Space Mechanic | Today’s Space News
Space News TodayJuly 22, 202600:32:1529.53 MB

Space Mechanic | Today’s Space News

Astronomy Daily — S05E147: "Space Mechanic" Wednesday 22 July 2026 A spacecraft with robotic arms is on its way to geostationary orbit to keep other satellites alive. A discarded rocket stage is two weeks out from hitting the Moon, and twenty-three astronomers have just asked the world to watch. Plus the first binary star system where both stars exploded, the first complete magnetic map of a galaxy cluster, and the asteroid breakup that may have bombarded three worlds while Earth froze. In This Episode ● The Space Mechanic Launches — Northrop Grumman's Mission Robotic Vehicle lifted off from Cape Canaveral on 21 July carrying three Mission Extension Pods. With two 3-metre robotic arms built by the US Naval Research Laboratory, it is designed to inspect, relocate, repair and refuel satellites in geostationary orbit. Each pod can give a 2,000 kg satellite up to eight more years of life. ● UPDATE — The Rocket Aimed at the Moon — A new arXiv preprint signed by 23 astronomers calls for a coordinated observing campaign when Falcon 9 upper stage 2025-010D strikes the Moon near Einstein crater on 5 August. North America has the best seat: 2:34am EDT, with the paper naming observers in the Americas as the ideal group. Refined impact time, predicted crater size, and why the ejecta plume may be visible even if the flash is not. ● Sibling Supernovae — Sixteen years of Fermi data reveal a faint supernova remnant hiding in the glare of the Jellyfish Nebula. The two may be the first known pair of remnants traced back to a single binary star system. ● Mapping a Cluster's Magnetic Field — Using the deepest radio observations ever made with LOFAR, astronomers have reconstructed the magnetic field of galaxy cluster Abell 2255 from nucleus to outer edge for the first time. ● The Eulalia Bombardment — A new Planetary Science Journal paper links the breakup of a main-belt asteroid to an impact shower that battered the Moon, Earth and Mars 800 million years ago — and may connect to a global freeze. ● Skywatch, Both Hemispheres — Why this week beats peak night for the Delta Aquariids wherever you are, how to catch them from the southern US and Mediterranean, and what's coming on 12 August: a total solar eclipse across Iceland and Spain, a North American partial, and the best Perseid peak in years on a new Moon.

Sources & Further Reading ● Space.com — SpaceX launches satellite repair drone with 10-foot robotic arms to Earth orbit ● NASASpaceflight.com — Falcon 9 to launch MRV-1 robotic servicing spacecraft for Northrop Grumman ● Northrop Grumman SpaceLogistics — Mission Robotic Vehicle and Mission Extension Pod fact sheets ● Scientific American — A SpaceX rocket is about to crash into the moon; scientists will be watching ● Phys.org — When a SpaceX rocket crashes into the moon, scientists will be watching (arXiv preprint) ● Project Pluto (Bill Gray) — Upper stage impacting the moon on 2026 August 5 ● Stanford University — Researchers uncover evidence for sibling supernovas (Michailidis et al., Nature Communications) ● Reuters — Scientists spot evidence of two huge companion stars that blew up ● Space.com — Galaxy cluster's magnetic field reconstructed for 1st time with record-breaking astronomy map (Botteon et al., INAF, A&A) ● Southwest Research Institute — SwRI-led research connects asteroid collision to impact showers 800 million years ago ● The Planetary Science Journal — Bottke, Vokrouhlický, Dykhuis & Zellner, "An 800 Myr-old Impact Shower on the Terrestrial Planets from the Breakup of the Eulalia Parent Body" ● EarthSky — Delta Aquariid meteor shower: all you need to know in 2026 ● NASA Science — Total Solar Eclipse on August 12, 2026 (path, partial visibility and safety guidance) ● BBC Sky at Night Magazine — August 12, 2026 solar eclipse: USA and Canada guide Connect ● Website: astronomydaily.io (http://astronomydaily.io) ● Socials: @AstroDailyPod ● Part of the Bitesz.com Podcast Network


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-the-latest-space-news--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-the-latest-space-news--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .


Sponsor Details:

Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!


Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)


This episode includes AI-generated content.

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/34404611?utm_source=youtube

Kind: captions Language: en
00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Somewhere above your head right now,

00:00:02 --> 00:00:07 about 36 km up, there is a graveyard

00:00:07 --> 00:00:10 shift going on. Hundreds of satellites

00:00:10 --> 00:00:13 still working, still useful, and slowly

00:00:13 --> 00:00:15 running out of fuel.

00:00:15 --> 00:00:17 >> And as of last night, there is finally a

00:00:18 --> 00:00:19 mechanic on the way.

00:00:19 --> 00:00:21 >> Good evening and welcome to Astronomy

00:00:21 --> 00:00:23 Daily. I'm Anna.

00:00:23 --> 00:00:26 >> And I'm Avery. Coming up, a spacecraft

00:00:26 --> 00:00:28 with arms launches on a mission to keep

00:00:28 --> 00:00:31 other spacecraft alive. A rocket stage

00:00:31 --> 00:00:33 is two weeks out from hitting the moon,

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35 and astronomers have just put out a call

00:00:35 --> 00:00:36 to arms about it.

00:00:36 --> 00:00:38 >> We've got two stars that were born

00:00:38 --> 00:00:41 together, lived together, and then died

00:00:41 --> 00:00:44 in sequence, leaving behind the first

00:00:44 --> 00:00:47 pair of supernova remnants ever traced

00:00:47 --> 00:00:50 back to a single binary. the first

00:00:50 --> 00:00:52 complete magnetic map of a galaxy

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 cluster, an asteroid breakup that may

00:00:54 --> 00:00:56 have bombarded three worlds and helped

00:00:56 --> 00:00:58 freeze our own,

00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 >> and a skywatching window that is closing

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02 faster than you'd like.

00:01:02 --> 00:01:04 >> Let's get into it.

00:01:04 --> 00:01:06 >> So, Avery, here's a problem that has

00:01:06 --> 00:01:08 quietly bothered the satellite industry

00:01:08 --> 00:01:11 for about 60 years. You build a

00:01:11 --> 00:01:13 satellite. You spend hundreds of

00:01:14 --> 00:01:16 millions of dollars on it. You put it in

00:01:16 --> 00:01:20 geostationary orbit 35

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23 km up where it hovers over the same

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 patch of ground forever and it works

00:01:26 --> 00:01:29 beautifully for 15 years and then it

00:01:29 --> 00:01:31 runs out of fuel

00:01:31 --> 00:01:33 >> and that's it. The hardware is fine.

00:01:33 --> 00:01:36 >> The hardware is often perfectly fine.

00:01:36 --> 00:01:38 The cameras work, the transponders work,

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41 the solar panels work, but without

00:01:41 --> 00:01:43 propellant, it can't hold its position.

00:01:43 --> 00:01:46 So, it drifts and it becomes junk. You

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49 throw away a working satellite because

00:01:49 --> 00:01:51 the tank is empty.

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53 >> That is a spectacularly wasteful way to

00:01:53 --> 00:01:54 run an industry.

