Quantum Light, Expanding Universes & Black Hole Mysteries: #502 - Answering Your Most Intriguing Questions
Space Nuts: Exploring the CosmosMarch 10, 2025
502
00:30:5128.29 MB

Quantum Light, Expanding Universes & Black Hole Mysteries: #502 - Answering Your Most Intriguing Questions

Space Nuts Episode 502: Q&A on Black Holes, Cosmic Temperatures, and Starshot Missions
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they tackle a variety of intriguing questions from listeners around the globe. From the mysteries of black holes to the minimum temperature of space and the ambitious Starshot mission, this episode is packed with thought-provoking insights and lively discussions.
Episode Highlights:
Black Hole Plasma Beams: Listener James from New Orleans sparks a fascinating discussion about plasma beams emanating from the M87 black hole and the recycling of matter in the universe. Andrew and Fred explore the implications of cooling plasma and its potential to change states.
Minimum Temperature of Space: Buddy from Morgan raises a thought-provoking question about whether the minimum temperature of space will continue to drop as the universe expands. The duo dives into cosmic background radiation and its effects on the elements in the universe.
Light and Gas Pressure: Jacob from Western Australia asks whether gas pressure can affect light. Andrew and Fred clarify the relationship between light, pressure, and the fascinating phenomenon of light refraction.
Starshot Mission Hypotheticals: Ash from Brisbane presents a mind-bending hypothetical about launching a micro spacecraft to Alpha Centauri at a right angle to the galactic plane. The team calculates the time it would take to observe our galaxy from the outside, revealing the vastness of space travel.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you'd like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
00:00 - Introduction and audience questions
02:15 - Discussion on black hole plasma beams
10:30 - Minimum temperature of space and its implications
18:00 - Light behavior under gas pressure
26:45 - Starshot mission hypothetical and calculations
30:00 - Listener Ash engagement and closing thoughts
✍️ Episode References
Hubble Telescope Observations of M87
https://www.nasa.gov/hubble
Cosmic Background Radiation Studies
https://www.nasa.gov/cosmic-background-radiation
Starshot Mission Overview
https://www.breakthroughinitiatives.org/initiatives/starshot

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-exploring-the-cosmos--2631155/support.


00:00:00 --> 00:00:03 Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us on a Q and A edition

00:00:03 --> 00:00:06 of Space Nuts. My name is Andrew Dunkley.

00:00:06 --> 00:00:08 It's always good to have your company. Thanks for joining

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11 us. All right, uh, what are we doing today? We're

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 answering audience questions from all around the

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 place. Well, mainly Australia, but one from New

00:00:17 --> 00:00:19 Orleans asking about black holes and plasma

00:00:19 --> 00:00:22 bursts. Uh, and Jordy wants to know where

00:00:22 --> 00:00:25 his food is. Uh, we're also talking about the

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 minimum temperature of space, the effect of gas or on

00:00:28 --> 00:00:31 light and the starshot mission.

00:00:31 --> 00:00:33 That's all coming up in this edition of space

00:00:33 --> 00:00:34 nuts.

00:00:34 --> 00:00:37 Voice Over Guy: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

00:00:37 --> 00:00:39 10, 9. Ignition

00:00:39 --> 00:00:41 sequence start. Space nuts.

00:00:41 --> 00:00:43 Andrew Dunkley: 5, 4, 3. 2.

00:00:43 --> 00:00:46 Professor Fred Watson: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3,

00:00:46 --> 00:00:49 2, 1. Space nuts. Astronauts report

00:00:49 --> 00:00:50 it feels good.

00:00:50 --> 00:00:53 Andrew Dunkley: And joining us along with Jordy, not Jaunty Joe

00:00:53 --> 00:00:56 Jordy. Uh, it's professor Fred Watson, astronomer at large.

00:00:56 --> 00:00:57 Hello, Fred.

00:00:57 --> 00:01:00 Professor Fred Watson: Hello, Andrew. Uh, yes, John. Um, John,

00:01:00 --> 00:01:02 Jordy's in the back.

00:01:03 --> 00:01:06 Johnty's not. Yeah,

00:01:06 --> 00:01:07 Jordy the dog.

00:01:08 --> 00:01:10 Andrew Dunkley: He's um, he's always welcome on the show.

00:01:10 --> 00:01:12 Always welcome on the show.

00:01:12 --> 00:01:15 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, he had a good walk with me this morning. I, I'm

00:01:15 --> 00:01:15 good fettle.

00:01:16 --> 00:01:18 Andrew Dunkley: I'm sure he did. Um, now you're so

00:01:18 --> 00:01:21 tall and he's so small, I bet his legs go 20 to the

00:01:21 --> 00:01:22 dozen.

00:01:22 --> 00:01:24 Professor Fred Watson: M quite cute to watch.

00:01:25 --> 00:01:26 Andrew Dunkley: Be like a little wind up.

00:01:27 --> 00:01:29 Professor Fred Watson: It's what it's like. Yeah, absolutely.

00:01:29 --> 00:01:30 Andrew Dunkley: Oh, gosh.

00:01:31 --> 00:01:33 Um, now I, I, I, we, we, we've got some

00:01:33 --> 00:01:36 questions, a couple of text and a couple of audio.

00:01:36 --> 00:01:39 Now I uh, must, uh, preempt

00:01:39 --> 00:01:42 this by saying I had an eye check this

00:01:42 --> 00:01:44 morning and I had to have my pupils

00:01:44 --> 00:01:46 dilated. Right now what I'm looking at

00:01:46 --> 00:01:49 is absolute gobbledygook

00:01:49 --> 00:01:51 and it's very hard for me to read.

00:01:51 --> 00:01:53 Professor Fred Watson: So please, you want me to read it?

00:01:54 --> 00:01:55 Andrew Dunkley: I'll give it a go.

00:01:55 --> 00:01:56 Professor Fred Watson: Give it a go.

00:01:56 --> 00:01:59 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, everything's, it's all double vision

00:01:59 --> 00:02:02 and blurry. Um, but anyway, let's, let's

00:02:02 --> 00:02:03 see what, uh, happens.

00:02:03 --> 00:02:06 Uh, this question comes from Jim in New Orleans.

