Moon Safe! Asteroid Threat Ends + Cosmic Laser Record + Solar Storm Hits Mars
Space News TodayMarch 06, 202600:19:5318.21 MB

Moon Safe! Asteroid Threat Ends + Cosmic Laser Record + Solar Storm Hits Mars

Astronomy Daily — S05E55 | 6 March 2026 Six stories today covering planetary defence, a cosmic laser record, a solar superstorm on Mars, space debris pollution, a mystery satellite launch, and the most charming farming experiment you'll hear about all year. Stories This Episode 1. Asteroid 2024 YR4 — Moon Impact Officially Ruled Out NASA has confirmed, using the James Webb Space Telescope, that infamous asteroid 2024 YR4 will not hit the Moon in 2032. The space rock — once the most dangerous asteroid identified in two decades — will instead pass the Moon at a distance of around 13,200 miles. It previously held a 4% lunar impact probability, now fully eliminated thanks to Webb's extraordinary sensitivity pushing it to the limits of what the telescope can observe. 2. MeerKAT Detects Cosmic 'Gigalaser' 8 Billion Light-Years Away South Africa's MeerKAT radio telescope has spotted the most distant hydroxyl megamaser ever detected — a natural 'space laser' in a galaxy undergoing a violent collision more than 8 billion light-years away. The signal is so powerful it qualifies as a gigamaser. Adding to the serendipity, the signal was further amplified by a foreground galaxy acting as a gravitational lens on its 8-billion-year journey to Earth. The discovery points toward the future capability of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). 3. ESA's Mars Orbiters Record Solar Superstorm Hitting Mars A new Nature Communications study reveals what happened when the record-breaking May 2024 solar superstorm hit Mars. ESA's Mars Express and ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter recorded unprecedented electron density spikes in the Martian upper atmosphere — up to 278% above normal — and both spacecraft experienced computer glitches from the energetic particles. The study uses a novel spacecraft-to-spacecraft radio occultation technique and highlights how Mars's lack of a global magnetic field leaves it vulnerable to solar events in ways that Earth is not. 4. SpaceX Falcon 9 Re-entry Directly Linked to Atmospheric Lithium Plume For the first time, scientists have directly tied a specific rocket re-entry to a measurable atmospheric pollution event. Researchers at the Leibniz Institute for Atmospheric Physics detected a tenfold spike in lithium vapour in the upper atmosphere — from 3 to 31 atoms per cubic centimetre — in the hours following the uncontrolled re-entry of a Falcon 9 upper stage off Ireland in February 2025. Eight thousand backward atmospheric simulations confirmed the connection. Published in Communications Earth & Environment, the paper raises important questions about the growing chemical footprint of the commercial space industry. 5. Rocket Lab Launches Mystery Satellite — 'Insight at Speed is a Friend Indeed' Rocket Lab completed its 83rd Electron launch from New Zealand, deploying a single satellite for a confidential commercial customer to an orbit 470 km above Earth. The company announced the mission just hours before liftoff, offering no further details on the customer or the payload's purpose. 6. Scientists Grow Chickpeas in Simulated Moon Dirt for First Time Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University have successfully grown and harvested chickpeas in simulated lunar regolith — the first time this has ever been achieved. Using a combination of vermicompost (worm castings) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to condition the otherwise toxic, sterile moon dirt, the team produced flowering, seed-bearing plants in soil mixtures of up to 75% regolith simulant. The chickpeas have not yet been cleared for eating pending metal accumulation testing — but the team's goal of 'moon hummus' is, apparently, very much alive. Find Us: astronomydaily.io | @AstroDailyPod on all platforms Subscribe & Review: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · YouTube · everywhere you listen


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .


Sponsor Details:

Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!


Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)


This episode includes AI-generated content.

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/32044070?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Hey everyone, welcome back to Astronomy

00:00:02 --> 00:00:04 Daily. I'm Anna.

00:00:04 --> 00:00:07 >> And I'm Avery. Happy Friday, space fans.

00:00:07 --> 00:00:09 We've got a great one for you today.

00:00:09 --> 00:00:12 >> We do. Six stories. And honestly, this

00:00:12 --> 00:00:14 is one of the more varied lineups we've

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 had in a while. We've got planetary

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 defense, a cosmic laser from halfway

00:00:20 --> 00:00:22 across the universe, a solar supertorrm

00:00:22 --> 00:00:25 hitting Mars, a SpaceX rocket polluting

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 the atmosphere on its way down. A

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30 mystery satellite launched from the

00:00:30 --> 00:00:32 other side of the world. And my personal

00:00:32 --> 00:00:35 favorite, scientists trying to grow

00:00:35 --> 00:00:38 chickpeas on the moon. Moon hummus.