00:01:54 --> 00:01:57 >> It is. And last night, Northre Grumman

00:01:57 --> 00:02:00 launched the most serious attempt yet to

00:02:00 --> 00:02:03 fix it. At 5:15 in the evening, Eastern

00:02:03 --> 00:02:07 time on Tuesday the 21st of July, the

00:02:07 --> 00:02:09 Falcon 9 lifted off from Space Launch

00:02:10 --> 00:02:13 Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral carrying

00:02:13 --> 00:02:15 the mission robotic vehicle plus three

00:02:16 --> 00:02:18 mission extension pods.

00:02:18 --> 00:02:20 >> Mission robotic vehicle. What does it

00:02:20 --> 00:02:23 actually look like? Picture a satellite

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 bus with two arms, two robotic arms,

00:02:26 --> 00:02:30 each about 3 m long, 10 ft, built by the

00:02:30 --> 00:02:33 United States Naval Research Laboratory

00:02:33 --> 00:02:36 and supplied through DARPA's robotic

00:02:36 --> 00:02:38 servicing of geostationary satellite

00:02:38 --> 00:02:39 program.

00:02:39 --> 00:02:42 >> So this is a genuinely dextrous machine,

00:02:42 --> 00:02:44 not just the tug that bolts on.

00:02:44 --> 00:02:46 >> That's the distinction that matters. The

00:02:46 --> 00:02:50 MRV can inspect, it can relocate, it can

00:02:50 --> 00:02:53 repair, it can upgrade, and its headline

00:02:53 --> 00:02:56 job on this mission is to pick up those

00:02:56 --> 00:02:58 three mission extension pods and install

00:02:58 --> 00:03:00 them on client satellites that are

00:03:00 --> 00:03:02 running low on propellant.

00:03:02 --> 00:03:05 >> So, the pods are the actual fuel

00:03:05 --> 00:03:06 solution.

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 >> Think of them as jetpacks. Each pod

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 clamps onto a satellite and takes over

00:03:11 --> 00:03:13 orbit control and momentum management

00:03:13 --> 00:03:16 using electric propulsion. Each one can

00:03:16 --> 00:03:20 handle a satellite of about 2 kg.

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 That's a typical big geostationary bird.

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26 And give it up to 8 more years of life.

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28 >> 8 years on a satellite that was

00:03:28 --> 00:03:30 otherwise finished.

00:03:30 --> 00:03:33 >> 8 years. And the MRV itself carries

00:03:34 --> 00:03:36 something called a passive refueling

00:03:36 --> 00:03:38 interface, which is the first refueling

00:03:38 --> 00:03:41 interface approved by the US Space

00:03:41 --> 00:03:43 Force. So, the servicer is itself

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46 designed to be refueled later.

00:03:46 --> 00:03:48 >> Now, Northrub have done a version of

00:03:48 --> 00:03:49 this before, haven't they?

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52 >> They have, and this is why they're the

00:03:52 --> 00:03:55 ones doing it. Bish extension vehicle 1

00:03:55 --> 00:03:58 launched in October 2019. The first

00:03:58 --> 00:04:00 commercial satellite servicing

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03 spacecraft ever. And 4 months later, it

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05 docked with communication satellite

00:04:05 --> 00:04:09 Intelsat 901 in geostationary orbit.

00:04:09 --> 00:04:13 MEV2 followed in August 2020.

00:04:13 --> 00:04:14 >> So what's different this time?

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 >> Those earlier vehicles were one to one.

00:04:17 --> 00:04:20 One serer went to one satellite, docked

00:04:20 --> 00:04:22 with it, and stayed there doing the work

00:04:22 --> 00:04:26 itself. The MRV is one to many. It

00:04:26 --> 00:04:29 carries pods, installs them, and moves

00:04:29 --> 00:04:31 on. It's the difference between a tow

00:04:31 --> 00:04:33 truck that has to stay attached to your

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36 car forever and a mechanic who fits a

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 new part and drives off to the next job.

00:04:39 --> 00:04:40 That scales.

00:04:40 --> 00:04:43 >> That scales. And there's a nice detail

00:04:43 --> 00:04:45 on the launch itself. The Falcon 9

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48 booster B1069

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51 was flying its 302nd mission and it was

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54 deliberately expended. No landing.

00:04:54 --> 00:04:56 >> Why give up a booster with 31 flights on

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59 it? Because GEO's stationary transfer

00:04:59 --> 00:05:01 orbit is demanding. Getting that much

00:05:01 --> 00:05:04 mass that high needed every bit of

00:05:04 --> 00:05:06 performance the rocket had. And there

00:05:06 --> 00:05:08 wasn't propellant left for a landing

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 burn. SpaceX made the trade.

00:05:11 --> 00:05:13 >> So when does the actual servicing start?

00:05:13 --> 00:05:16 >> Not for a while. The MRV and the three

00:05:16 --> 00:05:18 pods each separate and then climb to

00:05:18 --> 00:05:21 geostationary orbit under their own

00:05:21 --> 00:05:23 solar electric propulsion. And that

00:05:24 --> 00:05:26 climb takes up to a year. Servicing

00:05:26 --> 00:05:28 operations are expected to begin in

00:05:28 --> 00:05:32 2027. After the initial checkouts, the

00:05:32 --> 00:05:35 RSGS program gets handed over to the US

00:05:35 --> 00:05:36 Space Force.

00:05:36 --> 00:05:38 >> A year of just going up

00:05:38 --> 00:05:41 >> slowly and efficiently. Electric

00:05:41 --> 00:05:43 propulsion is patient. And at the end of

00:05:43 --> 00:05:46 it, for the first time, there's a repair

00:05:46 --> 00:05:48 capability parked permanently in the

00:05:48 --> 00:05:51 most valuable orbital real estate we

00:05:51 --> 00:05:51 have.

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54 >> Right. From a machine built to preserve

00:05:54 --> 00:05:56 spacecraft to a spacecraft that is about

00:05:56 --> 00:05:58 to be very thoroughly destroyed.

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00 >> This is one we've been tracking.

00:06:00 --> 00:06:02 >> It is. And I want to be upfront about

00:06:02 --> 00:06:05 that. We covered this back in June in

00:06:05 --> 00:06:08 episode 125. But there is a genuine

00:06:08 --> 00:06:10 reason to come back to it because the

00:06:10 --> 00:06:11 science community has just done

00:06:11 --> 00:06:13 something about it. The short version

00:06:13 --> 00:06:17 for anyone joining us since in January

00:06:17 --> 00:06:20 2025, a Falcon 9 launched two commercial

00:06:20 --> 00:06:24 lunar landers, Fireflyy's Blue Ghost and

00:06:24 --> 00:06:28 iSpace's Hakuto R Mission 2. It did its

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 job, but the upper stage cataloged as

00:06:31 --> 00:06:34 202510D

00:06:34 --> 00:06:37 never came home. Instead of burning up

00:06:37 --> 00:06:40 in our atmosphere, it ended up in a long

00:06:40 --> 00:06:42 looping orbit through the Earth Moon

00:06:42 --> 00:06:44 system. And somebody noticed.

00:06:44 --> 00:06:47 >> The independent astronomer Bill Gray,

00:06:47 --> 00:06:49 who runs Project Pluto and tracks this

00:06:49 --> 00:06:52 sort of high orbit debris, his software

00:06:52 --> 00:06:55 flagged an impact. On the 5th of August

00:06:55 --> 00:06:58 this year, that stage hits the moon.

