European Launch Ambitions, Starquake Mysteries, and the Quest for Hidden Stars
Space News TodayDecember 01, 202500:09:158.47 MB

European Launch Ambitions, Starquake Mysteries, and the Quest for Hidden Stars

ESA's European Launcher Challenge: The European Space Agency is taking significant steps towards enhancing its commercial launch market, with member states committing over 900 million euros to the European Launcher Challenge. This initiative will see ESA acting as an anchor client, co-funding upgrades for private companies and stimulating competition and innovation in space launch services.

Starquakes and Black Holes: Scientists are uncovering the mysteries of dormant black holes through the study of starquakes, or asteroseismology. Two systems, Gaia BH2 and Gaia BH3, reveal intriguing contradictions in the ages and compositions of their red giant stars, prompting a reevaluation of our understanding of stellar behavior and black hole interactions.

Redefining Time: A philosophical exploration into the nature of time sheds light on the distinction between existence and occurrence. By clarifying the concept of time, researchers challenge long-standing beliefs and offer a new perspective on Einstein's spacetime, suggesting that time should be viewed as a map of events rather than a physical entity.

Hidden Stars and SETI: A new study proposes that the search for extraterrestrial intelligence can be improved by considering previously overlooked stars. By utilizing the Besanc Galactic model, scientists can predict hidden stars in the field of view of telescopes, expanding the search for technosignatures without the need for additional observations.

Wessen Lunar Monitoring Mission: A new mission from Hong Kong, named Wessen, aims to provide continuous monitoring of meteoroid impacts on the Moon. Set to launch by 2028, this lunar orbiter will track the bright flashes caused by impacts, crucial for ensuring the safety of future lunar infrastructure and astronauts as nations plan for lunar bases.

For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io (http://www.astronomydaily.io/). Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTubeMusic, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna and Avery signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and exploring the wonders of our universe.

✍️ Episode References

ESA's European Launcher Challenge

[European Space Agency]( https://www.esa.int/ (https://www.esa.int/) )

Starquakes and Black Holes Research

[NASA]( https://www.nasa.gov/ (https://www.nasa.gov/) )

Philosophical Insights on Time

[Physics Today]( https://www.physicstoday.org/ (https://www.physicstoday.org/) )

SETI and Hidden Stars Study

[SETI Institute]( https://www.seti.org/ (https://www.seti.org/) )

Wessen Lunar Mission Details

[Hong Kong Space Research]( https://www.hksr.org/ (https://www.hksr.org/) )


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .


Sponsor Details:

Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!


Sponsor Details:

Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!


Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)


This episode includes AI-generated content.

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/30382892?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Hello and welcome to Astronomy Daily,

00:00:02 --> 00:00:04 [music] the podcast that brings you the

00:00:04 --> 00:00:06 latest news from across the cosmos. I'm

00:00:06 --> 00:00:07 Avery. [music]

00:00:07 --> 00:00:10 >> And I'm Anna. It's great to be with you.

00:00:10 --> 00:00:12 Today's agenda covers a lot, from

00:00:12 --> 00:00:14 [music] Europe's new ambitions in space

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 launch to the strange secrets of star

00:00:17 --> 00:00:18 [music] quakes near black holes.

00:00:18 --> 00:00:20 >> That's right. We'll also be diving into

00:00:20 --> 00:00:23 the very nature of time itself,

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25 searching for hidden stars that might

00:00:25 --> 00:00:27 host intelligent life, and looking at a

00:00:27 --> 00:00:29 new mission to monitor the dangers of

00:00:29 --> 00:00:32 living on the moon. So, let's get

00:00:32 --> 00:00:33 started.

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35 >> First up, [music] there's big news from

00:00:35 --> 00:00:37 the European Space Agency. It looks like

00:00:37 --> 00:00:39 they're getting very serious about

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 fostering a commercial launch market.

00:00:41 --> 00:00:44 >> They certainly are. Member states have

00:00:44 --> 00:00:47 committed over€ 900 million e to the

00:00:47 --> 00:00:49 European Launcher Challenge. That's more

00:00:49 --> 00:00:50 than double what was anticipated.

