Cosmic Colors, Stellar Mysteries & the Intricacies of Light: A Q&A Episode | Space Nuts:...
Space News TodayApril 14, 202500:26:3224.3 MB

Cosmic Colors, Stellar Mysteries & the Intricacies of Light: A Q&A Episode | Space Nuts:...

This episode of Space Nuts is brought you with the support of Saily. If you love travelling, you need Saily by your side. To find out more and get the special Space Nuts listener discount, visit www.saily.com/spacenuts (https://www.saily.com/spacenuts)


Space Nuts Episode 512 Q&A: Cosmic Colors, Gamma Ray Bursts, and Terraforming Venus

In this enlightening episode of Space Nuts, host Heidi Campo takes the helm alongside astronomer Professor Fred Watson to tackle a range of fascinating cosmic queries from our listeners. From the vibrant colors of celestial bodies to the dangers of gamma ray bursts, and the challenges of terraforming Venus, this episode is a treasure trove of astronomical insights that will spark your curiosity about the universe.

Episode Highlights:

- Cosmic Colors: Heidi and Fred discuss Rusty from Donnybrook's inquiry about the colors of stars, particularly red giants like Pollux and the blue hues of certain stars. They explore how large telescopes enhance our perception of these colors and the subtlety of what we actually see through the eyepiece.

- Gamma Ray Bursts Explained: The duo dives into the nature of gamma ray bursts and why their intensity diminishes with distance. Fred explains the inverse square law and clarifies the effects of dust and gas on signal strength, providing a comprehensive understanding of these powerful cosmic events.

- Terraforming Venus: A thought-provoking discussion on the feasibility of terraforming Venus reveals the planet's extreme conditions and the challenges posed by its thick atmosphere. Fred shares insights on whether blocking sunlight could reverse the runaway greenhouse effect and the implications of Venus's proximity to the sun.

- The Double Slit Experiment: The episode wraps up with a listener's question about the double slit experiment and the puzzling behavior of photons. Fred elaborates on the concept of quantum superposition and entanglement, shedding light on this fundamental experiment that underpins our understanding of light as both a particle and a wave.

For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about)

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

(00:00) Heidi Campo welcomes Professor Fred Watson to Space Nuts

(00:30) Andrew and Fred have some questions for you about telescopes and color

(06:36) Radio waves and gamma rays get weaker the further away they get

(09:41) Mike Cupid from the UK has a question about terraforming Venus

(11:41) How could you terraform Venus without losing runaway greenhouse effect

(16:45) Our very, uh, last question is from Todd. He's from Utah. His question is about spring skiing

(17:13) Todd from Utah has a question about the double slit experiment


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/26595429?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:03 all right let's rock and roll Welcome to

00:00:03 --> 00:00:06 another episode of Space Nuts I am your

00:00:06 --> 00:00:09 host Heidi Combo today filling in for

00:00:09 --> 00:00:11 Andrew Dunley and I'm here with

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 Professor Watson astronomer at

00:00:14 --> 00:00:18 large Professor Fred Watson Actually I

00:00:18 --> 00:00:21 just say Watson If I just say Watson it

00:00:22 --> 00:00:23 makes it sound like this is a mystery

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25 podcast and not a space podcast Yeah

00:00:25 --> 00:00:30 that's right Elementary my dear Watson

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32 All right Well speaking of mysteries we

00:00:32 --> 00:00:34 have a lot of really good questions with

00:00:34 --> 00:00:38 mysteries for you to solve today And our

00:00:38 --> 00:00:40 first question

00:00:40 --> 00:00:44 uh comes from Rusty from Donnie Brook

00:00:44 --> 00:00:46 Hey Andrew and Fred It's Rusty and Donny

00:00:46 --> 00:00:49 Brook I'm sitting out in a beautiful

00:00:49 --> 00:00:53 clear night and looking due north I see

00:00:53 --> 00:00:57 Mars there and it's quite close to the

00:00:57 --> 00:01:00 twins Caster and Pock the Gemini

00:01:00 --> 00:01:04 twins It's closest to

00:01:04 --> 00:01:09 Pock which is it's an orange giant

00:01:09 --> 00:01:14 star and it looks redder Pock looks

00:01:14 --> 00:01:17 redder than Mars

00:01:17 --> 00:01:21 Um and if we look to the southwest from

00:01:21 --> 00:01:24 there we can see Beetlejuice part of

00:01:24 --> 00:01:26 Orion That one looks redder again So the

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28 question my question

00:01:28 --> 00:01:32 is when you take a picture through a

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 very large telescope and you can really

00:01:35 --> 00:01:38 see uh these colors close up how

00:01:38 --> 00:01:42 colorful are they is is a red giant as

00:01:42 --> 00:01:43 red as

00:01:43 --> 00:01:45 um as

00:01:45 --> 00:01:49 a tomato or a pillar

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 box and what about the the blue stars

00:01:52 --> 00:01:55 how blue do they get is it like when we

00:01:55 --> 00:01:59 call them red and blue is that fair

00:01:59 --> 00:02:03 dinkham anyway have a good one And so I

00:02:03 --> 00:02:05 can imagine so Rusty is one of our

00:02:06 --> 00:02:08 regular questioners Donny Brook Donny

00:02:08 --> 00:02:11 Brook in Western Australia uh and always

00:02:11 --> 00:02:13 asking intriguing intriguing questions

00:02:13 --> 00:02:15 and I think what he's thinking of here

00:02:15 --> 00:02:19 is if you sat yourself at the eyepiece

00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 for example of the biggest telescope in

