#453: Starliner Suit Dilemma, Iron Rain on WASP 76b & Kuiper Belt Mysteries
Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights & Cosmic DiscoveriesSeptember 19, 2024
453
00:31:4829.17 MB

#453: Starliner Suit Dilemma, Iron Rain on WASP 76b & Kuiper Belt Mysteries

Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this captivating episode of Space Nuts, where they delve into the latest updates on the Boeing Starliner, the peculiar weather on planet Wasp 76 b, the bustling Kuiper Belt, and the mystery of Mars' missing water.
Episode Highlights:
- Starliner Troubles: Discover the latest issue plaguing the Boeing Starliner and the unique challenges faced by astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams.
- Wasp 76 b: Learn about the extreme weather on this distant exoplanet, where iron rain is a reality.
- Kuiper Belt Discoveries: New findings suggest the Kuiper Belt is more populated and extensive than previously thought.
- Mars' Water Mystery: Uncover the latest research on where Mars' water went and what it means for the planet's history.

For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed, visit our website at spacenutspodcast.com. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube Music, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts/support. Other supporter options can be found on our website.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
For a great VPN deal visit bitesz.com/nordvpn .... now more than ever you need a good vpn to protect your online life. Us the one we use.

[00:00:00] [SPEAKER_01]: Hello again, thank you for joining us. This is Space Nuts. My name is Andrew Dunkley and I'm glad

[00:00:05] [SPEAKER_01]: you could join us yet again. Coming up on this episode, Starliner. Yes, we have another update.

[00:00:11] [SPEAKER_01]: This is a really strange problem. A really strange problem. Nothing to do with noises coming from the

[00:00:17] [SPEAKER_01]: inside of the Starliner either. It's a completely different problem. They probably never anticipated.

[00:00:24] [SPEAKER_01]: We're also going to visit planet WASP 76b because it's got rain that you never want to get involved

[00:00:32] [SPEAKER_01]: in unless you love heavy metal. The Kuiper Belt is busier than we thought and they think they know

[00:00:40] [SPEAKER_01]: where all the water went on Mars. It's not here but it's somewhere. We'll tell you all about it on the

[00:00:46] [SPEAKER_01]: current episode of Space Nuts.

[00:01:04] [SPEAKER_01]: And to tell us all about it is the man himself, Professor Fred Watson. Hello Fred.

[00:01:14] [SPEAKER_00]: Hello Andrew. It's good to be the man himself. I appreciate that very much.

[00:01:18] [SPEAKER_00]: Better than being the man of somebody else. Yes, it probably happens sometimes.

[00:01:24] [SPEAKER_01]: No, good to see you too. We should get stuck straight into this because we have got a lot

[00:01:30] [SPEAKER_01]: to get through and some of these stories are extraordinary. We talked about Starliner last week

[00:01:37] [SPEAKER_01]: and the issue of that noise coming from the inside which turned out to be feedback on their audio

[00:01:44] [SPEAKER_01]: system which is not a big problem. You just turn off the speaker or the microphone or both.

[00:01:52] [SPEAKER_01]: But the new problem is one involving the two astronauts who are basically stuck

[00:02:00] [SPEAKER_01]: on the International Space Station because of the technical hitches that the Boeing Starliner

[00:02:06] [SPEAKER_01]: is suffering. We're talking about Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. Now they're looking at how

[00:02:14] [SPEAKER_01]: they're going to get them back. There's talk of getting them back sometime next year but a new

[00:02:20] [SPEAKER_01]: problem has arisen as a consequence of one of the potential solutions. That's correct.

[00:02:28] [SPEAKER_00]: So the potential solution which is what's going to happen and some of this may have already happened

[00:02:33] [SPEAKER_00]: by the time this episode goes to air in particular the Starliner itself might have come back empty

[00:02:40] [SPEAKER_00]: which is the plan at the moment. But the problem is when these two Boeing Starliner astronauts

[00:02:48] [SPEAKER_00]: Butch and Suni as you've mentioned, when they do finally come back it will not be on a Starliner

[00:02:56] [SPEAKER_00]: spacecraft. They will be coming back in a SpaceX Crew Dragon and the space suits that you use on a

[00:03:04] [SPEAKER_00]: Starliner are not the same as the ones that you use on a Crew Dragon and they're incompatible.