00:02:06 --> 00:02:09 I read where the Hubble telescope last

00:02:09 --> 00:02:12 fall. I assume you mean autumn for the people in the

00:02:12 --> 00:02:15 rest of the world. Um, I read where the Hubble

00:02:15 --> 00:02:17 telescope last fall observed what appeared to be a

00:02:17 --> 00:02:20 plasma beam of 3 light years emanating

00:02:20 --> 00:02:23 from, from the black hole at the center of Galaxy M

00:02:23 --> 00:02:25 M87 doing well so far.

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 That black hole was estimated to be

00:02:29 --> 00:02:31 6.5 billion solar masses.

00:02:31 --> 00:02:34 I realized that questions concerning black holes

00:02:34 --> 00:02:37 are rather rare. Uh, on the

00:02:37 --> 00:02:40 podcast, however, I understand that When a

00:02:40 --> 00:02:43 plasma, uh, cools on Earth, it can either

00:02:43 --> 00:02:45 return to its original, original gaseous

00:02:45 --> 00:02:48 elemental state, or it can potentially

00:02:48 --> 00:02:51 reform into completely different elements. Given the

00:02:51 --> 00:02:54 near absolute zero temperatures in space,

00:02:54 --> 00:02:57 I believe that at some point the plasma beam

00:02:57 --> 00:03:00 from, uh, uh, the uh,

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 black hole at M. M87 will eventually cool.

00:03:03 --> 00:03:06 Rather than being cursed as the ultimate destroyer

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 of matter in the universe, perhaps black holes should be

00:03:09 --> 00:03:11 considered the ultimate recyclers of

00:03:11 --> 00:03:14 matter instead. Love the podcast.

00:03:14 --> 00:03:16 Uh, all the best. Cheers.

00:03:16 --> 00:03:18 Jim in New Orleans. Uh,

00:03:19 --> 00:03:20 is he on the money?

00:03:20 --> 00:03:23 Professor Fred Watson: Well, it's an interesting question. Yes. Uh, I mean, I think

00:03:23 --> 00:03:26 he's, he's right in the sense that

00:03:26 --> 00:03:28 the plasma, when it cools,

00:03:28 --> 00:03:30 um, will,

00:03:31 --> 00:03:33 uh, essentially turn, you know,

00:03:34 --> 00:03:37 what's a plasma? A plasma is an ionized gas.

00:03:37 --> 00:03:39 So it's a gas with an electrical charge. It's

00:03:39 --> 00:03:42 an electrified gas. When it loses its

00:03:42 --> 00:03:45 charge, it basically stays the same

00:03:45 --> 00:03:47 gas, uh, but is

00:03:47 --> 00:03:50 cooler. Uh, now the completely

00:03:50 --> 00:03:53 different elements idea would involve nuclear

00:03:53 --> 00:03:56 processes because, uh, that's the only way you can

00:03:56 --> 00:03:59 change the elements, despite what

00:03:59 --> 00:04:02 the, um, what the alchemists used to try and do.

00:04:02 --> 00:04:05 Uh, you can do it with accelerators. Uh, and

00:04:05 --> 00:04:07 it may well be that, uh, the conditions in

00:04:07 --> 00:04:10 some plasmas, like the one from the M87

00:04:10 --> 00:04:13 black hole, maybe they do, um,

00:04:13 --> 00:04:16 have collisions between the,

00:04:16 --> 00:04:19 uh, the ionized atoms, uh,

00:04:19 --> 00:04:22 that are of such high energy that you might split them

00:04:22 --> 00:04:25 or something of that. So I'm not familiar with that because

00:04:25 --> 00:04:28 I'm not a particle physicist, but in that regard, yes,

00:04:28 --> 00:04:30 if that happens, you've got, uh, a nice

00:04:30 --> 00:04:33 recycling process which, um,

00:04:33 --> 00:04:36 you know, is what goes on in a nuclear reactor as well.

00:04:36 --> 00:04:39 Uh, but nice to hear from you, Jim. Uh, glad you're enjoying

00:04:39 --> 00:04:40 the podcast too.

00:04:40 --> 00:04:43 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, um, there's so much happening when it comes

00:04:43 --> 00:04:46 to black holes. I mean, there's just. Yes,

00:04:46 --> 00:04:48 you know, it's not just the plasma. It's,

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51 it's um, you know, the

00:04:51 --> 00:04:54 hunger, if I can use that term, black

00:04:54 --> 00:04:57 holes, uh, they get the munchies. They probably smoke

00:04:57 --> 00:04:58 too much pot.

00:04:59 --> 00:05:01 Professor Fred Watson: Um, is that what happens when you smoke too

00:05:01 --> 00:05:02 much pot?

00:05:02 --> 00:05:04 Andrew Dunkley: Apparently, I've been told, yeah. Yeah,

00:05:05 --> 00:05:07 Medical paper once,

00:05:08 --> 00:05:10 I spent a lot of time reading those.

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 Um, but yeah, they're very active,

00:05:14 --> 00:05:16 um, parts of the, the

00:05:16 --> 00:05:19 universe. And there's so much we know that

00:05:19 --> 00:05:22 they do, but we don't know so much more about

00:05:22 --> 00:05:25 them. And we've, uh, only in recent times been

00:05:25 --> 00:05:28 able to image them. Yep, not so much

00:05:28 --> 00:05:31 photographs, but, um, it, uh, was infrared, wasn't

00:05:31 --> 00:05:31 it?

00:05:31 --> 00:05:34 Professor Fred Watson: That's Radio signals in the Event

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37 Horizon Telescope. That's right. And that's where this image comes from

00:05:37 --> 00:05:39 that, that Jim's talking about.

00:05:39 --> 00:05:42 Andrew Dunkley: Okay, so, um, yeah, the.

00:05:42 --> 00:05:45 And, and we get so very many

00:05:45 --> 00:05:47 questions about them. They. One of the great

00:05:47 --> 00:05:49 mysteries. Sorry.

00:05:49 --> 00:05:52 Professor Fred Watson: And I'll just correct what I just said. Uh, the,

00:05:52 --> 00:05:55 the Hubble telescope is certainly, um, what

00:05:55 --> 00:05:58 observed that, uh, plasma beam. Uh,

00:05:58 --> 00:06:00 but M87, of course, has had its,

00:06:01 --> 00:06:04 its structure, uh, imaged by the Event Horizon

00:06:04 --> 00:06:07 Telescope. Sorry, just. Just correcting myself there.