00:02:21 --> 00:02:24 Australia uh the one that I used to be

00:02:24 --> 00:02:26 astronomer in charge of up in Kuna

00:02:26 --> 00:02:30 Baraban with its uh 3.9 m diameter

00:02:30 --> 00:02:32 mirror and you looked through an

00:02:32 --> 00:02:36 eyepiece uh at some of these objects

00:02:36 --> 00:02:38 what would you would you see the colors

00:02:38 --> 00:02:41 more richly than we do with a small

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43 instrument and the answer's a bit a

00:02:44 --> 00:02:45 little bit

00:02:45 --> 00:02:48 um I suppose disappointing really

00:02:48 --> 00:02:52 because the colors are still subtle Um

00:02:52 --> 00:02:54 looking through a very big telescope and

00:02:54 --> 00:02:55 I've actually done it with the Anglo

00:02:55 --> 00:02:57 Australian telescope It's quite hard to

00:02:57 --> 00:02:59 get an eyepiece on a telescope like that

00:02:59 --> 00:03:01 because it's funed with spectrographs

00:03:01 --> 00:03:05 and uh autoguiders and instruments of

00:03:05 --> 00:03:07 all different kinds that don't have an

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09 eyepiece on them But when you look

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12 through yes you do see the colors uh

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15 Mars looking red serious looking

00:03:15 --> 00:03:18 dazzlingly white um some blue stars the

00:03:18 --> 00:03:20 the the jewel box which is a cluster of

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 stars in um in the constellation of the

00:03:23 --> 00:03:25 southern cross uh so named because it's

00:03:25 --> 00:03:27 it's got stars of different colors

00:03:27 --> 00:03:30 including a particularly red one uh

00:03:30 --> 00:03:32 which is a sort of ruby colored stars

00:03:32 --> 00:03:35 Those those colors are exaggerated but

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37 perhaps not as much as you think they

00:03:37 --> 00:03:41 would be rusty They they um you know

00:03:41 --> 00:03:43 they don't go deep red or anything like

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46 that The colors are still as subtle as

00:03:46 --> 00:03:48 you see them But if I can put it this

00:03:48 --> 00:03:50 way it's just like sliding up the

00:03:50 --> 00:03:53 saturation button on your color editor

00:03:53 --> 00:03:56 uh in whatever whatever photo editing

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 system you use Slide up saturation a bit

00:03:59 --> 00:04:01 and you get a bit more color Likewise

00:04:01 --> 00:04:04 with the size of a telescope What you

00:04:04 --> 00:04:07 what you might be surprised at though is

00:04:07 --> 00:04:11 that um the the detail that you see with

00:04:11 --> 00:04:15 a big telescope uh is is not as fine as

00:04:15 --> 00:04:17 you'd expect And that's all about the

00:04:17 --> 00:04:19 way the atmosphere behaves The

00:04:19 --> 00:04:22 atmosphere in terms of the way

00:04:22 --> 00:04:24 turbulence in the atmosphere spoils the

00:04:24 --> 00:04:26 view through a telescope it's actually

00:04:26 --> 00:04:28 far less forgiving of a big telescope

00:04:28 --> 00:04:30 than it is in a smaller one A smaller

00:04:30 --> 00:04:32 one you might just see the object moving

00:04:32 --> 00:04:34 around but you can see it quite sharply

00:04:34 --> 00:04:36 Whereas with a big telescope it just

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 tends to blur it out It still moves out

00:04:39 --> 00:04:40 Would have totally thought it was the

00:04:40 --> 00:04:42 other way around I would have thought

00:04:42 --> 00:04:45 those big telescopes were like high def

00:04:45 --> 00:04:49 4K perfect picture Uh they are with with

00:04:49 --> 00:04:53 modern technology Uh these new uh not

00:04:53 --> 00:04:54 really new they've been around for 30

00:04:54 --> 00:04:55 years but it's only within the last

00:04:55 --> 00:04:57 decade that they've been perfected what

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 we call adaptive optics systems which

00:05:00 --> 00:05:01 actually it it's all about the

00:05:01 --> 00:05:03 turbulence the mirror the telescopes

00:05:03 --> 00:05:05 themselves if they were in space they

00:05:05 --> 00:05:07 would reveal perfect images exactly like

00:05:07 --> 00:05:09 the web telescope or the Hubble

00:05:09 --> 00:05:11 telescope do but because they're at the

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 bottom of an atmosphere with a lot of

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 turbulence in the air even on top of

00:05:16 --> 00:05:18 mountains there's turbulence uh that's

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21 what spoils the view but modern

00:05:21 --> 00:05:22 technology lets you sense that

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25 turbulence it lets you see what is the

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28 distortion that the atmosphere is

00:05:28 --> 00:05:30 providing and then just like a pair of

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33 noiseancelling headphones it cancels it

