Black Holes, Time Twists & the Future of Life on Mars: A Q&A Episode

Black Holes, Time Twists & the Future of Life on Mars: A Q&A Episode

Sponsor Details:
This episode is brought to you by NordVPN and Insta360
To get your Space Nuts NordVPN offer, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts - a special price and a 30 day moneyback guarantee await. Check it out
To check out Insta360's brilliant cameras and claim your Space Nuts freebie offer, visit store.insta360.com ... 360 degree photography at it's finest!

Black Holes, Time Dimensions, and the Future of Life on Mars
In this thought-provoking episode of Space Nuts, host Andrew Dunkley and the ever-insightful Professor Fred Watson tackle a variety of intriguing questions from listeners. From the mysteries of black holes to the complex nature of time and the potential for life on Mars, this episode promises to stimulate your cosmic curiosity.
Episode Highlights:
- Black Holes and Time: Andrew and Fred Watson delve into a listener's question about black holes and the nature of time as one approaches the event horizon. Can time really reverse, or does it simply stop? The duo explores these mind-bending concepts and the implications of black hole physics.
- The Nature of Time: A fascinating discussion arises from a question about whether time can be considered a true dimension. Andrew and Fred Watson unpack the complexities of time as a dimension, including its unique properties compared to spatial dimensions and how it affects our understanding of the universe.
- Future Habitats on Mars: The conversation shifts to the potential for life on Mars and the impact of Milankovitch cycles on the planet's climate. Can Mars become a habitable world again, and what does that mean for the future of life in our solar system? The duo examines the possibilities and the ongoing search for extraterrestrial life.
- Listener Ideas and Cosmic Creativity: Andrew shares an exciting book premise suggested by a listener, exploring the idea of Martian microbes merging with human cells. This sparks a conversation about the implications of such a scenario and the creative possibilities it presents.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Fred Watson Watson
(01:20) Discussion on black holes and the nature of time
(15:00) Exploring the potential for life on Mars and Milankovitch cycles
(25:30) Listener Ash ideas and cosmic creativity
For commercial-free versions of Space Nuts, join us on Patreon, Supercast, Apple Podcasts, or become a supporter here: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.


00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Andrew Dunkley here and this is

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 Space Nuts, a Q and A edition. Thanks for joining

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08 us. Coming up we're going to oh gosh,

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11 talk about something never before spoken of on

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 Space Nuts. A black hole. A little

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 bit of a different twist on this one though. We're also going to look at

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 the. Dimension of time, our obsession

00:00:20 --> 00:00:23 with life, the malinkov cycles

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25 of Mars and Paddy's got an idea for

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 me to write a book. That's all coming up

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30 on this edition of space nuts.

00:00:30 --> 00:00:33 Generic: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

00:00:33 --> 00:00:35 10, 9. Ignition

00:00:35 --> 00:00:38 sequence start. Space nuts. 5, 4, 3.

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,

00:00:41 --> 00:00:44 3, 2, 1. Space nuts. Astronauts

00:00:44 --> 00:00:46 report it feels good.

00:00:46 --> 00:00:49 Andrew Dunkley: And with all the answers is Professor Fred Watson

00:00:49 --> 00:00:51 Watson, astronomer at large. Hello friend.

00:00:52 --> 00:00:54 Professor Fred Watson: Hello Andrew. It's not all the answers but

00:00:55 --> 00:00:58 well, two or three of them, that's all

00:00:58 --> 00:00:58 we need.

00:00:59 --> 00:01:01 Andrew Dunkley: I thought I'd show you my background today.

00:01:01 --> 00:01:03 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, I was to ask you about that.

00:01:03 --> 00:01:06 Andrew Dunkley: All these rockets launching into space. That's from

00:01:06 --> 00:01:09 the sphere in Las Vegas. I took that photo

00:01:09 --> 00:01:12 when we went to a show there called Postcard From

00:01:12 --> 00:01:15 Earth. And the basis of the

00:01:15 --> 00:01:18 story is that Earth's become

00:01:18 --> 00:01:21 uninhabitable due to global warming. So everyone

00:01:21 --> 00:01:24 basically went let's get out of Dodge. And that's the

00:01:24 --> 00:01:27 scene of all the rockets taking off as humanity

00:01:27 --> 00:01:29 leaves the planet. And the whole

00:01:29 --> 00:01:32 storyline basically is about people coming back

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 to visit but we can't live here anymore because we messed it

00:01:35 --> 00:01:38 up so bad. And that, yeah, so that's the

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41 launch sequence from all the humans leaving the planet

00:01:41 --> 00:01:44 after we decimated it with global warming and climate

00:01:44 --> 00:01:47 change. and it's a 360

00:01:47 --> 00:01:50 degree sphere in Las Vegas, which you

00:01:50 --> 00:01:53 can walk around and it has

00:01:53 --> 00:01:55 pictures on the outside, but on the inside it's a

00:01:55 --> 00:01:58 visual screen that goes all around you.

00:01:58 --> 00:02:01 not only is it showing you pictures but you can also

00:02:01 --> 00:02:04 experience weather while you're there.

00:02:04 --> 00:02:07 So you fly over snow fields and you can feel the cold

00:02:07 --> 00:02:10 and the wind. you fly over an

00:02:10 --> 00:02:12 orchard in California, you can smell the citrus.

00:02:12 --> 00:02:15 it's really brilliant, really amazing facility

00:02:15 --> 00:02:18 that they've, they've built there and all centred around

00:02:18 --> 00:02:21 science. So yeah, loved it, Absolutely loved

00:02:21 --> 00:02:23 it. Notwithstanding the fact the Eagles are performing

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 there pretty much as I speak. So they do all kind of thing

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 as well. Yeah. But yeah, I like that, I like that as

00:02:29 --> 00:02:32 a backdrop. Sort of fits in with what we do. Space Nuts

00:02:33 --> 00:02:34 launching rockets, that kind of thing.

00:02:36 --> 00:02:39 Professor Fred Watson: So the reason why Earth, is uninhabitable. Is because of all

00:02:39 --> 00:02:42 these rockets leaving behind their trailer

00:02:43 --> 00:02:44 were nasty stuff.

00:02:44 --> 00:02:45 Andrew Dunkley: They dusted chemicals.

00:02:47 --> 00:02:49 It probably didn't help that many take.

00:02:49 --> 00:02:50 Professor Fred Watson: I don't think it would, no.