00:00:38 --> 00:00:40 Avery, that's where we're headed.

00:00:40 --> 00:00:42 >> Moon hummus. Let's go.

00:00:42 --> 00:00:45 >> Okay, first up, great news for anyone

00:00:45 --> 00:00:47 who's been losing sleep over asteroid

00:00:47 --> 00:00:51 2024 YR4. NASA has now officially ruled

00:00:51 --> 00:00:54 out any chance of it hitting the moon in

00:00:54 --> 00:00:55 2032.

00:00:55 --> 00:00:57 >> Right. So, let's quickly recap the story

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 for anyone who hasn't been following it.

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02 This asteroid was discovered back in

00:01:02 --> 00:01:05 December 2024, and for a while, it was

00:01:05 --> 00:01:08 genuinely alarming. It briefly became

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10 the most dangerous asteroid identified

00:01:10 --> 00:01:13 in the last 20 years with a small but

00:01:13 --> 00:01:15 very real chance it could hit Earth.

00:01:15 --> 00:01:18 >> That Earth impact risk was ruled out

00:01:18 --> 00:01:20 fairly quickly. But when the asteroid

00:01:20 --> 00:01:22 faded from view last year, astronomers

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24 were left with something almost as

00:01:24 --> 00:01:27 intriguing. a lingering 4% chance it

00:01:28 --> 00:01:30 could strike the moon on December 22nd,

00:01:30 --> 00:01:31 2032.

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 >> 4% sounds small, but in asteroid terms,

00:01:35 --> 00:01:37 that's enormous. We're talking about a

00:01:37 --> 00:01:40 60 m rock, roughly the same size as what

00:01:40 --> 00:01:43 caused the Tangusa event in 1908, or

00:01:43 --> 00:01:46 what dug out Meteor Crater in Arizona.

00:01:46 --> 00:01:47 If it hit the near side of the moon, it

00:01:48 --> 00:01:49 would have created a crater about a

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 kilometer wide and put on the most

00:01:52 --> 00:01:54 spectacular light show humanity has ever

00:01:54 --> 00:01:55 seen from Earth.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:57 >> So, everyone's been watching very

00:01:57 --> 00:02:00 closely. The problem was by spring last

00:02:00 --> 00:02:03 year, the asteroid had drifted so far

00:02:03 --> 00:02:05 away it was invisible to pretty much

00:02:05 --> 00:02:08 every telescope on Earth and in space

00:02:08 --> 00:02:11 with one exception. The James Webb Space

00:02:11 --> 00:02:14 Telescope, which pushed itself to its

00:02:14 --> 00:02:16 very limit to catch this thing. A team

00:02:16 --> 00:02:18 led by the John's Hopkins Applied

00:02:18 --> 00:02:21 Physics Laboratory use Web's near

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23 infrared camera in two observation

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 windows in February the 18th and the

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 26th to track down this incredibly faint

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 speck against the background of stars.

00:02:31 --> 00:02:33 >> And the result was clear. The new

00:02:33 --> 00:02:36 measurements allowed scientists to map

00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 2024 YR4 forest trajectory with enough

00:02:39 --> 00:02:42 precision to rule out a lunar collision.

00:02:42 --> 00:02:44 Instead of hitting the moon, it's going

00:02:44 --> 00:02:47 to pass at a distance of about 13

00:02:47 --> 00:02:50 m from the lunar surface, which is yes,

00:02:50 --> 00:02:53 closer than some satellites orbit Earth,

00:02:53 --> 00:02:54 but it's a miss.

00:02:54 --> 00:02:57 >> 13 m is basically next door in

00:02:57 --> 00:03:00 astronomical terms, but next door is

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 still a miss. The moon is safe. Earth is

00:03:03 --> 00:03:07 safe and 2024 YR4 is just going to keep

00:03:07 --> 00:03:07 trucking.

00:03:07 --> 00:03:09 >> NASA says they'll observe it again when

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12 it swings back near Earth in 2028. So,

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15 the story isn't quite over, but for now,

00:03:15 --> 00:03:17 the threat is officially off the table.

00:03:17 --> 00:03:19 >> Good news to kick off the show. What's

00:03:20 --> 00:03:20 next?

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 >> Okay, story two. This one comes out of

00:03:23 --> 00:03:25 South Africa and it involves what

00:03:25 --> 00:03:28 scientists are describing as a cosmic

00:03:28 --> 00:03:31 laser. And I mean that almost literally.