00:05:33 --> 00:05:35 out It provides the opposite signal Uh

00:05:35 --> 00:05:39 so it cancels out the the turbulence Uh

00:05:39 --> 00:05:41 it's very hard technology because you

00:05:41 --> 00:05:45 have to uh measure the star Uh we use

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47 what's called a reference star which is

00:05:47 --> 00:05:50 sometimes artificial Uh the you've got

00:05:50 --> 00:05:52 to measure that star a thousand times a

00:05:52 --> 00:05:55 second for this process to work Uh so it

00:05:55 --> 00:05:58 needs very fast readout sensors much

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00 much faster than what you find in a in

00:06:00 --> 00:06:03 for example a mobile phone Uh but the

00:06:03 --> 00:06:04 same sort of thing but they're reading

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 out a thousand times a second at least

00:06:06 --> 00:06:09 in fact sometimes twice that That is so

00:06:09 --> 00:06:11 incredible I just every day I'm so proud

00:06:11 --> 00:06:13 of humanity for what we've come up with

00:06:13 --> 00:06:15 It's just fantastic to think and if you

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17 know if we all just worked together as a

00:06:17 --> 00:06:20 team this would be you know we'd already

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 have you know gone past our own solar

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24 system by now if we all worked as a big

00:06:24 --> 00:06:26 team That is so incredible just to think

00:06:26 --> 00:06:31 of all the details of these technologies

00:06:31 --> 00:06:32 Let's take a little break from the show

00:06:32 --> 00:06:36 to tell you about our sponsor SY As you

00:06:36 --> 00:06:38 know my wife and I like to travel We've

00:06:38 --> 00:06:40 been overseas um quite a few times in

00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 recent years Now that I'm retired we

00:06:43 --> 00:06:46 plan to do more And one of the things I

00:06:46 --> 00:06:48 really like to do is make sure I've got

00:06:48 --> 00:06:50 access to mobile phone data particularly

00:06:50 --> 00:06:53 when I'm using maps because it's so easy

00:06:53 --> 00:06:54 to get lost when you're in a very

00:06:54 --> 00:06:58 unfamiliar environment Some time ago we

00:06:58 --> 00:07:01 did use an eim service uh from a from

00:07:01 --> 00:07:04 another company and it did not work and

00:07:04 --> 00:07:06 it left us in a very difficult position

00:07:06 --> 00:07:10 and we were high and dry and uh we were

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 not happy and we didn't have any backup

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 service which was also very very

00:07:16 --> 00:07:18 disconcerting So we we had no one to

00:07:18 --> 00:07:20 call to say look this doesn't work what

00:07:20 --> 00:07:23 can you do uh and it it it just left us

00:07:23 --> 00:07:25 in a really um difficult position and

00:07:25 --> 00:07:28 left a nasty taste in our mouths as well

00:07:28 --> 00:07:30 I wish I'd known about SY at that point

00:07:30 --> 00:07:34 in time Uh SY offers an eSIM service

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37 covering 180 countries Uh with an e SIM

00:07:37 --> 00:07:39 you don't have to physically change the

00:07:39 --> 00:07:41 SIM in your phone You just download it

00:07:41 --> 00:07:43 and it works when you switch the service

00:07:43 --> 00:07:47 on in whatever country or regional area

00:07:47 --> 00:07:50 that you want to serve the internet on

00:07:50 --> 00:07:53 And it's as simple as going to your app

00:07:53 --> 00:07:55 store or play store downloading the SY

00:07:55 --> 00:07:58 app and choosing whatever service you

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00 need from whatever country Uh and away

00:08:00 --> 00:08:03 you go Simple as that Right now there's

00:08:03 --> 00:08:05 a discount available to Space Nuts

00:08:05 --> 00:08:08 listeners And all you have to do when

00:08:08 --> 00:08:10 you buy whatever coverage area you've

00:08:10 --> 00:08:13 chosen is put space nuts uh the code

00:08:13 --> 00:08:16 word in at the checkout Okay so Space

00:08:16 --> 00:08:18 Nuts at the checkout will get you a

00:08:18 --> 00:08:21 discount as a Space Nuts listener on

00:08:21 --> 00:08:24 sale I highly recommend uh when you're

00:08:24 --> 00:08:27 overseas to use a service like this Uh

00:08:27 --> 00:08:28 so if you would like to get that

00:08:28 --> 00:08:30 discount as a as a Space Nuts listener

00:08:30 --> 00:08:33 on sale you download the app from your

00:08:33 --> 00:08:36 Android or Apple device and when you get

00:08:36 --> 00:08:38 to the checkout make sure you put Space

00:08:38 --> 00:08:39 Nuts in as the code word for the

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 discount Uh no matter where you are or

00:08:42 --> 00:08:44 what you plan to do this is a service

00:08:44 --> 00:08:47 that will back you 100% And you can read

00:08:48 --> 00:08:50 all about it as well at

00:08:50 --> 00:08:54 s.com/spacenuts That's

00:08:54 --> 00:08:56 sail.com/spacenuts and get all that

00:08:56 --> 00:08:58 stress out of your overseas travel This

00:08:58 --> 00:08:59 is one thing you won't have to worry

00:08:59 --> 00:09:01 about All the details of course are in

00:09:01 --> 00:09:02 our show

00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 notes Now back to the show Okay we

