door.

00:04:27 --> 00:04:30 >> Now, normally when a massive star dies,

00:04:30 --> 00:04:32 it goes out spectacularly as a

00:04:32 --> 00:04:35 supernova. The core collapses, nutrinos

00:04:35 --> 00:04:38 erupt outward, and the resulting shock

00:04:38 --> 00:04:40 wave blasts the stars outer layers into

00:04:40 --> 00:04:43 space in an explosion that can outshine

00:04:43 --> 00:04:46 an entire galaxy. But this star didn't

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48 do any of that. It appears to be what

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51 astronomers call a failed supernova. The

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54 theory is that the core collapsed as

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57 expected, forming a dense neutron star,

00:04:57 --> 00:04:59 but the shock wave that was supposed to

00:04:59 --> 00:05:02 blow the star apart just wasn't strong

00:05:02 --> 00:05:05 enough. Instead of exploding outward,

00:05:05 --> 00:05:08 most of the stars material fell back

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 inward, overwhelming the neutron star

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 and creating a black hole. It's death by

00:05:14 --> 00:05:17 implosion rather than explosion.

00:05:17 --> 00:05:19 >> And what's really interesting is the

00:05:19 --> 00:05:21 role of convection. The team realized

00:05:21 --> 00:05:24 that previous models hadn't properly

00:05:24 --> 00:05:26 accounted for the churning turbulent

00:05:26 --> 00:05:28 motions in the stars outer layers. When

00:05:28 --> 00:05:30 they factored that in, they found the

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33 convection actually helps sap energy

00:05:33 --> 00:05:35 from the shock wave, making it more

00:05:35 --> 00:05:37 likely to fail. That's a significant new

00:05:37 --> 00:05:40 insight. The material that didn't fall

00:05:40 --> 00:05:43 straight in is now forming a rotating

00:05:43 --> 00:05:46 accretion disc around the newborn black

00:05:46 --> 00:05:49 hole, slowly spiraling inward, much like

00:05:49 --> 00:05:52 water circling a drain. The infrared

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54 glow from that debris should remain

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57 visible to the James Web Space Telescope

00:05:57 --> 00:05:59 for decades as it gradually fades.

00:05:59 --> 00:06:01 >> The study was published yesterday in the

00:06:01 --> 00:06:04 journal Science and the implications are

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 huge. If relatively lightweight stars

00:06:06 --> 00:06:10 like this one at just 13 solar masses

00:06:10 --> 00:06:12 can collapse directly into black holes,

00:06:12 --> 00:06:14 then there could be far more black holes

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 out there than we've previously

00:06:16 --> 00:06:18 estimated. This could be a very common

00:06:18 --> 00:06:21 way for stars to die, and we've just

00:06:21 --> 00:06:22 been missing it because there's no

00:06:22 --> 00:06:23 explosion to see.

00:06:23 --> 00:06:26 >> Not everyone's convinced yet, though.

00:06:26 --> 00:06:28 Some astronomers suggest this could be a

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 case of merging stars whose combined

00:06:31 --> 00:06:34 light got obscured by dust. But as one

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36 researcher put it, the definitive test

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39 is simple. Death is forever. If it's

00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 truly a black hole, that star is never

00:06:43 --> 00:06:45 coming back. Future observations with

00:06:45 --> 00:06:49 JWST will help settle the debate.

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51 >> Sticking with the launch theme, Europe

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53 had a huge milestone yesterday. The most

00:06:54 --> 00:06:56 powerful version of the Aron 6 rocket

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 flew for the first time, and it was

00:06:58 --> 00:07:00 carrying cargo for one of SpaceX's

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02 biggest competitors.

00:07:02 --> 00:07:04 >> That's right. Aryan Space launched the

00:07:04 --> 00:07:08 Arion 64, the four booster configuration

00:07:08 --> 00:07:11 of Europe's new flagship rocket. It

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13 lifted off from the Guyana Space Center

00:07:13 --> 00:07:18 in Kuru, French Guyana at 1645 UTC on

00:07:18 --> 00:07:21 February 12th. And riding on top were 32

00:07:21 --> 00:07:23 satellites for Amazon's Internet

00:07:24 --> 00:07:26 Constellation, now officially branded as

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28 Amazon LEO.