00:06:58 --> 00:07:01 >> So, what's new? Three things. First, a

00:07:01 --> 00:07:03 new preprint has just gone up on archive

00:07:03 --> 00:07:06 and it is signed by 23 astronomers. It

00:07:06 --> 00:07:09 is essentially a call to arms. They're

00:07:09 --> 00:07:11 asking the scientific community,

00:07:11 --> 00:07:14 professional and amateur, to point

00:07:14 --> 00:07:15 everything they've got at the moon on

00:07:16 --> 00:07:17 the 5th of August

00:07:17 --> 00:07:19 >> because this is a rare thing

00:07:19 --> 00:07:22 >> because we almost never get this. We get

00:07:22 --> 00:07:23 natural impacts on the moon all the

00:07:23 --> 00:07:25 time, but we don't know when they're

00:07:25 --> 00:07:28 coming. Here, we know the object. We

00:07:28 --> 00:07:31 know its mass. We know its structure. We

00:07:31 --> 00:07:33 know its velocity. And we know the time

00:07:33 --> 00:07:35 to within about a second. That is an

00:07:35 --> 00:07:38 artificial impact experiment we didn't

00:07:38 --> 00:07:39 have to pay to set up.

00:07:39 --> 00:07:41 >> And the timing has been tightened,

00:07:41 --> 00:07:42 hasn't it?

00:07:42 --> 00:07:44 >> That's a second. You think Gray's latest

00:07:44 --> 00:07:47 published calculation dated the 17th of

00:07:47 --> 00:07:51 July puts the impact at 634 and 32

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53 seconds UTC. Earlier coverage back in

00:07:53 --> 00:07:57 May was quoting 644. So, if you've got

00:07:57 --> 00:07:59 the old number written down, update it.

00:07:59 --> 00:08:00 >> And the third,

00:08:00 --> 00:08:02 >> the third is the actual physics

00:08:02 --> 00:08:05 prediction. And this is the part I find

00:08:05 --> 00:08:07 genuinely interesting. The paper models

00:08:07 --> 00:08:10 what happens on contact. This thing is

00:08:10 --> 00:08:14 roughly 12 m long and about 4 kg.

00:08:14 --> 00:08:17 And crucially, it's hollow. It's a tank.

00:08:17 --> 00:08:19 So, the prediction is that it crushes

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21 rather than punching deep.

00:08:21 --> 00:08:24 >> Like a can rather than a bullet.

00:08:24 --> 00:08:26 >> Exactly like a can. And the result of

00:08:26 --> 00:08:29 that is a relatively shallow crater.

00:08:29 --> 00:08:31 They're estimating 20 to 30 meters

00:08:31 --> 00:08:35 across, but a very large eject plume.

00:08:35 --> 00:08:37 Kilometers of debris thrown up off the

00:08:37 --> 00:08:38 surface.

00:08:38 --> 00:08:40 >> So, the plume might be the visible part.

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 >> That's the hope. And it's a subtle bit

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 of reasoning. The impact site is near

00:08:45 --> 00:08:47 the crater Einstein, right on the moon's

00:08:47 --> 00:08:49 western limb, about the 10:00 position

00:08:50 --> 00:08:52 on the disc as you look at it. Now,

00:08:52 --> 00:08:54 that's awkward because it's on the

00:08:54 --> 00:08:56 sunlit part of the surface and no impact

00:08:56 --> 00:08:59 flash, artificial or natural, has ever

00:08:59 --> 00:09:01 been recorded on the lit face of the

00:09:01 --> 00:09:03 moon. The glare defeats you,

00:09:04 --> 00:09:06 >> but being on the limb helps.

00:09:06 --> 00:09:08 >> Being on the limb might save it because

00:09:08 --> 00:09:10 rocks thrown up from a site that close

00:09:10 --> 00:09:13 to the edge rise off the moon entirely.

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15 And once they're off the limb, they're

00:09:15 --> 00:09:17 silhouetted against black sky catching

00:09:17 --> 00:09:19 sunlight. So you might not see the

00:09:19 --> 00:09:21 flash, but you might see the plume.

00:09:21 --> 00:09:23 >> Who else is watching?

00:09:23 --> 00:09:25 >> NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 image the site before and after, which

00:09:28 --> 00:09:30 gives a clean comparison. And South

00:09:30 --> 00:09:32 Korea's Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter is

00:09:32 --> 00:09:34 going to attempt to observe as well.

00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 There's precedent for the after image,

00:09:36 --> 00:09:38 too. When a Chinese rocket stage hit the

00:09:38 --> 00:09:41 far side in 2022, LRO found the site,

00:09:41 --> 00:09:44 and it had made not one crater, but two.

00:09:44 --> 00:09:46 >> And there's a longer term payoff to all

00:09:46 --> 00:09:49 this. And this is why the paper matters

00:09:49 --> 00:09:51 beyond the spectacle. They want to test

00:09:51 --> 00:09:54 a method for pinpointing exactly where

00:09:54 --> 00:09:56 an object strikes the moon using the

00:09:56 --> 00:09:58 observations. If you can nail that down

00:09:58 --> 00:10:01 against a known impact, you validated a

00:10:01 --> 00:10:03 technique and that feeds directly into

00:10:03 --> 00:10:05 planning seismic experiments on the

00:10:05 --> 00:10:07 lunar surface for future missions.

00:10:07 --> 00:10:10 >> Now, the practical question, who

00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 actually gets to see this? And this is

00:10:12 --> 00:10:14 where our North American listeners want

00:10:14 --> 00:10:16 to pay attention because this one is

00:10:16 --> 00:10:20 squarely yours. 6:34 UTC on the 5th of

00:10:20 --> 00:10:23 August is 29 minutes past 2:00 in the

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26 morning Eastern time, 1:34 central,

00:10:26 --> 00:10:29 12:34 Mountain, and on the West Coast,

00:10:29 --> 00:10:31 it's still the night before, 11:34 in

00:10:31 --> 00:10:33 the evening on the 4th.

00:10:33 --> 00:10:35 >> Middle of the night, but the moon is

00:10:35 --> 00:10:37 well up. The moon is wellplaced across

00:10:37 --> 00:10:40 the continent and the paper specifically

00:10:40 --> 00:10:42 identifies observers in the Americas as

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45 the ideal group. If you have a telescope

00:10:45 --> 00:10:47 and you've ever wanted to contribute to

00:10:47 --> 00:10:49 something real, this is the night. They

00:10:49 --> 00:10:52 are explicitly asking amateurs to take

00:10:52 --> 00:10:52 part.

00:10:52 --> 00:10:54 >> And for those of us further around the

00:10:54 --> 00:10:55 globe,

00:10:55 --> 00:10:57 >> less kind, and I'll be straight about

00:10:57 --> 00:11:00 it. For us in Australia, that's 4:34 in

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02 the afternoon. Broad daylight. New

00:11:02 --> 00:11:05 Zealand, early evening, no good either.

00:11:05 --> 00:11:08 The UK and Europe get half 7 in the

00:11:08 --> 00:11:10 morning which is also daylight. So the

00:11:10 --> 00:11:13 live event belongs to the Americas.