00:09:05 --> 00:09:07 checked all four systems and being with

00:09:07 --> 00:09:10 Space Nuts Well our next question is

00:09:10 --> 00:09:15 from Dan from California Dan the man He

00:09:15 --> 00:09:18 says "I was reading about gammaray

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20 bursts and how devastating they can be

00:09:20 --> 00:09:22 should they hit Earth Can you explain

00:09:22 --> 00:09:25 why gamma ray bursts become less lethal

00:09:25 --> 00:09:27 the further away they are because the

00:09:27 --> 00:09:29 majority of space is a void rather than

00:09:29 --> 00:09:32 dust?" I assume the same goes for radio

00:09:32 --> 00:09:34 waves where over distance they get

00:09:34 --> 00:09:37 weaker and weaker Is this really due to

00:09:37 --> 00:09:39 dust and gas that are weakening the

00:09:39 --> 00:09:43 signals thanks

00:09:43 --> 00:09:46 Um yes it's actually nothing to do with

00:09:46 --> 00:09:50 dust and gas Uh uh Dan sorry wrong

00:09:50 --> 00:09:52 name Reading the wrong bit of the

00:09:52 --> 00:09:56 question Uh Dan the uh the reason why

00:09:56 --> 00:09:58 things get weaker the further away you

00:09:58 --> 00:10:01 get is because of a fundamental law of

00:10:01 --> 00:10:02 physics which is called the inverse

00:10:02 --> 00:10:07 square law uh and that is that uh if you

00:10:07 --> 00:10:09 double the distance that you are from a

00:10:09 --> 00:10:11 source of gamma rays or radio waves or

00:10:11 --> 00:10:14 whatever you double the distance uh the

00:10:14 --> 00:10:16 signal drops by a factor of four It's

00:10:16 --> 00:10:18 the square of the distance That's why

00:10:18 --> 00:10:21 it's called the inverse square law Uh so

00:10:21 --> 00:10:23 double the distance um you get you know

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26 a quarter of the signal and if you then

00:10:26 --> 00:10:28 double the distance again um it goes

00:10:28 --> 00:10:32 down by an equally large you know it

00:10:32 --> 00:10:33 goes down by the square of the the new

00:10:33 --> 00:10:35 distance The new distance is four so it

00:10:36 --> 00:10:38 goes down by 16 a factor of 16 and

00:10:38 --> 00:10:41 that's why uh all these signals get

00:10:41 --> 00:10:44 weaker Uh dust and gas do impact on them

00:10:44 --> 00:10:48 Uh um and for example um the perhaps the

00:10:48 --> 00:10:50 best example of that is the center of

00:10:50 --> 00:10:52 our Milky Way galaxy at a distance of

00:10:52 --> 00:10:57 about 25 light years Um we can't see

00:10:57 --> 00:10:58 the center of that with visible light

00:10:58 --> 00:11:00 telescopes because of the dust that

00:11:00 --> 00:11:03 blocks our view It's dusty in the Milky

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 Way and the center of our galaxy is

00:11:05 --> 00:11:08 hidden uh infrared radiation penetrates

00:11:08 --> 00:11:10 the dust and that's why we can actually

00:11:10 --> 00:11:12 see it uh see the center of our galaxy

00:11:12 --> 00:11:15 in infrared but not with visible light

00:11:15 --> 00:11:17 So dust certainly has an effect but it's

00:11:17 --> 00:11:19 the distance that is the real effect

00:11:19 --> 00:11:21 This inverse square or means it you know

00:11:22 --> 00:11:24 it's the square of the distance uh by

00:11:24 --> 00:11:28 which it drops every time you move away

00:11:28 --> 00:11:30 I wonder if that's uh everyone has that

00:11:30 --> 00:11:32 crazy friend that always is just on

00:11:32 --> 00:11:34 speaker phone And they're like "Oh I

00:11:34 --> 00:11:35 don't want to hold the phone up to my

00:11:35 --> 00:11:37 head I don't want the waves to get me

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 I'm going to hold my phone." Yeah You

00:11:40 --> 00:11:41 know two feet away from my face and I'm

00:11:42 --> 00:11:43 going to shout into it so everybody can

00:11:43 --> 00:11:46 hear my conversation Who knows maybe

00:11:46 --> 00:11:48 they might be on to something Well

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 you're you're right that sound waves

00:11:50 --> 00:11:52 also uh are affected by the inverse

00:11:52 --> 00:11:55 square law So So if you double the

00:11:55 --> 00:11:57 distance from the person who's yelling

00:11:57 --> 00:12:00 into their phone uh then it's going to

00:12:00 --> 00:12:03 go down by a factor of four So that you

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 you know you try try you know doubling

00:12:06 --> 00:12:08 the distance twice and it'll drop by a

00:12:08 --> 00:12:10 factor of 16

00:12:10 --> 00:12:13 Yeah I can't hear

00:12:13 --> 00:12:16 you All right our next question is from

00:12:16 --> 00:12:19 Mike from the UK It's Mike Cupid from

00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 the UK here Uh a very quick question if