00:07:28 --> 00:07:30 >> So, let's break down the naming. The

00:07:30 --> 00:07:33 Aron 6 comes in two versions. the 62

00:07:33 --> 00:07:36 with two strap-on solid rocket boosters

00:07:36 --> 00:07:39 and the 64 with four. This was the first

00:07:39 --> 00:07:42 time the 64 has ever flown, and it's

00:07:42 --> 00:07:45 significantly more powerful. Those four

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48 P120 Seolid boosters give it the extra

00:07:48 --> 00:07:51 punch needed to loft heavier payloads.

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53 And Amazon Leo, formerly known as

00:07:53 --> 00:07:56 Project Kyper, is Amazon's answer to

00:07:56 --> 00:07:59 SpaceX's Starlink. The plan is to build

00:07:59 --> 00:08:03 a constellation of 3

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06 satellites providing broadband internet

00:08:06 --> 00:08:09 from low Earth orbit. So these 32

00:08:09 --> 00:08:11 satellites are an early batch to start

00:08:11 --> 00:08:14 building out that network. It's a big

00:08:14 --> 00:08:17 deal on two fronts. For Europe, the Aron

00:08:17 --> 00:08:19 64 flying successfully means they now

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21 have a heavy lift option that can

00:08:21 --> 00:08:23 compete for larger commercial and

00:08:23 --> 00:08:26 government payloads. And for Amazon,

00:08:26 --> 00:08:28 getting satellites up on a non-SP SpaceX

00:08:28 --> 00:08:31 rocket is strategically important. You

00:08:31 --> 00:08:33 don't want your main competitor also

00:08:33 --> 00:08:35 being your sole ride to orbit.

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37 >> The launch went smoothly with the

00:08:37 --> 00:08:39 satellites successfully deployed into

00:08:39 --> 00:08:42 low Earth orbit. It's a promising start

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 for the Aron 64 configuration.

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47 >> Now, speaking of rockets that had a

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49 slightly less smooth day, we need to

00:08:49 --> 00:08:51 talk about the Vulcan Centaur. This is

00:08:52 --> 00:08:53 an update to the story we covered

00:08:53 --> 00:08:56 yesterday. United Launch Alliance flew

00:08:56 --> 00:08:57 the USSF87

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00 mission for the US Space Force early on

00:09:00 --> 00:09:02 February 12th, and there was a very

00:09:02 --> 00:09:06 familiar problem. About 30 seconds after

00:09:06 --> 00:09:09 liftoff from Cape Canaveral, observers

00:09:09 --> 00:09:11 noticed a bright glow and a shower of

00:09:11 --> 00:09:13 sparks pouring from the aft end of one

00:09:13 --> 00:09:17 of the four GEM 63 XL solid rocket

00:09:17 --> 00:09:19 boosters. Video and tracking footage

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22 showed what appears to be a nozzle burn

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24 through where hot exhaust gas

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26 essentially melts its way through the

00:09:26 --> 00:09:27 nozzle casing.

00:09:27 --> 00:09:30 >> And here's the thing, this has happened

00:09:30 --> 00:09:33 before. The exact same type of anomaly

00:09:33 --> 00:09:34 occurred during Vulcan's second

00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 certification flight back in October

00:09:36 --> 00:09:39 2024. ULA and booster manufacturer

00:09:40 --> 00:09:41 Northrup Grumman spent months

00:09:41 --> 00:09:43 investigating that incident, identified

00:09:44 --> 00:09:46 a manufacturing defect, and said they'd

00:09:46 --> 00:09:48 fixed it. The third flight in August

00:09:48 --> 00:09:50 2025 went cleanly.