00:02:51 --> 00:02:54 Andrew Dunkley: Let's get down to some questions. And our first one

00:02:54 --> 00:02:56 comes from Mark, Painter. this one came via, Facebook.

00:02:56 --> 00:02:59 Dear Andrew and Professor Fred Watson. I have a few questions that

00:02:59 --> 00:03:02 puzzle me today. I'll start with, of course,

00:03:02 --> 00:03:05 black holes in the movie Interstellar.

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 As they get closer to the black hole, time slows down

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 relative to the outside observer. By

00:03:11 --> 00:03:14 extension, as we get close to the event horizon, time

00:03:14 --> 00:03:17 would stretch more and more and I assume follows

00:03:17 --> 00:03:20 an exponential curve to the point where time

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 effectively stops. So then to enter

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26 the black hole, wouldn't time have to go in

00:03:26 --> 00:03:29 reverse? Could it be that all black holes

00:03:29 --> 00:03:31 are actually chunks that come from the Big

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33 Bang that did not,

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37 form, That did not form normal matter?

00:03:38 --> 00:03:39 Andrew Dunkley: Thanks in advance.

00:03:39 --> 00:03:42 Andrew Dunkley: We kind of talked about that in our last episode. The

00:03:42 --> 00:03:44 primordial black holes. And

00:03:45 --> 00:03:48 they're maybe being responsible

00:03:48 --> 00:03:51 for dark matter, which Fred Watson

00:03:51 --> 00:03:54 debunked pretty heavily. Yeah, there's

00:03:54 --> 00:03:57 a big up. Really? No, but, So he's

00:03:57 --> 00:03:59 asking about time being reversed. If you entered a

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 black hole, I know something that would be

00:04:02 --> 00:04:05 reversed. Your life. But that's besides the point.

00:04:06 --> 00:04:09 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, Just. Just to, elaborate on what you

00:04:09 --> 00:04:11 were just saying though, Andrew.

00:04:12 --> 00:04:15 primordial black holes may exist. We just don't know.

00:04:16 --> 00:04:19 and my comment was that I didn't think they would

00:04:19 --> 00:04:21 amount to forming the. The dark matter that,

00:04:21 --> 00:04:24 you know, looking for. But we

00:04:24 --> 00:04:27 do, we do know that, some black holes are

00:04:27 --> 00:04:29 actually formed from

00:04:30 --> 00:04:33 supernova explosions. The debris left over by

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36 supernova. The collapse of the core of a star that

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 has sufficient mass, up to 22.

00:04:39 --> 00:04:42 Something like 22 solar masses. So, the answer

00:04:42 --> 00:04:45 to the last bit of Mark's question there. Could

00:04:45 --> 00:04:48 it be that all the black holes are actually chunks that came from the Big

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51 Bang that did not form normal matter? And,

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54 some of them probably did, the primordial ones.

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57 But, some also didn't. We know that

00:04:57 --> 00:05:00 black holes are formed by. By stars getting to the ends of their

00:05:00 --> 00:05:02 lives. And regarding time

00:05:03 --> 00:05:06 reversal, Mark is absolutely right that

00:05:06 --> 00:05:09 as you, To an outside observer, the

00:05:09 --> 00:05:11 closer you get to the event horizon,

00:05:12 --> 00:05:14 the, More

00:05:15 --> 00:05:18 your time to the outside observer slows down,

00:05:18 --> 00:05:20 if I can put it that way. And when you cross the event

00:05:20 --> 00:05:23 horizon, basically time stops. So your person

00:05:23 --> 00:05:26 would be frozen, on the event horizon. Although

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29 they've actually fallen into it. They don't see

00:05:29 --> 00:05:32 the event horizon because that's ah, basically an

00:05:32 --> 00:05:35 optical illusion. It's the point at which light

00:05:35 --> 00:05:36 cannot escape.

00:05:36 --> 00:05:38 Andrew Dunkley: We thought this, some

00:05:38 --> 00:05:41 episodes back about how if you were to

00:05:41 --> 00:05:44 cross the threshold, like, oh, space and

00:05:44 --> 00:05:45 time would flip.

00:05:46 --> 00:05:49 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right, they do. that's. As you get close

00:05:49 --> 00:05:51 to it, it's exactly right. The dimensions

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54 flip. And we had quite a nice explanation as

00:05:54 --> 00:05:55 to why that would be.

00:05:55 --> 00:05:58 Andrew Dunkley: Which great YouTube video on it, I think.

00:05:58 --> 00:06:01 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that was it. There was a YouTube video. Very nicely put.

00:06:02 --> 00:06:04 very nicely put. Why the.

00:06:04 --> 00:06:07 Effectively space and time flip. and that

00:06:07 --> 00:06:10 in a way sort of illuminates

00:06:10 --> 00:06:12 Mark's question as well.

00:06:13 --> 00:06:16 The, the time doesn't reverse for you.

00:06:16 --> 00:06:19 time basically disappears along with

00:06:19 --> 00:06:21 you and you get swallowed into the,

00:06:22 --> 00:06:25 into the black hole from your perspective. and

00:06:25 --> 00:06:28 you know, it's no good thinking about whether to an outside

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 observer time might reverse because

00:06:31 --> 00:06:34 the outside observer can't see you because you're, by

00:06:34 --> 00:06:37 that time you're inside the event horizon. So

00:06:37 --> 00:06:40 nobody's going to see you, Nobody will feel your pain.

00:06:40 --> 00:06:41 Andrew Dunkley: No, no.

00:06:41 --> 00:06:43 Andrew Dunkley: But you'll be covered in spaghetti sauce.

00:06:43 --> 00:06:44 Professor Fred Watson: Spaghetti. Yes, that's right.

00:06:44 --> 00:06:47 Andrew Dunkley: In the movie Interstellar, of course he's referring to

00:06:47 --> 00:06:50 a situation where an astronaut did

00:06:50 --> 00:06:52 cross the plane into a black hole

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 to help solve, a, a, a

00:06:56 --> 00:06:59 puzzle that they could only solve if they could get

00:06:59 --> 00:07:00 inside a black hole.

00:07:01 --> 00:07:01 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.

00:07:01 --> 00:07:02 Paddy: Yep.

00:07:03 --> 00:07:05 Professor Fred Watson: I, I did see the movie, but I don't remember the exact plot.

00:07:05 --> 00:07:08 I just remember thinking, no, that couldn't possibly

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 happen. No. What are they talking about?