00:06:07 --> 00:06:09 Andrew Dunkley: That's okay. It's all good. Thank you, Jim.

00:06:10 --> 00:06:10 Professor Fred Watson: Appreciate.

00:06:10 --> 00:06:11 Andrew Dunkley: Uh, the question.

00:06:11 --> 00:06:14 Uh, our next question comes from, uh, one of our

00:06:14 --> 00:06:16 regulars, Buddy. Uh, we'll see

00:06:16 --> 00:06:19 what, uh, he's got on his mind this time.

00:06:19 --> 00:06:21 Buddy: Well, hello. This is Buddy from

00:06:21 --> 00:06:24 Morgan. All right, guys, um, I

00:06:24 --> 00:06:26 got one more good one. I'll leave you alone

00:06:26 --> 00:06:29 for a while. Uh,

00:06:29 --> 00:06:32 is the minimum temperature of space,

00:06:32 --> 00:06:35 like, in the dark? Uh, is that gonna get

00:06:35 --> 00:06:38 lower as the universe spreads out? And

00:06:38 --> 00:06:40 if so, is that going to affect how things

00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 root in the universe react? Like, is that going to

00:06:43 --> 00:06:46 make the hydrogen or, you know,

00:06:46 --> 00:06:49 like helium turn into a liquid or something?

00:06:49 --> 00:06:51 Um, all right, thanks, guys.

00:06:52 --> 00:06:55 Andrew Dunkley: Uh, thank you, Buddy. Um, so as the

00:06:55 --> 00:06:58 universe is expanding, is the minimum temperature

00:06:58 --> 00:07:01 of space going to get lower? And what effect

00:07:01 --> 00:07:04 might that have on the elements? I think that's sort of the

00:07:04 --> 00:07:05 pricey.

00:07:05 --> 00:07:07 Professor Fred Watson: That's a nice pricey. Um, and,

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 uh, Buddy's rice, it is getting

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 lower. Uh, so, uh,

00:07:13 --> 00:07:16 the minimum temperature of space is

00:07:17 --> 00:07:20 essentially the temperature, uh, that we record

00:07:20 --> 00:07:23 from the cosmic background radiation, which

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26 is 2.7 degrees above absolute zero.

00:07:26 --> 00:07:29 Uh, so 2.7 degrees Kelvin is the temperature

00:07:29 --> 00:07:32 of space. Uh, and,

00:07:32 --> 00:07:35 uh, if you think about what that temperature

00:07:35 --> 00:07:38 was when the universe was much younger than it

00:07:38 --> 00:07:41 is now, certainly, uh, in the

00:07:41 --> 00:07:44 aftermath of the Big Bang, that temperature was, you know,

00:07:44 --> 00:07:46 5, 6, 7 degrees Kelvin.

00:07:46 --> 00:07:49 So as the universe has expanded,

00:07:49 --> 00:07:52 that temperature has fallen. And that

00:07:52 --> 00:07:55 2.7 degrees is what we have now. And

00:07:55 --> 00:07:57 as the universe continues to expand, it will continue

00:07:57 --> 00:08:00 to cool, but not at a rate that would ever be

00:08:00 --> 00:08:03 detectable by human instruments. But it is

00:08:03 --> 00:08:06 cooling. Um, whether that changes

00:08:06 --> 00:08:08 the, you know, the circumstances

00:08:08 --> 00:08:11 of clouds of gas or whatever is a

00:08:11 --> 00:08:14 different question. And I suspect the answer is no.

00:08:14 --> 00:08:17 Uh, it may, you know, it would have a

00:08:17 --> 00:08:20 superficial effect, but I don't think it's

00:08:20 --> 00:08:23 got any really fundamental effect on the

00:08:23 --> 00:08:25 makeup of the, of the cosmos.

00:08:25 --> 00:08:28 Andrew Dunkley: Okay, um, let's focus

00:08:28 --> 00:08:31 on the, the Kelvin scale for a

00:08:31 --> 00:08:34 moment. Ah, it's, it's a measure of

00:08:34 --> 00:08:37 temperature based on the absolute,

00:08:37 --> 00:08:39 absolute zero, lowest temperature.

00:08:39 --> 00:08:42 Professor Fred Watson: That's right. And

00:08:42 --> 00:08:45 that temperature is defined by

00:08:45 --> 00:08:48 being the temperature at which all

00:08:48 --> 00:08:51 motion of atoms stops. So

00:08:51 --> 00:08:54 temperature is um, a vibration of

00:08:54 --> 00:08:56 atoms. So as a solid gets warmer, the

00:08:56 --> 00:08:59 atoms vibrate more. As a liquid gets warmer,

00:08:59 --> 00:09:02 the atoms sort of slosh around more. And

00:09:02 --> 00:09:05 as a gas gets warmer, the atoms whiz around

00:09:05 --> 00:09:08 much faster, uh, in space. So um,

00:09:09 --> 00:09:11 the three states of matter there, uh,

00:09:11 --> 00:09:14 that, uh, that's to say that

00:09:14 --> 00:09:17 um, uh, at, at zero degrees

00:09:17 --> 00:09:20 Kelvin, uh, all atomic motion

00:09:20 --> 00:09:22 stops and we know it's absolutely

00:09:22 --> 00:09:25 zero. I think, um, some modern laboratories

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 have got within a gazillionth of a degree of absolute zero.

00:09:28 --> 00:09:31 But it's one of those things you can never actually reach,

00:09:31 --> 00:09:34 uh, and get something that's whose

00:09:34 --> 00:09:37 atoms have stopped. As far as I know. Um, I might be wrong there, there might

00:09:37 --> 00:09:39 be physics laboratories where that's actually been done. But.

00:09:39 --> 00:09:42 Andrew Dunkley: Right, well, if you have, you know, chances are if you did achieve

00:09:42 --> 00:09:45 it, you'd never get home from work. Quite,

00:09:45 --> 00:09:46 you wouldn't be able to move.

00:09:47 --> 00:09:48 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah.

00:09:48 --> 00:09:51 Andrew Dunkley: So, so obviously this is a dumb

00:09:51 --> 00:09:54 question, but, um, if you like, when you

00:09:54 --> 00:09:57 freeze a tray of ice in your fridge,

00:09:57 --> 00:10:00 you've got an old fashioned fridge like me where you have to actually get the thing

00:10:00 --> 00:10:02 out, fill it with water and put it in and.