00:00:50 --> 00:00:52 >> And what's interesting here is the

00:00:52 --> 00:00:55 strategy. This isn't about ISSA directly

00:00:55 --> 00:00:57 funding the development of a new rocket.

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 Instead, they're acting more like a

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02 customer, promising to purchase launch

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05 services and co-und upgrades for private

00:01:05 --> 00:01:05 companies.

00:01:05 --> 00:01:07 >> Right? It's the shift from being the

00:01:07 --> 00:01:09 builder to being an anchor client. It's

00:01:09 --> 00:01:11 a model that has worked very well for

00:01:11 --> 00:01:14 NASA with companies like SpaceX. It

00:01:14 --> 00:01:16 stimulates competition and innovation.

00:01:16 --> 00:01:18 >> Exactly. There's a whole list of

00:01:18 --> 00:01:20 companies shortlisted for this,

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23 including ESAR Aerospace, Rocket

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 Factory, Augsburg, and PLLD Space, among

00:01:26 --> 00:01:28 others. We're seeing major contributions

00:01:28 --> 00:01:31 from countries like Germany, Spain, and

00:01:31 --> 00:01:32 the UK.

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 >> So, what's the timeline for this? When

00:01:35 --> 00:01:36 can we expect to see these new launch

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38 services in action?

00:01:38 --> 00:01:40 >> The plan is to sign framework agreements

00:01:40 --> 00:01:43 in 2026 with the goal of seeing launch

00:01:43 --> 00:01:47 system demonstrations by 2027. If all

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49 goes well, we should see actual missions

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 being flown under this program by 2030.

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 It's a major step towards European

00:01:54 --> 00:01:56 autonomy and space access.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:59 >> From launching rockets to listening to

00:01:59 --> 00:02:01 stars, our next story is truly

00:02:01 --> 00:02:04 fascinating. Scientists are using star

00:02:04 --> 00:02:07 quakes to uncover the secrets of dormant

00:02:07 --> 00:02:09 black holes. And it's rewriting what we

00:02:09 --> 00:02:10 thought we knew.

00:02:10 --> 00:02:14 >> Star quakes? So, you mean astroismology?

00:02:14 --> 00:02:16 studying the oscillations of stars.

00:02:16 --> 00:02:19 >> Precisely. The study focused on two

00:02:19 --> 00:02:23 systems, Gaia BH2 and Gaia BH3.

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 Each has a red giant star orbiting a

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 quiet black hole. In the Gaia BH2

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 system, the star quakes revealed a

00:02:31 --> 00:02:34 puzzle. The star appears young, but its

00:02:34 --> 00:02:37 chemical composition says it's old.

00:02:37 --> 00:02:39 >> That's a contradiction. How did they

00:02:39 --> 00:02:41 explain that? The leading theory is that

00:02:41 --> 00:02:43 the red giant is actually the product of

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46 two stars that merged into one. This

00:02:46 --> 00:02:48 would explain its unusually fast spin

00:02:48 --> 00:02:51 rate as well. So, it had a dramatic life

00:02:51 --> 00:02:53 even before it got captured by the black

00:02:53 --> 00:02:54 hole.

00:02:54 --> 00:02:56 >> Incredible. And what about the other

00:02:56 --> 00:02:58 system Gaia BH3?

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00 >> That one presented a different kind of

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 mystery. The red giant in that system is

00:03:03 --> 00:03:06 ancient and what we call metal pore.

00:03:06 --> 00:03:08 According to our models, it should be

00:03:08 --> 00:03:11 showing starquakes, but it isn't. It's

00:03:11 --> 00:03:12 completely silent.

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15 >> So, our understanding of how these old

00:03:15 --> 00:03:17 stars behave might be wrong.

00:03:17 --> 00:03:21 >> It suggests that yes, the research is a

00:03:21 --> 00:03:23 fantastic example of how studying these

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26 companion stars can refine how we

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28 measure black hole masses and reveal the

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31 complex violent histories these systems

00:03:31 --> 00:03:34 can have. Well, from the complex history

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37 of stars to the complex nature of time

00:03:37 --> 00:03:40 itself, this is a topic that has baffled

00:03:40 --> 00:03:42 physicists and philosophers for

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44 centuries. As St. Augustine famously

00:03:44 --> 00:03:47 said, we know what time is until someone

00:03:47 --> 00:03:49 asks us to explain it.