00:11:13 --> 00:11:15 >> But the aftermath belongs to everyone.

00:11:15 --> 00:11:17 >> The aftermath belongs to everyone. The

00:11:18 --> 00:11:20 LRO before and after imagery, the crater

00:11:20 --> 00:11:23 measurements, the analysis of how well

00:11:23 --> 00:11:25 the predictions held up. And frankly,

00:11:25 --> 00:11:27 the question sitting underneath all of

00:11:27 --> 00:11:29 this is global. We are about to start

00:11:29 --> 00:11:31 putting people back on the moon. and we

00:11:31 --> 00:11:33 are currently hitting it with our own

00:11:33 --> 00:11:36 rubbish by accident without warning.

00:11:36 --> 00:11:38 >> All right, Avery, moving on to our next

00:11:38 --> 00:11:41 story. More than half of all stars are

00:11:41 --> 00:11:44 in multiple systems, two or more suns

00:11:44 --> 00:11:47 orbiting each other. And for the really

00:11:47 --> 00:11:49 massive stars, the ones destined to

00:11:49 --> 00:11:52 explode, that fraction is even higher.

00:11:52 --> 00:11:54 >> So most supernovas should have had a

00:11:54 --> 00:11:55 sibling.

00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 >> That is exactly the implication. And yet

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 until this week, astronomers had never

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03 found a single case where both stars in

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 a binary exploded and both left behind

00:12:06 --> 00:12:08 remnants we can still see.

00:12:08 --> 00:12:10 >> Not one out of how many?

00:12:10 --> 00:12:13 >> We've cataloged around 300 supernova

00:12:13 --> 00:12:15 remnants in our galaxy. Not one

00:12:15 --> 00:12:17 confirmed sibling pair. And the reason

00:12:17 --> 00:12:19 is a bit embarrassing actually. One of

00:12:20 --> 00:12:22 them was probably sitting in plain sight

00:12:22 --> 00:12:23 the whole time.

00:12:23 --> 00:12:28 >> Go on. The Jellyfish Nebula IC 443 in

00:12:28 --> 00:12:31 the constellation Gemini about 6

00:12:31 --> 00:12:33 lighty years away. It is one of the best

00:12:33 --> 00:12:36 studied supernova remnants in the sky

00:12:36 --> 00:12:38 and one of the brightest gamma ray

00:12:38 --> 00:12:40 sources of its kind. If you could see it

00:12:40 --> 00:12:42 with your eye, it would look bigger than

00:12:42 --> 00:12:44 the full moon.

00:12:44 --> 00:12:46 >> And something was hiding behind it.

00:12:46 --> 00:12:49 >> Next to it, there's a much fainter

00:12:49 --> 00:12:52 object called G189.6

00:12:52 --> 00:12:55 + 3. It was first picked up in 1994 by

00:12:55 --> 00:12:58 the German ROSAT satellite as a faint

00:12:58 --> 00:13:01 X-ray glow and later the Russian German

00:13:01 --> 00:13:04 Spectrum Ronkin Gamma Observatory saw

00:13:04 --> 00:13:06 shell-like structures in it which

00:13:06 --> 00:13:08 suggested it was also a supernova

00:13:08 --> 00:13:11 remnant but it sits right up against the

00:13:11 --> 00:13:14 glare of the jellyfish and that glare

00:13:14 --> 00:13:15 drowns it.

00:13:15 --> 00:13:18 >> So how did they finally separate them?

00:13:18 --> 00:13:21 16 years of data from NASA's Fermy Gamma

00:13:21 --> 00:13:24 Ray Space Telescope. The team led by

00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 Miltiadis Malites, a post-doal fellow at

00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 Stanford, essentially subtracted the

00:13:30 --> 00:13:32 jellyfish out, isolated its gammaray

00:13:32 --> 00:13:34 emission, and looked at what was left

00:13:34 --> 00:13:35 underneath.

00:13:35 --> 00:13:37 >> And there was something left.

00:13:37 --> 00:13:40 >> There was G189.6

00:13:40 --> 00:13:43 6 + 3 is independently producing gamma

00:13:43 --> 00:13:46 rays which matters enormously because

00:13:46 --> 00:13:48 gamma rays mean particle acceleration

00:13:48 --> 00:13:50 and particle acceleration is what a

00:13:50 --> 00:13:53 supernova remnant does. It's the shock

00:13:53 --> 00:13:54 wave doing work.

00:13:54 --> 00:13:57 >> Ma's had a nice way of putting that,

00:13:57 --> 00:13:57 didn't he?

00:13:57 --> 00:14:00 >> He compared it to a drop of water

00:14:00 --> 00:14:02 falling on a still lake. The ripples

00:14:02 --> 00:14:05 spread out from the point of contact. A

00:14:05 --> 00:14:07 supernova remnant does exactly the same

00:14:07 --> 00:14:09 thing. And if you can see the ripples,

00:14:09 --> 00:14:11 you know something dropped.

00:14:11 --> 00:14:14 >> So, we have two remnants next to each

00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 other. How do we know they're related

00:14:16 --> 00:14:17 rather than just an accident of line of

00:14:18 --> 00:14:18 sight?

00:14:18 --> 00:14:20 >> This is the elegant part. There's a

00:14:20 --> 00:14:23 filament of gas arcing between them. And

00:14:23 --> 00:14:25 that filament is where the shock wave

00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 from G189.6

00:14:27 --> 00:14:30 + 3 has slammed into the same molecular

00:14:30 --> 00:14:33 cloud that the jellyfish is pushing

00:14:33 --> 00:14:33 against.

00:14:34 --> 00:14:36 >> Same cloud. So, same distance.

00:14:36 --> 00:14:38 >> Same cloud. same distance, same

00:14:38 --> 00:14:41 neighborhood. They're not one in front

00:14:41 --> 00:14:43 of the other. They're genuinely next

00:14:43 --> 00:14:45 door to each other. And that's what

00:14:45 --> 00:14:48 makes the shared origin story credible.

00:14:48 --> 00:14:49 >> So, walk me through the story they're

00:14:49 --> 00:14:50 proposing.

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53 >> A tale of two massive stars born

00:14:53 --> 00:14:55 together, gravitationally bound,

00:14:55 --> 00:14:59 orbiting extremely closely, perhaps only

00:14:59 --> 00:15:01 a few times the Earth's sun distance

00:15:01 --> 00:15:04 apart. Close enough that material was

00:15:04 --> 00:15:06 likely flowing from one to the other.

00:15:06 --> 00:15:08 And then the bigger one runs out of fuel

00:15:08 --> 00:15:10 and detonates.

00:15:10 --> 00:15:11 >> And the explosion breaks the

00:15:12 --> 00:15:12 partnership.

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 >> The explosion breaks the partnership.

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 The binary is disrupted and the

00:15:17 --> 00:15:19 surviving companion is essentially

00:15:19 --> 00:15:22 kicked, flung off through the galaxy on

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 its own. It keeps traveling and tens of

00:15:25 --> 00:15:27 thousands of years later, it explodes,

00:15:27 --> 00:15:28 too.