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 Andrew Dunkley: All a gravity problem and they couldn't do

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 it. Black hole. So that's,

00:07:16 --> 00:07:19 I had to go in, brilliant film, but that was probably

00:07:19 --> 00:07:21 where it jumped the shark, so to speak.

00:07:22 --> 00:07:25 in terms of reality. But who cares?

00:07:25 --> 00:07:27 It's science fiction. I loved it. Absolutely loved it.

00:07:28 --> 00:07:31 Thank you Mark, great to hear from you and thanks

00:07:31 --> 00:07:33 for reaching out on Facebook. Our next question

00:07:34 --> 00:07:35 comes from Craig.

00:07:35 --> 00:07:38 Craig: Hi professors, it's Craig calling from

00:07:38 --> 00:07:40 Sunny Marimbula in New South Wales.

00:07:41 --> 00:07:43 I have a question about dimensions.

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48 1, dimension, 2, 3.

00:07:49 --> 00:07:51 They all need time and we

00:07:51 --> 00:07:54 describe time as a dimension. But

00:07:54 --> 00:07:57 is it really? It's kind of

00:07:57 --> 00:08:00 like half a dimension. We can move in

00:08:00 --> 00:08:02 one vector but not in the other.

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06 Unless you can move faster than the speed of light

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08 and I don't think we can. So

00:08:08 --> 00:08:11 it's not really a full dimension.

00:08:11 --> 00:08:14 It's as I said, more like a Half a dimension.

00:08:14 --> 00:08:15 What are your thoughts?

00:08:16 --> 00:08:18 Andrew Dunkley: M. Okay, Craig, thank you.

00:08:19 --> 00:08:21 Andrew Dunkley: yes, half a dimension.

00:08:21 --> 00:08:23 Andrew Dunkley: We do describe time as a dimension

00:08:24 --> 00:08:27 and while you're talking I'm going to do some research because

00:08:27 --> 00:08:29 I remember us talking not so long ago

00:08:30 --> 00:08:32 about a paper that was released

00:08:32 --> 00:08:35 suggesting time travels in two

00:08:35 --> 00:08:38 directions at once. Was

00:08:38 --> 00:08:38 that.

00:08:40 --> 00:08:42 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's that was

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 for the. It's

00:08:45 --> 00:08:48 the way some quantum processes experience it. I

00:08:48 --> 00:08:51 think that was what it was about. Yeah. so time is

00:08:51 --> 00:08:54 a dimension. this emerged

00:08:54 --> 00:08:57 from sort of mathematical studies in the

00:08:57 --> 00:08:59 wake of Einstein's special theory of relativity.

00:09:01 --> 00:09:04 and so you can write down an

00:09:04 --> 00:09:06 equation, if I

00:09:07 --> 00:09:08 remember it rightly

00:09:10 --> 00:09:13 so you, excuse me, imagine yourself

00:09:13 --> 00:09:15 moving, in

00:09:16 --> 00:09:19 three dimensions, a

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22 distance which we'll call S. You've got

00:09:22 --> 00:09:24 three coordinates and actually in three

00:09:24 --> 00:09:27 dimensions you can write down an equation which we call the metric.

00:09:27 --> 00:09:30 And this is for normal non relativistic space

00:09:31 --> 00:09:33 which would be the S squared equals X squared plus Y squared

00:09:33 --> 00:09:36 plus Z squared. That would be a formal

00:09:36 --> 00:09:39 equation of how you would move in a three

00:09:39 --> 00:09:41 dimensional coordinate system. we,

00:09:43 --> 00:09:45 you know, we express these things

00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 mathematically. It's called a metric. That is the

00:09:50 --> 00:09:52 bottom line of this. but with

00:09:53 --> 00:09:55 relativity coming along people realise that

00:09:55 --> 00:09:58 yes, time behaves just like a dimension,

00:09:58 --> 00:10:01 and it is variable, it can be

00:10:01 --> 00:10:04 squashed and it can be extended. Just as we've been talking

00:10:04 --> 00:10:06 about time dilation, your time

00:10:07 --> 00:10:09 can look differently from the time of

00:10:09 --> 00:10:12 somebody else, who's in a different frame of

00:10:12 --> 00:10:14 reference from you, whether gravitationally or moving.

00:10:15 --> 00:10:18 so time is bendy, but

00:10:19 --> 00:10:22 you find that when you move to that

00:10:22 --> 00:10:24 relativistic situation you can write the

00:10:24 --> 00:10:27 equation down where you've got four dimensions,

00:10:27 --> 00:10:30 and one of them is time. And if I remember rightly, it's S squared equals

00:10:30 --> 00:10:33 X squared plus Y squared plus Z squared minus C

00:10:33 --> 00:10:36 squared T squared, where T is time.

00:10:36 --> 00:10:39 So it behaves just like a dimension.

00:10:40 --> 00:10:43 And that is why we call it a

00:10:43 --> 00:10:46 dimension, because it is, but it is clearly

00:10:46 --> 00:10:48 different in some ways from the three

00:10:48 --> 00:10:51 dimensions of space because. Exactly, as

00:10:51 --> 00:10:54 Craig says, we can move willy nilly about the three

00:10:54 --> 00:10:57 dimensions of space within reason of course, but we can

00:10:57 --> 00:11:00 move around them, but we can't move willy

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02 nilly around the dimension of time, except under

00:11:02 --> 00:11:05 certain circumstances where you're travelling at very high velocities

00:11:05 --> 00:11:08 and things of that sort. So it is a very

00:11:08 --> 00:11:11 unusual, it's an unusual dimension,

00:11:12 --> 00:11:15 but it is a dimension. I quite

00:11:15 --> 00:11:18 like the idea of it being half A dimension. but I

00:11:18 --> 00:11:19 think my mathematical friends would

00:11:20 --> 00:11:23 say no, it's definitely not half a dimension.

00:11:23 --> 00:11:26 Andrew Dunkley: Yes, I found several articles on what

00:11:26 --> 00:11:28 we'd spoken about, which was, a paper

00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 published late February, early March. In the

00:11:31 --> 00:11:34 quantum realm, time arrow might fly in

00:11:34 --> 00:11:37 two directions. Mark might want

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 to, Craig, I mean, might want to look that

00:11:40 --> 00:11:43 up, and read a bit more about it. But

00:11:43 --> 00:11:45 yeah, it's a special circumstance I

00:11:45 --> 00:11:48 suppose would be the best way to

00:11:48 --> 00:11:51 describe it. but yeah, it's,

00:11:51 --> 00:11:53 it's, yeah, it's an interesting article.