00:12:22 --> 00:12:25 I may I have heard many many questions

00:12:25 --> 00:12:27 over the years into you guys about

00:12:27 --> 00:12:30 terraforming Mars uh which is obviously

00:12:30 --> 00:12:32 something that is beyond our capability

00:12:32 --> 00:12:35 but a lot of people dream about Um what

00:12:35 --> 00:12:38 about terraforming Venus uh it's not

00:12:38 --> 00:12:40 something I've heard a lot about Now

00:12:40 --> 00:12:44 obviously it it's probably still beyond

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46 our capability So let's just talk sort

00:12:46 --> 00:12:49 of theoretical but would it just be a

00:12:49 --> 00:12:52 case of blocking out some of the sun's

00:12:52 --> 00:12:54 rays to cool the planet down and

00:12:54 --> 00:12:57 potentially reverse that runaway

00:12:57 --> 00:12:59 greenhouse effect that's happening on on

00:12:59 --> 00:13:03 Venus so potentially just thinking

00:13:03 --> 00:13:06 outside the box possibly um collide to

00:13:06 --> 00:13:10 uh asteroids together and let the debris

00:13:10 --> 00:13:12 catch in the orbit of Venus blocking out

00:13:12 --> 00:13:15 some of the sun and then cooling it down

00:13:15 --> 00:13:17 or potentially even sort of build a

00:13:17 --> 00:13:19 structure to block some of the sun's

00:13:19 --> 00:13:22 rays Um and the other question as well

00:13:22 --> 00:13:24 and like I say I know this is probably

00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 beyond our capability but if we did

00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 manage to do that and cool the planet

00:13:30 --> 00:13:33 down if we could get the conditions on

00:13:33 --> 00:13:36 Venus to be similar to what they are on

00:13:36 --> 00:13:39 Earth um which would probably never

00:13:39 --> 00:13:42 happen anyway but would it

00:13:42 --> 00:13:46 stabilize or would the greenhouse

00:13:46 --> 00:13:49 runaway effect happen again um is it too

00:13:49 --> 00:13:53 close to the sun to hold a stable

00:13:53 --> 00:13:56 atmosphere and a similar temperature to

00:13:56 --> 00:13:59 Earth um love the show It's my favorite

00:13:59 --> 00:14:01 podcast in the uh in the world I listen

00:14:01 --> 00:14:03 to it all the time I think I've listened

00:14:03 --> 00:14:05 to just about every episode So uh

00:14:05 --> 00:14:07 regardless of whether you answer my

00:14:07 --> 00:14:08 question or not please keep up the good

00:14:08 --> 00:14:10 work and thank you very much for your

00:14:10 --> 00:14:14 time Yeah that's a a great question Mike

00:14:14 --> 00:14:19 Um terraforming Venus Venus is so

00:14:19 --> 00:14:22 different from the Earth in its natural

00:14:22 --> 00:14:24 environment that it's hard to think of a

00:14:24 --> 00:14:26 more well you can think of more

00:14:26 --> 00:14:28 different planets because exoplanets are

00:14:28 --> 00:14:30 even wider in range But yes here we've

00:14:30 --> 00:14:32 got a planet with a surface temperature

00:14:32 --> 00:14:36 of about 460° C Hot enough to melt lead

00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 uh uh hot enough that the rocks probably

00:14:39 --> 00:14:42 glow a dull red as well uh because of

00:14:42 --> 00:14:44 that temperature uh and an atmosphere

00:14:44 --> 00:14:46 whose pressure is 100 times the pressure

00:14:46 --> 00:14:49 of the Earth's atmosphere laden with

00:14:49 --> 00:14:51 carbon dioxide And just to add to that

00:14:51 --> 00:14:55 lovely um benign picture uh in the upper

00:14:55 --> 00:14:57 atmosphere it drizzles sulfuric acid So

00:14:57 --> 00:15:00 you've really got a hellish uh

00:15:00 --> 00:15:04 circumstance for anybody on Venus Uh how

00:15:04 --> 00:15:07 could you terraform it well you you're

00:15:07 --> 00:15:11 you're right that the fact that Venus is

00:15:11 --> 00:15:12 you know it's much nearer the sun than

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 we are on Earth that contributes and

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 goes back to the question we were just

00:15:17 --> 00:15:19 talking about You you it's the inverse

00:15:19 --> 00:15:21 square law Uh so you're actually getting

00:15:21 --> 00:15:23 far more radiation than you might think

00:15:23 --> 00:15:26 just by being um you know a few million

00:15:26 --> 00:15:28 kil a few tens of millions of kilometers

00:15:28 --> 00:15:32 nearer to the sun Um the idea of

00:15:32 --> 00:15:34 blocking the sun's light is something

00:15:34 --> 00:15:37 that has been suggested quite seriously

00:15:37 --> 00:15:42 uh on on Earth uh in order to reduce the

00:15:42 --> 00:15:45 carbon footprint that we're all making

00:15:45 --> 00:15:48 Uh if you um launch I'm trying to

00:15:48 --> 00:15:50 remember who suggested it at first It's

00:15:50 --> 00:15:52 somebody I know and I can't remember who

00:15:52 --> 00:15:55 it was Uh but if you launch a swarm of

00:15:55 --> 00:15:58 spacecraft and put them at what we call

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00 the L2 point the second mrange point