00:15:28 --> 00:15:30 >> How far apart did they end up? The

00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 centers of the two explosions are now

00:15:33 --> 00:15:35 somewhere between 30 and 50 light years

00:15:35 --> 00:15:38 apart. Two stars that were once close

00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 enough to be exchanging material now

00:15:40 --> 00:15:43 separated by that gap and each marked by

00:15:43 --> 00:15:45 its own expanding shell.

00:15:45 --> 00:15:46 >> What were they?

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 >> The jellyfish's progenitor is thought to

00:15:49 --> 00:15:52 have been something like 15 to 25 times

00:15:52 --> 00:15:55 the mass of the sun. Its companion at

00:15:55 --> 00:15:58 least 20. both were probably tens of

00:15:58 --> 00:16:00 thousands times more luminous than the

00:16:00 --> 00:16:03 sun and both may now be neutron stars

00:16:03 --> 00:16:05 >> and publication status because I know

00:16:05 --> 00:16:07 this was previewed at a conference.

00:16:07 --> 00:16:10 >> Good flag. Milti presented the results

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12 at the American Astronomical Society

00:16:12 --> 00:16:15 meeting in Pasadena back in June. What's

00:16:15 --> 00:16:17 happened this week is the peer-reviewed

00:16:17 --> 00:16:19 paper. It's in Nature Communications

00:16:19 --> 00:16:21 with the Stanford release and wider

00:16:21 --> 00:16:24 coverage landing on the 21st.

00:16:24 --> 00:16:26 >> And one for our listeners. Can we go and

00:16:26 --> 00:16:27 look at any of this?

00:16:27 --> 00:16:30 >> Not this month, wherever you are. Gemini

00:16:30 --> 00:16:32 is close to the sun at the moment, so

00:16:32 --> 00:16:35 it's lost in the glare globally, but it

00:16:35 --> 00:16:37 comes back. And this is one where our

00:16:37 --> 00:16:39 northern hemisphere listeners get the

00:16:39 --> 00:16:41 better deal. From North America and

00:16:42 --> 00:16:44 Europe, Gemini rides high overhead

00:16:44 --> 00:16:47 through winter, December into March, and

00:16:47 --> 00:16:49 the jellyfish sits beautifully placed

00:16:49 --> 00:16:53 for a telescope or a long exposure. And

00:16:53 --> 00:16:54 from down here,

00:16:54 --> 00:16:56 >> we still get it just lower. From

00:16:56 --> 00:16:58 Australia and New Zealand, Gemini comes

00:16:58 --> 00:17:00 up in the northern sky through our

00:17:00 --> 00:17:03 summer. Visible, worth hunting, but

00:17:03 --> 00:17:06 closer to the horizon. Either way, put

00:17:06 --> 00:17:07 it on the list for the end of the year.

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 And bear in mind, the jellyfish is

00:17:10 --> 00:17:12 faint. It would be bigger than the full

00:17:12 --> 00:17:14 moon if your eye could pick it up, but

00:17:14 --> 00:17:16 it needs photography or a decent

00:17:16 --> 00:17:18 aperture to show itself. Anna, here's

00:17:18 --> 00:17:20 something we know exists, but have never

00:17:20 --> 00:17:23 actually been able to draw. Galaxy

00:17:23 --> 00:17:25 clusters. The largest gravitationally

00:17:26 --> 00:17:28 bound structures in the universe.

00:17:28 --> 00:17:30 Hundreds or thousands of galaxies plus

00:17:30 --> 00:17:33 enormous clouds of hot gas plus dark

00:17:33 --> 00:17:35 matter are threaded through with

00:17:35 --> 00:17:37 magnetic fields.

00:17:37 --> 00:17:39 >> We've known that for decades.

00:17:39 --> 00:17:41 >> What we have never done is map the shape

00:17:41 --> 00:17:44 of one across an entire cluster from the

00:17:44 --> 00:17:47 middle right out to the edge. And now

00:17:47 --> 00:17:48 somebody has

00:17:48 --> 00:17:51 >> a team led by Andrea Bhuton at INAF,

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53 Italy's National Astrophysics Institute

00:17:53 --> 00:17:55 has reconstructed the magnetic field of

00:17:56 --> 00:17:59 galaxy cluster Abel 2255. And I want to

00:17:59 --> 00:18:01 be precise about that name because at

00:18:01 --> 00:18:03 least one outlet has got it wrong this

00:18:03 --> 00:18:08 week and called it Abel 2142. It is Abel

00:18:08 --> 00:18:09


00:18:09 --> 00:18:11 about a billion lighty years away.

00:18:11 --> 00:18:13 >> Why that cluster?

00:18:13 --> 00:18:15 >> Because it's famously messy in radio.

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19 Abel 2255 has long been known for its

00:18:19 --> 00:18:21 complexity. It's full of strange

00:18:21 --> 00:18:23 diffused radio structures, halos, and

00:18:23 --> 00:18:25 filaments, which is exactly what you

00:18:25 --> 00:18:27 want if you're trying to trace magnetic

00:18:27 --> 00:18:29 fields because those structures are made

00:18:29 --> 00:18:32 by energetic electrons spiraling along

00:18:32 --> 00:18:33 magnetic lines.

00:18:33 --> 00:18:35 >> So the radio emission is the field

00:18:35 --> 00:18:37 effectively made visible.

00:18:37 --> 00:18:40 >> It's the tracer. Electrons corkcrewing

00:18:40 --> 00:18:42 along magnetic lines give off radio

00:18:42 --> 00:18:44 waves. So if you can see the emission

00:18:44 --> 00:18:47 finely enough, you can work backwards to

00:18:47 --> 00:18:49 the field. The problem has always been

00:18:49 --> 00:18:51 that these signals are extraordinarily

00:18:51 --> 00:18:52 faint.

00:18:52 --> 00:18:54 >> What did they observe with?

00:18:54 --> 00:18:56 >> Loar, the low frequency array, the

00:18:56 --> 00:18:58 European radio telescope, spread across

00:18:58 --> 00:19:01 a continent. And these are the deepest

00:19:01 --> 00:19:03 radio observations ever made of a galaxy

00:19:04 --> 00:19:06 cluster. That was combined with a new

00:19:06 --> 00:19:08 data analysis technique. And between

00:19:08 --> 00:19:09 them, that's what cracked it.

00:19:09 --> 00:19:12 >> And what does the map show? This is

00:19:12 --> 00:19:14 defining. In some regions of the

00:19:14 --> 00:19:16 cluster, the magnetic field lines are

00:19:16 --> 00:19:19 strikingly coherent. They follow very

00:19:19 --> 00:19:21 specific directions, stretching radially

00:19:21 --> 00:19:23 outward along the extended radial

00:19:23 --> 00:19:25 structures. They're not random,

00:19:25 --> 00:19:27 >> which tells you something made them that

00:19:27 --> 00:19:28 way,

00:19:28 --> 00:19:30 >> which tells you something is organizing

00:19:30 --> 00:19:32 them. And Bolton's conclusion is that

00:19:32 --> 00:19:34 the shape of the field is intimately

00:19:34 --> 00:19:36 linked to the motion of the gas it sits

00:19:36 --> 00:19:39 in. The field gets stretched and

00:19:39 --> 00:19:41 compressed by the movements associated

00:19:41 --> 00:19:43 with the cluster's own formation.

00:19:43 --> 00:19:45 >> So the cluster assembling itself is what

00:19:45 --> 00:19:47 shapes the magnetism.