00:11:54 --> 00:11:56 Professor Fred Watson: It's an interesting question from Craig too.

00:11:56 --> 00:11:59 Andrew Dunkley: Yes, very interesting. Thank you Craig. Great to hear from you.

00:12:00 --> 00:12:02 this is Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley here with

00:12:02 --> 00:12:04 Professor Fred Watson Watson.

00:12:05 --> 00:12:08 Andrew Dunkley: Let's take a break from the show to tell you about our sponsor,

00:12:08 --> 00:12:11 NordVPN. Now if you've ever

00:12:11 --> 00:12:14 felt like your online privacy is slipping through the

00:12:14 --> 00:12:16 cracks, then you're not alone. Hackers,

00:12:16 --> 00:12:19 scammers, harvesters, they're all out there trying to get your

00:12:19 --> 00:12:22 private info. Whether that's your passwords

00:12:22 --> 00:12:25 or your personal details to sell on the dark web

00:12:25 --> 00:12:28 or to use themselves to access your bank

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30 accounts, credit card details and who knows what

00:12:30 --> 00:12:33 else. But you can protect yourself with

00:12:33 --> 00:12:36 NordVPN. You can take control

00:12:36 --> 00:12:39 at home or more importantly when you're

00:12:39 --> 00:12:42 out in public. Using free WI fi

00:12:42 --> 00:12:45 right now, using the exclusive Space

00:12:45 --> 00:12:48 Nuts offer, you can secure a two year

00:12:48 --> 00:12:51 plan and receive four extra months for

00:12:51 --> 00:12:53 free on a

00:12:53 --> 00:12:56 NordVPN.com plan. That's

00:12:56 --> 00:12:59 over two years of top tier online protection.

00:12:59 --> 00:13:02 NORDVPN encrypts your Internet

00:13:02 --> 00:13:05 connection, hides your IP address and offers access

00:13:05 --> 00:13:08 to over 7700700 servers around

00:13:08 --> 00:13:11 the world. Plus with features like

00:13:11 --> 00:13:13 Threat Protection Pro, MeshNet,

00:13:14 --> 00:13:17 ultra fast speeds via Nord Links,

00:13:17 --> 00:13:20 your digital life stays private and

00:13:20 --> 00:13:22 efficient. So don't miss out.

00:13:23 --> 00:13:25 Visit nordvpn.com slash

00:13:25 --> 00:13:28 spacenuts and enter the

00:13:28 --> 00:13:31 code SPACENUTS to claim this deal. Remember,

00:13:31 --> 00:13:33 there's a 30 day money back guarantee so it's

00:13:33 --> 00:13:36 risk free to try. Stay safe, stay

00:13:36 --> 00:13:39 private and browse with confidence.

00:13:39 --> 00:13:41 That's nordvpn.com

00:13:42 --> 00:13:44 spacenuts and use the code

00:13:44 --> 00:13:46 word SPACENUTS

00:13:47 --> 00:13:48 nordvpn.comspacenuts

00:13:49 --> 00:13:51 Now back to the show.

00:13:54 --> 00:13:56 Andrew Dunkley: SpaceNuts. Okay, Fred Watson, we've got another

00:13:56 --> 00:13:58 audio question from a regular

00:13:58 --> 00:14:01 senderinera. Here's Mikey.

00:14:01 --> 00:14:04 Mikey: Hey friend. And Andrew. It is Mikey from Illinois. Once again,

00:14:05 --> 00:14:08 I'm sitting here at 5:30 in the morning as one does,

00:14:08 --> 00:14:11 pondering about life in the universe. And I

00:14:11 --> 00:14:13 Was just wondering why we're so fixated on life

00:14:14 --> 00:14:16 had already happening on other

00:14:16 --> 00:14:19 planets. we look for signs of life

00:14:19 --> 00:14:22 from the past on Mars, you know eventually on Venus

00:14:22 --> 00:14:25 and all these places that we go. But what are the

00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 odds that these places say

00:14:28 --> 00:14:30 Venus for example are

00:14:30 --> 00:14:33 on their infancy stage of life and

00:14:33 --> 00:14:35 Venus will eventually cool down

00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 one day and when the Earth is

00:14:39 --> 00:14:41 long gone, possibly because we've self

00:14:41 --> 00:14:44 annihilated ourselves, maybe one day

00:14:44 --> 00:14:47 millions of years in the future, Venus will be an

00:14:47 --> 00:14:50 oasis. I'm just curious on

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53 your guys thoughts of this and I mean what are, what are the

00:14:53 --> 00:14:55 chances that maybe some planet or

00:14:55 --> 00:14:58 somebody in our solar system as of right now may not be able

00:14:58 --> 00:15:01 to harbour life but someday in the future will

00:15:01 --> 00:15:03 be. Thanks guys.

00:15:04 --> 00:15:05 Andrew Dunkley: Thank you Mikey.

00:15:05 --> 00:15:08 Andrew Dunkley: that's a really interesting question. in terms of the

00:15:08 --> 00:15:09 Venus theory,

00:15:10 --> 00:15:13 you might argue that Venus has already been there because

00:15:13 --> 00:15:16 I remember a story way back when we

00:15:16 --> 00:15:19 talked about the potential for three

00:15:19 --> 00:15:21 planets in our own solar system that all

00:15:22 --> 00:15:25 could have potentially harboured life. We know of one, we

00:15:25 --> 00:15:28 live on it. But Mars and Venus were also cited

00:15:28 --> 00:15:30 as planets at some stage

00:15:31 --> 00:15:33 had what would have been

00:15:35 --> 00:15:37 a ah, chemistry, an environment

00:15:38 --> 00:15:40 that could have harboured life. And

00:15:41 --> 00:15:44 Mars lost its atmosphere which sort of put them to

00:15:44 --> 00:15:47 bed. Venus went rogue.

00:15:48 --> 00:15:50 Greenhouse effect. And that put their

00:15:51 --> 00:15:54 potential for life to bed but doesn't write off

00:15:54 --> 00:15:55 the possibility that they might have had it.

00:15:56 --> 00:15:59 Professor Fred Watson: That's true. and I think that's absolutely right. Both those

00:15:59 --> 00:16:01 planets might have had it.