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33 Tell me more. Lasers in space sounds

00:03:33 --> 00:03:35 like something I need in my life.

00:03:36 --> 00:03:38 >> So, astronomers using the Mircat radio

00:03:38 --> 00:03:41 telescope in the Ku Desert have detected

00:03:41 --> 00:03:44 the most distant hydroxal megaer ever

00:03:44 --> 00:03:46 found. It's located in a violently

00:03:46 --> 00:03:49 merging galaxy more than 8 billion

00:03:49 --> 00:03:51 lightyear away. And the signal is so

00:03:52 --> 00:03:54 powerful that researchers are actually

00:03:54 --> 00:03:56 calling it a gigamaser rather than a

00:03:56 --> 00:03:57 megaer.

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59 >> Okay, let's break this down for people.

00:03:59 --> 00:04:03 What exactly is a hydroxal megamaser?

00:04:03 --> 00:04:06 >> Right. So on earth, a laser works by

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09 exciting atoms or molecules until they

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11 release light in a very tight amplified

00:04:11 --> 00:04:14 beam. The same basic physics can happen

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 in space. But instead of visible light,

00:04:17 --> 00:04:19 it happens at radio wavelengths.

00:04:19 --> 00:04:22 Hydroxal molecules, that's one hydrogen,

00:04:22 --> 00:04:25 one oxygen, in massive gas clouds, can

00:04:25 --> 00:04:27 be excited by the energy of colliding

00:04:27 --> 00:04:30 galaxies and amplify radio waves in

00:04:30 --> 00:04:33 exactly the same way. When the signal is

00:04:33 --> 00:04:35 extraordinarily bright, it's called a

00:04:35 --> 00:04:36 megaer.

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 >> So, it's a natural radio laser powered

00:04:39 --> 00:04:41 by two galaxies smashing into each

00:04:41 --> 00:04:41 other.

00:04:42 --> 00:04:44 >> Exactly. And the one Mircatound

00:04:44 --> 00:04:53 cataloged as H A T L A SJ142935.3-002836

00:04:53 --> 00:04:56 is the most distant and luminous example

00:04:56 --> 00:04:58 ever detected. We're seeing it as it

00:04:58 --> 00:05:00 existed when the universe was less than

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02 half its current age.

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04 >> And you said there was a gravitational

00:05:04 --> 00:05:06 lens involved as well.

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08 >> Yes. This is the really lovely part of

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 the story. On its 8 billionyear journey

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13 to Earth, the radio signal happened to

00:05:13 --> 00:05:16 pass directly behind another completely

00:05:16 --> 00:05:19 unrelated galaxy sitting between us and

00:05:19 --> 00:05:22 the source. That foreground galaxy's

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25 gravity bent and warped space around it,

00:05:25 --> 00:05:27 acting like a natural magnifying glass

00:05:27 --> 00:05:29 and amplifying the signal even further

00:05:29 --> 00:05:32 before it reached Mircat. So, we have a

00:05:32 --> 00:05:35 natural space laser being focused by a

00:05:35 --> 00:05:37 natural gravitational telescope.

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39 >> That is genuinely delightful. The

00:05:39 --> 00:05:40 universe just handed astronomers a

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42 cosmic gift.

00:05:42 --> 00:05:45 >> The lead researcher, Dr. Tho Monla from

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47 the University of Ptoria, described it

00:05:48 --> 00:05:49 beautifully. He said they were seeing

00:05:50 --> 00:05:52 the radio equivalent of a laser halfway

00:05:52 --> 00:05:54 across the universe and that it was a

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57 wonderfully serendipitous discovery.

00:05:57 --> 00:05:58 >> And the bigger picture here is that

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00 Mircat is a precursor to the square

00:06:00 --> 00:06:03 kilometer array, the SKA, which is going

00:06:03 --> 00:06:05 to be even more powerful. So this is

00:06:05 --> 00:06:07 just a start of what's possible.

00:06:07 --> 00:06:10 >> Exactly. Bonamela's team wants to find

00:06:10 --> 00:06:12 hundreds, even thousands of these

00:06:12 --> 00:06:15 objects. And when the SKA comes online,

00:06:15 --> 00:06:16 that's going to become a real

00:06:16 --> 00:06:17 possibility.

00:06:18 --> 00:06:20 >> Incredible. All right, story three.

00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 >> And a bit of recent space history.

00:06:22 --> 00:06:25 >> Story three takes us back to May 2024

00:06:25 --> 00:06:27 and to Mars. You might remember that in

00:06:27 --> 00:06:30 May 2024, Earth was hit by the biggest

00:06:30 --> 00:06:33 solar storm recorded in over 20 years.