00:19:47 --> 00:19:49 >> That's the argument and it's the first

00:19:49 --> 00:19:51 observational evidence of it. The same

00:19:51 --> 00:19:53 violent process that builds a galaxy

00:19:53 --> 00:19:57 cluster. Gas falling in, sloshing,

00:19:57 --> 00:19:59 colliding, merging is the process that

00:19:59 --> 00:20:01 combs the magnetic field into the

00:20:01 --> 00:20:03 pattern we now see.

00:20:03 --> 00:20:05 >> And that ties into the radio halos

00:20:05 --> 00:20:08 question. It does. Bolton says they

00:20:08 --> 00:20:10 believe the mechanism that switches on

00:20:10 --> 00:20:12 these gigantic radio emissions is linked

00:20:12 --> 00:20:14 to the formation process of the clusters

00:20:14 --> 00:20:17 themselves. So, the map isn't just a

00:20:17 --> 00:20:19 pretty picture. It's the evidence for

00:20:19 --> 00:20:20 the engine.

00:20:20 --> 00:20:22 >> It's a lovely example of the thing

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 radioastronomy does best.

00:20:24 --> 00:20:26 >> Showing you a structure that is

00:20:26 --> 00:20:28 completely invisible, is a billion

00:20:28 --> 00:20:30 lighty years away, is bigger than

00:20:30 --> 00:20:32 anything else in the universe, and has

00:20:32 --> 00:20:34 been sitting there the entire time.

00:20:34 --> 00:20:37 published in astronomy and astrophysics.

00:20:37 --> 00:20:40 >> Every if you want to know what has hit

00:20:40 --> 00:20:42 the earth, don't look at the earth

00:20:42 --> 00:20:44 >> because the earth keeps erasing it

00:20:44 --> 00:20:47 >> constantly. Play tectonics, volcanism,

00:20:47 --> 00:20:50 weather, water, erosion, craters get

00:20:50 --> 00:20:53 buried, distorted, subducted, destroyed.

00:20:53 --> 00:20:55 The practical consequence is that

00:20:55 --> 00:20:57 geological evidence for impacts older

00:20:57 --> 00:21:00 than about 650 million years is

00:21:00 --> 00:21:02 extremely scarce here.

00:21:02 --> 00:21:04 >> And the moon doesn't do any of that. No

00:21:04 --> 00:21:07 plate tectonics, no flowing water, no

00:21:07 --> 00:21:09 meaningful atmosphere. The moon just

00:21:09 --> 00:21:11 keeps the receipts. And when you read

00:21:11 --> 00:21:13 those receipts carefully, there's a

00:21:13 --> 00:21:14 spike

00:21:14 --> 00:21:14 >> when

00:21:14 --> 00:21:17 >> around 800 million years ago, there's a

00:21:17 --> 00:21:19 surge in large lunar impacts, and it

00:21:19 --> 00:21:22 shows up in two independent ways. One is

00:21:22 --> 00:21:25 the estimated ages of big craters,

00:21:25 --> 00:21:28 including Capernicus, which is 93 km

00:21:28 --> 00:21:31 across. The other is impact glass.

00:21:31 --> 00:21:33 Explain impact glass.

00:21:33 --> 00:21:35 >> When something hits hard enough, the

00:21:35 --> 00:21:38 heat melts rock. That melt cools into

00:21:38 --> 00:21:41 glass and the glass locks in a chemical

00:21:41 --> 00:21:43 time stamp. The Apollo missions brought

00:21:43 --> 00:21:45 a lot of it home. And when you look at

00:21:45 --> 00:21:48 the age distribution of that glass, you

00:21:48 --> 00:21:51 see the same spike at 800 million years.

00:21:51 --> 00:21:53 >> So, two different methods agree that

00:21:53 --> 00:21:55 something happened, but nobody knew

00:21:55 --> 00:21:56 what.

00:21:56 --> 00:21:58 >> Nobody knew what. That's the puzzle

00:21:58 --> 00:22:00 that's been sitting there for decades.

00:22:00 --> 00:22:02 And a new paper led by Dr. William Bachi

00:22:02 --> 00:22:04 at the Southwest Research Institute in

00:22:04 --> 00:22:07 Boulder proposes a specific culprit,

00:22:07 --> 00:22:08 >> which is

00:22:08 --> 00:22:11 >> an asteroid called Ulia, or rather the

00:22:11 --> 00:22:13 parent body of the family of asteroids

00:22:13 --> 00:22:16 we now call Ulia because the object

00:22:16 --> 00:22:18 itself no longer exists. It was

00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 catastrophically broken apart in a

00:22:21 --> 00:22:22 collision in the main belt.

00:22:22 --> 00:22:24 >> And the location of that breakup

00:22:24 --> 00:22:25 matters.

00:22:25 --> 00:22:27 >> The location is everything. It happened

00:22:27 --> 00:22:30 right next to what's called the J3:1

00:22:30 --> 00:22:32 resonance with Jupiter. And a resonance

00:22:32 --> 00:22:34 like that is essentially a gravitational

00:22:34 --> 00:22:37 trap door. Material that wanders into it

00:22:37 --> 00:22:39 gets its orbit pumped up by Jupiter and

00:22:39 --> 00:22:42 flung into the inner solar system.

00:22:42 --> 00:22:44 >> So the shrapnel had a delivery mechanism

00:22:44 --> 00:22:45 waiting right there.

00:22:45 --> 00:22:48 >> It had an open door right next to it.

00:22:48 --> 00:22:50 And the simulations show what happened

00:22:50 --> 00:22:52 in two phases. Half the fragments

00:22:52 --> 00:22:53 reached the resonance almost

00:22:53 --> 00:22:55 immediately. That's the prompt

00:22:55 --> 00:22:58 bombardment. planetary shrapnel sprayed

00:22:58 --> 00:22:59 across the inner solar system

00:22:59 --> 00:23:01 >> and the other half

00:23:01 --> 00:23:04 >> over the following 100 to 150 million

00:23:04 --> 00:23:06 years another quarter of the fragments

00:23:06 --> 00:23:09 drifted into the resonance more slowly

00:23:09 --> 00:23:11 pushed by something called the Yarovsky

00:23:11 --> 00:23:11 effect

00:23:12 --> 00:23:13 >> which is what in plain terms

00:23:13 --> 00:23:16 >> it's sunlight doing work a rotating

00:23:16 --> 00:23:19 asteroid absorbs sunlight on one side

00:23:19 --> 00:23:22 and reraiates that heat as it turns that

00:23:22 --> 00:23:25 riation gives an incredibly gentle push

00:23:25 --> 00:23:28 on a human scale, it's nothing. Over a

00:23:28 --> 00:23:30 100 million years, it can move an

00:23:30 --> 00:23:32 asteroid's orbit enough to drop it into

00:23:32 --> 00:23:33 a trapoor.

00:23:33 --> 00:23:36 >> So, this wasn't one bad afternoon. This

00:23:36 --> 00:23:37 was a long siege.

00:23:37 --> 00:23:39 >> That's the reframing I think is

00:23:39 --> 00:23:41 genuinely important here. Not an event,

00:23:41 --> 00:23:44 an episode, a bombardment that opened

00:23:44 --> 00:23:46 suddenly and then kept going for well

00:23:46 --> 00:23:48 over 100 million years.