[00:03:11] [SPEAKER_00]: So what it means is that when their ferry home is launched up to the Space Station

[00:03:20] [SPEAKER_00]: this will be the Crew Dragon that is going to bring them back home next February. It's going up there

[00:03:24] [SPEAKER_00]: sometime we think this month, September with two empty seats in it. They will also have to send up

[00:03:32] [SPEAKER_00]: two empty space suits for Butch and Suni. The reason why it's tricky is because

[00:03:43] [SPEAKER_00]: once that spacecraft arrives, that's the Crew Dragon later this month,

[00:03:49] [SPEAKER_00]: once that arrives the problem is solved because NASA will send up their correct space suits with it.

[00:03:56] [SPEAKER_00]: But if there's an issue before then, an issue in which the International Space Station has to be

[00:04:03] [SPEAKER_00]: evacuated and that's always at the back of people's minds you've got to be ready to get off just in

[00:04:09] [SPEAKER_00]: case something goes catastrophically wrong. Like a big bit of space junk colliding with it

[00:04:14] [SPEAKER_00]: or something like that. If they had to return there is a Crew Dragon docked with the Space

[00:04:22] [SPEAKER_00]: Station at the moment which will carry the current crew of four astronauts in what's called the Crew

[00:04:29] [SPEAKER_00]: 8 mission back to Earth and it will have room for Suni, Williams and Bruce Wilmore. It will have

[00:04:38] [SPEAKER_00]: on a cargo pallet underneath the seats. Oh what? Are you kidding? That's right, yeah. It's like

[00:04:46] [SPEAKER_00]: riding in the back of the U. Oh my gosh. So they're going to be huddled under there but the

[00:04:52] [SPEAKER_00]: problem is that their space suit designed for the Starliner won't work so they're going to have

[00:05:01] [SPEAKER_01]: to do it without the space suit. So they have to leave them behind? They have to leave them

[00:05:06] [SPEAKER_00]: and go home in their undies? Probably a little bit more than their undies but they will not be

[00:05:12] [SPEAKER_00]: protected by a space suit which has been standard practice for many decades in both NASA and Ros

[00:05:19] [SPEAKER_00]: Cosmos flights that you don't land or launch without your space suit on just in case something

[00:05:24] [SPEAKER_00]: goes wrong and the spacecraft depressurizes. Yes, yes. Wow. But they will be in that situation.

[00:05:31] [SPEAKER_00]: It's likely that, you know, I mean it would have to be a real emergency situation for them to do

[00:05:36] [SPEAKER_00]: that and you would hope that everything would work out all right. Yeah. But it is, yes, it's putting

[00:05:42] [SPEAKER_01]: them in an interesting position. So at the very best they get to come home on February next year

[00:05:54] [SPEAKER_01]: with alternative space suits but in an emergency could end up having to come back without space

[00:05:59] [SPEAKER_00]: suits. Wow. Yeah, only if that emergency occurs before the Crew 9 spacecraft gets there. So yeah,

[00:06:07] [SPEAKER_00]: so it's a short window when there is this situation but it is a situation that

[00:06:12] [SPEAKER_01]: has real risks attached to it. Yeah, gosh, wouldn't you love to be in a room

[00:06:17] [SPEAKER_01]: just watching the people trying to figure all this out? How are we going to do this? What are

[00:06:21] [SPEAKER_01]: we going to do? Oh hang on there's a new problem. Oh, you know, we set that pallet of bricks up,

[00:06:26] [SPEAKER_01]: can we use the pallet? That's it, yeah. Never throw away a good pallet. No, no, that's right,

[00:06:36] [SPEAKER_01]: they're very useful. People make Christmas trees out of them, you know. Well I'm sure they do. Yeah,

[00:06:42] [SPEAKER_01]: my son's got a Christmas tree made out of an old pallet. Yeah, looks nice. Wow, so that's the state

[00:06:49] [SPEAKER_01]: of play as we speak but like we're recording ahead of time to cover a trip of mine so

[00:06:55] [SPEAKER_01]: it may well be a different story by the time this comes out but that's a unique problem. I don't

[00:07:01] [SPEAKER_01]: think I've ever heard of that one before. Fascinating. All right, well we'll try to

[00:07:07] [SPEAKER_01]: keep you informed but time might work against us over the coming weeks but yes, it's been a

[00:07:13] [SPEAKER_01]: fascinating, it's been a soap opera really hasn't it? A little bit, yes. Are you sure about that?