00:16:02 --> 00:16:05 as you say Venus had the

00:16:05 --> 00:16:07 runaway greenhouse effect which put its

00:16:07 --> 00:16:10 surface temperature up to what is it, 450 or

00:16:10 --> 00:16:10 thereabouts.

00:16:10 --> 00:16:12 Andrew Dunkley: That's yeah, Celsius.

00:16:13 --> 00:16:16 Professor Fred Watson: so I think with Venus it's

00:16:16 --> 00:16:18 done its dash because as time

00:16:19 --> 00:16:22 goes on the likelihood is that Venus will

00:16:22 --> 00:16:25 get even more inhospitable to life.

00:16:25 --> 00:16:28 as the sun basically

00:16:28 --> 00:16:30 swells towards the end of its

00:16:30 --> 00:16:33 lifetime and I'm talking now about 3 billion

00:16:33 --> 00:16:36 years or so in the future it'll start swelling,

00:16:36 --> 00:16:39 Venus will get even hotter than it is now.

00:16:40 --> 00:16:43 Earth might very well become uninhabitable by

00:16:43 --> 00:16:46 then. Mars however might turn into a

00:16:46 --> 00:16:49 warm world. it's doubtful it would

00:16:49 --> 00:16:52 regain its atmosphere. it might regain

00:16:53 --> 00:16:56 a lot of water which probably would evaporate

00:16:56 --> 00:16:58 into space without pressure of an atmosphere. But

00:16:58 --> 00:17:01 yeah it's impossible. Future ah, habitable

00:17:01 --> 00:17:04 world even if it's not. Now we don't know whether any

00:17:04 --> 00:17:07 microbes on Mars, but that's why we're being so

00:17:07 --> 00:17:10 careful to avoid contaminating them if there are,

00:17:10 --> 00:17:13 Perhaps an even more interesting world is Titan.

00:17:15 --> 00:17:18 As the Goldilocks zone creeps outwards as the

00:17:18 --> 00:17:20 sun expands in its later years,

00:17:21 --> 00:17:24 Titan is going to become a much more desirable

00:17:24 --> 00:17:26 place. in terms of habitability.

00:17:27 --> 00:17:30 It's the only place in the world. Sorry, the only place

00:17:30 --> 00:17:32 in the universe that we know of where there are ah,

00:17:33 --> 00:17:35 lakes and rivers in equilibrium with its

00:17:35 --> 00:17:38 atmosphere. They are liquid natural gas rather

00:17:38 --> 00:17:41 than water. But I think it's a, you know, it's a

00:17:41 --> 00:17:44 big planet. It's bigger than the planet Mercury. Sorry, It's a big

00:17:44 --> 00:17:46 satellite. It's bigger than the planet Mercury.

00:17:46 --> 00:17:49 maybe that's a place where we could find

00:17:49 --> 00:17:52 living organisms some way down the track in the future.

00:17:52 --> 00:17:55 Andrew Dunkley: Not, not to mention Europa,

00:17:55 --> 00:17:57 Enceladus, Ganymede, Callista,

00:17:58 --> 00:17:58 Triton.

00:17:59 --> 00:18:01 Professor Fred Watson: All possible. Yapetus.

00:18:01 --> 00:18:03 Andrew Dunkley: Yapetus, yes, yes.

00:18:05 --> 00:18:07 the ice moons in

00:18:08 --> 00:18:11 orbiting the gas giants are all looking,

00:18:11 --> 00:18:14 being looked at favourably for potential life

00:18:14 --> 00:18:17 with their under ice oceans.

00:18:17 --> 00:18:20 So you can't say never. I mean we haven't

00:18:21 --> 00:18:24 yet. We haven't found it yet.

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 But they have found the,

00:18:27 --> 00:18:29 the seeds of life in the, in the geysers

00:18:29 --> 00:18:32 coming out of Of one or two of these moons.

00:18:32 --> 00:18:32 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

00:18:33 --> 00:18:34 Andrew Dunkley: Was it Cassini that did that?

00:18:34 --> 00:18:36 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, with Enceladus.

00:18:36 --> 00:18:37 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah.

00:18:37 --> 00:18:39 Professor Fred Watson: Such as some of us.

00:18:39 --> 00:18:42 Andrew Dunkley: No, it's The evidence is starting to build up.

00:18:43 --> 00:18:45 I do believe that we will find something

00:18:46 --> 00:18:49 in our own solar system in the not too distant future.

00:18:50 --> 00:18:51 That's my theory anyway.

00:18:53 --> 00:18:54 Professor Fred Watson: I hope you're right because I'd like.

00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 Andrew Dunkley: To know, and in

00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 answer to the initial question, why are we

00:19:00 --> 00:19:02 so obsessed with life? because

00:19:02 --> 00:19:05 we are living creatures and we want to know if there

00:19:05 --> 00:19:08 are any others beyond our planet. I mean it's,

00:19:08 --> 00:19:11 it's a natural thing to consider. And

00:19:11 --> 00:19:14 wouldn't it be great if we found it? It would be the, the

00:19:14 --> 00:19:17 probably the biggest discovery in the

00:19:17 --> 00:19:19 history. History of humanity.

00:19:19 --> 00:19:20 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, exactly.

00:19:20 --> 00:19:22 Andrew Dunkley: Even if it's a flea

00:19:24 --> 00:19:26 or krill, I'm still hanging.

00:19:28 --> 00:19:31 Yes, there's krill, there's whales.

00:19:31 --> 00:19:31 Professor Fred Watson: Yes.

00:19:33 --> 00:19:34 Andrew Dunkley: Thanks Mikey.

00:19:34 --> 00:19:37 Good to hear from you. And our next question comes

00:19:37 --> 00:19:39 from Fritz, who's put

00:19:40 --> 00:19:41 this one.

00:19:41 --> 00:19:44 Paddy: Hi, space nuts. This is Fritz from

00:19:44 --> 00:19:46 Northeast, rural Georgia.

00:19:48 --> 00:19:50 My question is for

00:19:50 --> 00:19:52 planetary scientists and Mars

00:19:53 --> 00:19:56 and water on the surface. Why

00:19:56 --> 00:19:58 aren't they discussing further the

00:19:58 --> 00:20:01 Milankovitch cycles and the influence

00:20:02 --> 00:20:04 on Mars having wetter, warmer

00:20:05 --> 00:20:08 phases? This is part of the

00:20:08 --> 00:20:11 obliquity the axle tilt which can

00:20:11 --> 00:20:13 range between 10 to

00:20:13 --> 00:20:16 66.0degrees

00:20:17 --> 00:20:20 over a range of 120

00:20:20 --> 00:20:22 years up to a longer modulation

00:20:23 --> 00:20:26 of as much as 1.25 million

00:20:26 --> 00:20:29 years. And even at 40%

00:20:29 --> 00:20:32 it could trigger significant ice

00:20:32 --> 00:20:34 redistribution or melting.