00:06:33 --> 00:06:35 Spectacular auroras were seen as far

00:06:35 --> 00:06:38 south as Mexico. I remember it well.

00:06:38 --> 00:06:40 Half the world was posting aurora

00:06:40 --> 00:06:41 photos,

00:06:41 --> 00:06:43 >> right? But that same storm also slammed

00:06:43 --> 00:06:45 into Mars. And thanks to ISA's two Mars

00:06:46 --> 00:06:48 orbiters, Mars Express and ExoMars Trace

00:06:48 --> 00:06:50 Gas Orbital, we now know in

00:06:50 --> 00:06:53 unprecedented detail what that actually

00:06:53 --> 00:06:55 looked like. A new paper published today

00:06:55 --> 00:06:56 in Nature Communications reveals the

00:06:56 --> 00:06:58 full picture.

00:06:58 --> 00:07:00 >> So what happened to Mars?

00:07:00 --> 00:07:02 >> In short, Mars got absolutely hammered.

00:07:02 --> 00:07:05 The storm sent fastmoving, energetic,

00:07:05 --> 00:07:07 magnetized plasma and X-rays flooding

00:07:07 --> 00:07:09 towards the red planet. When this

00:07:09 --> 00:07:11 barrage hit Mars' upper atmosphere, it

00:07:11 --> 00:07:13 stripped electrons from neutral atoms,

00:07:13 --> 00:07:15 causing two distinct layers of the

00:07:15 --> 00:07:17 atmosphere to fill up with charged

00:07:17 --> 00:07:21 particles at altitudes of around 110 and

00:07:21 --> 00:07:22 130 km.

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25 >> How much of an effect are we talking?

00:07:25 --> 00:07:26 The electron density in those layers

00:07:26 --> 00:07:31 surged by 45% in one and a whopping 278%

00:07:31 --> 00:07:34 in the other. Lead author Jacob Parrot

00:07:34 --> 00:07:35 from issa described it as the biggest

00:07:36 --> 00:07:38 response to a solar storm ever seen at

00:07:38 --> 00:07:39 Mars.

00:07:39 --> 00:07:41 >> And the orbiters themselves were

00:07:41 --> 00:07:42 affected too, right?

00:07:42 --> 00:07:45 >> They were. Both spacecraft suffered

00:07:45 --> 00:07:47 computer errors from the energetic

00:07:47 --> 00:07:49 particles which is a known hazard of

00:07:49 --> 00:07:52 space weather. But crucially, both had

00:07:52 --> 00:07:54 been designed with radiation resistant

00:07:54 --> 00:07:57 components and error correction systems,

00:07:57 --> 00:08:00 so they recovered fast. And the timing

00:08:00 --> 00:08:02 was incredibly fortunate. The

00:08:02 --> 00:08:04 researchers were able to capture the

00:08:04 --> 00:08:06 aftermath of the storm using a technique

00:08:06 --> 00:08:09 called radio occultation. Just 10

00:08:09 --> 00:08:11 minutes after a large solar flare hit

00:08:11 --> 00:08:12 Mars.

00:08:12 --> 00:08:15 >> Radial occultation. For our listeners,

00:08:15 --> 00:08:17 that's where one spacecraft beams a

00:08:17 --> 00:08:20 radio signal to another at precisely the

00:08:20 --> 00:08:22 moment it disappears over the planet's

00:08:22 --> 00:08:24 horizon. The signal gets bent by the

00:08:24 --> 00:08:27 atmosphere on the way, and scientists

00:08:27 --> 00:08:29 can read all sorts of information about

00:08:29 --> 00:08:31 the atmospheric layers from the way it

00:08:31 --> 00:08:32 bends.

00:08:32 --> 00:08:34 >> It's a technique that's been used for

00:08:34 --> 00:08:37 decades here at Earth, but only recently

00:08:37 --> 00:08:38 has it been applied between two

00:08:38 --> 00:08:41 spacecraft at Mars. This was a perfect

00:08:41 --> 00:08:43 demonstration of how powerful it can be.

00:08:43 --> 00:08:45 And there's a broader significance here,

00:08:46 --> 00:08:48 isn't there? Mars has no global magnetic

00:08:48 --> 00:08:51 field the way Earth does, which is why

00:08:51 --> 00:08:54 the storm hits so much harder.