00:03:49 --> 00:03:51 >> It's one of the ultimate questions. And

00:03:51 --> 00:03:53 a lot of the confusion, according to

00:03:53 --> 00:03:56 some physicists, comes from mixing up

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 two different concepts, existence and

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 occurrence. Okay, break that down for

00:04:02 --> 00:04:03 us.

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05 >> The universe as a physical object

00:04:05 --> 00:04:07 exists, but events within the universe

00:04:07 --> 00:04:10 don't exist in the same way. They happen

00:04:10 --> 00:04:13 or they occur. The past isn't a place

00:04:13 --> 00:04:16 that still exists. And the future isn't

00:04:16 --> 00:04:18 a place that's waiting for us. They are

00:04:18 --> 00:04:20 just records and probabilities of

00:04:20 --> 00:04:21 occurrences.

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24 >> That makes sense. So, this helps clarify

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 some old philosophical arguments.

00:04:27 --> 00:04:29 >> It does. Take the ancient Greek

00:04:29 --> 00:04:31 philosopher Parmenities who argue that

00:04:31 --> 00:04:33 since we can talk about the past and

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36 future, they must exist. This new

00:04:36 --> 00:04:38 perspective says that's a fallacy based

00:04:38 --> 00:04:41 on that core confusion. The same goes

00:04:41 --> 00:04:43 for how we often interpret Einstein's

00:04:43 --> 00:04:45 concept of spaceime.

00:04:45 --> 00:04:47 >> Right. People often imagine spacetime as

00:04:48 --> 00:04:50 a physical block universe that you could

00:04:50 --> 00:04:52 theoretically travel through.

00:04:52 --> 00:04:54 >> Exactly. But it's more useful to think

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57 of spaceime as a map of events. The map

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 is a real useful model, but it's not the

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02 territory. The map of your city exists,

00:05:02 --> 00:05:05 but you can't live in the map. By

00:05:05 --> 00:05:07 cleanly separating the existence of the

00:05:07 --> 00:05:10 universe from the occurrence of events,

00:05:10 --> 00:05:12 the so-called mystery of time becomes

00:05:12 --> 00:05:14 much less mysterious.

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 >> Speaking of searching for things, let's

00:05:16 --> 00:05:19 turn our attention to the search for

00:05:19 --> 00:05:22 extraterrestrial intelligence or SETI. A

00:05:22 --> 00:05:24 new study suggests we can make our

00:05:24 --> 00:05:27 search much more effective by accounting

00:05:27 --> 00:05:29 for stars that we've been ignoring.

00:05:30 --> 00:05:33 >> Hidden stars. How can a star be hidden?

00:05:33 --> 00:05:34 >> It's not that they're physically hidden,

00:05:34 --> 00:05:36 but they're not the primary targets of

00:05:36 --> 00:05:39 our surveys. Think about it. When a

00:05:39 --> 00:05:41 radio telescope points at a specific

00:05:41 --> 00:05:45 star, its field of view is much wider.

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47 It inevitably captures data from

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49 countless other stars in the background

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51 and foreground. The study calls this

00:05:51 --> 00:05:53 stellar by catch.

00:05:53 --> 00:05:56 >> Ah, I see. So, we have all this data on

00:05:56 --> 00:05:58 stars we weren't even intentionally

00:05:58 --> 00:05:59 looking at.

00:05:59 --> 00:06:01 >> Precisely. The challenge is knowing

00:06:01 --> 00:06:04 which stars are in that by catch. To

00:06:04 --> 00:06:06 solve this, scientists are using

00:06:06 --> 00:06:08 something called the Bisank galactic

00:06:08 --> 00:06:11 model. It simulates our galaxy's star

00:06:11 --> 00:06:13 populations, allowing them to predict

00:06:13 --> 00:06:15 which hidden stars are likely in a

00:06:15 --> 00:06:17 telescope's field of view at any given

00:06:18 --> 00:06:20 time. So this vastly expands the number

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 of stars we're monitoring for techno

00:06:22 --> 00:06:24 signatures without needing any new

00:06:24 --> 00:06:26 observations or equipment.