00:09:50 --> 00:09:52 >> But now on just the fourth flight

00:09:52 --> 00:09:55 overall, the problem is back. ULA

00:09:55 --> 00:09:58 acknowledged it had quote an observation

00:09:58 --> 00:10:00 early during flight on one of the four

00:10:00 --> 00:10:03 solid rocket motors and said the team is

00:10:03 --> 00:10:04 reviewing the data.

00:10:04 --> 00:10:06 >> The silver lining is that the mission

00:10:06 --> 00:10:09 still succeeded. The Falcon 9, sorry,

00:10:09 --> 00:10:12 the Vulcan's twin BE4 main engines

00:10:12 --> 00:10:14 compensated and the Centaur upper stage

00:10:14 --> 00:10:17 completed all its planned burns. About

00:10:17 --> 00:10:19 eight hours after launch, ULA confirmed

00:10:19 --> 00:10:21 the payloads were successfully delivered

00:10:21 --> 00:10:24 to geocynchronous orbit more than 22

00:10:24 --> 00:10:28 m above Earth. The primary payload was a

00:10:28 --> 00:10:31 pair of GSSAP satellites for the Space

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33 Force. These are maneuverable spacecraft

00:10:33 --> 00:10:35 that serve as a sort of neighborhood

00:10:35 --> 00:10:37 watch for geocynchronous orbit,

00:10:38 --> 00:10:40 monitoring activity near US and Allied

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42 assets. There were also some research

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45 and development payloads aboard. But the

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47 bigger question now is what this means

00:10:47 --> 00:10:50 for Vulcan's future. ULA had ambitious

00:10:50 --> 00:10:53 plans to fly 16 to 18 missions this

00:10:53 --> 00:10:56 year, including launches for Amazon GPS

00:10:56 --> 00:10:58 satellites and more Space Force

00:10:58 --> 00:11:00 payloads. A recurring booster issue on a

00:11:00 --> 00:11:03 rocket that's only flown four times is a

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 serious concern. The Space Force has

00:11:05 --> 00:11:07 already said it will work closely with

00:11:07 --> 00:11:09 ULA on flightw worthiness before the

00:11:09 --> 00:11:11 next national security mission.

00:11:11 --> 00:11:13 >> We'll be watching this one closely.

00:11:13 --> 00:11:16 Vulcan is supposed to be ULA's flagship

00:11:16 --> 00:11:18 for the future, replacing the venerable

00:11:18 --> 00:11:21 Atlas 5. It needs to prove it can fly

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23 reliably, and a pattern of booster

00:11:23 --> 00:11:26 issues isn't helping that case.

00:11:26 --> 00:11:28 All right, time for some planetary

00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 weirdness. Astronomers have found a star

00:11:31 --> 00:11:33 system that looks like someone assembled

00:11:33 --> 00:11:35 the planets in the wrong order. Think of

00:11:35 --> 00:11:38 it as a cosmic double stuffed Oreo.

00:11:38 --> 00:11:41 That's actually a great analogy. The

00:11:41 --> 00:11:44 star is called LHS1903.