00:08:54 --> 00:08:56 >> Exactly. On Earth, our magnetic field

00:08:56 --> 00:08:58 deflects a lot of the solar particles

00:08:58 --> 00:09:00 and channels the rest toward the poles

00:09:00 --> 00:09:03 as auroras. Mars lost its magnetic field

00:09:03 --> 00:09:05 billions of years ago, and that's almost

00:09:05 --> 00:09:08 certainly why it also lost most of its

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10 atmosphere and its liquid water over

00:09:10 --> 00:09:13 time. This study helps us understand

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15 that ongoing process and it has very

00:09:15 --> 00:09:17 practical implications for future crude

00:09:18 --> 00:09:20 missions and radar operations on and

00:09:20 --> 00:09:21 around Mars.

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24 >> Really fascinating stuff.

00:09:24 --> 00:09:26 >> Okay, story four. And this one has a bit

00:09:26 --> 00:09:29 more of an edge to it. So, this story

00:09:29 --> 00:09:31 starts with a SpaceX Falcon 9 upper

00:09:31 --> 00:09:35 stage that back in February 2025 failed

00:09:35 --> 00:09:38 to execute its planned de-orbit burn

00:09:38 --> 00:09:41 after delivering 22 Starlink satellites

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44 to orbit. It drifted uncontrolled for 18

00:09:44 --> 00:09:47 days before beginning an uncontrolled

00:09:47 --> 00:09:50 re-entry about 100 km off the west coast

00:09:50 --> 00:09:51 of Ireland.

00:09:51 --> 00:09:53 >> I remember this one. Some debris came

00:09:54 --> 00:09:56 down in Poland, which caused a fairly

00:09:56 --> 00:09:59 significant diplomatic incident. Poland

00:09:59 --> 00:10:01 dismissed its head of space agency over

00:10:01 --> 00:10:03 the lack of communication about where

00:10:03 --> 00:10:05 the thing was going to land. Right. But

00:10:06 --> 00:10:07 now there's a new dimension to this

00:10:08 --> 00:10:10 story. A paper just published in

00:10:10 --> 00:10:13 communications earth and environment by

00:10:13 --> 00:10:15 Robin Wing and her colleagues at the

00:10:15 --> 00:10:17 Libnitz Institute for Atmospheric

00:10:17 --> 00:10:20 Physics in Germany has for the first

00:10:20 --> 00:10:23 time ever directly tied a specific

00:10:23 --> 00:10:25 rocket re-entry to a measurable

00:10:25 --> 00:10:27 atmospheric pollution plume.

00:10:27 --> 00:10:29 >> How did they do that?

00:10:29 --> 00:10:31 >> They were operating a highly sensitive

00:10:31 --> 00:10:34 resonance fluoresence LAR system in

00:10:34 --> 00:10:37 Koulensbornne Germany. essentially a

00:10:37 --> 00:10:39 laserbased atmospheric monitoring

00:10:39 --> 00:10:41 instrument. They weren't specifically

00:10:41 --> 00:10:43 watching for the rocket. They were just

00:10:43 --> 00:10:45 doing their regular atmospheric

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47 observations. But right around midnight

00:10:47 --> 00:10:51 on the 20th of February 2025, just 20

00:10:51 --> 00:10:54 hours after the Falcon 9 came down, they

00:10:54 --> 00:10:57 detected a spike in lithium vapor levels

00:10:57 --> 00:10:59 in the upper atmosphere.

00:10:59 --> 00:11:01 >> Lithium, which is not something that

00:11:01 --> 00:11:03 should be up there in any quantity.

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 Normally lithium in the upper atmosphere

00:11:05 --> 00:11:09 sits at about 3 atoms per cubic cm. They

00:11:09 --> 00:11:13 measured a spike to 31 atoms per cm at

00:11:13 --> 00:11:17 an altitude of between 94 and 97 km.

00:11:17 --> 00:11:20 That's a tfold increase. And lithium is

00:11:20 --> 00:11:22 in the rocket because

00:11:22 --> 00:11:25 >> Falcon 9 upper stages carry an estimated

00:11:25 --> 00:11:28 30 kg of lithium in lithium ion

00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 batteries and in the aluminum lithium

00:11:31 --> 00:11:33 alloy that makes up the whole plating.

00:11:33 --> 00:11:36 Critically, that alloy starts melting at

00:11:36 --> 00:11:40 precisely 98.2 km altitude, which

00:11:40 --> 00:11:42 matches exactly where the pollution

00:11:42 --> 00:11:44 cloud was detected.

00:11:44 --> 00:11:46 >> That's a pretty compelling fingerprint.

00:11:46 --> 00:11:48 But did they need to do more than just

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 say, "Well, there's lithium up there and

00:11:50 --> 00:11:51 a rocket just fell down."