[00:07:19] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, Boeing wouldn't like it if we called that but I think you're right. Yeah,

[00:07:23] [SPEAKER_01]: yeah, well it's better than a horror movie. Yes, exactly. Okay, let's move on to our next story

[00:07:29] [SPEAKER_01]: and this one takes us a long way away to a planet called Wasp 76b. It was only discovered

[00:07:38] [SPEAKER_01]: what 11 years ago but it's been the subject of a lot of study and they are learning more and more

[00:07:45] [SPEAKER_01]: about it and what's really good is they've been able to actually optically observe this one,

[00:07:50] [SPEAKER_01]: I think Fred. It's a stinking hot place though. Australians would like it. We like the heat.

[00:07:57] [SPEAKER_00]: I'm not sure you'd like this much though. So yes, it is a star that is very, very close,

[00:08:06] [SPEAKER_00]: sorry, a planet that is very close to its parent star. The parent star is Wasp 76

[00:08:11] [SPEAKER_00]: and in the normal convention you put a b after it for the first planet that's discovered around it

[00:08:16] [SPEAKER_00]: and it's Wasp 76b which is the planet that we're talking about. It's about something like

[00:08:25] [SPEAKER_00]: getting on for twice the size of Jupiter so it's what we call a hot Jupiter but it is very,

[00:08:32] [SPEAKER_00]: very close to its parent star. Distance is measured almost in centimeters, not quite

[00:08:38] [SPEAKER_00]: but it's actually about 40 million kilometers from its parent star. Now that sounds like a lot

[00:08:47] [SPEAKER_00]: but it's such a close place to its parent star that it goes round something like once every

[00:08:58] [SPEAKER_00]: two days or thereabouts. It's a ridiculously short length of time, I can't find the exact figure

[00:09:03] [SPEAKER_00]: but it's that sort of length of time. It absolutely whizzes around. It's actually 1.8

[00:09:11] [SPEAKER_00]: Earth days and so that means a number of things. First of all, because the star and its planet are

[00:09:17] [SPEAKER_00]: so close together, the star is more massive. It's actually I think more massive than the sun,

[00:09:24] [SPEAKER_00]: about one and a half times the mass of the sun. What that means is that the planet itself is

[00:09:30] [SPEAKER_00]: locked tidally so it always faces its parent star, Wasp 76. It's always got a hot side and

[00:09:40] [SPEAKER_00]: not exactly a cold side but a cooler side. Now on the hot side you've got a temperature high enough

[00:09:49] [SPEAKER_00]: to not just melt iron but vaporize iron. So there is iron vapor in the atmosphere of this planet.

[00:09:57] [SPEAKER_00]: It's about 2,400 degrees Celsius or about 4,350 degrees Fahrenheit on the hot side. Now that vapor

[00:10:08] [SPEAKER_00]: is whizzed around by really strong winds that exist on Wasp 76b. Those winds are generated by

[00:10:17] [SPEAKER_00]: the sheer heat of the atmosphere being so close to its parent star. So this vaporized iron whizzes

[00:10:25] [SPEAKER_00]: around to the back side of the planet, the night side, the permanent night side and there it gets

[00:10:32] [SPEAKER_00]: cool enough to be not vapor but liquid. And so it condenses into droplets of iron rain. So iron rain

[00:10:44] [SPEAKER_00]: to me does not sound that good. Yes, it's cooler but not that much cooler. You'd have to come up

[00:10:52] [SPEAKER_00]: with a really good umbrella. Yeah, I think you would too. But that's only part of the story.

[00:11:01] [SPEAKER_00]: And I should say that this planet has become almost the personal property of scientists at

[00:11:08] [SPEAKER_00]: the University of Geneva in Switzerland. They've done a lot of serious research on this planet and

[00:11:14] [SPEAKER_00]: it's a release from them that's really discovered these very hot winds of vaporized iron.

[00:11:23] [SPEAKER_00]: It's such an extreme planet that is well worth studying because it gives you an idea of how

[00:11:29] [SPEAKER_00]: extreme things can be and sheds light on other planets which are also in our part of the universe.