00:16:00 --> 00:16:03 which is a stable position between any

00:16:03 --> 00:16:05 planet and the sun where the gravity

00:16:06 --> 00:16:07 balances out you put this swarm of

00:16:08 --> 00:16:09 spacecraft This was suggested for the

00:16:09 --> 00:16:11 Earth but it would equally apply to

00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 Venus You can do the same thing to try

00:16:13 --> 00:16:16 and block down the sun's light I'm not

00:16:16 --> 00:16:19 convinced that that would actually have

00:16:19 --> 00:16:23 any uh positive effect on the uh on the

00:16:23 --> 00:16:25 atmosphere of Venus It would certainly

00:16:25 --> 00:16:27 cool the radiation that it feels from

00:16:27 --> 00:16:31 the sun Uh that uh the the the carbon

00:16:31 --> 00:16:33 dioxide rich atmosphere would still act

00:16:33 --> 00:16:36 as a um you know as a a runaway

00:16:36 --> 00:16:39 greenhouse atmosphere Uh so I think you

00:16:39 --> 00:16:41 would still have these very high

00:16:41 --> 00:16:44 temperatures and I don't think there is

00:16:44 --> 00:16:46 any technology we could imagine that

00:16:46 --> 00:16:49 would change that and if you were going

00:16:49 --> 00:16:52 to think about terraforming somewhere uh

00:16:52 --> 00:16:53 and I should say it's pretty well

00:16:54 --> 00:16:55 impossible but if you were going to

00:16:55 --> 00:16:58 think of it Mars will be a better bet Uh

00:16:58 --> 00:17:00 you'd have to keep on terraforming it

00:17:00 --> 00:17:01 though because Mars doesn't have enough

00:17:01 --> 00:17:03 gravity to hang on to an atmosphere like

00:17:03 --> 00:17:07 the Earth's So um I think you're right

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 that you would not um you would not lose

00:17:09 --> 00:17:11 the runaway greenhouse effect It would

00:17:11 --> 00:17:15 not uh it would not go away basically

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 Yeah Venus is really I'm sorry Venus

00:17:18 --> 00:17:21 It's a terrible terrible planet It's uh

00:17:21 --> 00:17:24 really I think pretty pretty nasty as

00:17:24 --> 00:17:26 far as everything that's going on on

00:17:26 --> 00:17:29 that planet But you know we we did

00:17:30 --> 00:17:31 historically used to think that that was

00:17:31 --> 00:17:34 going to be the most similar closest

00:17:34 --> 00:17:37 planet to us and then we flew some

00:17:37 --> 00:17:38 satellites by it and we're like "Oh

00:17:38 --> 00:17:40 that's terrifying."

00:17:40 --> 00:17:42 But yeah you're right I mean it is

00:17:42 --> 00:17:44 similar It's virtually the same size as

00:17:44 --> 00:17:47 Earth Uh there's some new research just

00:17:47 --> 00:17:50 been uh released actually which I nearly

00:17:50 --> 00:17:51 thought we might talk about on Space

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53 Nuts Uh and it's about the crust of

00:17:53 --> 00:17:58 Venus uh the the because like the Earth

00:17:58 --> 00:18:02 uh Venus has we don't know what's at its

00:18:02 --> 00:18:04 core It doesn't have a magnetic field So

00:18:04 --> 00:18:06 it's probably not an iron core like ours

00:18:06 --> 00:18:08 A mantle a sort of soft rock above that

00:18:08 --> 00:18:11 and a crust Uh and we live on the

00:18:12 --> 00:18:13 Earth's crust for example which is not

00:18:13 --> 00:18:16 very thick It's 30 or 40 kilometers

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19 thick which is quite slender But the

00:18:19 --> 00:18:22 thinking is that uh Venus has a much

00:18:22 --> 00:18:24 thicker crust and that there is what we

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 call convection This you know heat

00:18:26 --> 00:18:29 rising or material rising because of

00:18:29 --> 00:18:31 because of heat convection taking place

00:18:31 --> 00:18:34 in the crust of Venus which may be why

00:18:34 --> 00:18:36 Venus has the largest number of

00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 volcanoes of any object known in the

00:18:39 --> 00:18:40 solar system Now we don't know if

00:18:40 --> 00:18:42 they're active or not Uh this is just

00:18:42 --> 00:18:44 counting craters from radar measurements

00:18:44 --> 00:18:47 of its surface It's uh got the largest

00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 number of certainly volcanic structures

00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 Uh and the thinking now is that that

00:18:52 --> 00:18:54 comes from convection in the crust

00:18:54 --> 00:18:55 rather than convection in the mantle

00:18:55 --> 00:18:57 which is what we have here on Earth Just

00:18:57 --> 00:18:59 a little factoid about Venus that I

00:18:59 --> 00:19:02 think contributes to its um its

00:19:02 --> 00:19:06 reputation as uh Earth's ugly system

00:19:06 --> 00:19:08 Well that's a that is a such a fun fact

00:19:08 --> 00:19:13 though I never knew that about Venus

00:19:13 --> 00:19:20 3 2 1 Space nuts Our very last question

00:19:20 --> 00:19:23 is from Todd who's from Utah Um I I am

00:19:24 --> 00:19:26 also from Utah So Todd thank you for uh

00:19:26 --> 00:19:29 representing our our little state

00:19:29 --> 00:19:31 Hopefully you're uh winding up for some

00:19:31 --> 00:19:34 good weather there I know springtime um

00:19:34 --> 00:19:36 in Salt Lake's always really beautiful

00:19:36 --> 00:19:38 and I don't know if you're a skier if

00:19:38 --> 00:19:40 you got some good skiing in this season

00:19:40 --> 00:19:44 but that's my little plug to a fellow

00:19:44 --> 00:19:47 Uton His question is "Hello gentlemen I

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50 have a question about the double slit