00:11:52 --> 00:11:55 >> They did. They ran 8 simulations of

00:11:55 --> 00:11:57 backward wind trajectories from the LAR

00:11:57 --> 00:12:00 station in Germany all the way back to

00:12:00 --> 00:12:02 the re-entry point over Ireland. They

00:12:02 --> 00:12:05 checked every other possible source and

00:12:05 --> 00:12:07 everything pointed to the rocket. The

00:12:07 --> 00:12:08 case is solid.

00:12:08 --> 00:12:11 >> So, what are the implications? Is a

00:12:11 --> 00:12:13 lithium cloud in the upper atmosphere a

00:12:13 --> 00:12:15 big deal? That's actually still an open

00:12:15 --> 00:12:17 question and the researchers are honest

00:12:17 --> 00:12:19 about that. We don't yet fully

00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 understand the impact on atmospheric

00:12:22 --> 00:12:24 chemistry. But what this paper

00:12:24 --> 00:12:26 represents is a first. It's the first

00:12:26 --> 00:12:29 time a specific re-entry event has been

00:12:29 --> 00:12:32 directly linked to a specific pollution

00:12:32 --> 00:12:34 plume. And with the growth of mega

00:12:34 --> 00:12:37 constellations, hundreds and eventually

00:12:37 --> 00:12:39 thousands of satellites being launched

00:12:39 --> 00:12:41 and de-orbited, this is going to become

00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 an increasingly important area of study.

00:12:44 --> 00:12:45 >> And presumably, we need to start

00:12:46 --> 00:12:47 thinking about whether controlled

00:12:47 --> 00:12:50 re-entries can be designed to minimize

00:12:50 --> 00:12:52 this kind of chemical contamination.

00:12:52 --> 00:12:54 >> Exactly. That's the question the paper

00:12:54 --> 00:12:56 ends with. It's not alarmist. It's more

00:12:56 --> 00:12:59 of a we need to start measuring this

00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 properly moment, which this paper very

00:13:01 --> 00:13:04 much is. Good. Story five. Slightly

00:13:04 --> 00:13:05 lighter.

00:13:05 --> 00:13:07 >> It's mystery launch time.

00:13:07 --> 00:13:10 >> Okay. Story five. Rocket Lab launched an

00:13:10 --> 00:13:12 Electron rocket from its New Zealand

00:13:12 --> 00:13:14 site yesterday evening local time,

00:13:14 --> 00:13:16 marking the company's 83rd launch to

00:13:16 --> 00:13:19 date. The mission is called Insight at

00:13:19 --> 00:13:21 Speed is a friend indeed, which is

00:13:22 --> 00:13:24 exactly the kind of cryptic mission name

00:13:24 --> 00:13:26 that drives people absolutely mad on the

00:13:26 --> 00:13:27 space forums.

00:13:27 --> 00:13:28 >> What do we know about it?

00:13:28 --> 00:13:30 >> Almost nothing, which is rather the

00:13:30 --> 00:13:33 point. Rocket Lab announced the launch

00:13:33 --> 00:13:35 just a few hours before liftoff, which

00:13:35 --> 00:13:38 is unusually short notice even for them.

00:13:38 --> 00:13:40 They confirmed it's a single satellite

00:13:40 --> 00:13:42 for a confidential commercial customer

00:13:42 --> 00:13:46 deployed to an orbit about 470 km above

00:13:46 --> 00:13:47 Earth. That's it.

00:13:47 --> 00:13:50 >> The mission name is interesting though.

00:13:50 --> 00:13:52 Insight at Speed. That sounds like it

00:13:52 --> 00:13:54 could be an Earth observation or

00:13:54 --> 00:13:56 intelligence related payload. Fast

00:13:56 --> 00:13:58 access to imagery. Maybe

00:13:58 --> 00:14:00 >> that's been the general speculation.

00:14:00 --> 00:14:03 Yes. small fast satellite for rapid

00:14:03 --> 00:14:05 imaging. But Rocket Lab isn't saying

00:14:05 --> 00:14:07 anything beyond confidential commercial

00:14:07 --> 00:14:09 customer. And the customer isn't saying

00:14:09 --> 00:14:11 anything either, which is of course

00:14:11 --> 00:14:12 they're right.

00:14:12 --> 00:14:14 >> Rocket Lab has carved out quite a niche

00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 for exactly this kind of mission. Small

00:14:16 --> 00:14:18 dedicated launches on relatively short

00:14:18 --> 00:14:20 notice for customers who want

00:14:20 --> 00:14:22 discretion. It's a good business to be

00:14:22 --> 00:14:23 in.