00:20:35 --> 00:20:37 And this could change

00:20:38 --> 00:20:41 what's a cold dry period to a surface

00:20:41 --> 00:20:44 of flowing water at times and

00:20:44 --> 00:20:46 a wetter period at times.

00:20:47 --> 00:20:50 And this happens regularly and Mars will

00:20:50 --> 00:20:52 have a wet and warm period

00:20:53 --> 00:20:55 again. So I'm surprised

00:20:55 --> 00:20:58 planetary scientists don't discuss this when they talk about the

00:20:58 --> 00:21:01 loss of water. But water is there in

00:21:01 --> 00:21:04 the permafrost and such and where did it all

00:21:04 --> 00:21:07 go and everything. But it's not discussed how it

00:21:07 --> 00:21:10 will return. Thanks a lot and love the

00:21:10 --> 00:21:12 show. Can't wait to hear more.

00:21:12 --> 00:21:12 Andrew Dunkley: Thank you.

00:21:12 --> 00:21:15 Andrew Dunkley: Fritz, you kind of touched on that when you were talking about

00:21:15 --> 00:21:18 Mikey's question and how

00:21:18 --> 00:21:21 Venus is probably a write off but Mars will actually

00:21:21 --> 00:21:24 get back to a state of having liquid water.

00:21:26 --> 00:21:27 what's the Malinkov cycle?

00:21:29 --> 00:21:31 Professor Fred Watson: actually the Milankovitch

00:21:32 --> 00:21:35 is yes the name of the person

00:21:36 --> 00:21:38 who put the idea on the map that

00:21:40 --> 00:21:43 various periodicities and they're to do

00:21:43 --> 00:21:46 with the eccentricity or non

00:21:46 --> 00:21:49 circularity of an orbit, the incline

00:21:49 --> 00:21:51 of the you know, the axis in the orbit, and

00:21:52 --> 00:21:55 other parameters like that, these things vary

00:21:55 --> 00:21:58 in cycles. Mars has had exactly

00:21:58 --> 00:22:01 as Fritz says, a really big

00:22:01 --> 00:22:04 range in its axial tilt, 10 to 60

00:22:04 --> 00:22:06 degrees is what he quoted. And I think that's about right.

00:22:07 --> 00:22:10 we think the reason why that hasn't happened on Earth is because the

00:22:10 --> 00:22:13 moon actually stabilises the Earth's rotation. So

00:22:13 --> 00:22:15 it's the tilt of its axis has remained much

00:22:16 --> 00:22:19 much closer to its present 23 and a half

00:22:19 --> 00:22:22 degrees. but the answer

00:22:22 --> 00:22:24 to Fritz's question is that actually planetary

00:22:24 --> 00:22:27 scientists do look at this and you don't have to

00:22:27 --> 00:22:30 look that far to find papers that

00:22:30 --> 00:22:32 refer to these M.

00:22:32 --> 00:22:35 Milankovitch cycles. in terms

00:22:35 --> 00:22:38 of Mars climate. I found a nice one

00:22:38 --> 00:22:40 by some Swiss authors published in

00:22:41 --> 00:22:44 2019. this is

00:22:44 --> 00:22:46 called time scales of the climate record in the south

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49 polar ice cap of Mars. And it's basically

00:22:50 --> 00:22:52 linking the ice layer

00:22:52 --> 00:22:53 deposits

00:22:55 --> 00:22:58 basically in the south polar ice cap of Mars, the largest

00:22:58 --> 00:23:01 water ice reservoirs on Mars as they say in

00:23:01 --> 00:23:04 the abstract of their paper, and linking them to

00:23:04 --> 00:23:07 climate oscillations, the Milankovitch cycles of

00:23:07 --> 00:23:10 Mars's orbit. and so that's quite

00:23:10 --> 00:23:12 an interesting paper. As I said I don't Know whether I mentioned

00:23:12 --> 00:23:15 published in 2019 in Geophysical

00:23:15 --> 00:23:18 Research Letters. and there are other papers too that talk

00:23:18 --> 00:23:21 about the climatic effect of these

00:23:21 --> 00:23:24 orbital cycles. So it's not something that's

00:23:24 --> 00:23:27 being ignored by planetary scientists. I think the view that

00:23:27 --> 00:23:29 they've come to though is that

00:23:30 --> 00:23:33 they're giving you relatively modest changes

00:23:33 --> 00:23:35 in climate. the fact that

00:23:35 --> 00:23:38 the solar parameters will themselves change over

00:23:38 --> 00:23:41 time, as we were discussing in Mikey's question,

00:23:42 --> 00:23:44 that means that even without those you might find that

00:23:44 --> 00:23:47 Mars is warming up enough that perhaps we will see

00:23:47 --> 00:23:50 a warm wet planet one day, but we won't be around to see it here

00:23:50 --> 00:23:52 on planet Earth because we'll be gone by then.

00:23:52 --> 00:23:55 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, however, as you said

00:23:55 --> 00:23:58 with Mikey's question, that water will probably.

00:23:58 --> 00:24:01 Professor Fred Watson: Get, it depends what, yeah, what the,

00:24:01 --> 00:24:04 what the circumstances are. But yeah, check out

00:24:04 --> 00:24:07 Mars and Milankovitch cycles and there's quite a

00:24:07 --> 00:24:09 few papers that refer to it.

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12 Andrew Dunkley: Very good, thank you Fritz. Great question though.

00:24:12 --> 00:24:15 Love those curveballs. That's ah, a rip

00:24:15 --> 00:24:15 up.