00:10:02 --> 00:10:03 Professor Fred Watson: Wait, you do that too?

00:10:03 --> 00:10:06 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. Um, that's not

00:10:06 --> 00:10:08 absolute zero. So there's still

00:10:08 --> 00:10:09 movement.

00:10:09 --> 00:10:10 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. In the atoms.

00:10:10 --> 00:10:12 Andrew Dunkley: In the atoms, yes, that's right.

00:10:12 --> 00:10:15 Professor Fred Watson: Even though the ice looks pretty inert, uh, the

00:10:15 --> 00:10:18 fact that it's probably, uh,

00:10:18 --> 00:10:20 well, absolute zero is minus 273

00:10:20 --> 00:10:23 degrees Celsius. So if you're cooling it down

00:10:23 --> 00:10:26 to, you know, -13 or something, then you've

00:10:26 --> 00:10:29 still got another 260 degrees to

00:10:29 --> 00:10:32 go before you get to absolute zero. So there's

00:10:32 --> 00:10:35 still plenty of movement in the atoms of your ice. Yeah.

00:10:35 --> 00:10:38 Andrew Dunkley: What about out in the depths of the solar system

00:10:38 --> 00:10:40 where the ice is so cold that

00:10:40 --> 00:10:43 it's the same as rock here?

00:10:44 --> 00:10:46 Is that anywhere near absolute zero?

00:10:46 --> 00:10:47 Professor Fred Watson: It's about um, uh,

00:10:48 --> 00:10:51 minus 190 on the

00:10:51 --> 00:10:54 surface of Titan, which is where ice is

00:10:54 --> 00:10:57 certainly effectively rock. It's as hard as rock,

00:10:57 --> 00:11:00 uh, hard as granite I think was the way, um,

00:11:00 --> 00:11:02 Jonti described it last week. Yeah, um,

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 but even then you still, you know,

00:11:05 --> 00:11:08 83 degrees away from absolute zero.

00:11:08 --> 00:11:11 Wow. Uh, it's a very, very cold temperature.

00:11:11 --> 00:11:14 Andrew Dunkley: Sure is. Um, yeah, I,

00:11:14 --> 00:11:17 I, I, it's hard to imagine that kind of cold when

00:11:17 --> 00:11:20 the temperature outside here gets to 9 degrees. That's enough

00:11:20 --> 00:11:20 for me.

00:11:21 --> 00:11:23 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, yeah,

00:11:23 --> 00:11:24 yeah.

00:11:24 --> 00:11:27 Andrew Dunkley: Uh, so just to clarify one more

00:11:27 --> 00:11:29 point. Um, um, so absolute

00:11:29 --> 00:11:32 zero. Even though the universe is

00:11:33 --> 00:11:35 cooling, absolute zero is still absolute

00:11:35 --> 00:11:37 zero. That's not going to alter.

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 Professor Fred Watson: That's right. Yes, that's right. And, and the universe

00:11:40 --> 00:11:43 isn't at, uh, that temperature yet. It's 2.7 degrees

00:11:43 --> 00:11:44 above it still.

00:11:44 --> 00:11:45 Buddy: Okay.

00:11:45 --> 00:11:47 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. And that's the leftover heat of the Big Bang.

00:11:48 --> 00:11:50 Andrew Dunkley: Right. But it's slowly diminishing

00:11:50 --> 00:11:52 as, as the universe expands.

00:11:52 --> 00:11:53 Professor Fred Watson: That's right.

00:11:53 --> 00:11:55 Andrew Dunkley: But it could take a while to get down.

00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 Professor Fred Watson: Could it ever get down another degree? It

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 will probably. If the universe

00:12:01 --> 00:12:04 carries on behaving as it does now. Uh, as it

00:12:04 --> 00:12:07 continues to expand. Yep. The temperature will continue to

00:12:07 --> 00:12:09 go down. Uh, it will never

00:12:09 --> 00:12:12 reach absolute zero. It might approach it

00:12:12 --> 00:12:15 asymptotically, which means it gets nearer and

00:12:15 --> 00:12:18 nearer, but takes longer and longer to do

00:12:18 --> 00:12:18 that.

00:12:18 --> 00:12:21 Andrew Dunkley: Right, okay. Very interesting. Great question,

00:12:21 --> 00:12:24 buddy. Thanks for sending it in. Good to hear

00:12:24 --> 00:12:25 from you as always.

00:12:25 --> 00:12:28 This is Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley here with

00:12:28 --> 00:12:30 Professor Fred Watson.

00:12:32 --> 00:12:35 Professor Fred Watson: Three, two, one.

00:12:35 --> 00:12:38 Andrew Dunkley: Space Nuts. Now, if my eyes do not

00:12:38 --> 00:12:41 deceive me, I have a text question in front of me. Or it could just

00:12:41 --> 00:12:44 be a message from my wife that I probably shouldn't read.

00:12:44 --> 00:12:47 Uh, no, it's a question. We

00:12:47 --> 00:12:50 know that light travels at slightly different

00:12:50 --> 00:12:53 speeds in different mediums. Uh, we also

00:12:53 --> 00:12:56 see different mediums affect light via

00:12:56 --> 00:12:59 refraction since this is somewhat related

00:12:59 --> 00:13:01 to the density of gas. Can pressure affect

00:13:01 --> 00:13:04 this? Uh, if we go to the

00:13:04 --> 00:13:07 extreme case, is it possible for enough pressure,

00:13:07 --> 00:13:10 ah, of a gas, I assume cloud,

00:13:10 --> 00:13:12 or enough pressure of a gas in

00:13:12 --> 00:13:15 general to push back on light itself and

00:13:15 --> 00:13:18 stop it? That comes from Jacob in Western

00:13:18 --> 00:13:21 Australia. Um, I assume Western

00:13:21 --> 00:13:24 Australia. It could be an American state that has the abbreviation

00:13:24 --> 00:13:26 Wa I believe there is one, so

00:13:26 --> 00:13:29 could be either. But um,

00:13:29 --> 00:13:32 this reminds me of an experiment they did

00:13:32 --> 00:13:35 not so long ago where they actually did

00:13:35 --> 00:13:37 claim to have stopped light.

00:13:37 --> 00:13:40 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right. Um, so you can

00:13:40 --> 00:13:43 stop photons. Um, and I'm

00:13:43 --> 00:13:45 not sure about the

00:13:46 --> 00:13:48 mechanism that is used to do that. It's not just

00:13:48 --> 00:13:51 pressure. There's more to it than that.