00:14:23 --> 00:14:25 >> 83 launches in counting. They're doing

00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 just fine. Okay, last story. And I've

00:14:28 --> 00:14:29 been looking forward to this one all

00:14:29 --> 00:14:32 morning. That can only mean one thing.

00:14:32 --> 00:14:34 It's a food related story,

00:14:34 --> 00:14:36 >> right? Scientists at the University of

00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 Texas at Austin, working with Texas A&M

00:14:39 --> 00:14:41 have successfully grown and harvested

00:14:41 --> 00:14:44 chickpeas in simulated moon dirt

00:14:44 --> 00:14:46 published today in scientific reports.

00:14:46 --> 00:14:48 First time it's ever been done.

00:14:48 --> 00:14:50 >> Okay, tell me everything.

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53 >> So, the challenge with lunar regalith,

00:14:53 --> 00:14:54 which is the technical name for moon

00:14:54 --> 00:14:57 dirt, is that it is spectacularly

00:14:57 --> 00:14:59 hostile to plant life. It's fine as

00:14:59 --> 00:15:02 talcum powder. It's abrasive and clingy.

00:15:02 --> 00:15:05 It has no organic material whatsoever,

00:15:05 --> 00:15:07 no microbes, and it contains toxic heavy

00:15:08 --> 00:15:10 metals like aluminum, copper, and zinc.

00:15:10 --> 00:15:12 Previous attempts to grow plants in

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 actual Apollo lunar samples resulted in

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 stressed, stunted plants that absorbed

00:15:18 --> 00:15:19 dangerous levels of metals.

00:15:19 --> 00:15:22 >> So, how did the Texas team crack it?

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 >> Two ingredients. First, vermic compost,

00:15:25 --> 00:15:27 which is essentially worm castings. Red

00:15:27 --> 00:15:30 Wigler earthworms were fed food scraps

00:15:30 --> 00:15:32 and cotton waste, the kind of organic

00:15:32 --> 00:15:34 material that would naturally accumulate

00:15:34 --> 00:15:36 on a long lunar mission anyway. And

00:15:36 --> 00:15:39 their output provided a rich microbially

00:15:39 --> 00:15:41 diverse soil amendment that could be

00:15:41 --> 00:15:43 mixed with the regalith simulant.

00:15:43 --> 00:15:45 >> Okay, so worm poo. Got it

00:15:45 --> 00:15:48 >> precisely. Second ingredient are

00:15:48 --> 00:15:51 buscular microisal fungi AMF which were

00:15:51 --> 00:15:53 used to coat the chickpea seeds before

00:15:53 --> 00:15:56 planting. These fungi are remarkable.

00:15:56 --> 00:15:58 They extend into the soil like a

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00 secondary root system, improving

00:16:00 --> 00:16:02 nutrient uptake while simultaneously

00:16:02 --> 00:16:05 helping to sequester heavy metals away

00:16:05 --> 00:16:07 from the plant. They also produce

00:16:07 --> 00:16:09 proteins that bind loose regalith

00:16:09 --> 00:16:11 particles together, making the stuff

00:16:11 --> 00:16:13 behave more like actual soil.

00:16:13 --> 00:16:14 >> And it worked.

00:16:14 --> 00:16:18 >> It worked with caveats. Mixtures of up

00:16:18 --> 00:16:20 to 75% regulative simulant could

00:16:20 --> 00:16:22 successfully produce flowering

00:16:22 --> 00:16:26 seedbearing plants. go above 75% and the

00:16:26 --> 00:16:28 plants started showing serious stress

00:16:28 --> 00:16:31 and dying early. And across the board,

00:16:31 --> 00:16:33 the regalith plants produced fewer seeds

00:16:33 --> 00:16:35 than the control plants grown in

00:16:35 --> 00:16:37 ordinary earth soil, though the

00:16:37 --> 00:16:40 individual seeds that did grow were

00:16:40 --> 00:16:42 comparable in size and weight.

00:16:42 --> 00:16:44 >> Can they eat them?

00:16:44 --> 00:16:46 >> Not yet. The chickpeas are currently

00:16:46 --> 00:16:49 being tested for metal accumulation.