[00:11:38] [SPEAKER_00]: So just an aside, the work that's being done in Geneva is using a telescope that we Australian

[00:11:45] [SPEAKER_00]: astronomers also have access to, the ESO, European Southern Observatory, very large telescope down

[00:11:50] [SPEAKER_00]: in Chile. There's an instrument on that that is, excuse me I just have to press a button on my

[00:11:59] [SPEAKER_00]: watch here, sorry about that. There's an instrument on that that was actually built by the University

[00:12:05] [SPEAKER_00]: of Geneva. So that's what they're using to make these measurements of the vaporized iron whizzing

[00:12:10] [SPEAKER_00]: around the planet. But wait, there's more because some research done I think by the same group

[00:12:20] [SPEAKER_00]: and published a little while ago actually, we missed this story back in April. It's work that

[00:12:28] [SPEAKER_00]: concerns what might happen to those iron droplets in the atmosphere. Yes you've got iron rain.

[00:12:35] [SPEAKER_00]: Now when we have rain on our planet you get phenomena like rainbows and things of that

[00:12:43] [SPEAKER_00]: sort. And there's evidence that phenomena like that are occurring on WASP-76b,

[00:12:53] [SPEAKER_00]: not specifically rainbows but rainbow-like phenomena and in particular it's something

[00:12:58] [SPEAKER_00]: called a glory which most of us have actually seen believe it or not. And I'm sure you have

[00:13:04] [SPEAKER_01]: Andrew when you look at the... Does it happen in the morning?

[00:13:10] [SPEAKER_00]: That's a different thing altogether.

[00:13:15] [SPEAKER_00]: And I should explain to non-Australian listeners that there is a plant called a morning glory which

[00:13:22] [SPEAKER_00]: blossoms in the morning. Yeah. I'm sure that's what you were talking about Andrew. Absolutely of course.

[00:13:29] [SPEAKER_00]: No, a glory is something, I was just going to say you've almost certainly seen it because

[00:13:36] [SPEAKER_00]: if you've looked out of the window of an aircraft that's flying over cloud, you will often see a

[00:13:43] [SPEAKER_00]: little shadow of the aircraft from if you're on the right side of the plane with circular colored

[00:13:48] [SPEAKER_00]: rings around it. And that's called the glory. It occurs because light is being diffracted

[00:13:54] [SPEAKER_00]: by the rain droplets in the clouds and that diffraction process splits it up into its

[00:14:01] [SPEAKER_00]: rainbow colors and you see this succession of rainbow rings. Similar to something you might

[00:14:08] [SPEAKER_00]: have seen today if you've been looking in the right direction which is called a pollen corona.

[00:14:13] [SPEAKER_01]: Yes, I should go out there and try and take another photo. Yeah, you got a lovely photo of

[00:14:18] [SPEAKER_01]: one last year. And a few years back when you first told me about them and I took up the challenge

[00:14:24] [SPEAKER_01]: and I went outside and I couldn't see it because it was so bright but the camera picked it up

[00:14:30] [SPEAKER_01]: and got a beautiful photo of a pollen corona. Yeah, they're quite strong. Which they are and

[00:14:36] [SPEAKER_00]: the corona is a little bit different because it's around the sun when you're looking towards the sun

[00:14:42] [SPEAKER_00]: but it's still caused by this same diffraction effect and a glory... We've got a very windy day

[00:14:47] [SPEAKER_01]: today and it's sunny and the sun is just in the perfect position so I might go out and take a

[00:14:53] [SPEAKER_00]: snapshot. Are you going to do it now? Not right this minute, that's good. I'm glad to hear that

[00:15:00] [SPEAKER_00]: because otherwise I would have had to waffle on for a little while and I might much rather be

[00:15:04] [SPEAKER_00]: talking to you. So yeah, but you're familiar I'm sure with that phenomenon of looking down

[00:15:11] [SPEAKER_00]: from an aircraft, you see the clouds, you often see the shadow of the plane and around it is this

[00:15:17] [SPEAKER_00]: this succession of colored rings. We think that might be occurring on WASP-76b and the reason why

[00:15:27] [SPEAKER_00]: scientists, as I said at the University of Geneva and actually the Institute of Astrophysics and

[00:15:36] [SPEAKER_00]: Space Science in Portugal, there's a group involved with it there too, they have worked out from

[00:15:48] [SPEAKER_00]: asymmetries in what we call an asymmetric light curve. The light curve is the way the light of