00:11:44 --> 00:11:47 It's a red dwarf about half the mass of

00:11:47 --> 00:11:50 our sun, located about 116 light years

00:11:50 --> 00:11:53 away. It has four planets, all orbiting

00:11:53 --> 00:11:56 in less than 30 days. So it's a very

00:11:56 --> 00:11:59 compact system and from the star outward

00:11:59 --> 00:12:01 the arrangement goes rocky gaseous

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03 gaseous rocky

00:12:03 --> 00:12:05 >> which is the exact opposite of what

00:12:05 --> 00:12:08 models predict. In standard planetary

00:12:08 --> 00:12:10 formation theory rocky planets form

00:12:10 --> 00:12:12 closer to the star where intense

00:12:12 --> 00:12:14 starlight strips away atmospheres and

00:12:14 --> 00:12:16 gas giants form farther out where

00:12:16 --> 00:12:18 there's more gas available in the

00:12:18 --> 00:12:20 protolanetary disc. You'd expect rocky

00:12:20 --> 00:12:23 on the inside, gassy on the outside. But

00:12:23 --> 00:12:25 LHS1903

00:12:25 --> 00:12:27 follows the rules beautifully for the

00:12:27 --> 00:12:29 first three planets. A rocky one closest

00:12:29 --> 00:12:32 in, then two gaseous ones, and then the

00:12:32 --> 00:12:34 fourth planet, the one furthest out, is

00:12:34 --> 00:12:37 rocky again. It's like finding a

00:12:37 --> 00:12:39 Venuslike world out past Neptune's

00:12:39 --> 00:12:42 orbit. It just shouldn't be there. The

00:12:42 --> 00:12:44 system was first discovered by NASA's

00:12:44 --> 00:12:47 test mission back in 2019. And this

00:12:47 --> 00:12:49 latest study published February 12th in

00:12:49 --> 00:12:52 Science used a suite of groundbased and

00:12:52 --> 00:12:54 space-based instruments to precisely

00:12:54 --> 00:12:55 determine the planet's masses and

00:12:55 --> 00:12:57 densities. That's how they could tell

00:12:57 --> 00:12:59 which ones are rocky and which have

00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 thick gaseous envelopes.

00:13:01 --> 00:13:04 >> The leading explanation is planetary

00:13:04 --> 00:13:07 migration. Sometime early in the systems

00:13:07 --> 00:13:09 history, the inner planets may have

00:13:09 --> 00:13:12 shuffled around, similar to what

00:13:12 --> 00:13:14 happened in our own solar system during

00:13:14 --> 00:13:17 the late heavy bombardment. A

00:13:17 --> 00:13:19 gravitational reshuffle could have sent

00:13:19 --> 00:13:22 a large body crashing into the fourth

00:13:22 --> 00:13:25 planet, stripping away its atmosphere,

00:13:25 --> 00:13:27 or the planet may have formed late after

00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 the system had run out of gas.

00:13:30 --> 00:13:32 >> As astronomer Andrew Cameron from the

00:13:32 --> 00:13:35 University of St. Andrews put it, that

00:13:35 --> 00:13:37 stuff does happen in young planetary

00:13:37 --> 00:13:39 systems. This one has the look of

00:13:39 --> 00:13:42 something that's been turned inside out.

00:13:42 --> 00:13:44 It's a fantastic reminder that for all

00:13:44 --> 00:13:46 our models and theories, the universe

00:13:46 --> 00:13:49 keeps finding ways to surprise us.

00:13:49 --> 00:13:52 >> Our final story today is about a veteran

00:13:52 --> 00:13:54 space telescope that's fighting for its

00:13:54 --> 00:13:57 life and NASA's creative plan to save

00:13:57 --> 00:14:00 it. The Neil Gerald Swift Observatory

00:14:00 --> 00:14:02 has been one of NASA's workh horses for

00:14:02 --> 00:14:04 high energy astrophysics. It's been in

00:14:04 --> 00:14:08 orbit for about 21 years, rapidly sooing

00:14:08 --> 00:14:10 to observe gammaray births and other

00:14:10 --> 00:14:13 transient cosmic events. But time and

00:14:13 --> 00:14:15 physics are catching up with it.

00:14:15 --> 00:14:18 >> The problem is atmospheric drag.

00:14:18 --> 00:14:21 Enhanced solar activity, and we're right

00:14:21 --> 00:14:24 around solar maximum heats Earth's upper

00:14:24 --> 00:14:27 atmosphere and causes it to expand. That

00:14:27 --> 00:14:30 expanded atmosphere creates more drag on

00:14:30 --> 00:14:33 satellites in low orbit, slowly pulling

00:14:33 --> 00:14:36 them down. Swift's average altitude has

00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 been steadily declining, and it's now

00:14:39 --> 00:14:44 dropped below about 250 m or 400 km.