00:16:49 --> 00:16:51 They need to make sure no dangerous

00:16:51 --> 00:16:53 levels of aluminum or other heavy metals

00:16:53 --> 00:16:55 made it into the seeds before anyone

00:16:55 --> 00:16:58 takes a bite. The lead researcher,

00:16:58 --> 00:17:01 Jessica Atkin, said, and I love this,

00:17:01 --> 00:17:04 "Before anyone makes moon hummus, we

00:17:04 --> 00:17:06 need to confirm they are safe and

00:17:06 --> 00:17:08 nutritious." She has also promised to be

00:17:08 --> 00:17:11 the first one to make moon hummus if

00:17:11 --> 00:17:12 they pass.

00:17:12 --> 00:17:15 >> That is a fantastic quote, and I love

00:17:15 --> 00:17:17 that she played Bad Moon Rising to

00:17:17 --> 00:17:19 encourage the plants in the lab. She

00:17:19 --> 00:17:21 hung a poster of chickpeas growing on

00:17:21 --> 00:17:22 the moon above the growth chamber as

00:17:22 --> 00:17:25 well. Kind of silly, but something to

00:17:25 --> 00:17:28 aim for. This is the energy we want in

00:17:28 --> 00:17:29 space science.

00:17:29 --> 00:17:31 >> So, what's the bigger picture here? This

00:17:31 --> 00:17:34 isn't just about hummus, I assume.

00:17:34 --> 00:17:36 >> No. Although the hummus angle is doing a

00:17:36 --> 00:17:38 lot of heavy lifting for the press

00:17:38 --> 00:17:41 coverage, the real significance is this.

00:17:41 --> 00:17:43 As we plan for long-term human presence

00:17:44 --> 00:17:45 on the moon through the Aremis program

00:17:46 --> 00:17:48 and beyond, food sustainability is a

00:17:48 --> 00:17:51 genuine challenge. You cannot shuttle

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53 all the food you need from Earth to a

00:17:53 --> 00:17:55 lunar base indefinitely. The cost is

00:17:55 --> 00:17:58 prohibitive. So being able to grow crops

00:17:58 --> 00:18:01 from local resources, converting sterile

00:18:01 --> 00:18:04 regalith into living soil using biology

00:18:04 --> 00:18:06 that future astronauts could actually

00:18:06 --> 00:18:08 bring with them and maintain is a

00:18:08 --> 00:18:10 crucial piece of the puzzle. And

00:18:10 --> 00:18:12 chickpeas specifically are a great

00:18:12 --> 00:18:14 choice for this, right? High protein,

00:18:14 --> 00:18:16 resilient plant.

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19 >> Exactly. High protein, nitrogen fixing.

00:18:19 --> 00:18:21 They actually put nutrients back into

00:18:21 --> 00:18:24 the soil as they grow and relatively

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 hardy. The team is now exploring whether

00:18:26 --> 00:18:28 seeds from the moon grown chickpeas can

00:18:28 --> 00:18:31 grow a second generation and what the

00:18:31 --> 00:18:33 nutritional profile of the harvest looks

00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 like. It's early days, but Sarah Santos,

00:18:36 --> 00:18:38 the principal investigator, summed it up

00:18:38 --> 00:18:41 well. This is a small first step toward

00:18:41 --> 00:18:43 growing crops on the moon, but we have

00:18:43 --> 00:18:45 shown this is feasible and we are moving

00:18:46 --> 00:18:47 in the right direction.

00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 >> Moon hummus coming to a lunar outpost

00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 near you eventually.

00:18:52 --> 00:18:54 >> I will be first in line

00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 >> and that's your astronomy daily for

00:18:57 --> 00:19:01 Friday the 6th of March 2026. I'm Anna

00:19:01 --> 00:19:03 >> and I'm Avery. Thanks so much for

00:19:03 --> 00:19:05 listening, space fans. If you enjoyed

00:19:05 --> 00:19:07 today's show, please leave us a review

00:19:07 --> 00:19:09 wherever you get your podcasts. It

00:19:09 --> 00:19:11 genuinely makes a difference.

00:19:11 --> 00:19:13 >> You can find show notes, our blog, and a

00:19:13 --> 00:19:16 whole lot more at astronomy.io.

00:19:16 --> 00:19:19 And we're at Astro Daily Pod on X,

00:19:19 --> 00:19:21 Instagram, Tik Tok, YouTube, and

00:19:21 --> 00:19:22 elsewhere.

00:19:22 --> 00:19:24 >> We'll be back tomorrow with more of the

00:19:24 --> 00:19:26 universe's greatest hits. Until then,

00:19:26 --> 00:19:28 keep looking up.

00:19:28 --> 00:19:32 >> Clear skies, everyone.

00:19:32 --> 00:19:40 Stories told

00:19:40 --> 00:19:48 stories told

00:19:48 --> 00:19:51 stories