[00:15:54] [SPEAKER_00]: this planet varies as it goes around its parent star and you expect that to be more or less

[00:16:00] [SPEAKER_00]: symmetrical because when it is on one side of the star it's shining with a particular brightness

[00:16:05] [SPEAKER_00]: and it should be the same when it's on the other side of the star but they've discovered

[00:16:09] [SPEAKER_00]: it's not, there are asymmetries in it so it's not symmetrical and these scientists are putting

[00:16:14] [SPEAKER_00]: that down to the existence of a glory in the clouds of WASP-76b which is quite an extraordinary

[00:16:22] [SPEAKER_01]: claim really and an extraordinary discovery. What would an iron rain rainbow look like?

[00:16:29] [SPEAKER_00]: Pretty hot I think, no it's a good question. So it depends on the transparency of the droplets

[00:16:39] [SPEAKER_00]: which I find it hard to get my head around transparent iron droplets. Yeah me too.

[00:16:47] [SPEAKER_00]: Because you think of iron as being a metal but if it's heated enough and it's on the point of

[00:16:54] [SPEAKER_00]: becoming vapor the droplets might be quite transparent and would give you these various

[00:17:00] [SPEAKER_00]: phenomena, refraction and diffraction. But it's something yes we need to look into and I can

[00:17:06] [SPEAKER_00]: hear you typing on your keyboard so you're probably doing it as we speak. I'm trying to

[00:17:09] [SPEAKER_01]: see whether or not there is a colour for iron vapor but it's not something that's

[00:17:16] [SPEAKER_01]: been searched for very much so there's not many references to it. But yeah it might be something

[00:17:22] [SPEAKER_01]: for another day. Indeed. Yeah great story though, so much to learn from WASP-76b and was I right

[00:17:30] [SPEAKER_01]: it's one that has been observed optically?

[00:17:35] [SPEAKER_00]: I think it's still yes but not directly. I think what has been measured is the way the

[00:17:42] [SPEAKER_00]: combined brightness of the star and the planet change as it goes around in its orbit.

[00:17:47] [SPEAKER_00]: Right. I think that's the optical observations that have been made. Okay very good. If you'd

[00:17:51] [SPEAKER_01]: like to read up on that story you can find out more about it, the iron rains of WASP-76b

[00:17:59] [SPEAKER_01]: in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. This is Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley here with

[00:18:05] [SPEAKER_02]: Professor Fred Watson. Okay we checked all four systems and in with the girls. Space Nuts.

[00:18:14] [SPEAKER_01]: Oh that was a short break. Okay I was going to take a breath. Yeah you don't get time for breaths

[00:18:22] [SPEAKER_01]: in this. No no. Our next story takes us to the Kuiper Belt. Now what's interesting about the

[00:18:29] [SPEAKER_01]: Kuiper Belt is well just about everything about it but now they think it might actually be bigger,

[00:18:35] [SPEAKER_00]: deeper and more occupied than we first thought. Fascinating. Yeah that's right. So a very nice

[00:18:43] [SPEAKER_00]: combination of astronomical infrastructure here because this is work that combines the Japanese

[00:18:54] [SPEAKER_00]: Subaru telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii which is an eight meter class telescope named Subaru

[00:19:00] [SPEAKER_00]: after the Japanese name for the Pleiades, the seven sisters. And the work has been done in

[00:19:08] [SPEAKER_00]: collaboration with the mission scientists of New Horizons, the spacecraft that is leaving the solar

[00:19:15] [SPEAKER_00]: system, one of five that's leaving the solar system. Now you and I spoke about New Horizons

[00:19:20] [SPEAKER_00]: not very long ago because it's used its cameras to measure the night sky brightness. So it's just

[00:19:29] [SPEAKER_00]: the brightness of the sky because it's night all the time out there. This is 60 astronomical units

[00:19:35] [SPEAKER_00]: from the Earth which is where the spacecraft is at the moment. Remember one astronomical unit is

[00:19:40] [SPEAKER_00]: 150 million kilometers, it's the distance between the Earth and the Sun. So a long long way,

[00:19:47] [SPEAKER_00]: 60 times further away from the Sun than the Earth is. And the New Horizons flew by Jupiter in 2015,

[00:19:56] [SPEAKER_00]: sorry flew by Pluto 2015, flew by Arrokoth a couple of years later, a distant Kuiper Belt object,