00:14:44 --> 00:14:47 >> So on February 11th, NASA's Swift team

00:14:47 --> 00:14:49 made a tough call. They've temporarily

00:14:50 --> 00:14:52 suspended most science operations. The

00:14:52 --> 00:14:54 burst alert telescope will keep

00:14:54 --> 00:14:56 detecting gammaray bursts, but the

00:14:56 --> 00:14:58 spacecraft will no longer slew to follow

00:14:58 --> 00:15:00 up on those detections with its other

00:15:00 --> 00:15:03 instruments. Instead, controllers are

00:15:03 --> 00:15:05 keeping Swift in a fixed orientation

00:15:05 --> 00:15:07 that minimizes atmospheric drag. Think

00:15:08 --> 00:15:10 of it like a swimmer turning sideways to

00:15:10 --> 00:15:12 cut through a current instead of facing

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 it headon. By reducing how much surface

00:15:16 --> 00:15:18 area Swift presents to the thin wisps of

00:15:18 --> 00:15:21 atmosphere at that altitude, they can

00:15:21 --> 00:15:23 slow the orbital decay.

00:15:23 --> 00:15:26 >> And here's the creative part. NASA has

00:15:26 --> 00:15:28 contracted a company called Catalyst

00:15:28 --> 00:15:30 Space Technologies based in Flagstaff,

00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 Arizona to actually go up and give Swift

00:15:33 --> 00:15:35 a push. They're planning a servicing

00:15:35 --> 00:15:37 mission that will boost the observatory

00:15:37 --> 00:15:39 into a higher orbit, extending its

00:15:40 --> 00:15:42 scientific lifetime. The reboost

00:15:42 --> 00:15:44 spacecraft is expected to launch in the

00:15:44 --> 00:15:47 summer, but for that to work, Swift

00:15:47 --> 00:15:51 needs to stay above about 185 m, roughly

00:15:51 --> 00:15:55 300 km. So everything they're doing now

00:15:55 --> 00:15:57 is about preserving enough altitude to

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00 make the rescue mission possible.

00:16:00 --> 00:16:02 >> It's a fascinating case study in

00:16:02 --> 00:16:04 satellite servicing. If it works, it

00:16:04 --> 00:16:06 demonstrates a capability that could be

00:16:06 --> 00:16:08 applied to all sorts of aging

00:16:08 --> 00:16:11 spacecraft. Rather than letting valuable

00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 observatories burn up, you send a little

00:16:13 --> 00:16:15 tugboat to push them back up. The

00:16:15 --> 00:16:17 economics of that could be

00:16:17 --> 00:16:19 transformative for space science.

00:16:19 --> 00:16:22 >> We're rooting for Swift. 21 years of

00:16:22 --> 00:16:24 service and still going. Fingers crossed

00:16:24 --> 00:16:27 the reboost mission comes together in

00:16:27 --> 00:16:27 time.

00:16:28 --> 00:16:30 >> And that wraps up another packed edition

00:16:30 --> 00:16:32 of Astronomy Daily. What a Friday the

00:16:32 --> 00:16:35 13th it's been. From a star silently

00:16:35 --> 00:16:37 becoming a black hole to rockets that

00:16:37 --> 00:16:40 keep surprising us, the universe never

00:16:40 --> 00:16:42 takes a day off. If you enjoyed today's

00:16:42 --> 00:16:45 episode, please hit subscribe wherever

00:16:45 --> 00:16:47 you're listening and leave us a review

00:16:47 --> 00:16:49 if you can. It really does help new

00:16:49 --> 00:16:51 listeners find us. You can also follow

00:16:52 --> 00:16:55 us on social media at astroaily pod on

00:16:55 --> 00:16:57 all the major platforms.

00:16:57 --> 00:16:59 >> Head over to astronomyaily.io

00:16:59 --> 00:17:01 io for full show notes and links to all

00:17:01 --> 00:17:03 the stories we covered today. And if

00:17:03 --> 00:17:05 you've got questions, story tips, or

00:17:05 --> 00:17:07 just want to say hi, we'd love to hear

00:17:07 --> 00:17:08 from you.

00:17:08 --> 00:17:10 >> Until next time, keep looking up.

00:17:10 --> 00:17:15 >> Clear skies, everyone. Astronomy day.

00:17:15 --> 00:17:23 Stories be told.

00:17:23 --> 00:17:27 Stories to tell.