00:13:51 --> 00:13:54 I think it involves basically grabbing

00:13:54 --> 00:13:57 hold of photons using optical

00:13:57 --> 00:14:00 tweezers, uh, to stop the light.

00:14:00 --> 00:14:03 Uh, and so you can stop light. It's been done

00:14:03 --> 00:14:06 exactly as you've said, Andrew. But, uh, it's not just

00:14:06 --> 00:14:08 pressure. Pressures does have an interesting. I mean

00:14:08 --> 00:14:11 it does affect the gas. So refraction,

00:14:11 --> 00:14:14 the refraction of gas is invent, is

00:14:14 --> 00:14:17 affected by the pressure of the gas. Um,

00:14:17 --> 00:14:20 what also is affected

00:14:20 --> 00:14:23 Is if you send light of a single

00:14:23 --> 00:14:26 wavelength through a gas at

00:14:26 --> 00:14:28 high pressure, um, it will spread

00:14:29 --> 00:14:31 into adjacent wavelengths. It uh, means that,

00:14:32 --> 00:14:34 you know, the way we see it is as a spectrum line. If

00:14:34 --> 00:14:37 you send that light through a

00:14:37 --> 00:14:40 rain, sorry, a prism or something like

00:14:40 --> 00:14:42 that, you'll uh, end up with a single line of

00:14:42 --> 00:14:45 light corresponding to that color which corresponds

00:14:45 --> 00:14:47 to uh, a certain wavelength.

00:14:48 --> 00:14:50 Pressure actually broadens that and so these

00:14:50 --> 00:14:53 lines become wider. Uh, the process

00:14:53 --> 00:14:56 is called guess what? Pressure broadening.

00:14:56 --> 00:14:59 And um, um, that's what we see.

00:14:59 --> 00:15:02 Uh, and that's actually how we can

00:15:02 --> 00:15:05 use light, uh, from stars to

00:15:05 --> 00:15:07 measure the pressure in the atmosphere of the star,

00:15:08 --> 00:15:11 uh, by how much the line of

00:15:11 --> 00:15:12 light is broadened.

00:15:14 --> 00:15:16 Andrew Dunkley: Okay, okay. All right.

00:15:16 --> 00:15:19 Um, I was just reading something that,

00:15:19 --> 00:15:22 um, because we were talking about the fact that they have

00:15:22 --> 00:15:24 stopped light in a lab,

00:15:25 --> 00:15:27 um, the way they did it

00:15:27 --> 00:15:30 was um, they used, as you said, a

00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 special medium like um, a cloud of

00:15:33 --> 00:15:35 ultra cold atoms.

00:15:35 --> 00:15:36 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.

00:15:36 --> 00:15:39 Andrew Dunkley: Trapped the light's photons and it

00:15:39 --> 00:15:42 effectively brought the light to a complete standstill

00:15:42 --> 00:15:45 for a brief period. And that was work that was

00:15:45 --> 00:15:47 pioneered by physicists, um,

00:15:47 --> 00:15:50 uh, lean Howe, uh, from

00:15:50 --> 00:15:53 the Bose Einstein, um.

00:15:55 --> 00:15:56 Condensate. Condensate.

00:15:57 --> 00:15:58 Professor Fred Watson: Condensate, yeah.

00:15:58 --> 00:16:01 Andrew Dunkley: So, yes, your eyes aren't working.

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, well, you're doing well actually. You're doing very well. If I,

00:16:04 --> 00:16:07 um. The eyes that you've got at the moment, I couldn't read any of the stuff that

00:16:07 --> 00:16:09 you're looking at. A, um, Bose Einstein

00:16:09 --> 00:16:12 condenser is basically, uh,

00:16:13 --> 00:16:16 it says peculiar state of matter

00:16:16 --> 00:16:19 where it behaves as a single quantum object.

00:16:19 --> 00:16:22 Uh, so you know, you put all the atoms

00:16:22 --> 00:16:25 together and they all behave like one object. It's a bit like

00:16:25 --> 00:16:26 entanglement.

00:16:26 --> 00:16:29 Andrew Dunkley: Right. It's headache y stuff, isn't it?

00:16:29 --> 00:16:31 Professor Fred Watson: It is, yeah. A very headache, yeah.

00:16:33 --> 00:16:35 Andrew Dunkley: Um, we gave uh, Jonti a lot of headaches while he was.

00:16:36 --> 00:16:37 Professor Fred Watson: Oh, good. Well that's good. He

00:16:38 --> 00:16:40 complained his keep then every time.

00:16:40 --> 00:16:43 Andrew Dunkley: He was constantly having

00:16:43 --> 00:16:45 headaches. Um. All right, uh, so we

00:16:46 --> 00:16:48 covered Jacob's question effectively.

00:16:48 --> 00:16:51 Professor Fred Watson: I, uh, hope so. Um, it's uh, really all I've got

00:16:51 --> 00:16:54 to say about it. Unless you want to throw in a couple of.

00:16:54 --> 00:16:57 Andrew Dunkley: Oh no, you're getting into the realm

00:16:57 --> 00:17:00 of science fiction if you ask me to start talking about this.

00:17:01 --> 00:17:03 Professor Fred Watson: That's all right. That's perfectly acceptable.

00:17:04 --> 00:17:06 Andrew Dunkley: Thanks, Jacob. Great. Uh, question.

00:17:08 --> 00:17:10 Okay, we checked all four systems,

00:17:11 --> 00:17:14 space nets, and our final question

00:17:14 --> 00:17:17 today comes from Ash in

00:17:17 --> 00:17:17 Brisbane.

00:17:17 --> 00:17:20 Jonti: G'day Fred and Andrew. Ash from Brisbane

00:17:20 --> 00:17:23 here. Um, got a bit of a mind bender

00:17:23 --> 00:17:26 question for you. I'm, uh, just wondering if we

00:17:26 --> 00:17:29 were to take one of the breakthrough star shot

00:17:29 --> 00:17:32 micro spacecraft that we're going to send through to Alpha

00:17:32 --> 00:17:35 Centauri, but launch it 90 degrees to the

00:17:35 --> 00:17:38 plane of our galaxy, how far, ah,

00:17:38 --> 00:17:41 and for how long? Going to have to travel before I can look back

00:17:41 --> 00:17:43 and see what our galaxy looks like from the outside.