00:23:48 --> 00:23:50 >> And what does that mean for Earth?

00:23:50 --> 00:23:52 >> Here's the number that changes the scale

00:23:52 --> 00:23:55 of it. For every large impact recorded

00:23:55 --> 00:23:57 on the moon, roughly 20 similar or

00:23:57 --> 00:24:00 larger impacts hit the earth where a

00:24:00 --> 00:24:02 bigger target with stronger gravity.

00:24:02 --> 00:24:03 >> 20 to one.

00:24:03 --> 00:24:07 >> 20 to1. So a spike on the moon means a

00:24:07 --> 00:24:09 barrage down here. And now look at what

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12 else was happening around 800 million

00:24:12 --> 00:24:14 years ago. That is the runup to one of

00:24:14 --> 00:24:16 the most dramatic climate episodes in

00:24:16 --> 00:24:19 our planet's history. widespread global

00:24:19 --> 00:24:21 cooling and major shifts in the

00:24:21 --> 00:24:23 biosphere.

00:24:23 --> 00:24:25 >> Is he claiming a causal link?

00:24:25 --> 00:24:27 >> He's careful. And I want to be careful,

00:24:27 --> 00:24:30 too. Baky's phrasing is that given the

00:24:30 --> 00:24:32 peak of this barrage coincides with a

00:24:32 --> 00:24:35 period of widespread cooling and major

00:24:35 --> 00:24:37 shifts in our biosphere. It is tempting

00:24:37 --> 00:24:40 to suggest the former produced the

00:24:40 --> 00:24:43 latter. That is a hypothesis flagged as

00:24:43 --> 00:24:46 tempting, not a conclusion. Because so

00:24:46 --> 00:24:49 far only one impact has ever been firmly

00:24:49 --> 00:24:51 tied to a biological outcome.

00:24:51 --> 00:24:54 >> Pick shaloo 66 million years ago. The

00:24:54 --> 00:24:57 end of the dinosaurs. That's the one.

00:24:57 --> 00:24:59 Everything else is inference.

00:24:59 --> 00:25:02 >> So how would you ever test this?

00:25:02 --> 00:25:04 >> This is my favorite part of the paper

00:25:04 --> 00:25:06 and it's the reason to keep an eye on

00:25:06 --> 00:25:09 this story. We have asteroid samples on

00:25:09 --> 00:25:11 Earth right now. Hayabusa 2 brought

00:25:11 --> 00:25:14 material back from Ryugu in December

00:25:14 --> 00:25:17 2020. Osiris Rex brought Bennu back in

00:25:17 --> 00:25:21 September 2023. Both are under analysis.

00:25:21 --> 00:25:24 >> And if they carry the Ulia fingerprint,

00:25:24 --> 00:25:27 >> if the minology matches the Ulleia

00:25:27 --> 00:25:29 family, then we are holding in a

00:25:29 --> 00:25:31 laboratory physical samples of the

00:25:31 --> 00:25:33 material that rained on the inner solar

00:25:34 --> 00:25:37 system 800 million years ago. That would

00:25:37 --> 00:25:40 turn a dynamical model into a direct

00:25:40 --> 00:25:42 compositional record.

00:25:42 --> 00:25:44 >> That's a remarkable thought. Brains in a

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47 lab in Japan and Texas. That might be

00:25:47 --> 00:25:49 pieces of the thing that helped freeze

00:25:49 --> 00:25:50 the Earth.

00:25:50 --> 00:25:52 >> Published in the Planetary Science

00:25:52 --> 00:25:55 Journal by Botkkey with Vocritzky, Dyke

00:25:55 --> 00:25:56 House, and Zelner.

00:25:56 --> 00:25:58 >> Great. And our next story comes with a

00:25:58 --> 00:25:59 deadline wherever in the world you're

00:26:00 --> 00:26:00 listening.

00:26:00 --> 00:26:02 >> What's the urgency?

00:26:02 --> 00:26:04 >> The moon. First quarter was yesterday,

00:26:04 --> 00:26:08 the 21st. Tonight it's a waxing gibbus

00:26:08 --> 00:26:10 and every night from here it gets

00:26:10 --> 00:26:12 brighter and stays up longer building to

00:26:12 --> 00:26:15 the buck moon full at 4:36 in the

00:26:15 --> 00:26:18 afternoon UTC on Wednesday the 29th.

00:26:18 --> 00:26:21 That's 10:36 in the morning eastern time

00:26:21 --> 00:26:24 in the states and 12:36 on Thursday

00:26:24 --> 00:26:26 morning for us in Australia.

00:26:26 --> 00:26:27 >> And that matters because of what's

00:26:27 --> 00:26:28 peaking.

00:26:28 --> 00:26:31 >> The southern delta Aquarius peak falls

00:26:31 --> 00:26:34 on the 30th effectively the same night

00:26:34 --> 00:26:36 as the full moon. So, the peak is going

00:26:36 --> 00:26:38 to be washed out, which means the

00:26:38 --> 00:26:40 practical advice is the same for

00:26:40 --> 00:26:42 everybody. Don't wait for peak night.

00:26:42 --> 00:26:44 This week is your window in the small

00:26:44 --> 00:26:46 hours while the moon still sets and

00:26:46 --> 00:26:49 leaves you real darkness before dawn.

00:26:49 --> 00:26:51 >> And this is a shower that favors us.

00:26:51 --> 00:26:54 >> It does. From Australia, New Zealand,

00:26:54 --> 00:26:56 and southern Africa, the radiant sits

00:26:56 --> 00:26:59 high close to overhead, which is why the

00:26:59 --> 00:27:01 shower gets underrated in the north.

00:27:01 --> 00:27:04 Under genuinely dark skies, you might

00:27:04 --> 00:27:07 see 15 to 20 an hour. And they're lovely

00:27:07 --> 00:27:10 meteors, long, graceful streaks rather

00:27:10 --> 00:27:12 than quick flashes, and known for

00:27:12 --> 00:27:14 persistent trains, those glowing trails

00:27:14 --> 00:27:16 that hang in the air for a second or two

00:27:16 --> 00:27:17 afterwards.

00:27:17 --> 00:27:19 >> And northern listeners aren't shut out

00:27:19 --> 00:27:20 of this one.

00:27:20 --> 00:27:22 >> Not at all. And I want to be clear about

00:27:22 --> 00:27:24 that because this shower gets written

00:27:24 --> 00:27:27 off in the north too readily. If you're

00:27:27 --> 00:27:29 in North America, particularly the

00:27:29 --> 00:27:31 southern states, Texas, Florida,

00:27:31 --> 00:27:34 Arizona, the Gulf Coast, the Delta

00:27:34 --> 00:27:37 Aquar.

00:27:37 --> 00:27:39 The radiant sits low in your southern

00:27:39 --> 00:27:41 sky rather than overhead, so you'll see

00:27:41 --> 00:27:44 fewer of them, but the ones you do catch

00:27:44 --> 00:27:46 travel long paths across the sky, and

00:27:46 --> 00:27:48 they can be spectacular. Best time is

00:27:48 --> 00:27:51 after midnight through to dawn. Southern

00:27:51 --> 00:27:53 Europe, the Mediterranean, North Africa,

00:27:53 --> 00:27:56 same deal. And where do people look?