00:06:26 --> 00:06:29 >> Yes. And it also helps remove human bias

00:06:29 --> 00:06:32 from target selection. Projects like

00:06:32 --> 00:06:34 Breakthrough Listen can now apply this

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36 method to get a much more comprehensive

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39 survey of our galaxy. It's a very clever

00:06:39 --> 00:06:42 way to maximize the scientific return

00:06:42 --> 00:06:44 from the data we're already collecting.

00:06:44 --> 00:06:46 For our final story, we're coming back a

00:06:46 --> 00:06:49 little closer to home, to the moon. As

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51 nations like China and the US make

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53 serious plans for lunar bases, a new

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 mission from Hong Kong aims to monitor a

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 constant threat, things falling from the

00:06:58 --> 00:06:59 sky.

00:06:59 --> 00:07:02 >> You mean meteoroid impacts. We know they

00:07:02 --> 00:07:04 happen, but this mission aims to provide

00:07:04 --> 00:07:07 the first ever continuous monitoring of

00:07:07 --> 00:07:08 them from lunar orbit.

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 >> That's right. The mission is called

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 Wessen, which means moon flashes. It's a

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 lunar orbiter set to launch by 2028. Its

00:07:16 --> 00:07:18 primary job will be to watch for the

00:07:18 --> 00:07:20 bright flashes caused by meteoroids

00:07:20 --> 00:07:22 hitting the lunar surface.

00:07:22 --> 00:07:24 >> And this data is critical. Without an

00:07:24 --> 00:07:27 atmosphere to burn them up, even small

00:07:27 --> 00:07:29 pebbles can hit with the force of a hand

00:07:29 --> 00:07:32 grenade. These impacts pose a very real

00:07:32 --> 00:07:34 threat to future lunar infrastructure

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37 and of course to astronauts.

00:07:37 --> 00:07:38 >> It's a huge engineering and safety

00:07:38 --> 00:07:40 challenge. Wesson's data will be

00:07:40 --> 00:07:42 particularly valuable for China's

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44 ambitious plans to establish a lunar

00:07:44 --> 00:07:46 research station. What's also notable is

00:07:46 --> 00:07:48 that the telescope for the mission is

00:07:48 --> 00:07:50 being designed and built in Hong Kong,

00:07:50 --> 00:07:52 marking a significant step for the city

00:07:52 --> 00:07:53 in space exploration.

00:07:53 --> 00:07:55 >> It will be a great complement to other

00:07:56 --> 00:07:58 monitoring efforts like NASA's

00:07:58 --> 00:08:00 Earth-based observations and ISIS

00:08:00 --> 00:08:03 proposed Lumio mission. To truly

00:08:03 --> 00:08:04 understand the risks of living on the

00:08:04 --> 00:08:07 moon, we need that constant closeup

00:08:08 --> 00:08:10 view. USAN promises to deliver just

00:08:10 --> 00:08:11 that.

00:08:11 --> 00:08:13 >> And that's all the time we have for

00:08:13 --> 00:08:15 today. From commercial rockets to cosmic

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17 philosophies, we've covered a lot of

00:08:17 --> 00:08:18 ground.

00:08:18 --> 00:08:20 >> We hope you enjoyed the journey. Join us

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22 next time for another edition of

00:08:22 --> 00:08:24 Astronomy Daily, where we continue to

00:08:24 --> 00:08:27 explore the universe one story at a

00:08:27 --> 00:08:29 time. Thanks for listening.

00:08:29 --> 00:08:32 >> And one quick plug. For more space and

00:08:32 --> 00:08:35 astronomy news and all our back catalog,

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37 just visit our website at

00:08:37 --> 00:08:40 astronomyaily.io.

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 You can also follow us on social media.

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 Just search for Astro Daily Pod on your

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47 favorite platforms. That's it for me.

00:08:48 --> 00:08:50 I'm Avery. Clear skies, everyone, and

00:08:50 --> 00:08:55 keep looking up.

00:08:55 --> 00:09:02 [music]

00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 Stories told. [music]