00:17:44 --> 00:17:46 Interested to hear your thoughts. See you guys.

00:17:46 --> 00:17:48 Love the show. Bye.

00:17:48 --> 00:17:51 Andrew Dunkley: Thank you, Ash. I'm, uh, thinking that question

00:17:51 --> 00:17:53 came from one of the

00:17:54 --> 00:17:57 hypotheticals, um, that were thrown at us recently,

00:17:57 --> 00:18:00 asking if we could go anywhere in the

00:18:00 --> 00:18:03 universe and look at something, what would

00:18:03 --> 00:18:06 it be? And your answer was to go outside our

00:18:06 --> 00:18:09 galaxy and look back at it and see what it really looked like.

00:18:09 --> 00:18:10 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right.

00:18:10 --> 00:18:12 Andrew Dunkley: I think that's where that one's come from.

00:18:13 --> 00:18:13 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

00:18:13 --> 00:18:16 Andrew Dunkley: So if Starshot was able to do that, uh, how long

00:18:16 --> 00:18:19 would it take to get out there far

00:18:19 --> 00:18:22 enough for us to be able to look back and go, oh,

00:18:22 --> 00:18:24 look, there's our, oh gosh, we need to take the garbage

00:18:24 --> 00:18:26 out. Um.

00:18:28 --> 00:18:31 Professor Fred Watson: Um, so, uh, the

00:18:31 --> 00:18:33 answer, rather remarkably, Andrew,

00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 is a number that you quoted in our last

00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 400 years. That's right.

00:18:41 --> 00:18:44 So I'm doing that as a calculation in my head. So

00:18:44 --> 00:18:47 Starshot is the,

00:18:47 --> 00:18:50 it's breakthrough. Starshot is still

00:18:50 --> 00:18:52 just a concept investigator, uh,

00:18:52 --> 00:18:55 that the idea with the project Breakthrough

00:18:55 --> 00:18:57 Starshot was to look at the possibilities of

00:18:57 --> 00:19:00 accelerating a spacecraft smaller than your

00:19:00 --> 00:19:03 mobile phone, uh, to something like a

00:19:03 --> 00:19:06 quarter of the speed of light so that you get

00:19:06 --> 00:19:09 to Alpha Centauri maybe

00:19:09 --> 00:19:12 in, um, rather than in, you know,

00:19:12 --> 00:19:14 4.3 years. Um, you get there in 16

00:19:14 --> 00:19:17 years or something like that. 4.3 years is how long it

00:19:17 --> 00:19:20 would take for light to get to us. Uh,

00:19:20 --> 00:19:23 you could do it in 16 years if you were traveling at four

00:19:23 --> 00:19:26 times a, uh, quarter of the speed of light. With

00:19:26 --> 00:19:29 conventional rockets it takes about 60 years.

00:19:29 --> 00:19:32 So that's the difference. So if you. All right,

00:19:32 --> 00:19:35 so you accelerate your spacecraft to a quarter of the speed of

00:19:35 --> 00:19:38 light, I reckon you need to be 100 light years

00:19:38 --> 00:19:41 above the plane to see our galaxy in all

00:19:41 --> 00:19:43 its splendor. Because that's its diameter. It's

00:19:43 --> 00:19:46 100 light years in diameter. So you

00:19:47 --> 00:19:49 push back, um, push

00:19:49 --> 00:19:52 out one, uh, hundred thousand light years, you'll

00:19:52 --> 00:19:55 see the whole thing, um, at, uh, a quarter of

00:19:55 --> 00:19:58 the speed of light, that's going to take you 400 years. So

00:19:58 --> 00:20:00 it's not as quick trip.

00:20:00 --> 00:20:03 Andrew Dunkley: No, no. And, um, yeah, it makes

00:20:03 --> 00:20:05 it very hard to um, to arrange really, because by

00:20:05 --> 00:20:08 the time it's there, no one will have

00:20:08 --> 00:20:11 remembered it, why it was.

00:20:11 --> 00:20:12 Professor Fred Watson: Sent, what it was.

00:20:12 --> 00:20:15 Andrew Dunkley: And then of course it sends back the photo. It's

00:20:15 --> 00:20:18 800 years. 800 years.

00:20:18 --> 00:20:20 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's right. No, um, actually it's

00:20:20 --> 00:20:22 not. It's

00:20:22 --> 00:20:25 500 because, because the light travels

00:20:25 --> 00:20:27 back at, you know, speed of light.

00:20:27 --> 00:20:28 Andrew Dunkley: Speed of light, of course.

00:20:28 --> 00:20:31 Professor Fred Watson: Half a million. Half a million years for the full mission.

00:20:31 --> 00:20:31 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

00:20:31 --> 00:20:33 Professor Fred Watson: That's doable, I think, Andrew, don't you?

00:20:33 --> 00:20:36 Andrew Dunkley: Oh, you know, I,

00:20:36 --> 00:20:38 I'm, I'm a fairly patient person. I'm just

00:20:38 --> 00:20:41 sure I'm patient. That, patient enough for that?

00:20:42 --> 00:20:43 Professor Fred Watson: No, me neither.

00:20:43 --> 00:20:45 Andrew Dunkley: Do you think Starshot will happen though?

00:20:45 --> 00:20:48 Professor Fred Watson: No, I think, I think

00:20:48 --> 00:20:51 the results that are coming out are promising. But

00:20:51 --> 00:20:54 uh, the Starshot is only a project

00:20:54 --> 00:20:57 to investigate whether it's feasible. Uh,

00:20:57 --> 00:21:00 so that will wind up. Then somebody's got to put the money

00:21:00 --> 00:21:03 in to not just build the

00:21:03 --> 00:21:06 spacecraft, which is probably quite cheap because

00:21:06 --> 00:21:09 it's small, uh, but to arrange for that

00:21:09 --> 00:21:12 Mylar, uh, light sail that's going to catch the light of

00:21:12 --> 00:21:15 the laser. And the big ticket item is the

00:21:15 --> 00:21:17 laser itself. Yeah, we currently

00:21:18 --> 00:21:20 don't have a laser that's anywhere near powerful enough

00:21:21 --> 00:21:24 to uh, accelerate something to the quarter of the speed

00:21:24 --> 00:21:24 of light.