00:27:56 --> 00:27:59 >> The radiant is in Aquarius near the star

00:27:59 --> 00:28:02 Delta Aquari. Use fulomalt to find the

00:28:02 --> 00:28:04 region. But honestly, don't stare at the

00:28:04 --> 00:28:07 radiant. Lie back, take in as much sky

00:28:07 --> 00:28:10 as you can, and let them come to you.

00:28:10 --> 00:28:13 Parent body is suspected to be comet 96P

00:28:13 --> 00:28:16 Mack Holtz. There are also the Alpha

00:28:16 --> 00:28:18 Capricornids building to the 30th and

00:28:18 --> 00:28:21 31st. Far fewer meteors, but famous for

00:28:22 --> 00:28:24 slow, brilliant fireballs that can punch

00:28:24 --> 00:28:26 straight through moonlight.

00:28:26 --> 00:28:27 >> And for the north, there's something

00:28:27 --> 00:28:30 considerably bigger coming.

00:28:30 --> 00:28:32 >> There is. And if you're listening in

00:28:32 --> 00:28:34 North America or Europe, you should be

00:28:34 --> 00:28:36 planning for this now. Two things land

00:28:36 --> 00:28:39 together on the 12th of August. First,

00:28:39 --> 00:28:41 the Perciads peak. And this year, the

00:28:41 --> 00:28:43 moon is new that same day, which means a

00:28:43 --> 00:28:46 properly dark sky. That is the best

00:28:46 --> 00:28:48 perciate year in some time. And the

00:28:48 --> 00:28:49 second,

00:28:49 --> 00:28:53 >> a total solar eclipse, the first on

00:28:53 --> 00:28:56 mainland Europe since 1999 and the first

00:28:56 --> 00:29:00 in Spain since 1905. Totality sweeps

00:29:00 --> 00:29:02 across the Arctic, Greenland, Iceland,

00:29:02 --> 00:29:04 and northern Spain. And in Spain, it

00:29:04 --> 00:29:07 happens close to sunset with the sun

00:29:07 --> 00:29:09 only a few degrees above the horizon,

00:29:09 --> 00:29:11 which could be extraordinary.

00:29:11 --> 00:29:14 >> North America doesn't get totality this

00:29:14 --> 00:29:15 time.

00:29:15 --> 00:29:17 >> No. And I won't oversell it, but there

00:29:17 --> 00:29:20 is a real partial eclipse across much of

00:29:20 --> 00:29:23 the continent. Alaska gets the deepest

00:29:23 --> 00:29:26 view near sunrise. Atlantic Canada gets

00:29:26 --> 00:29:28 roughly half the sun covered at maximum

00:29:28 --> 00:29:30 in the afternoon. New England and the

00:29:30 --> 00:29:32 northeastern states get a smaller bite.

00:29:32 --> 00:29:34 And there's some coverage visible right

00:29:34 --> 00:29:37 across every Canadian province and the

00:29:37 --> 00:29:39 northern contiguous states.

00:29:39 --> 00:29:41 >> So, dig out the glasses. Dig out the

00:29:41 --> 00:29:44 Eclipse glasses from 2024 and check

00:29:44 --> 00:29:47 their ISO12312-2

00:29:47 --> 00:29:50 certified. It will not get dark. Even

00:29:50 --> 00:29:53 with 50% coverage, the remaining sun is

00:29:53 --> 00:29:55 blindingly bright, so there is never a

00:29:55 --> 00:29:57 safe moment to look without protection.

00:29:57 --> 00:29:59 And a lovely detail, if you're standing

00:29:59 --> 00:30:01 in the path of totality in Spain or

00:30:02 --> 00:30:04 Iceland, there's a genuine chance of a

00:30:04 --> 00:30:06 percied streaking past during those two

00:30:06 --> 00:30:09 minutes. And tonight for everyone,

00:30:09 --> 00:30:11 >> the Milky Way. From the southern

00:30:11 --> 00:30:14 hemisphere, the galactic core is riding

00:30:14 --> 00:30:16 high overhead right now. One of the real

00:30:16 --> 00:30:19 privileges of our winter and it's at its

00:30:19 --> 00:30:21 best. From the northern hemisphere, it's

00:30:21 --> 00:30:24 lower in the south towards Sagittarius.

00:30:24 --> 00:30:25 But on a dark night, it's still

00:30:25 --> 00:30:28 magnificent. And before dawn, Saturn and

00:30:28 --> 00:30:30 Mars are in the eastern sky for both

00:30:30 --> 00:30:31 hemispheres.

00:30:31 --> 00:30:33 >> One more thing before we go.

00:30:33 --> 00:30:36 >> The launch watchers. SpaceX is targeting

00:30:36 --> 00:30:39 Thursday the 23rd for Starship flight

00:30:39 --> 00:30:42 13. Window opening at 6:45 in the

00:30:42 --> 00:30:45 evening Eastern time. That's 5:45

00:30:45 --> 00:30:48 central, 3:45 Pacific and Friday

00:30:48 --> 00:30:51 morning/4 to 9 for us in Australia. 20

00:30:51 --> 00:30:54 Starling V3 satellites aboard. Second

00:30:54 --> 00:30:56 flight of the V3 vehicle.

00:30:56 --> 00:30:57 >> Dead an alarm.

00:30:57 --> 00:30:59 >> And as always with Starship, check

00:30:59 --> 00:31:01 before you commit. The date has already

00:31:01 --> 00:31:04 moved twice. That's Astronomy Daily for

00:31:04 --> 00:31:07 Wednesday, the 22nd of July. A mechanic

00:31:07 --> 00:31:10 on its way to geostationary orbit. A

00:31:10 --> 00:31:13 rocket stage 2 weeks from making a new

00:31:13 --> 00:31:15 crater. And 23 astronomers asking the

00:31:16 --> 00:31:18 world to watch. Two stars that died in

00:31:18 --> 00:31:21 sequence and left their remnants side by

00:31:21 --> 00:31:23 side. The first magnetic map of a galaxy

00:31:24 --> 00:31:26 cluster. And an asteroid breakup that

00:31:26 --> 00:31:27 may have been raining down on us while

00:31:28 --> 00:31:30 the Earth froze. Donotes, sources, and

00:31:30 --> 00:31:33 links are all at astronomyaily.io,

00:31:33 --> 00:31:36 and you can find us at astrodaily pod

00:31:36 --> 00:31:37 across the socials.

00:31:37 --> 00:31:39 >> If you enjoy the show, a rating or

00:31:39 --> 00:31:41 review genuinely helps other people find

00:31:41 --> 00:31:43 us. Astronomy Daily is part of the

00:31:43 --> 00:31:46 byes.com podcast network.

00:31:46 --> 00:31:47 >> I'm Anna.

00:31:47 --> 00:31:49 >> And I'm Avery. Get outside this week. It

00:31:49 --> 00:31:50 won't be dark for long.

00:31:50 --> 00:31:55 >> Clear skies.

00:31:55 --> 00:32:03 Stories told

00:32:03 --> 00:32:11 stories told

00:32:11 --> 00:32:13 stories