00:24:16 --> 00:24:19 Andrew Dunkley: Let's take a little break from the show to tell you about our

00:24:19 --> 00:24:22 sponsor Insta360 and their

00:24:22 --> 00:24:25 brand spanking new 300160 degree camera,

00:24:25 --> 00:24:28 the X5. Now at

00:24:28 --> 00:24:31 the end of this I'll tell you how you can get a special bonus

00:24:31 --> 00:24:34 as a Space Nuts listener, being

00:24:34 --> 00:24:37 a free 114 centimetre

00:24:37 --> 00:24:40 invisible selfie stick. It's worth around

00:24:40 --> 00:24:43 US$25 and you

00:24:43 --> 00:24:45 can get that if you buy the standard package,

00:24:46 --> 00:24:48 through insta360. So what is

00:24:48 --> 00:24:50 insta360? Well it's a camera,

00:24:51 --> 00:24:53 but it's no ordinary camera. This is a

00:24:53 --> 00:24:56 beautiful piece of equipment. it is their

00:24:56 --> 00:24:59 flagship model and it can take

00:24:59 --> 00:25:02 footage 360 degrees. You don't have

00:25:02 --> 00:25:04 to point it at anything. You just start recording

00:25:04 --> 00:25:07 and it records everything around you and then you

00:25:07 --> 00:25:10 can sort out what you want later on through their

00:25:10 --> 00:25:13 mobile phone app or cell phone app. And it works on

00:25:13 --> 00:25:16 Android and Apple and it

00:25:16 --> 00:25:18 works in all sorts of situations. It works in low

00:25:18 --> 00:25:21 light, it works, it works underwater. it has

00:25:21 --> 00:25:24 outstanding image quality. We're talking

00:25:24 --> 00:25:26 8K, 8K

00:25:26 --> 00:25:29 360 degree video

00:25:29 --> 00:25:32 night shooting. It's just changed the game

00:25:32 --> 00:25:34 in terms of night shooting and

00:25:35 --> 00:25:38 as I said you just need to start recording

00:25:38 --> 00:25:41 and it will just focus on everything around you and you can

00:25:41 --> 00:25:43 figure out what you want to do with that footage later.

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47 regardless. And it's AI powered.

00:25:47 --> 00:25:50 It has all these amazing AI Powered

00:25:50 --> 00:25:52 tools that just make the job so much easier.

00:25:53 --> 00:25:55 On top of that there are replaceable lenses.

00:25:56 --> 00:25:58 these lenses are made of very tough optical glass

00:25:59 --> 00:26:02 and they are much better in terms of drop

00:26:02 --> 00:26:04 resistance than your average camera and

00:26:05 --> 00:26:07 waterproofing to 15 metres or

00:26:07 --> 00:26:10 49ft. And the list

00:26:10 --> 00:26:13 goes on. they are fabulous. also the built in

00:26:13 --> 00:26:16 wind guard we don't think about that much but wind

00:26:16 --> 00:26:18 can really mess up your audio and they use an

00:26:18 --> 00:26:21 audio algorithm to get rid of that problem.

00:26:21 --> 00:26:24 So that's the product. if you would like to have

00:26:24 --> 00:26:26 a look at it, go to the store,

00:26:27 --> 00:26:30 store.insta360.com

00:26:30 --> 00:26:32 that's store.insta360

00:26:34 --> 00:26:37 and if you one of the first 30 Space

00:26:37 --> 00:26:40 Nuts listeners to sign up for the

00:26:40 --> 00:26:43 standard package, you will pick, pick

00:26:43 --> 00:26:45 up that 114 centimetre invisible

00:26:45 --> 00:26:48 selfie stick worth $24.99 US.

00:26:49 --> 00:26:51 So all you have to do is go

00:26:52 --> 00:26:52 to

00:26:53 --> 00:26:56 store.insta360.com

00:26:56 --> 00:26:59 for the Insta360x5 standard

00:26:59 --> 00:27:01 package. That's

00:27:01 --> 00:27:03 store.insta360.com

00:27:04 --> 00:27:06 and don't forget the promo code Space

00:27:06 --> 00:27:09 Nuts. That's very important. So

00:27:09 --> 00:27:12 there it is. I'm sure you won't be disappointed.

00:27:12 --> 00:27:15 This is an amazing piece of equipment and you'll have many

00:27:15 --> 00:27:18 hours of fun and I'm sure whatever you do with

00:27:18 --> 00:27:20 it, whether it's domestic or professional,

00:27:20 --> 00:27:23 it will live up to the

00:27:23 --> 00:27:25 expectations. So that's

00:27:25 --> 00:27:27 store.insta360.com

00:27:28 --> 00:27:31 with the promo code Space Nuts and we'll have all

00:27:31 --> 00:27:32 that information in the show notes.

00:27:33 --> 00:27:34 Now back to the show.

00:27:35 --> 00:27:38 Andrew Dunkley: Okay, we checked all four systems and being with a go

00:27:38 --> 00:27:40 Space Nuts, one final

00:27:41 --> 00:27:43 thought and this one comes from

00:27:44 --> 00:27:47 Paddy. He said hi Andrew and Fred Watson. I

00:27:47 --> 00:27:49 have a premise for a book for Andrew. your

00:27:49 --> 00:27:52 discussion on Martian water provoked the thought what

00:27:52 --> 00:27:55 if humans are on Mars, drink

00:27:55 --> 00:27:58 unfiltered water and ingest a Martian

00:27:58 --> 00:28:01 microbe that merges with human cells

00:28:01 --> 00:28:04 like mitochondria did, resulting in

00:28:04 --> 00:28:07 whatever you wish to knew the story

00:28:07 --> 00:28:09 with. I hope you like the idea.

00:28:09 --> 00:28:12 Cheers from Patty. I do like the idea.

00:28:12 --> 00:28:15 Funny, funny you should bring that up Patty because

00:28:15 --> 00:28:18 this is my last show for a few months. Judy and

00:28:18 --> 00:28:21 I and going around the world

00:28:21 --> 00:28:23 basically and we're going to take our time.

00:28:23 --> 00:28:26 and Judy said, you know, I don't want you

00:28:26 --> 00:28:29 to get bored. Why, why don't you write a book while you're away.

00:28:29 --> 00:28:32 And I was trying to come up with concepts. I was

00:28:32 --> 00:28:35 thinking about maybe, you know, a story

00:28:36 --> 00:28:38 revolving around Earth building its own

00:28:39 --> 00:28:41 Dyson Sphere or some kind of megastructure.

00:28:42 --> 00:28:45 But, now you've given me something else to think about. So

00:28:46 --> 00:28:49 might. Might go down that road. Although it's

00:28:49 --> 00:28:52 kind of been done before. There was a movie many, many

00:28:52 --> 00:28:55 years ago about a, meteorite

00:28:55 --> 00:28:58 that hit Earth and it had some

00:28:58 --> 00:29:01 kind of viral thing in it that.