00:21:24 --> 00:21:27 Andrew Dunkley: Which leads me to um, uh, um,

00:21:28 --> 00:21:30 a question without notice because we've actually, I think

00:21:30 --> 00:21:33 in recent weeks or months had two or

00:21:33 --> 00:21:36 three questions directly related

00:21:36 --> 00:21:38 to sending a mission to

00:21:38 --> 00:21:41 Alpha Centauri using Laser

00:21:42 --> 00:21:44 United spacecraft. Um,

00:21:44 --> 00:21:47 this is not science fiction. This is

00:21:47 --> 00:21:50 feasible and

00:21:50 --> 00:21:52 doable. We've uh, been doing all sorts of experiments with

00:21:53 --> 00:21:55 spacecraft sending up wooden

00:21:55 --> 00:21:58 satellites and things like that. But this

00:21:58 --> 00:22:01 would probably be one of the most

00:22:01 --> 00:22:03 efficient ways to send a long haul

00:22:03 --> 00:22:06 spacecraft to another place.

00:22:06 --> 00:22:08 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, so you're quite right. It is doable, it's

00:22:09 --> 00:22:09 feasible.

00:22:09 --> 00:22:10 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

00:22:10 --> 00:22:13 Professor Fred Watson: Uh, but you need the technology which we don't have at the moment.

00:22:13 --> 00:22:15 And um, uh, I mean we should

00:22:16 --> 00:22:18 put a footnote in that. It has been done.

00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 There's light sail experiments have already been

00:22:21 --> 00:22:24 done, uh, in orbit around the Earth

00:22:24 --> 00:22:27 just by the spacecraft deploying a very large

00:22:27 --> 00:22:29 sheet of Mylar, uh, and

00:22:29 --> 00:22:32 the ground controllers noticing the change

00:22:32 --> 00:22:35 in the acceleration of the spacecraft as a result of that.

00:22:35 --> 00:22:38 That's, that's been done and I think you and I covered it

00:22:38 --> 00:22:40 actually on one of the shows. Um,

00:22:41 --> 00:22:43 so the principle works. Uh,

00:22:43 --> 00:22:46 light sail, that's a principle that

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49 will actually work well. But uh,

00:22:50 --> 00:22:53 for the kind of figures that you were talking about

00:22:53 --> 00:22:56 sending a spacecraft to Alpha Centauri. You

00:22:56 --> 00:22:59 need such a big laser, uh, that we

00:22:59 --> 00:23:02 simply don't have at the moment. And it may even. You might

00:23:02 --> 00:23:05 even have to uh, put it into orbit

00:23:05 --> 00:23:08 around the Earth, uh because if you had it on the ground it

00:23:08 --> 00:23:10 might fry the atmosphere or something like that.

00:23:10 --> 00:23:11 Andrew Dunkley: Oh, that'd be fun.

00:23:11 --> 00:23:13 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah, we do.

00:23:13 --> 00:23:15 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, we really need that.

00:23:15 --> 00:23:18 Um, yeah, I love that it's

00:23:18 --> 00:23:21 feasible. I have a

00:23:22 --> 00:23:24 sneaking suspicion that we could never do it out of Australia

00:23:25 --> 00:23:28 because of electricity prices and you're talking about leaving a light

00:23:28 --> 00:23:30 on for 16 years. I mean let's face it.

00:23:30 --> 00:23:31 Professor Fred Watson: Yes, and it's a big light too.

00:23:31 --> 00:23:33 Andrew Dunkley: Not feasible in Australia.

00:23:35 --> 00:23:36 Not with what we pay for.

00:23:36 --> 00:23:37 Professor Fred Watson: You get a bill.

00:23:38 --> 00:23:41 Andrew Dunkley: Um, another thing that uh, has fascinated me in

00:23:41 --> 00:23:44 recent times, uh, and I read a couple of stories like this

00:23:44 --> 00:23:47 when you were away, Fred was

00:23:47 --> 00:23:49 uh, the ongoing development

00:23:50 --> 00:23:52 into new engine technology for

00:23:52 --> 00:23:55 space travel. And I know NASA's been working on

00:23:55 --> 00:23:58 something called the Deep Space Engine.

00:23:59 --> 00:24:02 Um, um, it's a thruster,

00:24:02 --> 00:24:05 uh, that uh, is showing a heck of a lot of

00:24:05 --> 00:24:07 promise in terms of its power.

00:24:08 --> 00:24:10 Uh, it's a low cost chemical compound

00:24:10 --> 00:24:12 engine. Uh, it's lightweight,

00:24:13 --> 00:24:16 uh, and it promises to do some pretty amazing things if

00:24:16 --> 00:24:19 they can perfect it. We're on the cusp

00:24:19 --> 00:24:22 of probably achieving breakthrough

00:24:22 --> 00:24:25 technology in terms of speed and

00:24:25 --> 00:24:28 long haul space travel by the sound of it.

00:24:28 --> 00:24:30 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, I think we covered um,

00:24:31 --> 00:24:33 some stories last year about EU

00:24:33 --> 00:24:36 ion drives and plasma drives and things like that which

00:24:36 --> 00:24:38 are all very promising.

00:24:38 --> 00:24:41 Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I, yeah, I think it's uh, it's a pretty exciting

00:24:41 --> 00:24:44 time and uh, there's a lot of development going on, a

00:24:44 --> 00:24:47 lot of money being poured into it because there

00:24:47 --> 00:24:50 are rewards to be gained if you can get out there.

00:24:50 --> 00:24:50 Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Ah.

00:24:50 --> 00:24:53 Andrew Dunkley: And um, you probably don't like the idea

00:24:53 --> 00:24:56 but they're. You know, we've already spoken

00:24:56 --> 00:24:59 about uh, in the last episode or two about uh,

00:24:59 --> 00:25:02 asteroid mining. That's a, um, that's a

00:25:02 --> 00:25:05 mission test that's been um. Well as we

00:25:05 --> 00:25:08 talked about in the previous episode, has fallen uh,

00:25:08 --> 00:25:11 foul unfortunately. But that, that's just the beginning.

00:25:11 --> 00:25:14 That's just going to be. Yes, it will continue on and of course

00:25:14 --> 00:25:17 mining the moon for that um, that, that mineral

00:25:17 --> 00:25:20 that's not so common on Earth. Can't remember the name of it.