00:19:50 --> 00:19:53 experiment." Well truthfully I have many

00:19:53 --> 00:19:55 questions about it but let's just focus

00:19:55 --> 00:19:58 on one for now I have seen that some

00:19:58 --> 00:20:00 have done this experiment by shooting

00:20:00 --> 00:20:04 individual um photons at the double slit

00:20:04 --> 00:20:07 one at a time Yet this still produces an

00:20:07 --> 00:20:10 inference pattern This of course boggles

00:20:10 --> 00:20:13 my mind I've read that I've read that

00:20:13 --> 00:20:16 this is an example of quantum superos

00:20:17 --> 00:20:19 superposition and that somehow those

00:20:19 --> 00:20:22 photons are interacting with themselves

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 Can you and Fred please elaborate on

00:20:24 --> 00:20:27 what exactly we understand is happening

00:20:27 --> 00:20:29 here is this something silly along the

00:20:29 --> 00:20:31 lines of photons not being bound by time

00:20:31 --> 00:20:34 speaking of time thank you for yours

00:20:34 --> 00:20:37 Finally I have an observational joke for

00:20:37 --> 00:20:42 you In 3,25 years from now life on Earth

00:20:42 --> 00:20:45 will either be really good or really bad

00:20:45 --> 00:20:46 It's

00:20:46 --> 00:20:51 50/50 That is from uh Todd from Utah USA

00:20:51 --> 00:20:53 Thank you so much for the joke Todd and

00:20:53 --> 00:20:56 the question I like the joke a lot but

00:20:56 --> 00:20:58 nobody I've told it to so far gets it So

00:20:58 --> 00:21:01 I'm obviously losing something in the

00:21:01 --> 00:21:03 retelling there Uh it's a good one Thank

00:21:03 --> 00:21:05 you I think you need a better audience

00:21:06 --> 00:21:07 They're not laughing at that They're

00:21:08 --> 00:21:13 maybe So yeah Anyway the question yeah

00:21:13 --> 00:21:15 this is and just to you know sort of

00:21:15 --> 00:21:16 fill in the backstory what are we

00:21:16 --> 00:21:18 talking about with the double slit

00:21:18 --> 00:21:22 experiment um if you pass beams of light

00:21:22 --> 00:21:25 through two slits uh under the right

00:21:25 --> 00:21:27 circumstance they will interfere with

00:21:27 --> 00:21:29 one another and that means we will see

00:21:29 --> 00:21:32 bright and dark patterns because of the

00:21:32 --> 00:21:36 way the waves mix Uh so waves of light

00:21:36 --> 00:21:38 basically can add together or can cancel

00:21:38 --> 00:21:40 out and it's where they add together and

00:21:40 --> 00:21:42 cancel out that we see these bright and

00:21:42 --> 00:21:45 dark patterns I was very keen on

00:21:45 --> 00:21:47 interferometry the technique of doing

00:21:47 --> 00:21:49 that and making measurements by it when

00:21:49 --> 00:21:53 I was a young student Uh but um so that

00:21:53 --> 00:21:56 uh is basically it was the proof of the

00:21:56 --> 00:21:59 fact that light is a wave motion um

00:21:59 --> 00:22:02 because Newton thought it was particles

00:22:02 --> 00:22:04 uh but it was demonstrated not long

00:22:04 --> 00:22:06 after Newton's time that it was a wave

00:22:06 --> 00:22:08 motion by virtue of this double slit

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11 experiment at the beginning of the 19th

00:22:11 --> 00:22:16 century But now um we know that light is

00:22:16 --> 00:22:19 particles and waves

00:22:19 --> 00:22:21 uh and sometime maybe the way to imagine

00:22:21 --> 00:22:24 it is as wave packets These photons

00:22:24 --> 00:22:28 particles of light are sort of also a

00:22:28 --> 00:22:30 wave Uh that was the way we kind of

00:22:30 --> 00:22:32 looked at things perhaps in the 50s and

00:22:32 --> 00:22:34 60s that photons were packets of waves

00:22:34 --> 00:22:36 because that would let you then use

00:22:36 --> 00:22:39 particles but the that they would still

00:22:39 --> 00:22:40 do this interference trick So that

00:22:40 --> 00:22:43 proved they had a wave motion Along

00:22:43 --> 00:22:46 comes quantum theory that says particles

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49 are basically made of waves Uh they're