[00:20:04] [SPEAKER_00]: and used its cameras to very good effect. It's got fantastic cameras on board. Now the mission team

[00:20:10] [SPEAKER_00]: of New Horizons, which is still scanning for new Kuiper Belt objects to try and divert New

[00:20:17] [SPEAKER_00]: Horizons 2 to have a close look at, given the limited fuel that they've got on board New Horizons

[00:20:24] [SPEAKER_00]: in order to do that diversion, they've got to be fairly careful about what they choose. And at the

[00:20:30] [SPEAKER_00]: moment there are no candidates. And part of the problem for that is that whilst New Horizons has

[00:20:35] [SPEAKER_00]: got, as I said, superb cameras on board, they're not wide-angle cameras, they're not the kind of

[00:20:40] [SPEAKER_00]: camera that you want to use for searching for potential candidates. And for that you need a

[00:20:45] [SPEAKER_00]: wider field of view, and it turns out that back here on Earth, back home on our sunny planet as

[00:20:52] [SPEAKER_00]: it is for me now, the Subaru telescope has a wide-field camera which is capable of detecting

[00:21:01] [SPEAKER_00]: these faint objects at these great distances from the Earth. And so the combination of the two of

[00:21:08] [SPEAKER_00]: them has been to identify some Kuiper Belt objects that New Horizons can sort of foam in on, at least

[00:21:14] [SPEAKER_00]: with its camera, not necessarily being diverted there, but they can have a look at it with the

[00:21:19] [SPEAKER_00]: New Horizons camera because it's much closer than Subaru is. Subaru can find these objects and say

[00:21:24] [SPEAKER_00]: there's a target that you need to look at, and New Horizons can then have a close look at it.

[00:21:29] [SPEAKER_00]: And the upshot of all this is that it looks as though the Kuiper Belt has more of these icy

[00:21:37] [SPEAKER_00]: asteroids in it than we thought. Basically, we thought that the Kuiper Belt ran out of steam

[00:21:43] [SPEAKER_00]: roughly at the distance where New Horizons is, 60 astronomical units from the Sun.

[00:21:49] [SPEAKER_00]: But it turns out that there's more. They found a population of these things beyond,

[00:21:57] [SPEAKER_00]: in the region of a dozen I think or so that have been found so far, perhaps a few more than that.

[00:22:02] [SPEAKER_00]: But these kind of cluster around 80 astronomical units from the Sun. So another quarter, sorry,

[00:22:11] [SPEAKER_00]: third of the distance away, you've got another group of these objects, which is something that

[00:22:17] [SPEAKER_00]: was not known. We do know that the icy asteroids beyond Neptune, which we call trans-Neptunian

[00:22:25] [SPEAKER_00]: objects, we know that they do group into different groups. And the Kuiper Belt is the innermost of

[00:22:29] [SPEAKER_00]: those groups. There are some things called scattered disk objects, which are much further

[00:22:35] [SPEAKER_00]: away. And I don't think that's what we're looking at though. We're not looking at the scattered disk,

[00:22:40] [SPEAKER_00]: we're looking seriously at the Kuiper Belt and finding that there's more in it than we thought

[00:22:44] [SPEAKER_00]: there were. And the conclusion to be drawn from that is that perhaps the protoplanetary disk

[00:22:52] [SPEAKER_00]: around the Sun when the planets were being formed was bigger than what we thought it was,

[00:22:57] [SPEAKER_00]: because we're finding debris out there that is almost certainly left over from that process,

[00:23:02] [SPEAKER_01]: but it's further away from the Sun than we expected. Okay. Now someone's got to think of it.

[00:23:08] [SPEAKER_01]: So I'll just ask if this is the case and we've got a bigger Kuiper Belt than we thought,

[00:23:13] [SPEAKER_01]: and there's much more junk out there from our solar system origins, could planet nine be a

[00:23:26] [SPEAKER_00]: reason for that? No, it's a great question. And the thinking with planet nine is that it

[00:23:33] [SPEAKER_00]: is much further away, perhaps twice that distance. But we don't... The thinking about

[00:23:41] [SPEAKER_00]: the hypothetical planet nine is that it affects these objects, these really most distant objects

[00:23:50] [SPEAKER_00]: in the trans-Neptunian region beyond Neptune, and it changes their orbits. That's the thinking

[00:23:56] [SPEAKER_00]: why some astronomers believe that planet nine exists. Some believe it doesn't exist as well.