00:25:20 --> 00:25:22 Professor Fred Watson: Something called water, I think.

00:25:22 --> 00:25:25 Andrew Dunkley: No, no, there's something else up there. Something else up there that

00:25:25 --> 00:25:25 they.

00:25:25 --> 00:25:27 Professor Fred Watson: Well, helium 3 is it?

00:25:27 --> 00:25:30 Andrew Dunkley: That's it. So there's a lot going on

00:25:30 --> 00:25:33 and um, yeah, I'm sorry to

00:25:33 --> 00:25:36 say that profit's uh, probably the driving

00:25:36 --> 00:25:37 force behind.

00:25:37 --> 00:25:39 Professor Fred Watson: It in the end. That's right.

00:25:39 --> 00:25:40 Andrew Dunkley: It's a very human thing to do.

00:25:41 --> 00:25:44 Yep, essentially.

00:25:44 --> 00:25:47 All right, thank you, Ash. Thanks, uh, for the question. Great

00:25:47 --> 00:25:50 to hear from you. And don't forget, if you've got questions for

00:25:50 --> 00:25:53 us, you're always welcome to send them to us via

00:25:53 --> 00:25:56 our website, spacenutspodcast.com

00:25:56 --> 00:25:58 or spacenuts IO

00:25:58 --> 00:26:01 and you just click on the little thing at the top called

00:26:01 --> 00:26:04 ama. Now, I know some time ago someone said, can you change

00:26:04 --> 00:26:07 it to something else so that we know where to

00:26:07 --> 00:26:10 send questions? Still working on

00:26:10 --> 00:26:13 that. Not sure where that's up to. I'll have to check with

00:26:13 --> 00:26:16 Huw in the studio, uh, as to where that's up to. But,

00:26:16 --> 00:26:19 uh, yeah, the AMA M button @ the top is the one you

00:26:19 --> 00:26:21 click on. When you click on that, which I'm doing right now,

00:26:21 --> 00:26:24 you can send us a text question just, um, with your

00:26:24 --> 00:26:27 name, email address and the message, or you can

00:26:27 --> 00:26:30 click start recording. If you've got a device with

00:26:30 --> 00:26:33 a microphone. It's really quite simple.

00:26:33 --> 00:26:36 And while you're on the website, um, just randomly click

00:26:36 --> 00:26:38 on, oh, I don't know, shop.

00:26:40 --> 00:26:43 Speaking about profitable humans. And, uh, look at

00:26:43 --> 00:26:46 all the, uh, Space Nuts paraphernalia. You can get

00:26:46 --> 00:26:49 stickers, you can get T shirts, you can get mugs,

00:26:49 --> 00:26:51 you can get, uh, polo shirts, dad

00:26:51 --> 00:26:54 hats, bucket hats. Uh, for those

00:26:54 --> 00:26:57 of you that live in those northern cold latitudes,

00:26:57 --> 00:27:00 um, you can get a ribbed beanie, all with

00:27:00 --> 00:27:03 the Space Nuts logo. You can even get Space

00:27:03 --> 00:27:04 Nuts socks.

00:27:05 --> 00:27:07 Professor Fred Watson: I need one of those beanies for the next time we go up to the

00:27:08 --> 00:27:08 Arctic.

00:27:08 --> 00:27:11 Andrew Dunkley: Yes, yes. Well, when

00:27:11 --> 00:27:14 we're up above the Arctic later this year, even though it'll be summer,

00:27:14 --> 00:27:16 the temperatures that we don't get down to here in winter,

00:27:17 --> 00:27:19 essentially. So we've bought ear muffs.

00:27:19 --> 00:27:22 So we should get some Space Nuts earmuffs, I reckon.

00:27:23 --> 00:27:26 Uh, there's also the, uh, the Space Nuts hoodie.

00:27:26 --> 00:27:29 That's a fun item if, you know, if you want to scare

00:27:29 --> 00:27:32 people. Not just Space Nut, but you've got a Space

00:27:32 --> 00:27:34 Nut hoodie on that'll freak people

00:27:34 --> 00:27:37 out. Yeah, that's all

00:27:37 --> 00:27:40 on the Space Nuts website and plenty of other things to see and

00:27:40 --> 00:27:43 do there. And if you want to become a Space Nut supporter,

00:27:43 --> 00:27:46 you can do that on the Space, uh,

00:27:46 --> 00:27:49 Nuts website as well. And thank you to all of our

00:27:49 --> 00:27:51 patrons. Uh, um, we think you are

00:27:51 --> 00:27:54 awesome. Um, thanks for getting behind

00:27:54 --> 00:27:57 us. Uh, and did I say goodbye,

00:27:57 --> 00:27:57 Fred?

00:27:58 --> 00:28:00 Professor Fred Watson: Uh, I'm not sure whether you got there or not, actually.

00:28:00 --> 00:28:01 Andrew Dunkley: Thank you, Fred.

00:28:01 --> 00:28:02 Professor Fred Watson: Nice.

00:28:04 --> 00:28:07 Good to talk to you, Andrew. And we shall speak again

00:28:07 --> 00:28:07 soon.

00:28:07 --> 00:28:10 Andrew Dunkley: We will indeed. And, uh, that's Professor Fred Watson,

00:28:10 --> 00:28:13 astronomer at large. And thanks to Huw in the studio, who couldn't be with us

00:28:13 --> 00:28:16 today because, uh, he actually thought Starshot

00:28:16 --> 00:28:18 was real. And, um, he went, bought a

00:28:18 --> 00:28:21 ticket, and it cost him a million

00:28:21 --> 00:28:24 bucks. So he's out, uh, doing his second

00:28:24 --> 00:28:27 and third job to pay it off from me, Andrew Dunkley. Thanks for your

00:28:27 --> 00:28:30 company. Catch you on the next episode of Space Nuts. Until then,

00:28:30 --> 00:28:31 bye bye.

00:28:31 --> 00:28:34 Voice Over Guy: You've been listening to the Space Nuts

00:28:34 --> 00:28:37 Podcast, available at

00:28:37 --> 00:28:40 Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio

00:28:40 --> 00:28:42 Radio, or your favorite podcast player. You can

00:28:42 --> 00:28:45 also stream on demand at bitesz.com.

00:28:45 --> 00:28:48 This has been another quality podcast production from

00:28:48 --> 00:28:50 bitesz.com um.