00:22:49 --> 00:22:51 not just packets of waves they're made

00:22:51 --> 00:22:56 of waves in a very odd way And uh that

00:22:56 --> 00:22:59 uh experiment that uh that Todd has

00:22:59 --> 00:23:02 referred to is the one that tells you

00:23:02 --> 00:23:04 that there's something really peculiar

00:23:04 --> 00:23:08 going on uh because if you shoot photons

00:23:08 --> 00:23:11 single photons through this double slit

00:23:11 --> 00:23:13 experiment one at a time so that they

00:23:13 --> 00:23:16 they never come together in a wave meth

00:23:16 --> 00:23:18 method you still get the interference

00:23:18 --> 00:23:20 pattern building up that proves that

00:23:20 --> 00:23:24 they're waves And I think um you know uh

00:23:24 --> 00:23:25 Todd's comment about is it something

00:23:25 --> 00:23:30 silly like uh photons not being bound by

00:23:30 --> 00:23:34 time in a way it is uh I think it's more

00:23:34 --> 00:23:39 about the the mystery of uh quantum

00:23:39 --> 00:23:41 entanglement that these particles are

00:23:41 --> 00:23:43 entangled together which means that they

00:23:43 --> 00:23:45 behave like a single particle So if

00:23:46 --> 00:23:47 you've got one going through one side of

00:23:47 --> 00:23:49 the slit or one half of the slit one

00:23:49 --> 00:23:52 going through another uh they're still

00:23:52 --> 00:23:54 part of the same object even if they're

00:23:54 --> 00:23:57 going through at different times So

00:23:57 --> 00:24:00 that's perhaps yes that they're not

00:24:00 --> 00:24:01 bound by time in that sense but I think

00:24:02 --> 00:24:03 it's more to do with the phenomenon of

00:24:03 --> 00:24:06 quantum entanglement that things behave

00:24:06 --> 00:24:08 as though they're a single quantum

00:24:08 --> 00:24:09 object even though they're quite

00:24:09 --> 00:24:11 separate They're separated sometimes by

00:24:11 --> 00:24:15 very large distances uh uh but they they

00:24:15 --> 00:24:17 have common behavior between them and I

00:24:17 --> 00:24:19 think that's how the double slit

00:24:19 --> 00:24:22 experiment arises when you use photons

00:24:22 --> 00:24:25 separate photons I probably left you

00:24:25 --> 00:24:28 completely cold and hiding I thought

00:24:28 --> 00:24:30 this was fantastic and all went

00:24:30 --> 00:24:34 completely over my head Yeah but it's

00:24:34 --> 00:24:36 one of the it's one of the sort of

00:24:36 --> 00:24:39 fundamental experiments of physics that

00:24:39 --> 00:24:41 tells you that light is both a wave and

00:24:41 --> 00:24:44 a particle but the two somehow mix

00:24:44 --> 00:24:46 together in a very mysterious way I

00:24:46 --> 00:24:48 think that's the bottom line Okay Well I

00:24:48 --> 00:24:51 I I think I can understand that it's a

00:24:51 --> 00:24:53 mystery and they miss I understood those

00:24:53 --> 00:24:54 words

00:24:54 --> 00:24:57 Yeah Oh wow I mean once again thank you

00:24:57 --> 00:25:00 so much Fred for you always take um such

00:25:00 --> 00:25:02 such patience and care with answering

00:25:02 --> 00:25:05 these questions and making making things

00:25:05 --> 00:25:07 make sense and just making it fun and

00:25:07 --> 00:25:09 relatable and just and just exploring

00:25:09 --> 00:25:12 and thinking together So thank you so

00:25:12 --> 00:25:15 much for um everything that you provided

00:25:15 --> 00:25:18 us with today It's a pleasure Kaidie

00:25:18 --> 00:25:20 Thank you for being the the colonel of

00:25:20 --> 00:25:23 the of the show by keeping it going I

00:25:23 --> 00:25:26 mean K E R N E L rather than C O

00:25:26 --> 00:25:29 N C English language is uh quite

00:25:29 --> 00:25:31 interesting Well thank you so much

00:25:31 --> 00:25:35 everybody for listening in to today's

00:25:35 --> 00:25:37 episode This today's question and answer

00:25:37 --> 00:25:40 episode of Space Nuts and we will catch

00:25:40 --> 00:25:42 you next week I will be back here again

00:25:42 --> 00:25:44 for just a couple more weeks and then

00:25:44 --> 00:25:46 you'll get your dear sweet Andrew back

00:25:46 --> 00:25:48 But until then you're stuck with me Uh

00:25:48 --> 00:25:50 thanks again to those of you I heard

00:25:50 --> 00:25:52 that um a few of you wrote in with some

00:25:52 --> 00:25:54 kind words about me So thank you so much

00:25:54 --> 00:25:57 if you guys had compliments I appreciate

00:25:57 --> 00:26:01 that Um but until next time we will be

00:26:01 --> 00:26:03 signing off Thank you so much Thank you

00:26:04 --> 00:26:05 Heidi And thanks also to Hugh in the

00:26:06 --> 00:26:07 background there back in the studio

00:26:07 --> 00:26:10 keeping us all honest We'll see you next

00:26:10 --> 00:26:13 time Heidi Bye for now Space nuts You'll

00:26:13 --> 00:26:17 be listening to the Space Nuts podcast

00:26:17 --> 00:26:20 available at Apple Podcasts Spotify

00:26:20 --> 00:26:23 iHeart Radio or your favorite podcast

00:26:23 --> 00:26:25 player You can also stream on demand at

00:26:25 --> 00:26:28 byes.com This has been another quality

00:26:28 --> 00:26:32 podcast production from byes.com