[00:24:02] [SPEAKER_00]: I talked to one earlier in the year who was a planetary scientist who said,

[00:24:06] [SPEAKER_00]: no, it's pie in the sky. So you've got very different opinions there. But anyway,

[00:24:15] [SPEAKER_00]: that idea of planet nine being part of this new population of Kuiper Belt objects,

[00:24:22] [SPEAKER_00]: I think it's too far away to be included in what is being considered here.

[00:24:27] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, but it's certainly a great discovery that the Kuiper Belt might be bigger and

[00:24:33] [SPEAKER_01]: contain a lot more objects than we ever thought. So probably a lot more to learn and a lot more

[00:24:38] [SPEAKER_01]: to talk about going forward. And you can find out more about it when they publish,

[00:24:44] [SPEAKER_01]: I think there's a couple of papers on this, which will be published in the Planetary Science Journal.

[00:24:55] [SPEAKER_01]: Space nuts. Okay, moving on from the Kuiper Belt to a little rock closer to its parent star,

[00:25:03] [SPEAKER_01]: and that is a planet called Mars. And one of the things that gets people scratching their heads

[00:25:10] [SPEAKER_01]: about Mars is what happened to the water? What happened to the atmosphere?

[00:25:14] [SPEAKER_01]: What happened to all the dogs and cats that lived there?

[00:25:19] [SPEAKER_01]: But we may have an answer on the water issue. Yes, that's right. And again, this is a really

[00:25:25] [SPEAKER_00]: nice collaboration between very well known facilities, and both NASA facilities in this case.

[00:25:33] [SPEAKER_00]: NASA has spacecraft in orbit around Mars. It's got a number of spacecraft in orbit around Mars.

[00:25:38] [SPEAKER_00]: But one of them is MAVEN, which is an acronym for Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution.

[00:25:47] [SPEAKER_00]: So as the name implies, MAVEN is looking at the atmosphere of Mars. And one of the reasons why

[00:25:54] [SPEAKER_00]: MAVEN was sent to Mars, and in fact, it's probably the best part of a decade ago,

[00:25:57] [SPEAKER_00]: it's quite a long time ago. The reason for that was to look at exactly what we're talking about,

[00:26:03] [SPEAKER_00]: the prospects of atoms leaving Mars' atmosphere. And I guess the main culprit,

[00:26:14] [SPEAKER_00]: especially if you're thinking about water, is hydrogen, because water is hydrogen and oxygen.

[00:26:20] [SPEAKER_00]: We think one of the reasons why Mars has lost its water is because of the dissociation of water

[00:26:31] [SPEAKER_00]: into hydrogen and oxygen. And the hydrogen basically escapes from Mars' atmosphere. And

[00:26:37] [SPEAKER_00]: that has been kind of demonstrated already by MAVEN. But there is an issue with the observations.

[00:26:47] [SPEAKER_00]: And it is because during the Martian, I think it's the Northern Hemisphere winter,

[00:26:55] [SPEAKER_00]: it's Mars, just to step back a minute, Mars has an orbit, which is much less circular than the

[00:27:04] [SPEAKER_00]: Earth's orbit. It's highly elliptical, quite elongated. So for part of the year,

[00:27:11] [SPEAKER_00]: Mars is significantly further away from the sun than it is at other times of the year.

[00:27:18] [SPEAKER_00]: And what happens is this spreading of hydrogen into space from Mars' upper atmosphere,

[00:27:26] [SPEAKER_00]: actually in that period when Mars is a long way away, it becomes too faint for MAVEN to see.

[00:27:34] [SPEAKER_00]: And that is why the mission scientists have turned to the Hubble Space Telescope,

[00:27:40] [SPEAKER_00]: another NASA facility, which can see Mars pretty clearly and is able to actually provide data on

[00:27:48] [SPEAKER_00]: the hydrogen escaping from Mars back to 1991, actually. And in fact, I've just seen that MAVEN

[00:27:56] [SPEAKER_00]: arrived at Mars in 2014. So my guess of it being the best part of 10 years was right on the line.