00:29:01 --> 00:29:03 That was basically killing people. And the whole story

00:29:03 --> 00:29:05 centred around a bunch of scientists that were

00:29:06 --> 00:29:09 basically in lockdown in some facility

00:29:09 --> 00:29:11 in the middle of the desert trying to figure out how to stop it.

00:29:12 --> 00:29:14 I can't remember what it was called, but it's a great film.

00:29:15 --> 00:29:18 Fabulous film. scared the bajeebis out of me.

00:29:19 --> 00:29:22 It was. It wasn't the Blob or anything like that. This was

00:29:22 --> 00:29:24 just a micro. But it had, It. It

00:29:24 --> 00:29:27 just was highly volatile and, and very

00:29:27 --> 00:29:30 destructive and. Yeah, but

00:29:30 --> 00:29:33 look, definitely food for thought,

00:29:33 --> 00:29:35 Patti. I'll. I'll give it some consideration

00:29:36 --> 00:29:38 and wonder how I can actually merge that with

00:29:38 --> 00:29:40 a Dyson spear angle.

00:29:41 --> 00:29:44 Professor Fred Watson: Sure you'll manage it, Andrew. I look forward to hearing about

00:29:44 --> 00:29:46 it. when you come back in August, we'll

00:29:47 --> 00:29:50 probably get a full rundown of what the plot is. Yes.

00:29:51 --> 00:29:54 Andrew Dunkley: a few people have contacted me saying, oh, when are you in

00:29:54 --> 00:29:56 New York? I might. And things like that.

00:29:56 --> 00:29:57 Professor Fred Watson: So cool.

00:29:58 --> 00:30:01 Andrew Dunkley: We might be able to track a few people down and have a chat. But

00:30:01 --> 00:30:03 look, what I'm going to try and do during

00:30:03 --> 00:30:06 the trip is do some monologues back into the show so

00:30:06 --> 00:30:09 I can give you updates of, of what we're doing. So

00:30:09 --> 00:30:12 if anyone's interested. If you're not, I'll just stay out of it.

00:30:13 --> 00:30:16 Professor Fred Watson: I think that would be great. I think you should, do that. It will,

00:30:16 --> 00:30:18 be something that Heidi and I can fit into the,

00:30:19 --> 00:30:22 into the scheme of things, I hope. And, and enjoy it very

00:30:22 --> 00:30:24 much. So we look forward to that every

00:30:24 --> 00:30:25 week.

00:30:25 --> 00:30:27 Andrew Dunkley: But, there's some really interesting

00:30:27 --> 00:30:30 places. So, there might be something to talk about.

00:30:31 --> 00:30:34 we'll see. It looks like every time we go somewhere there's a

00:30:34 --> 00:30:35 volcano, it erupts.

00:30:35 --> 00:30:35 Professor Fred Watson: So.

00:30:37 --> 00:30:40 Andrew Dunkley: Might be able to. That, we'll see how it goes.

00:30:40 --> 00:30:43 but yeah, we've been planning this trip for a long, long time and

00:30:43 --> 00:30:45 yeah, we, we head off next week.

00:30:45 --> 00:30:45 Andrew Dunkley: So.

00:30:46 --> 00:30:48 Andrew Dunkley: Very exciting, very exciting.

00:30:49 --> 00:30:52 and that brings us to the end. Thanks to everybody who contributed.

00:30:52 --> 00:30:55 Keep the questions coming because Heidi will need them to

00:30:55 --> 00:30:57 try and stump Fred Watson. which is very, very

00:30:57 --> 00:30:59 hard to do. but yes,

00:31:00 --> 00:31:03 just go to our website and send them via the

00:31:03 --> 00:31:05 AMA tab. So there's two

00:31:05 --> 00:31:08 URLs Space Nuts IO or

00:31:08 --> 00:31:11 Space Nuts podcast.com

00:31:11 --> 00:31:14 and keep those, keep those messages coming in.

00:31:15 --> 00:31:17 and Heidi and Fred Watson will tackle them over the next

00:31:17 --> 00:31:20 few months. Gosh, it's hard to believe it'll be that long.

00:31:20 --> 00:31:23 But, yeah, I've never been away from home for that long in

00:31:23 --> 00:31:26 my life. But you know,

00:31:26 --> 00:31:29 it'll be exciting. And thank you as always, Fred Watson.

00:31:29 --> 00:31:31 Thank you very much as always.

00:31:31 --> 00:31:34 Professor Fred Watson: A pleasure, Andrew. And yeah, have a great trip. We

00:31:34 --> 00:31:37 hope everything goes well for you. I look forward

00:31:37 --> 00:31:39 to seeing your emails from time to time. Find out what's

00:31:39 --> 00:31:42 happening. I'd be interested to know whether you'll be homeless when

00:31:42 --> 00:31:43 you get back.

00:31:44 --> 00:31:47 Andrew Dunkley: It's a distinct possibility. We put an ass on the market

00:31:47 --> 00:31:49 and just deal with all that when we get home.

00:31:50 --> 00:31:53 Professor Fred Watson: There you go. Nice, good, good, good stuff.

00:31:53 --> 00:31:56 And so have a great time, both you and Judy. And we'll

00:31:56 --> 00:31:57 speak again in August.

00:31:57 --> 00:32:00 Andrew Dunkley: Indeed. Thank you, Fred Watson. Thanks as always been,

00:32:00 --> 00:32:01 it's been terrific.

00:32:01 --> 00:32:04 And thanks, to Huw in the studio who

00:32:04 --> 00:32:06 couldn't be with us today. Tried to ride a,

00:32:07 --> 00:32:09 Milankovich cycle and the chain fell off.

00:32:10 --> 00:32:13 And from me, Andrew Dunkley. Thanks for your company. See you in

00:32:13 --> 00:32:14 a few months.

00:32:14 --> 00:32:14 Professor Fred Watson: Bye.

00:32:14 --> 00:32:14 Andrew Dunkley: Bye.

00:32:16 --> 00:32:18 Generic: You've been listening to the Space Nuts Podcast,

00:32:20 --> 00:32:23 available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

00:32:23 --> 00:32:26 iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast

00:32:26 --> 00:32:27 player. You can also stream on

00:32:27 --> 00:32:30 demand at bitesz.com This has been

00:32:30 --> 00:32:33 another quality podcast production from

00:32:33 --> 00:32:34 bitesz.com