[00:28:02] [SPEAKER_00]: Spot on. Now there's a subtlety to this though, that I just must mention because it's not just

[00:28:07] [SPEAKER_00]: the ordinary hydrogen that the Hubble is helping out with. It is deuterium, the heavy hydrogen. And

[00:28:15] [SPEAKER_00]: you and I have spoken about this before, that heavy hydrogen has an additional neutron, which means

[00:28:23] [SPEAKER_00]: its mass is about twice, mass of a hydrogen atom is about twice what it is normal hydrogen. We call

[00:28:30] [SPEAKER_00]: it deuterium. We sometimes call it heavy hydrogen, but we call it deuterium. If that combines with

[00:28:37] [SPEAKER_00]: oxygen, then you get heavy water. And it's the ratio between these two that is the clue to what

[00:28:45] [SPEAKER_00]: might have happened to Mars' oceans in the distant past. And so these scientists, what they're doing

[00:28:51] [SPEAKER_00]: is they're looking at the ratio of hydrogen to deuterium in the gas that is leaving Mars at

[00:28:58] [SPEAKER_00]: present. And from that, it's a bit like carbon-14 dating, from that they can work out

[00:29:03] [SPEAKER_00]: how early in Mars' history that water left, how long it's been being lost from Mars.

[00:29:13] [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, so they can do the calculations backwards and see how long...

[00:29:17] [SPEAKER_00]: That's right.

[00:29:18] [SPEAKER_00]: The calculations back in time, that's it.

[00:29:20] [SPEAKER_01]: Incredible. And so they've basically confirmed that it's this deuterium that's

[00:29:29] [SPEAKER_01]: zipping out into the... No, it's heavier, isn't it? So it's...

[00:29:34] [SPEAKER_00]: Yes. So probably, yeah, it's the heavy stuff probably stays closer to Mars than the light

[00:29:41] [SPEAKER_00]: stuff. But you've got to... It's the ratio of the two of them that you're really interested in.

[00:29:46] [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. And that's what's telling the tale.

[00:29:49] [SPEAKER_00]: That is what's telling the tale. That's right. As, is it phys.org puts it,

[00:29:54] [SPEAKER_00]: measuring the ratio today gives scientists a clue as to how much water was present during

[00:29:58] [SPEAKER_00]: the warm-wet period on Mars. Fascinating.

[00:30:02] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah. Wow. All right. So we... Yeah, it's been sort of zipping off into the ether, basically.

[00:30:10] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.

[00:30:10] [SPEAKER_01]: That's right. Yes.

[00:30:12] [SPEAKER_01]: And it's still happening by the description you gave.

[00:30:16] [SPEAKER_00]: That's correct. Yes. Yeah. Look, I'll read the next sentence to that because it's beautifully

[00:30:20] [SPEAKER_00]: put by phys.org, by studying how these atoms currently escape, they can understand the

[00:30:25] [SPEAKER_00]: processes that determine the escape rate over the last four billion years and thereby extrapolate

[00:30:30] [SPEAKER_00]: back in time. Very nicely done. Indeed. I think actually that might be a NASA press release

[00:30:36] [SPEAKER_01]: rather than a phys.org article. Okay. But you can read it on phys.org. You can also read the study

[00:30:43] [SPEAKER_01]: in Science Advances. That brings us to the end of this episode. Thank you so much, Fred.

[00:30:51] [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, it's a pleasure, Andrew. We should do it again sometime.

[00:30:54] [SPEAKER_01]: We probably will in a few minutes. Well, soon, in a few days. Yes. Thank you, Fred. Professor

[00:31:01] [SPEAKER_01]: Fred Watson, astronomer at large, and thanks to Hugh in the studio for being Hugh in the studio

[00:31:06] [SPEAKER_01]: and no one else can be Hugh in the studio. I can tell you that for free. And from me,

[00:31:12] [SPEAKER_01]: Andrew Dunkley, thanks for listening into another episode. Don't forget to leave some reviews and

[00:31:18] [SPEAKER_01]: check our social media and our website while you're at it. And we will catch you again soon

[00:31:23] [SPEAKER_01]: on another episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye. Space Nuts. You've been listening to the Space Nuts

[00:31:29] [SPEAKER_03]: podcast. Available at Apple podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast player.

[00:31:38] [SPEAKER_03]: You can also stream on demand at bytes.com. This has been another quality podcast production

[00:31:44] [SPEAKER_02]: from tights.com